Connect with us

Opinion

The Oracle: The NASS: Manual or Electronic Rigging? (Pt. 2)

Published

on

By Chief Mike Ozekhome

APC’S UNRULY ROLE IN THIS TABOO

It was reported by The PUNCH that the All Progressives Congress (APC) had rallied its Senators to reject moves to adopt electronic transmission of election results in 2023. The source gathered that APC had been reaching to its lawmakers through zonal caucuses to insist that their position on this controversial issue would test their party loyalty.

Recall that the Senate Committee on INEC had recommended the use of electronic transmission of results in its election. The Committee was chaired by Senator Kabiru Gaya (APC, Kano) who, on Thursday, 15th July, 2021, voted against the use of electronic transmission. When questioned as to why he voted against the recommendation in the report of the Committee he headed, he said, “If you prepare something and you later saw an improved version of it, you can go for it. There is nothing wrong if the Chairman of a Committee supports the amended version of a report he presented”. How is voting against electronic voting an improved version? What exactly does it improve? In my opinion, I believe it further solidifies the allegations that the APC rallied its Senators to vote against the electronic transfer of election results and speaks truth to it.

In a publication by PremiumTimes.ng on the 16th of July, 2021, a high-ranking APC member, whose anonymity was preserved, stated as follows:

“This is politics and as the governing party, you don’t allow the opposition to dictate the pace. Those in opposition certainly know something we don’t know. The way they (PDP) were pushing for this electronic transfer of results or electronic voting thing using NGOs, international agencies and all that, should tell you something”.

This statement says it all. It highlights that the debate on the electronic transmission of votes was merely a power play battle for the APC, and not a battle for the betterment of future elections in Nigeria and the Nigerian citizens in general. It is a despicable truth that urgent and relevant issues affecting the country and its citizens are argued on a power level, rather than with the interests of the country at heart.

 

IS THE SENATE’S RULING CONSTITUTIONAL?

NO! The decision of the Senate on the electronic transmission of election results lack any form of constitutionality. For the avoidance of doubt, section 78 of the 1999 Constitution provides that “the registration of voters and the CONDUCT OF ELECTIONS shall be SUBJECT to the DIRECTION AND SUPERVISION OF [INEC]” (emphasis supplied). The Constitution further provides that “INEC OPERATIONS SHALL NOT BE SUBJECT TO THE DIRECTION OF ANYBODY OR AUTHORITY”. The words direction and supervision suggests that INEC is the primary body to determine how elections are to be conducted and also supervise the conduct of elections. Thus, the Constitution expressly and impliedly provide that INEC is not subject to the governance of anybody, authority or agency, less to talk of a body that is not recognised by the Constitution (NCC).

It is obvious that the “electronic transmission of election results” constitute the conduct and supervision of election, which INEC has been exclusively tasked with. It is equally obvious that the National Assembly has the power to create laws and amend Acts, but such power to create and amend laws must be consistent with the 1999 Constitution, which is the highest law of the land, the grundnorm and fons et origo.

The supremacy of the Constitution to all other laws and Act has been emphasized in a plethora of cases. In UGBOJI v. STATE (2017) LPELR-43427(SC), the Nigerian apex court, per AMIRU SANUSI, JSC (Pp 23 – 23 Paras B – D), held thus:

“My lords, permit me to reiterate that the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria of 1999, as amended, had by Section one, made provision to emphasize or assert its supremacy. By that provision, any law/statute or provisions thereof that runs riot and violent to the provisions of the Constitution or is in conflict with the constitutional provision is null and void to the extent of inconsistency. See A.G. Ondo State vs AG of the Federation and Ors (2002)9 NWLR (pt 772) 226.”

Therefore, where the provisions of the Constitution conflict with the provisions of Acts or Bills passed by the National Assembly and State Houses of Assembly, the latter prevails. See also the cases of OLAGBENRO & ORS v. OLAYIWOLA & ORS (2014) LPELR-22597(CA); A-G ABIA STATE V. A-G. FEDERATION (2006) 16 NWLR (Pt. 1005) page 265 at Pages 290 and 291; AINABEBHOLO V. EDO STATE UNIVERSITY WORKERS FARMERS MULTI-PURPOSE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. & ANR. (2007) 2 NWLR (PART 1017) page 33 at page 50 paragraph G and P, 151 paragraphs C-D.

Therefore, it is clear that the ruling of the Senate on electronic transmission is unconstitutional, null, void, of no effect and is dead on arrival. Therefore, while the Electoral Act (Amendment) Bill, 2021, may be constitutional and valid, the amendment made to Claude 52(3) that subjects the national coverage to be adjudged to be adequate and secure by the NCC and approved by the National Assembly before INEC can transmit votes electronically is null and void to the extent of its inconsistency with the 1999 Constitution.

It must also be stated here that the Constitution reserves the right to expressly make provisions, and such provisions are interpreted literally. An Act, Bill or even the courts cannot add words to the Constitution, nor subtract from it. As a result, the golden latin maxim of expression unius est exclusion alterius – the explicit mention of one thing is the exclusion of another – applies to the Constitution. The Constitution expressly provided for INEC to supervise and conduct all elections, but did not provide for INEC to be supervised or subject to the direction of anybody, arm of government or agency. See the cases of PORTS AND CARGO HANDLINGS SERVICES CO LTD & ORS v. MIGFO (NIG) LTD & ANOR (2012) LPELR-9725(SC); EHUWA v. ONDO STATE INDEPENDENT ELECTORAL COMMISSION & ORS (2006) LPELR-1056(SC); and, WEST AFRICAN UTILITIES METERING & SERVICES LTD v. AKWA IBOM PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS CO. LTD (2019) LPELR-47089(CA). Therefore, the Senate’s decision to subject INEC’s constitutional power to conduct elections via electronic transmission of votes (if INEC so wishes) is patently null and void, unconstitutional, unlawful, dead on arrival, and of no effect whatsoever and howsoever.

THE WAY FORWARD

Upon the conclusion of the open voting session at the Senate on Thursday, 15th July, 2021, the Senate President, Ahmed Ibrahim Lawan, stated that:

“there is no victor, no vanquished in this affair…we want an electronic transmission system for our electoral process, however, we want to ensure that no Nigerian is disenfranchised in this process, and time will definitely come when all part of Nigeria will have coverage that we all need to deploy our technology to ensure electronic transmission of election results. This has come to settle the issue of what INEC can do and what INEC cannot. We have given INEC an electoral Act amended to enhance its performance” (underline supplied for emphasis).

This statement of Ahmed Lawan can be tackled from three perspectives. First, there is clearly those “vanquished” by their decision – the entire citizens of Nigeria. The citizens of Nigeria have once again been subjected to the horrors, chaos and dastardly acts of election rigging, ballot boxes snatching, disruption of polling units, fightings, maimings and killings in upcoming elections. The Rule of Law that provides that no one, including the Executive, Legislative and the Judiciary, should act ultra vires (above the law) has suffered heavily. The future of peaceful, free, fair and secure elections has also taken a dive for disaster. So yes, there is “the vanquished in this affair”.

Second, INEC has come out to state that the claims that Nigeria does not have enough network coverage to guarantee the electronic transmission of election results is false. INEC maintains that all network providers in Nigeria have assured of 100 percent coverage for electronic transmission of results. To this effect, INEC’s Director of Publicity and Voter Education, stated that: “In January 2018, INEC approached NCC that it wants a technological-driven commission and both have been working closely to deliver free, fair and credible elections in our country for the benefit of our citizens. They are also aware that two network providers, MTN and Airtel, have assisted JAMB conduct their examinations across Nigeria.” In the same way, these network providers, alongside other network providers in Nigeria, can assist INEC to ensure 100 percent network coverage for the electronic transmission of election results, as assured. In any event where the network coverage in Nigeria is not 100 percent, what stops the Senate from ordering the NCC to ensure that the network coverage be guaranteed before 2023? Why become penny wise, and pound foolish? Why not thrust Nigeria into the technological advancement that a developing country like Nigeria lacks? Questions, questions, questions.

Lastly, the Senate cannot settle what INEC can and cannot do. INEC is an independent body, as guaranteed by the Constitution. Although the Senate can amend the Electoral Act of 2010 and make subsequent provisions affecting INEC, it CANNOT make provisions which encroach on INEC’s independence. Therefore, their decision that the national network coverage is adjudged to be adequate and secured by NCC and approved by the National Assembly (and any other future decisions that affects INEC’s independence) is contrary to the provisions of the 1999 Constitution and is null and void.

CONCLUSION

THE WAY FORWARD

Simple. Let INEC be. Let INEC supervise and conduct elections in Nigeria however it sees it fit. If INEC makes a turnaround and decide that electronic transmission of election results is not practicable, then that is within their purview. If they maintain however, such transmission is feasible, then it is also within their supervisory functions. INEC should not be intimidated by the Electoral Act (Amendment) Bill, 2021. If same is made into law, they can go to the Nigeria courts and seek a declaration of its consistency with the 1999 Constitution. INEC should continue to be bold, brave and courageous in granting free, fair and credible elections in Nigeria.

To conclude, I totally agree with the statement of Comrade Paul Ikechukwu Njoku that:

“The Ahmed Lawan-led 9th clueless and rubber stamp Senate has on Thursday, July 15, 2021, dubiously adopted a legislative banditry which obviously castrated the absolute and operational independence of our electoral umpire, INEC, (in contravention of section 78 of the 1999 constitution) by voting to allow the National Communications Commission (NCC) and the National Assembly to specifically downplay and technically usurp the philosophy of the usage of electronic transmission of results in our elections devoid of the absolutism of INEC and what was proposed and campaigned in the Electoral Act Amendment Bill. We say No to election rigging. We say NO to legislative banditry against our electoral process. Power belongs to the people”.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Opinion

PDP Crisis: Illegal Factional Convention is a Direct Assault on Party Constitution and Democracy

Published

on

By

By Prince Adedipe Dauda Ewenla

The attention of party faithfuls and the general public has been drawn to the desperate and unconstitutional attempt by a faction within the Peoples Democratic Party to foist an illegal National Convention on the party in clear violation of its constitution and established democratic norms.

Let it be stated unequivocally: the Constitution of the PDP is clear, unambiguous, and binding on all members only a duly elected National Working Committee (NWC) has the constitutional authority to convene, approve, and conduct a National Convention.

This position is firmly grounded in the provisions of the PDP Constitution:

1. Section 31(3) clearly vests the power to summon and convene the National Convention in the appropriate constitutional organ of the party, which operates through the National Working Committee.

2. Section 29(2)(a) establishes the National Working Committee as the principal executive organ responsible for the day-to-day administration and decision-making of the party.

3. Section 47(1) affirms the supremacy of the party constitution, making it binding on all members and organs of the party without exception.

Flowing from these provisions, any gathering, meeting, or assembly convened outside this constitutional framework is illegal, null, void, and of no consequence, being ultra vires, null ab initio, and incapable of conferring any legal rights or obligations whatsoever.

The ongoing attempt by a faction reportedly aligned with the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Nyesom Wike, to organize a so-called convention through an imposed and illegitimate caretaker structure is nothing but a brazen assault on the rule of law, party supremacy, and internal democracy, and amounts to a clear case of constitutional subversion.

For the avoidance of doubt:
Individuals who have been suspended or expelled from the party lack the locus standi to act on its behalf.

Any caretaker arrangement not constitutionally backed by the elected organs of the party remains a nullity ab initio.
No faction, no matter how powerful, can override the supremacy of the party constitution.

Any purported action taken in furtherance of this illegality is void and liable to be set aside ex debito justitiae by any court of competent jurisdiction.

It is instructive that the Federal High Court and other competent courts have already taken judicial notice of these constitutional breaches by entertaining suits challenging the legality of the proposed convention. This alone is a clear warning that the entire process is fundamentally defective and cannot stand the test of law.

We therefore align firmly and unequivocally with the leadership direction and stabilizing efforts under Kabiru Turaki, whose commitment to constitutional order, due process, and party unity remains the only credible path forward for the PDP at this critical time.

The party cannot and must not be hijacked by individuals driven by personal ambition, vendetta politics, or external influence.

The survival of the PDP as a viable opposition platform depends on strict adherence to its constitution and respect for its legitimate structures.

We warn, in the strongest possible terms, that:

Any convention conducted outside the authority of a duly elected NWC will be resisted and rejected by loyal members of the party.

Any outcome from such an illegal exercise will be treated as void ab initio and will not be recognized within the party or before the Independent National Electoral Commission.

Those promoting this illegality are inviting avoidable chaos, multiplicity of suits, and grave political consequences for the PDP ahead of 2027.

This is not just about a convention this is about the soul, legality, and future of our great party.

I call on all genuine stakeholders to rise above factional manipulation and defend the constitution of the PDP with courage and clarity.

The rule of law must prevail. Fiat justitia ruat caelum. The constitution must stand. The PDP must not fall.

Prince Amb. (Dr.) Adedipe Dauda Ewenla
PDP Southwest Ex-Officio

Continue Reading

Opinion

Intentional Progressive Leadership and Disciplined Security: Catalysts for Unlocking Possibilities

Published

on

By

By Tolulope Adegoke PhD

In an increasingly interconnected and volatile world, the twin forces of intentional progressive leadership and disciplined security stand as indispensable drivers of meaningful advancement. Intentional progressive leadership is characterized by deliberate, forward-thinking decision-making that prioritizes inclusive growth, innovation, accountability, and long-term societal transformation over short-term gains or entrenched interests. Disciplined security, in turn, refers to a professional, rule-of-law-based, human-centered approach to safeguarding citizens, institutions, and resources—one that integrates military, intelligence, law enforcement, and community engagement while upholding human rights and fostering trust. Together, these elements do not merely maintain stability; they actively unlock possibilities across three interconnected spheres: peoples (individuals and communities), corporates (businesses and organizations), and nation building (state institutions and societal cohesion).

This write-up examines their active roles, portrays the current realities as they stand in Nigeria, Africa, and the wider world, provides relevant global and regional examples, and offers practical, unbiased solutions. Drawing on established patterns of development, the analysis underscores that where these forces converge effectively, they generate exponential outcomes; where they falter, stagnation and fragility ensue. The goal is to present a balanced, evidence-informed perspective suitable for policymakers, business leaders, scholars, and development practitioners internationally.

Defining and Contextualizing the Core Elements

Intentional progressive leadership goes beyond charisma or authority. It demands strategic vision anchored in data, ethical governance, stakeholder inclusion, and adaptive resilience. Leaders in this mold invest in human capital, promote transparency, and align policies with sustainable development goals. Disciplined security complements this by creating the enabling environment of safety and predictability. It emphasizes professional training, intelligence-led operations, community policing, and the rule of law rather than militarization or repression. When these operate in synergy, they transform potential into tangible progress: educated citizens innovate, businesses thrive without fear, and nations build resilient institutions.

Active Roles in Delivering Possibilities for Peoples

For individuals and communities, intentional progressive leadership and disciplined security create pathways to dignity, opportunity, and empowerment. Progressive leaders prioritize education, healthcare, and skills development, viewing people as the primary asset. Disciplined security ensures freedom from fear, enabling daily pursuits of livelihood and aspiration.

In practice, this synergy fosters social mobility and cohesion. Progressive leadership invests in youth programs and vocational training, while disciplined security protects learning environments and public spaces. The result is reduced vulnerability to exploitation and increased civic participation.

Active Roles in Delivering Possibilities for Corporates

Corporations require stable operating environments to invest, innovate, and expand. Intentional progressive leadership enacts policies that ease business registration, combat corruption, and promote public-private partnerships. Disciplined security safeguards supply chains, intellectual property, and personnel against threats like extortion or sabotage.

This combination drives economic dynamism. Businesses flourish when leaders provide predictable regulations and when security forces respond swiftly to disruptions, allowing corporates to focus on value creation rather than risk mitigation.

Active Roles in Delivering Possibilities for Nation Building

At the national level, these elements are foundational to sovereignty, legitimacy, and prosperity. Progressive leadership builds inclusive institutions, diversifies economies, and integrates regional and global partnerships. Disciplined security preserves territorial integrity, deters external interference, and supports internal harmony.

Nation building succeeds when leadership fosters national identity and security architecture reinforces it through equitable protection and justice.

The Current Picture: Realities in Nigeria, Africa, and the Wider World

Nigeria exemplifies both promise and persistent hurdles. As Africa’s most populous nation and largest economy, it possesses immense human and natural potential. Yet, as of early 2026, security challenges remain acute: insurgency and banditry in the Northeast and Northwest, farmer-herder conflicts in the Middle Belt, kidnapping for ransom nationwide, and separatist tensions in the Southeast. These have displaced millions, stifled agriculture and commerce, and eroded public trust. Leadership under President Bola Tinubu has pursued reforms, including kinetic and non-kinetic counter-insurgency measures, the appointment of a new Chief of Defence Staff in late 2025 for better operational coherence, and emphasis on human capital development (HCD 2.0). Progress includes reported surrenders of insurgent affiliates and targeted infrastructure investments, yet gaps persist in governance coordination, community engagement, and addressing root causes such as poverty and youth unemployment.

Across Africa, the landscape is heterogeneous. Positive models include Rwanda, where post-genocide leadership under President Paul Kagame has combined visionary governance with disciplined security to achieve sustained growth, digital innovation, and regional stability. Botswana stands as another exemplar: decades of prudent, transparent leadership have turned diamond revenues into broad-based development while maintaining professional security institutions that uphold democratic norms. Ghana demonstrates democratic continuity with progressive economic policies and relatively effective security cooperation. Conversely, parts of the Sahel face coups, jihadist expansion, and governance fragility, highlighting how leadership vacuums and undisciplined security exacerbate cycles of instability.

Globally, the interplay is evident in success stories such as Singapore’s transformation under Lee Kuan Yew, where meritocratic leadership and disciplined, corruption-free security institutions propelled a resource-poor city-state into a high-income economy. South Korea’s post-war reconstruction similarly blended visionary leadership with security alliances and human capital focus. In contrast, nations experiencing leadership complacency or fragmented security—such as certain conflict zones in the Middle East or Latin America—illustrate stalled development and eroded possibilities.

These realities reveal a clear pattern: intentional progressive leadership and disciplined security are not luxuries but necessities. Their absence perpetuates underdevelopment; their presence catalyzes breakthroughs.

Relevant Examples Illustrating Essence and Impact

  • Rwanda: Post-1994 genocide, intentional leadership focused on reconciliation, education, and technology hubs, supported by disciplined security reforms that prioritized professional training and community policing. This has elevated Rwanda to one of Africa’s fastest-growing economies, attracting foreign investment and reducing poverty dramatically.
  • Botswana: Progressive leadership emphasized accountable resource management and anti-corruption measures, paired with a professional military and police force. The outcome is one of Africa’s most stable democracies and highest Human Development Indices.
  • Singapore: Lee Kuan Yew’s intentional policies built a merit-based civil service and rigorous, rule-based security apparatus. This created a safe, efficient environment that transformed the nation into a global financial and logistics hub.
  • Nigeria-specific: Initiatives like community-based security arrangements in some states, when aligned with progressive local leadership, have reduced localized banditry. Corporate examples include Lagos tech ecosystems thriving amid targeted security enhancements in business districts.

These cases justify the essence: deliberate leadership and disciplined security deliver measurable possibilities when integrated holistically.

Proffering Relevant Solutions: Pathways Forward Without Prejudice

Solutions must be context-specific yet universally applicable, emphasizing collaboration across stakeholders.

For Peoples (Individuals and Communities):

  • Nigeria and Africa: Scale up human capital programs like Nigeria’s HCD 2.0 through universal basic education, vocational training, and digital literacy, especially in rural and conflict-affected areas. Integrate community policing models that empower local vigilantes under professional oversight to build trust.
  • Wider World: Adopt inclusive social safety nets and mental health support in post-conflict settings. International partners can provide technical assistance for youth entrepreneurship funds.
  • Outcome: Reduced vulnerability and empowered citizens who contribute actively to development.

For Corporates:

  • Nigeria and Africa: Enact progressive policies such as streamlined business regulations, tax incentives for security technology investments, and public-private security partnerships (e.g., joint task forces for critical infrastructure). Encourage corporate social responsibility in community safety initiatives.
  • Wider World: Promote global standards like ISO security management systems and cross-border investment guarantees tied to stability metrics.
  • Outcome: Enhanced investor confidence, job creation, and innovation ecosystems.

For Nation Building:

  • Nigeria: Strengthen institutional reforms, including anti-corruption enforcement, judicial independence, and devolved security responsibilities (e.g., state police with federal safeguards). Foster inclusive national dialogues and leverage technology for intelligence sharing.
  • Africa: Enhance African Union mechanisms for peer review, joint peacekeeping, and economic integration to address transnational threats.
  • Wider World: Support multilateral frameworks that reward progressive governance with development aid and security cooperation, emphasizing capacity-building over external imposition.
  • Cross-cutting Measures: Invest in data-driven monitoring (e.g., peace indices), leadership training academies, and civil society engagement to ensure accountability.

Implementation requires political will, sustained funding, and adaptive evaluation. International standards—such as those from the World Bank’s governance indicators or the Institute for Economics and Peace—can guide benchmarking without external overreach.

Conclusion: A Call to Deliberate Action

Intentional progressive leadership and disciplined security are not abstract ideals but active agents that shape destinies. In Nigeria and across Africa, where challenges are pronounced yet potential is vast, their effective deployment can convert vulnerabilities into strengths. Globally, they offer proven blueprints for resilient, prosperous societies. The current picture, while marked by setbacks, also reveals pathways of hope through ongoing reforms and exemplary models. By embracing these forces with intentionality, stakeholders at all levels can deliver genuine possibilities—empowered peoples, thriving corporates, and cohesive nations. The imperative is clear: invest in people-centered leadership and professional security today to secure a more equitable and stable tomorrow. Through collaborative, evidence-based strategies, Nigeria, Africa, and the wider world can realize their full potential in an interdependent global order.

Dr. Tolulope A. Adegoke, AMBP-UN is a globally recognized scholar-practitioner and thought leader at the nexus of security, governance, and strategic leadership. His mission is dedicated to advancing ethical governance, strategic human capital development, and resilient nation-building, and global peace. He can be reached via: tolulopeadegoke01@gmail.comglobalstageimpacts@gmail.com

Continue Reading

Opinion

Characterisation of Biomass Feedstocks Relaxation Properties Using Visco Elastic Models

Published

on

By

By Dr. Aminu Owonikoko, PhD

Overview

This thesis investigates a deceptively simple but industrially important question: what happens to biomass materials when they are compressed and then allowed to relax? Biomass — such as woodchips, wheat straw, leafy residues, cotton seeds, and wood pellets — is a major renewable resource used for energy production and sustainable manufacturing. However, its physical behaviour during handling, storage, and processing is poorly understood. Unlike uniform materials such as sand or grain, biomass is irregular, springy, and unpredictable. This unpredictability leads to blockages, equipment failures, and inefficient energy use in biomass processing plants.

The research provides a scientific foundation for predicting how biomass behaves under pressure by combining controlled experiments with Visco elastic modelling. The work introduces a new method for extracting key model parameters, enabling more accurate and transparent predictions of biomass relaxation behaviour.

Why Biomass Behaviour Matters

Biomass supply chains involve several mechanical steps: compaction, transport, storage, and feeding into processing equipment. During these steps, biomass is often compressed. Once the pressure is removed, the material “relaxes” — it expands, shifts, and redistributes internal stresses. This relaxation affects:
• how much biomass can be stored
• how reliably it flows through hoppers and conveyors
• how much energy is required to process it
• the likelihood of blockages or equipment downtime

Understanding this behaviour is essential for designing efficient, reliable, and cost effective biomass systems.

Research Aim

The central aim of the thesis is to characterise the stress relaxation behaviour of five biomass feedstocks and to develop robust Visco elastic models that can predict this behaviour under different loading conditions.

Experimental Approach

Five biomass materials were selected due to their relevance in renewable energy and agricultural supply chains:
• Fuzzy cotton seeds
• Leafy biomass
• Wheat straw
• Woodchips
• Wood pellets

Each material was compressed using a Shimadzu MTS testing machine. After reaching a target stress level, the load was held constant while the material’s stress decay was recorded over time (typically 60, 120, and 180 seconds). These measurements captured both fast relaxation (immediate stress drop) and slow relaxation (longer term settling).

The experimental data revealed that each biomass type behaves differently, reflecting differences in structure, moisture content, particle shape, and internal bonding.
Modelling Approach

To interpret the experimental results, the thesis applies Visco elastic models — mathematical tools traditionally used to describe materials that behave partly like solids and partly like fluids. Two models were central:
1. Zener Model
– Captures both elastic and viscous behaviour
– Useful for materials with a clear fast relaxation component

2. Two Maxwell Elements Model
– Represents two relaxation processes simultaneously
– Ideal for materials with both fast and slow relaxation phases

A key contribution of the thesis is the development of a numerical and graphical method for estimating model parameters (such as relaxation time constants) without relying heavily on curve fitting software like MATLAB or OriginPro. This method improves transparency, reduces error, and makes the modelling approach more accessible to engineers.
Key Findings

1. Biomass Has Distinct Relaxation “Signatures”

Each biomass type exhibits a unique pattern of stress decay. For example:
• Wood pellets relax quickly and predictably.
• Leafy biomass relaxes slowly and irregularly.
• Wheat straw shows intermediate behaviour.
These signatures can be used to classify materials and predict their handling performance.

2. Fast and Slow Relaxation Are Mechanically Meaningful

The two Maxwell elements model successfully separates fast and slow relaxation processes. This distinction helps engineers understand how biomass responds immediately after compression versus how it settles over time.

3. New Parameter Extraction Method Improves Accuracy

The thesis introduces a novel approach for estimating relaxation time constants and stress components. This reduces dependence on automated curve fitting tools and provides more reliable model predictions.

4. Models Predict Real Behaviour Well

When applied to experimental data, both the Zener and two Maxwell models accurately reproduce the relaxation curves. This confirms that Visco elastic modelling is a powerful tool for biomass characterisation.

Practical Implications

The findings have direct relevance for industries that handle biomass:
• Improved equipment design: Better predictions of relaxation behaviour reduce blockages and mechanical failures.
• Optimised storage: Understanding how biomass settles helps determine safe and efficient storage densities.
• Reduced energy use: More predictable flow reduces the energy required for conveying and processing.
• Enhanced process reliability: Plants can operate more consistently with fewer interruptions.

Conclusion

This thesis provides a comprehensive experimental and theoretical framework for understanding biomass relaxation behaviour. By combining detailed measurements with improved Visco elastic modelling, it offers new insights into how biomass responds under pressure — insights that are essential for scaling up renewable energy and sustainable manufacturing.

The work advances both scientific understanding and practical engineering, contributing to the development of cleaner, more efficient biomass systems.

Continue Reading

Trending