By Kayode Emola
The Roman catholic church this week appointed its new leader, Bishop Robert Francis Prevost, who took on the title Pope Leo XIV. Before his ordination as a Pope, he wasn’t even the frontrunner; clearly, his humble beginning didn’t even make him think he would ever assume the highest position of the Catholic church.
It is not Pope Leo XIV’s election but the process that brought him into office that fascinates me. Many countries and peoples of the world are currently more conscious of democracy. However, the Vatican shows a good example of how democracy should work, and if the world can learn from the Vatican, perhaps it will be a better place for all.
We notice that before the election of the Pope, there were grand rules in place. No Bishop above the age of 80 years is allowed to stand for that position, nor is allowed to vote. Hence, of the 252 cardinals alive, only 133 were able to stand for the position or be able to vote. If only 133 people will decide the fate of over 1 billion people of the catholic faith and even beyond the faith, then perhaps we need to redefine democracy.
The second thing we notice was that the election process was done by people of understand the teachings of the Catholic church and who have had years of experience as Bishops. They are not mere novices who knew nothing about Christianity or the catholic church and were given the responsibility to choose the leader.
Also, when it was time for the election, all eligible cardinals were made to swear an oath of secrecy and made to hand in their electronic devices. This is to ensure there is no external interference with the process, and whoever was elected was the decision of the cardinals present.
At the end of the process, the new head of the Catholic church emerged with no controversy or the need for lengthy court cases. Even the ballot papers are burnt, never to be seen again, yet this has been a tradition spanning over eight centuries.
I am not a Roman catholic, but I believe the catholic church has perfected a conventional way of electing leaders without causing a controversy. It may not be the best and may have its own shortcomings, but it has proven to be efficient, cost-effective, and meets the needs of the catholic church with over 1.4 billion people across the world.
Imagine if we, in the name of democracy, ask every catholic member to participate in the voting process that will bring about the new Pope. This will be a lengthy process marred with corruption, bribery, politicking, and all the vices associated with an election. In the end, those who have spent lots of money and think they deserve the position will begin a smear campaign against any chosen leader.
This is why the Yoruba nation, in building its own democratic system, must not be quick to adopt the European or American version of democracy. In the past, it was the Oba (King) who was the head of government, not chosen by the people but by the gods through the chief priest.
The selection of Oba is from the ruling house or houses, and whoever emerges is taken through a rigorous process of initiation. Once the initiation is complete, the individual becomes King, and we notice here too that the people are not involved in the voting process, and there is no lengthy court case.
In today’s case, we see in Yorubaland that most of the Obas that are selected do not follow the ancient precepts that is laid down. Most of them are being selected by the politicians for their own political survival.
Therefore, there is a need to deliberately work out a way in the new Yoruba country so that the leader of the new nation will emerge. We may not follow the Roman catholic pattern where only the cardinals of a certain age are allowed to contest or vote. We may also not follow the ancient precept in which Yoruba Kings are being chosen, but it would be nice to follow a simple system that works for Yorubaland, devoid of lengthy court cases after a leader has been chosen.
We should also endeavour to come up with a process that is devoid of external interference, just as we see in many countries of the world today. We can see clearly that no form of communication with the outside world was permitted during the 48-hour period in which the new Pope was being elected. It ensures that external influences cannot predict the outcome of our internal elections for their own benefit.
If we can do this, then we will be a step closer to ensuring that Yorubaland is perpetually free from colonial or neocolonial influences. It will allow us to be unpredictable and help us to build a lasting system devoid of corrupt politicians who seek political office not for the good of the people but for what they can get for themselves.