Opinion
INEC: The Umpire or a Political Pawn?
Published
10 months agoon
By
Eric
…The Akpoti-Uduaghan Recall Scandal and the Credibility Crisis
By Oyinkan Andu
In the never-ending drama of Nigerian politics, INEC has once again found itself in the spotlight—the electoral body’s role in a recall petition against Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, raises fundamental questions about its impartiality. Despite INECs sudden u-turn where they now state that the Senators Recall did not “meet requirements”. Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan has rightly criticised INEC for accepting a recall petition she claims containing “fictitious signatures and names,” arguing that such a petition should have been dismissed outright. This raises an endlessly looming question: Is INEC a neutral referee, or just another tool for political strongmen to wield at will?
This isn’t just about one senator; it’s about whether INEC is fit to serve as the guardian of Nigeria’s democracy—or if it has simply become an accomplice in the country’s long tradition of political warfare.
INEC’s History
A Pattern of Partisan Shenanigans
INEC’s track record of “selective integrity” is well-documented. While the commission likes to insist on its neutrality, history tells a different story.
2018: The Credibility Debate
INEC Commissioner Mohammed Haruna insisted the commission wasn’t an “appendage” of any ruling party. Yet, accusations of bias persisted, fueled by numerous controversial electoral outcomes.
Several elections in 2018 raised serious concerns about INEC’s neutrality. One of the most infamous was the Osun State gubernatorial election, where the commission’s handling of the poll led to widespread accusations of electoral manipulation. The election was declared inconclusive after the opposition Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) candidate, Senator Ademola Adeleke, initially led in the first round of voting. INEC then conducted a rerun in selected areas—areas predominantly favourable to the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC). The result? The APC candidate, Gboyega Oyetola, emerged victorious. Critics, including international observers, questioned the legitimacy of the rerun and accused INEC of orchestrating an outcome favourable to the ruling party.
Similarly, in Ekiti State, the governorship election was marred by reports of vote-buying, intimidation, and a heavy military presence—circumstances that some believed were designed to tilt the outcome in favour of the APC. The PDP candidate, Kolapo Olusola, cried foul, alleging that INEC had turned a blind eye to electoral irregularities.In response to these mounting criticisms, Commissioner Mohammed Haruna took to the media to defend INEC’s reputation. He strongly refuted claims that the electoral body was compromised, stating unequivocally that INEC was not an extension of the ruling party. However, given the controversial nature of the elections under its watch, his words did little to assuage public scepticism.
2023 Presidential Election: The Great Betrayal
Nigerians were promised real-time electronic transmission of results. Then, on election day, INEC conveniently “forgot” its own promises, failing to transmit results electronically in what many saw as a deliberate ploy to manipulate the process. Public trust was shattered, and Laolu Akande, spokesperson for former VP Osinbajo, bluntly said INEC had “broken the trust of Nigerians.”
Now: The Recall Ruckus
Fast-forward to today: INEC is, once again, caught in a controversy, entertaining a recall petition that Akpoti-Uduaghan insists should never have seen the light of day. She argues that if the process were truly fair, INEC would have dismissed the petition outright for its obvious flaws. Instead, the commission pressed on, triggering a legal battle that has now forced a Federal High Court in Lokoja to intervene, halting the process.
For many Nigerians, INEC’s credibility crisis in 2018 was not just about one or two disputed elections—it was about a larger pattern of electoral conduct that seemed to repeatedly benefit those in power. The perception of bias was fueled by the commission’s selective enforcement of electoral rules, delayed election results, and last-minute decisions that many believed favoured the incumbent government.
The Recall Process: A Tool for Democracy or a Political Weapon
Recalls are supposed to be a mechanism for constituents to hold their representatives accountable—not a tool for political hit jobs. But in Nigeria, where political vendettas are disguised as democratic processes, recalls can easily become weapons of convenience.
INEC’s role is to prevent this abuse. Yet, by proceeding with a recall petition that is allegedly fraudulent, the commission isn’t acting as an impartial arbiter—it’s acting as a willing participant. If this is allowed to stand, what stops powerful politicians from fabricating recall petitions whenever they want to get rid of an “inconvenient” opponent?
A Pattern of Partisanship
INEC’s history is marred by allegations of bias. In November 2023, the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP), along with BudgIT and 34 concerned Nigerians, sued President Bola Tinubu over the appointment of alleged All Progressives Congress (APC) loyalists as Resident Electoral Commissioners (RECs) for INEC. The plaintiffs argued that such appointments compromised the commission’s independence and violated constitutional provisions requiring non-partisanship in electoral umpire roles.
Fast forward to March 2025, and INEC finds itself embroiled in another controversy. Critics argue that INEC’s willingness to entertain this petition, despite allegations of fictitious signatures, suggests a susceptibility to political manipulation.
Judicial Intervention: A See-Saw of Justice?
On March 20, 2025, Justice Isa H. Dashen of the Federal High Court in Lokoja issued an injunction temporarily halting INEC from processing the recall petition against Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan. The decision stemmed from concerns that the petition contained fictitious signatures and irregularities that warranted further scrutiny.
However, in a later ruling, Justice Dashen vacated the injunction, allowing INEC to proceed with the recall process, citing the constitutional right of constituents to initiate a recall as long as due process is followed. While this decision aligns with democratic principles, the reversal has fueled debate over the judiciary’s role in electoral matters and its ability to navigate politically sensitive cases without external pressure.
The judiciary, ideally a neutral arbiter, faces growing scrutiny over its independence, particularly under the APC-led government. While courts have historically played a crucial role in upholding electoral integrity, concerns persist about whether political considerations sometimes influence legal outcomes. This back-and-forth ruling highlights the complexities of balancing constitutional rights with procedural safeguards.
Ultimately, the case raises an important question: Is the judiciary maintaining its role as an impartial guardian of democracy, or does the shifting nature of legal rulings reflect broader institutional challenges in Nigeria’s political and electoral landscape?
INEC’s Selective Efficiency
The speed at which INEC moves depends on whose interests are at stake. When it comes to cases that benefit the political elite, INEC is swift, decisive, and unwavering. But when ordinary Nigerians demand electoral accountability? Suddenly, the commission moves at a snail’s pace—if at all.
If INEC were this efficient in tackling electoral fraud, Nigeria wouldn’t have the mountain of post-election court cases it does today. But when a recall process conveniently aligns with the interests of powerful figures, INEC seems all too eager to oblige.
INEC’s role is to prevent this abuse. Yet, by proceeding with a recall petition that is fraudulent, the commission isn’t acting as an impartial arbiter—it’s acting as a willing participant. If this is allowed to stand, what stops powerful politicians from fabricating recall petitions whenever they want to get rid of an “inconvenient” opponent?
INEC stands at a crossroads. To restore public confidence, it must demonstrate unwavering commitment to impartiality, ensuring that its actions are guided by the principles of fairness and justice, free from political influence. The integrity of Nigeria’s democracy hinges on an electoral body that upholds the sanctity of the electoral process, irrespective of the individuals or parties involved.
INEC’s credibility crisis is bigger than Akpoti-Uduaghan’s recall battle. It cuts to the heart of Nigeria’s democratic future. If the electoral umpire is seen as compromised, then elections—and by extension, democracy itself—become nothing more than a stage-managed farce.
The solution is simple: INEC must adopt radical transparency. Every recall petition must be subjected to rigorous verification, free from political influence. The commission must prove, through its actions—not just its words—that it is an independent body, not a puppet of the highest bidder.
Because if INEC continues on this path, Nigerians won’t just lose faith in one failed recall—they’ll lose faith in the entire democratic process.And when that happens, who will recall INEC?
Related
You may like
By Eric Elezuo
Anybody that knows what Barr Nyesom Wike, who is now the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) stood for prior to the events leading to the 2023 General Elections would be highly shocked, surprised or even disappointed at the trend of events in Rivers State, which boldly has the signature of the former and immediate past governor on it.
To the political watchers, observers and practitioners alike, Wike has been an epitome of deliver good governance, shine as much as you can when it’s your turn, and bow out respectfully when you conclude your tenure, leaving your successor, irrespective of the part you played in his emergence, to perform as he could without interference. But that notion seems to have exited through the backdoor since Wike’s political godson, Siminalayi Fubara, became governor of Rivers State on May 29, 2023.
Though feelers of high handedness or excessive demand of state’s resources against Fubara by Wike has not been officially confirmed, the fact that is starring everyone in the face has remained the governor’s inability to perform maximally as a result of Wike breathing uncomfortably down his neck, and using the instrumentality of the state House of Assembly, which is unequivocally loyal to him, making it difficult to further address the House as Rivers House of Assembly
From reports, the travails of Fubara in the hands of Wike and his House of Assembly dated back to the period around August 2023, barely three months into the administration. Events suggested that Fubara was choking under Wike’s stranglehold, and attempted a self-rescue. It backfired as Wike came after him with the full strength of his controlled-Assembly, and then the full federal might.
In a nutshell, the Assembly has on three occasions attempted to impeach Fubara with the third right now domiciled with the judiciary amid court injunctions.
What is more tiring in the renewed fights between Fubara and Wike-House of Assembly, lies in the fact that both the governor and members of the Assembly, who are giving voice to Wike’s songs, just came back from a six-month suspension occasioned by President Bola Tinubu’s State of Emergency declaration.
One would have thought that lasting peace has arrived even as all the state political institutions including the executive and legislative arms have joined the All Progressives Congress (APC), but the reverse seems to be the case. The House of Assembly has invoked Section 188 of the Nigerian Constitution to begin an impeachment proceedings against the governor. They accused him of Gross Misconduct, spread into eight grievous crimes.
But much as the House of Assembly is speaking through the Speaker, Martin Amaewhule, the real voice being heard by Nigerians is the voice of Wike, who controls almost all elected officers in the state.
Rivers State revel in the reputation of being the treasure of the nation, yet in close to three years, no meaningful development has been witnessed as a result of squabbles and skirmishes between the executive and the legislature with Wike in the driver’s seat.
At a time in his history, Wike denounced and condemned godfatherism in politics. It is sad that he is the one playing the intimidation card today after all he has been through in his political life, and all he has confessed with his month.
While it is imperative that Fubara should acknowledge his political godfather, Wike should understand that he has played his part in Rivers State, and is obligated to allow Fubara play his, or wait for the next election to mobilise to vote him out. But the fact from all indication says the bone of contest is on political agreement more than constitutional infraction. And that renders the whole process more shameful.
The pride of Rivers State, not those of individuals, is at stake, and needs to be salvaged. Wike should shealth his sword, and let peace reign.
The House of Assembly belongs to Rivers people, and not Wike.
Related
Opinion
Re-engineering the Mind: A Pathway to Freedom for Peoples, Corporates and Nations
Published
5 days agoon
January 17, 2026By
Eric
By Tolulope A. Adegoke PhD
“The most formidable borders we must cross are not geographic, but cognitive. True sovereignty—for peoples, corporates, or nations—begins with the courageous act of dismantling the internal architectures of limitation and rebuilding with the materials of our own authentic possibilities.” – Tolulope A. Adegoke, PhD
We live in a world shaped by history, yet our future is not predetermined by it. One of the most profound challenges facing individuals, corporations, and nations, particularly in contexts like Nigeria and Africa—is the legacy of mental colonialism. This isn’t merely a historical discussion; it’s about the unconscious frameworks that continue to dictate how we think, what we value, and what we believe is possible. Decolonizing oneself from this “mental slavery” is the essential first step toward delivering genuine, self-determined possibilities. This process requires honesty, courage, and a deliberate reclamation of thought.
Understanding the Invisible Chains
Mental slavery is the internalization of a worldview where the former colonizer’s culture, systems, and standards are seen as inherently superior, universal, and the sole benchmark for progress. It manifests in subtle ways: the devaluation of local languages and knowledge, the preference for foreign goods and credentials over local ones, and the persistent narrative that real solutions must always come from outside. This mindset creates a ceiling on imagination, fostering dependency and a crippling doubt in one’s own innate capacity to innovate and lead.
The Personal Journey: Reclaiming Your Inner Narrative
For the individual, decolonization is a deeply personal journey of unlearning and rediscovery. It starts with critical self-reflection.
- Questioning Knowledge: It asks, “Whose history am I learning? Whose definition of beauty, success, and intelligence have I accepted?” It involves actively seeking out and valuing indigenous philosophies, like the Ubuntu concept of “I am because we are,” not as folklore but as viable, sophisticated frameworks for living.
- Redefining Value: It means measuring personal success not only by proximity to Western lifestyles but by contributions to community, by cultural continuity, and by personal integrity aligned with one’s own roots.
- Language as Liberation: It recognizes the power of language to shape reality. Embracing one’s mother tongue in thought and creative expression becomes an act of resistance and a reconnection to a distinct way of seeing the world.
The Corporate Transformation: From Extraction to Ecosystem
Businesses and organizations are often perfect mirrors of colonial logic, built on hierarchical control, resource extraction, and the standardization of Western corporate models. Decolonizing the corporate sphere requires a fundamental shift in purpose and practice.
- Beyond Exploitation: It moves from a model that extracts value (from people, communities, and the environment) for distant shareholders to one that generates and circulates value within local ecosystems. It prioritizes regenerative practices and community equity.
- Innovation from Within: It rejects the mere copying of foreign business playbooks. Instead, it looks inward, developing uniquely African management styles, products, and solutions that respond to local realities, needs, and social structures. It sees the informal sector not as a problem, but as a reservoir of resilience and ingenuity.
- Partnership Over Paternalism: It abandons the “savior” complex—the idea that development is “delivered” from the outside. A decolonized corporate entity positions itself as a humble partner, listening to and amplifying local agency and existing expertise.
The National Project: Reimagining Governance and Identity
For nation-states like Nigeria, the legacy is etched into the very architecture of the state: borders that divide ethnic groups, economies structured for export of raw materials, and educational systems that glorify foreign histories.
- Institutional Reformation: True decolonization necessitates the courageous reform of institutions. This means auditing legal systems, constitutions, and national curricula to root out colonial biases and integrate indigenous knowledge and juridical principles.
- Economic Sovereignty: It demands a strategic, deliberate reduction of dependency. This involves prioritizing regional trade (like the African Continental Free Trade Area), adding value to natural resources locally, and investing in home-grown technology and manufacturing. It is a pivot from being a primary commodity exporter in a global system designed by others to being an architect of one’s own economic destiny.
- Cultural Agency: On the global stage, a decolonized nation defines itself. It conducts diplomacy based on its own historical experiences and philosophical foundations, not merely by aligning with blocs formed by colonial histories. It tells its own stories, controlling its narrative.
Nigeria and Africa: The Crucible of Challenge and Promise
Africa, with Nigeria as its most populous nation, is the undeniable focal point of this global conversation. The continent’s challenges are real, but they are too often diagnosed through the very colonial lens that contributed to them. Nigeria’s specific struggle—to forge a cohesive national identity from its stunning diversity, to manage resource wealth for the benefit of all, and to overcome governance failures—is a direct engagement with its colonial past.
The “African Renaissance” envisioned in frameworks like Agenda 2063 is, at its heart, a decolonial project. It seeks an Africa integrated by its own people’s design, powered by its own intellectual and cultural capital, and speaking to the world with confidence and authority.
A Universal Call: Why the Wider World Must Engage
This is not a project for the formerly colonized alone. The wider world, including former colonial powers and global institutions, has a responsibility to engage.
- Acknowledgment and Equity: It begins with a sincere acknowledgment of historical injustices and their modern-day economic and political echoes. It requires moving from a paradigm of charity and aid to one of justice, fair trade, and equitable partnership.
- Enriching Humanity: Ultimately, decolonizing the mind enriches all of humanity. It frees everyone from the limitations of a single, dominant story about progress and human achievement. It opens the door to a world where multiple ways of knowing, being, and creating can coexist and cross-pollinate, leading to more resilient and innovative global solutions.
Conclusion: The Freedom to Imagine Anew
In this moment of global reckoning and transformation, the work of mental decolonization is not a luxury; it is an urgent necessity. It is the hard, internal work that must precede lasting external change. For the individual, it delivers the profound possibility of wholeness. For the corporation, it unlocks sustainable innovation and authentic purpose. For nations like Nigeria and for the African continent, it is the non-negotiable foundation for true sovereignty and transformational progress.
The ultimate deliverable is freedom—the freedom to imagine a future unbounded by the past, and the agency to build it.
Dr. Tolulope A. Adegoke is a Distinguished Ambassador For World Peace (AMBP-UN); Nigeria @65 Leaders of Distinction (2025); Recipient, Nigerian Role Models Award (2024); African Leadership Par Excellence Award (2024).
He can be reached via: tolulopeadegoke01@gmail.com, globalstageimpacts@gmail.com
Related
Opinion
Dele Momodu’s Arrival: Day ADC Became Heavier
Published
6 days agoon
January 16, 2026By
Eric
By Dr. Sani S a’idu Baba
What does loyalty mean to you in friendships, family, or work? To me, loyalty is staying true, honest and supportive even when it’s hard. That truth defines my relationship with Chief Dele Momodu, whom I more often refer to as the pride of Africa. My loyalty to him is non-negotiable. It is not seasonal, transactional, or driven by convenience. It is rooted in conviction. So, the moment he collected his membership card of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) in his hometown of Ihievbe, Owan East, Edo State, I did the same in Kano. In that instant, distance dissolved, and purpose aligned. What happened yesterday was not just a decamping; it was a declaration. A declaration that the long, hard road to Rescue, Recover and Reset Nigeria has gained one of its most formidable travellers.
This is indeed a remarkable day for the ADC. While many defections into political parties come and go with the tides of ambition, Dele Momodu’s entry stands apart, loud in meaning, deep in symbolism, and heavy with consequence. For the ADC, this is not merely the acquisition of a new member; it is the embrace of a movement-builder, a conscience-keeper, and a bridge across Nigeria’s fractured divides, and these qualities are evident in his record.
First, Dele Momodu’s political pedigree is rare and refreshing. In an environment where political loyalty often bends toward power, he has never been part of the ruling party throughout his entire political life. This is not stubbornness; it is principle. It means he understands opposition not as noise-making, but as nation-guarding. He knows how to put governments on their toes firmly, intelligently, and fearlessly. The ADC has gained a man perfectly schooled in democratic vigilance, one who knows that true progress is sharpened by principled opposition.
Second, the ADC has gained a tested pro-democracy fighter in Dele Momodu. He paid a personal price during the military era for resisting dictatorship and standing firmly for democratic rule in the Third Republic. That history of sacrifice now translates into a major advantage for the ADC: a leader with the moral authority, experience, and courage to constitutionally, peacefully and intellectually confront the growing threat of a one-party state and one-man dictatorship. With Dele Momodu in its fold, the ADC is better equipped to defend democracy and lead the national effort to recover Nigeria from authoritarian drift.
Third, he is widely recognized as one of the most principled and loyal politicians Nigeria has produced. When Dele Momodu commits, he commits fully. No half-measures. No double games. No conditional loyalty. If he belongs to a party, he supports it wholeheartedly and unconditionally. For the ADC, this is priceless. In a time when political parties struggle with internal contradictions and wavering allegiances, here is a man whose word is his bond and whose presence strengthens internal cohesion.
Fourth, the ADC has attracted not just a member, but a truth-teller. Dele Momodu derives pleasure in saying the truth as it is, without varnish, without fear, without apology. Parties rise or fall not only by their slogans but by their capacity for honest self-examination. With Momodu in the ADC, the party gains its greatest advisor and most reliable mirror. He will celebrate what is right, challenge what is wrong, and insist on moral clarity. This is how serious political institutions are built.
Fifth, Dele Momodu is a magnet. He attracts highly responsible, competent, and patriotic Nigerians from every corner of the country. Many see him as a part-time and independent politician, one whose ultimate allegiance is not to party symbols but to Nigeria’s soul. That perception is powerful. It means that wherever he goes, Nigerians are ready to follow, to join, and to support. By welcoming him, the ADC has sent a clear signal to the nation: this is a home for credibility, courage, and Nigeria first politics.
Wherever Dele Momodu goes, Nigerians at home and in the diaspora admire him effortlessly. He never gets tired of engaging, mentoring, inspiring, and mobilising. Without any noise, he becomes a vehicle of mass mobilisation. With him, the ADC’s message will travel farther than billboards, deeper than rallies, and faster than propaganda. This is influence earned through decades of credibility, not imposed.
I speak from experience. I was the North-West Coordinator of the Dele Momodu Movement in 2022 when he contested the presidential primaries under the PDP. I later served as his agent at the primaries held at the Moshood Abiola Stadium, Abuja, on May 28, 2022. I went round with him all over Nigeria, and from that experience, I came to truly understand the perception of the ordinary Nigerian about the extraordinary pedigree of Dele Momodu, how people see him as consistent, authentic, accessible, and genuinely committed to Nigeria’s progress.
Sixth, the ADC has attracted a great promise-keeper in Dele Momodu. Let me back this claim with facts. I was among those who accompanied him to the screening before the PDP presidential primaries. When he came out and journalists asked him questions, his response was characteristically clear and sincere: it is totally about Nigeria, nothing personal. He went further to announce the promise he took during the screening, that he would support whoever emerged as the party’s candidate to victory, and he kept that promise. As great globetrotter that he is, no one can easily recall when last Dele Momodu stayed in Nigeria for months, working assiduously for the success of his party and its candidate, His Excellency Atiku Abubakar. While many others who took the same promise were busy throwing tantrums, he was on the field, mobilising, advocating, and delivering. That was a promise kept.
But beyond politics lies the most compelling asset Dele Momodu brings to the ADC: his story. The turbulent but triumphant journey of his life can draw tears not only from the over 140 million Nigerians living in extreme poverty today, but from anyone who understands struggle. It is a story that melts hearts across class, age, and geography. Relatable. Poignant. Edifying. It speaks directly to the Nigerian who feels forgotten by birth or battered by circumstance. It tells you that you may be a rejected stone today, penniless, down and out but you can become a chief cornerstone tomorrow. Not by cutting corners, but by patience, consistency, building networks of influence, embracing hard work, and staying faithful to your dream. Perhaps this is why Dele Momodu is arguably the Nigerian mentor with the highest number of mentees across every nook and cranny of this country, myself included. His mentorship culture is organic, generous, and transformational. He opens doors, builds people, and multiplies hope. For the ADC, this is a strategic advantage that cannot be overstated. A party that attracts Dele Momodu automatically attracts thousands of thinkers, professionals, youths, and patriots he has inspired over decades.
Dele Momodu is in a class of his own. Naturally unique. Authentically Nigerian. Globally respected and travels road less travel. His life proves that greatness can rise from adversity, and leadership can be forged without bitterness. With his entry into the ADC, the party has not just caught a “big fish”; it has netted a tide-changer. Yesterday, in Ihiebve, history was made. From Edo to Kano, from the grassroots to the global stage, a new chapter has begun. The ADC is no longer just preparing for the future, it is recruiting it. And with Dele Momodu on board, the mission to Rescue, Recover and Reset Nigeria has found one of its strongest voices and most trusted hands.
The journey ahead is demanding. But with men of principle, truth and influence like Chief Dele Momodu, the ADC is no longer asking Nigerians to believe. It is giving them a reason to.
Dr Baba writes from Kano, and can be reached via drssbaba@yahoo.com
Related


Fubara’s Impeachment Suffers Setback As Judge Rejects Invitation to Set Up Probe Panel
LP: Court Affirms Abure’s Sack, Orders Recognition of Nenadi’s Leadership
After Calling CAN ‘Conflict Entrepreneurs’, Police Make U-turn, Confirm Mass Abduction of Kaduna Churchgoers
Military Discovers B’Haram Underground Storage, Fuel Dump
Apapa Tanker Accident: Scooping Spilled Fuel is Suicidal, Sanwo-Olu Warns Lagos Residents
2027: Oyegun Welcomes Edo Obidient Movement into ADC
Army Dismisses Mutiny Threat Against Tinubu’s Govt
9th AFRIMA: Full List of Winners As Nigerian Stars Dominate Awards
Re-engineering the Mind: A Pathway to Freedom for Peoples, Corporates and Nations
Voice of Emancipation: Nigeria Government Descends into Lobbying
Nigeria Mourns As Imam Abubakar Abdullahi, Who Sheltered Multiple Christians, Dies at 90
2027: ADC Draws Battleline Against Tinubu’s APC
Adding Value: Why You Must Work by Henry Ukazu
Super Eagles Defeat Egypt, Bags Bronze Medal As AFCON 2025 Grounds to a Halt
Trending
-
Entertainment5 days ago9th AFRIMA: Full List of Winners As Nigerian Stars Dominate Awards
-
Opinion5 days agoRe-engineering the Mind: A Pathway to Freedom for Peoples, Corporates and Nations
-
Voice of Emancipation5 days agoVoice of Emancipation: Nigeria Government Descends into Lobbying
-
Featured4 days agoNigeria Mourns As Imam Abubakar Abdullahi, Who Sheltered Multiple Christians, Dies at 90
-
Headline4 days ago2027: ADC Draws Battleline Against Tinubu’s APC
-
Adding Value6 days agoAdding Value: Why You Must Work by Henry Ukazu
-
Sports3 days agoSuper Eagles Defeat Egypt, Bags Bronze Medal As AFCON 2025 Grounds to a Halt
-
Featured3 days agoEquity Health Group Acquires Europe Dental Ltd, to Launch Nationwide Retail Dental Clinics in Nigeria

