Opinion

INEC: The Umpire or a Political Pawn?

Published

1 year ago

March 29, 2025

Eric

…The Akpoti-Uduaghan Recall Scandal and the Credibility Crisis

By Oyinkan Andu

In the never-ending drama of Nigerian politics, INEC has once again found itself in the spotlight—the electoral body’s role in a recall petition against Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, raises fundamental questions about its impartiality. Despite INECs sudden u-turn where they now state that the Senators Recall did not “meet requirements”. Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan has rightly criticised INEC for accepting a recall petition she claims containing “fictitious signatures and names,” arguing that such a petition should have been dismissed outright. This raises an endlessly looming question: Is INEC a neutral referee, or just another tool for political strongmen to wield at will?

This isn’t just about one senator; it’s about whether INEC is fit to serve as the guardian of Nigeria’s democracy—or if it has simply become an accomplice in the country’s long tradition of political warfare.

INEC’s History

A Pattern of Partisan Shenanigans
INEC’s track record of “selective integrity” is well-documented. While the commission likes to insist on its neutrality, history tells a different story.

2018: The Credibility Debate

INEC Commissioner Mohammed Haruna insisted the commission wasn’t an “appendage” of any ruling party. Yet, accusations of bias persisted, fueled by numerous controversial electoral outcomes.

Several elections in 2018 raised serious concerns about INEC’s neutrality. One of the most infamous was the Osun State gubernatorial election, where the commission’s handling of the poll led to widespread accusations of electoral manipulation. The election was declared inconclusive after the opposition Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) candidate, Senator Ademola Adeleke, initially led in the first round of voting. INEC then conducted a rerun in selected areas—areas predominantly favourable to the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC). The result? The APC candidate, Gboyega Oyetola, emerged victorious. Critics, including international observers, questioned the legitimacy of the rerun and accused INEC of orchestrating an outcome favourable to the ruling party.

Similarly, in Ekiti State, the governorship election was marred by reports of vote-buying, intimidation, and a heavy military presence—circumstances that some believed were designed to tilt the outcome in favour of the APC. The PDP candidate, Kolapo Olusola, cried foul, alleging that INEC had turned a blind eye to electoral irregularities.In response to these mounting criticisms, Commissioner Mohammed Haruna took to the media to defend INEC’s reputation. He strongly refuted claims that the electoral body was compromised, stating unequivocally that INEC was not an extension of the ruling party. However, given the controversial nature of the elections under its watch, his words did little to assuage public scepticism.

2023 Presidential Election: The Great Betrayal

Nigerians were promised real-time electronic transmission of results. Then, on election day, INEC conveniently “forgot” its own promises, failing to transmit results electronically in what many saw as a deliberate ploy to manipulate the process. Public trust was shattered, and Laolu Akande, spokesperson for former VP Osinbajo, bluntly said INEC had “broken the trust of Nigerians.”

Now: The Recall Ruckus

Fast-forward to today: INEC is, once again, caught in a controversy, entertaining a recall petition that Akpoti-Uduaghan insists should never have seen the light of day. She argues that if the process were truly fair, INEC would have dismissed the petition outright for its obvious flaws. Instead, the commission pressed on, triggering a legal battle that has now forced a Federal High Court in Lokoja to intervene, halting the process.

For many Nigerians, INEC’s credibility crisis in 2018 was not just about one or two disputed elections—it was about a larger pattern of electoral conduct that seemed to repeatedly benefit those in power. The perception of bias was fueled by the commission’s selective enforcement of electoral rules, delayed election results, and last-minute decisions that many believed favoured the incumbent government.

The Recall Process: A Tool for Democracy or a Political Weapon

Recalls are supposed to be a mechanism for constituents to hold their representatives accountable—not a tool for political hit jobs. But in Nigeria, where political vendettas are disguised as democratic processes, recalls can easily become weapons of convenience.

INEC’s role is to prevent this abuse. Yet, by proceeding with a recall petition that is allegedly fraudulent, the commission isn’t acting as an impartial arbiter—it’s acting as a willing participant. If this is allowed to stand, what stops powerful politicians from fabricating recall petitions whenever they want to get rid of an “inconvenient” opponent?

A Pattern of Partisanship

INEC’s history is marred by allegations of bias. In November 2023, the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP), along with BudgIT and 34 concerned Nigerians, sued President Bola Tinubu over the appointment of alleged All Progressives Congress (APC) loyalists as Resident Electoral Commissioners (RECs) for INEC. The plaintiffs argued that such appointments compromised the commission’s independence and violated constitutional provisions requiring non-partisanship in electoral umpire roles.
Fast forward to March 2025, and INEC finds itself embroiled in another controversy. Critics argue that INEC’s willingness to entertain this petition, despite allegations of fictitious signatures, suggests a susceptibility to political manipulation.

Judicial Intervention: A See-Saw of Justice?
On March 20, 2025, Justice Isa H. Dashen of the Federal High Court in Lokoja issued an injunction temporarily halting INEC from processing the recall petition against Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan. The decision stemmed from concerns that the petition contained fictitious signatures and irregularities that warranted further scrutiny.

However, in a later ruling, Justice Dashen vacated the injunction, allowing INEC to proceed with the recall process, citing the constitutional right of constituents to initiate a recall as long as due process is followed. While this decision aligns with democratic principles, the reversal has fueled debate over the judiciary’s role in electoral matters and its ability to navigate politically sensitive cases without external pressure.

The judiciary, ideally a neutral arbiter, faces growing scrutiny over its independence, particularly under the APC-led government. While courts have historically played a crucial role in upholding electoral integrity, concerns persist about whether political considerations sometimes influence legal outcomes. This back-and-forth ruling highlights the complexities of balancing constitutional rights with procedural safeguards.

Ultimately, the case raises an important question: Is the judiciary maintaining its role as an impartial guardian of democracy, or does the shifting nature of legal rulings reflect broader institutional challenges in Nigeria’s political and electoral landscape?

INEC’s Selective Efficiency

The speed at which INEC moves depends on whose interests are at stake. When it comes to cases that benefit the political elite, INEC is swift, decisive, and unwavering. But when ordinary Nigerians demand electoral accountability? Suddenly, the commission moves at a snail’s pace—if at all.

If INEC were this efficient in tackling electoral fraud, Nigeria wouldn’t have the mountain of post-election court cases it does today. But when a recall process conveniently aligns with the interests of powerful figures, INEC seems all too eager to oblige.

INEC’s role is to prevent this abuse. Yet, by proceeding with a recall petition that is fraudulent, the commission isn’t acting as an impartial arbiter—it’s acting as a willing participant. If this is allowed to stand, what stops powerful politicians from fabricating recall petitions whenever they want to get rid of an “inconvenient” opponent?

INEC stands at a crossroads. To restore public confidence, it must demonstrate unwavering commitment to impartiality, ensuring that its actions are guided by the principles of fairness and justice, free from political influence. The integrity of Nigeria’s democracy hinges on an electoral body that upholds the sanctity of the electoral process, irrespective of the individuals or parties involved.

INEC’s credibility crisis is bigger than Akpoti-Uduaghan’s recall battle. It cuts to the heart of Nigeria’s democratic future. If the electoral umpire is seen as compromised, then elections—and by extension, democracy itself—become nothing more than a stage-managed farce.

The solution is simple: INEC must adopt radical transparency. Every recall petition must be subjected to rigorous verification, free from political influence. The commission must prove, through its actions—not just its words—that it is an independent body, not a puppet of the highest bidder.

Because if INEC continues on this path, Nigerians won’t just lose faith in one failed recall—they’ll lose faith in the entire democratic process.And when that happens, who will recall INEC?

Opinion

From 55,000 TB a Year to 1.4 Million a Month: Nigeria’s Data Boom is Overwhelming the System

Published

4 minutes ago

June 15, 2026

Eric

By Osita Odafi

In late 2025, this writer projected that Nigeria’s data traffic would surpass 13.2 million terabytes (TB) by year-end. It did—closing at 13.25 million TB. What has happened since makes that milestone look modest.

Consider two numbers. In 2020, Nigeria consumed 1,538,000 TB of data across an entire year. In March 2026 alone, the country consumed 1,422,764 TB. One month. Nearly the same volume. That is not just a statistic. It is a structural shift.

But even that comparison understates the transformation.

In 2015, Nigeria’s entire annual data consumption stood at just 55,000 TB. Today, that volume is exhausted in little more than a single day. What took twelve months to generate a decade ago now moves across networks in roughly 24 hours. This is not just growth. It is compression—of time, of scale, and of how an economy functions when connectivity becomes its operating layer.

Between 2015 and 2025, Nigeria’s data traffic expanded from 55,000 TB to 13.25 million—an increase of more than 24,000 percent, achieved without a single year of decline. Even within the more recent window, the acceleration is stark: traffic rose 761 percent between 2020 and 2025 alone. Q1 2026 added another 4.07 million TB, putting the full year on course to surpass 16 million.

By March, Nigerians were consuming an estimated 45,900 TB every day—up from about 41,000 TB per day just four months earlier. That daily increment alone—roughly 5,000 TB—would have been a meaningful national average not long ago. At current run rates, monthly traffic is set to cross 1.5 million TB by June 2026—levels that once defined an entire year.

Nigeria is already a data-driven economy. The real question is whether the system behind it can keep up.

A decade without deceleration

The shift did not begin in 2021. It has been building, uninterrupted, for a decade.

From 55,000 TB in 2015—when broadband penetration stood at just 10 percent—consumption doubled to 93,000 TB in 2016, then to 148,000 TB in 2017. In 2018, it surged 114 percent to 316,000 TB. In 2019, another 106 percent to 651,000 TB. By 2020, it had crossed 1.5 million TB—more than doubling again in a single year. Every year. No reversals. No plateau.

The pandemic did not create this trajectory. It accelerated one already running at extraordinary pace. Between 2020 and 2021, data traffic more than doubled again—rising 109.6 percent to 3.22 million TB—as remote work, e-learning, digital payments, and streaming all surged simultaneously. Many of those behaviours became permanent, raising the floor from which subsequent growth has compounded.

What followed was not a spike, but a new baseline. Traffic climbed to 5.45 million TB in 2022, before settling into a still-aggressive 33–36 percent growth band between 2023 and 2025. Consumption reached 7.27 million TB in 2023, 9.76 million in 2024, and 13.25 million in 2025. This is not a slowdown. It is scale.

In 2021, Nigeria added roughly 1.7 million TB of new traffic. By 2025, it was adding about 3.5 million annually—twice the volume, even at lower growth rates. The base has expanded. Compounding has taken over. The story is no longer annual. It is monthly.

What is driving the surge

The forces behind Nigeria’s data growth are structural and self-reinforcing: cheaper smartphone financing schemes, wider mobile internet access, rising video consumption, cloud adoption, and the steady digitisation of services and business operations.

They were present in 2015 when consumption was 55,000 TB. They are present now as the country approaches 1.5 million TB a month. The decade between those two figures is what happens when structural forces compound without interruption.

Nigeria’s demographics amplify all of it. With a median age of around 18, the country has one of the most digitally native populations globally. As this cohort enters the economy—opening accounts, launching businesses, consuming content, and accessing services—each new participant adds materially to monthly traffic.

One milestone stands out. In November 2025, broadband penetration crossed 50 percent for the first time. Half the country now has access to broadband. The traffic numbers show what happens when that access is fully used.

This is not occurring in isolation. Africa is the fastest-growing region globally for international bandwidth, expanding at a 38 percent CAGR between 2021 and 2025. Nigeria sits at the centre of that expansion.

Seasonality is now structural

December has quietly become the system’s stress test. In 2023, December traffic exceeded November by 67,794 TB. In 2024, by 94,502 TB. In 2025, by an estimated 150,000 TB, driven by travel, streaming, and e-commerce activity. Month-on-month growth of roughly 10–12 percent is now a recurring feature.

For operators, it is a capacity test. For analysts, it is a demand signal. For the system, it is pressure that never fully resets.

Infrastructure is falling behind

Demand is compounding. Supply is struggling to keep up. The turning point on the supply side came with pricing. A tariff adjustment in early 2025 freed up much-needed investment capital in an industry that had been financially constrained.

Operators have since responded at scale. Last year, MTN invested over ₦900 billion in infrastructure upgrades; Airtel committed roughly $500 million; and Globacom expanded network capacity. The regulator has complemented this with stronger enforcement and accountability. A quarterly Industry Performance Report—covering consumer trends, 5G performance, rural–urban gaps, and network quality—alongside mandatory airtime refunds for service shortfalls, has materially increased the cost of underperformance.

But policy pressure alone is not closing the gap. Operators have agreed to upgrade approximately 12,000 sites in 2026—but that effort is running against deeper structural constraints.

Project BRIDGE, the 90,000-kilometre national fibre rollout, requires faster execution. Right-of-way bottlenecks and multiple taxation persist. Grid instability adds another layer of cost and complexity, forcing operators to run diesel-dependent sites whose economics deteriorate as fuel prices rise. Security risks compound the problem further: nearly 5,000 theft incidents and 49 cases of vandalism were recorded last year, alongside an estimated 70 fibre cuts daily.

None of these constraints is new. All of them are more urgent.

What the numbers signal to investors

A country consuming 1.4 million TB in a single month—up from 55,000 TB a year just a decade ago—is structurally undersupplied in data infrastructure. The case for fibre, data centres, and edge computing is no longer speculative. It is immediate.

For digital businesses, the message is clear: the addressable market is expanding rapidly. Data consumption is increasingly a proxy for economic activity—how Nigerians communicate, transact, learn, and build.

At this scale, the digital economy is not a layer on top of the real economy. It is the connective tissue of it.

The bottom line

There is something almost vertiginous about what ten years has compressed into a single data point. In 2015, 55,000 TB was a year. In 2020, 1.5 million TB was a year. In March 2026, 1.4 million TB was a month. Nigeria now consumes its entire 2015 annual data volume in little more than a day.

This is no longer a story about growth. It is a story about scale—a decade of it, unbroken and still accelerating. The question is not whether Nigeria will consume more data. It will. The question is whether the infrastructure, policy and investment behind it can scale fast enough to support what comes next.

Osita Odafi, a digital economy analyst, writes from Lagos.

Opinion

Democracy and Prosperity of Nigerian Citizenry: Foundations for Deciding a Fruitful Future

Published

2 days ago

June 13, 2026

Eric

By Tolulope A. Adegoke PhD

Democracy, at its best, represents far more than periodic elections or formal institutions of government. It is a living covenant between the state and its people — one that promises participation, accountability, justice, transparency, and the genuine opportunity for collective advancement. In Nigeria, Africa’s most populous nation and a key actor on the global stage, the interplay between democracy and the prosperity of its citizens remains central to the nation’s future. When democracy is nurtured with sincerity and competence, it becomes a powerful driver of human development, economic growth, social cohesion, and national stability. When it falls short, it risks breeding disillusionment, inequality, and unrest. This write-up examines this vital relationship, reflecting on Nigeria’s democratic journey, its impact on citizen well-being, persistent obstacles, and realistic pathways toward a more secure, prosperous, and hopeful future for all Nigerians.

The Promise and Practice of Democracy in Nigeria

Nigeria’s return to civilian rule in 1999 ushered in the longest stretch of uninterrupted democratic governance in the country’s post-independence history. The 1999 Constitution, despite its imperfections, enshrines core principles such as separation of powers, fundamental human rights, federal character, and regular elections. For millions of Nigerians, democracy symbolises the chance to have a voice in shaping their destiny and to benefit from responsive governance.

True democratic prosperity goes beyond economic statistics. It encompasses improved access to quality education, healthcare, security, infrastructure, decent employment, and equal opportunities. When citizens experience tangible improvements in their daily lives as a result of democratic processes, public trust in institutions grows stronger. Conversely, when prosperity remains elusive for large segments of the population, democratic legitimacy weakens.

Nigeria has recorded notable achievements within its democratic framework. The liberalisation of the telecommunications sector, banking reforms, the rise of the creative economy (Nollywood, music, and digital content), and increasing participation in regional trade agreements such as the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) all occurred in a democratic environment that enabled private enterprise and innovation.

Persistent Challenges on the Path to Prosperity

Despite these gains, significant gaps remain between democratic aspirations and lived realities. Nigeria continues to grapple with high rates of multidimensional poverty, youth unemployment, and widening inequality. Many citizens, particularly in rural areas and among vulnerable groups, feel disconnected from the dividends of democracy.

Key challenges include:

Insecurity: Persistent threats from insurgency, banditry, kidnapping, and communal conflicts continue to destroy lives, displace communities, and discourage investment.
Economic Structure: Over-reliance on oil revenue, weak industrial base, and limited value addition in agriculture and solid minerals constrain broad-based prosperity.
Institutional Weaknesses: Corruption, uneven policy implementation, and limited coordination across government levels often undermine development efforts.
Human Capital Deficits: Inadequate investment in education, healthcare, and skills development leaves many young Nigerians unprepared for the demands of a modern economy.
Electoral and Governance Issues: Concerns about electoral integrity, political patronage, and policy inconsistency sometimes erode public confidence.

These issues are not unique to Nigeria. Many democracies worldwide, especially in developing contexts, face similar tensions between democratic ideals and developmental outcomes.

Practical Pathways to a Deciding and Fruitful Democratic Future

For democracy to truly assure prosperity for the Nigerian citizenry, deliberate and sustained actions are required across multiple fronts:

1. Strengthening Institutions and Accountability Independent and well-resourced institutions — particularly the judiciary, anti-corruption agencies, and electoral bodies — are essential. Transparent appointment processes, adequate funding, and robust oversight mechanisms can significantly reduce impunity and enhance public trust.

2. Inclusive Economic Transformation Nigeria must accelerate economic diversification by investing heavily in agriculture, technology, manufacturing, renewable energy, and the creative industries. Policies should deliberately target small and medium enterprises, women, and youth. Human capital development through quality education, vocational training, and digital skills must become a national priority.

3. Security as a Foundation for Prosperity A holistic security strategy that combines effective law enforcement with community engagement, intelligence-led operations, and massive socio-economic interventions in affected regions is vital. Addressing the root causes of conflict — poverty, unemployment, and marginalisation — is as important as tactical responses.

4. Youth and Women Empowerment With a predominantly youthful population, Nigeria’s greatest resource is its people. Deliberate investments in youth entrepreneurship, innovation hubs, sports, and leadership development can transform demographic pressure into a powerful dividend. Similarly, gender-inclusive policies that enhance women’s access to education, finance, and political participation will accelerate national progress.

5. Deepening Democratic Culture and Participation Civic education, responsible media, and active citizen engagement beyond election periods are crucial. Citizens must be empowered to demand accountability while contributing constructively to nation-building.

6. Leveraging Regional and Global Opportunities Nigeria should continue to play a leadership role in ECOWAS and the African Union while attracting responsible foreign investment and technology transfer. Successful democratic governance and economic progress in Nigeria can serve as a beacon for other African nations.

Relevance to the Wider-World

Nigeria’s democratic experience offers valuable lessons for other nations navigating the complex relationship between democracy and development. It demonstrates the resilience of democratic ideals even in challenging contexts, the power of a vibrant civil society, and the potential of a youthful population. At the same time, it highlights the universal truth that democracy must deliver tangible results to remain legitimate and sustainable.

Conclusion: Democracy as an Assurance of a Fruitful Future

Democracy remains the most credible pathway to sustainable prosperity for the Nigerian citizenry. While challenges persist, they should not overshadow the progress achieved or the immense potential that still lies ahead. The deciding factor for a fruitful future lies not in abandoning democracy, but in deepening, refining, and perfecting it.

This requires visionary and ethical leadership that prioritises the common good, active and responsible citizenship that demands accountability, and institutional reforms that translate democratic promises into tangible improvements in people’s lives. When democracy truly works for the people — delivering security, opportunity, justice, and dignity — it becomes the strongest assurance of a stable, prosperous, and hopeful future.

Nigeria stands at a critical crossroads. The choices made by leaders and citizens today will determine whether the promise of democracy translates into widespread prosperity or remains an unfulfilled aspiration. With courage, wisdom, collective commitment, and sustained effort, Nigeria can build a democracy that not only endures but genuinely serves the aspirations of its people — offering inspiration to many nations facing similar journeys around the world.

The future of the Nigerian citizenry can be brighter — if democracy is well defended, strengthened, and made to work for all.

Dr. Tolulope A. Adegoke, AMBP-UN is a globally recognized scholar-practitioner and thought leader at the nexus of security, governance, and strategic leadership. His mission is dedicated to advancing ethical governance, strategic human capital development, resilient nation building, and global peace. He can be reached via: tolulopeadegoke01@gmail.com, globalstageimpacts@gmail.com

Opinion

GLO and the Democratization of Communication in Nigeria

Published

2 days ago

June 13, 2026

Eric

By Dr. Sani Sa’idu Baba

Glo, the “Digital Oxygen” of Nigeria’s Democracy

As Nigeria marked Democracy Day on June 12, it is important to celebrate not only our democratic journey as a nation, but also institutions whose values and contributions reflect the very essence of democracy.

In Nigeria’s telecommunications industry, Glo stands out as arguably the most democratic network. Democracy thrives on inclusion, accessibility, equal opportunity, participation, and the empowerment of the people. Since its inception, Glo has consistently demonstrated these ideals through its commitment to making communication affordable and accessible to millions of Nigerians.

By pioneering competitive tariffs, affordable data services, and innovative products tailored to the needs of ordinary citizens, Glo helped break barriers to communication and brought connectivity within reach of people across different social and economic backgrounds. In doing so, it democratized access to information, knowledge, and opportunities in an increasingly digital world.

This commitment has been tested in recent times. Following the Nigerian Communications Commission’s approval of a 50 percent tariff adjustment across the telecommunications industry in 2025, operators were compelled to review their pricing structures. Yet Glo’s response reflected a people-first philosophy even amid economic pressure. Through generous data bundles, rollover benefits, value-back offers on MiFi devices, and bonus data packages, the company sought to cushion the impact on subscribers. While the industry generally moved toward higher costs, Glo worked to ensure that communication remained within the reach of ordinary Nigerians, staying true to the democratic principle that access should never be reserved for a privileged few.

Glo’s democratic approach extends beyond pricing to infrastructure development. Its 2025–2026 network modernization programme, which involved the deployment of over a thousand new 4G LTE sites, spectrum expansion, and the reconstruction of critical fibre routes, has been particularly noteworthy for its focus on underserved rural communities as well as densely populated urban centres such as markets and educational institutions. Democracy is not merely about serving those already at the centre of power; it is about extending opportunity to those at the margins. By expanding connectivity to communities that have historically been overlooked by telecommunications infrastructure, Glo has quietly been democratizing not only communication but also access to the digital future.

A key pillar of any true democracy is the protection and promotion of freedom of speech and expression. Through its reliable and affordable network, Glo has empowered millions of Nigerians to express their views, share ideas, engage in public discourse, and connect with others without being constrained by cost or access. This is not an abstract principle. It is reflected daily in the WhatsApp groups, Facebook communities, online forums, and citizen-led conversations that increasingly shape Nigeria’s political and social discourse. From grassroots town hall engagements to real-time reactions during elections and national debates, Glo provides a platform through which citizens exercise one of the most fundamental rights in a democratic society.

Furthermore, Glo’s unwavering support for local content, Nigerian talents, sports, entertainment, and entrepreneurship reflects its belief in creating opportunities for people to succeed and contribute meaningfully to national development. From its long-standing sponsorship of football competitions to its investment in Nigerian music, Nollywood, and homegrown entrepreneurial initiatives, Glo has consistently amplified Nigerian voices and celebrated Nigerian excellence. This commitment to empowering individuals mirrors the democratic principle of broad participation and shared progress.

As we honour the heroes of June 12 and reflect on the sacrifices that paved the way for democratic governance in Nigeria, Glo deserves recognition as a corporate institution that has consistently advanced the values of inclusion, accessibility, empowerment, and freedom of expression. In many respects, Glo has done for communication what democracy seeks to do for governance: place power in the hands of the people.

As Nigeria celebrates Democracy Day, Glo stands not merely as a telecom provider but as a symbol of inclusion, accessibility, and empowerment. In connecting millions of Nigerians to one another and to the world, it has helped deepen democratic participation and amplify the voices of ordinary citizens. It is more than a network. It is more than “unlimited.” It is “digital oxygen” that keeps Nigeria’s democratic conversation alive.

Happy Democracy Day, Nigeria.