Connect with us

Headline

War Against Terror: What’s America’s Real Agenda in Nigeria?

Published

on

By Eric Elezuo

As Nigerians were smacking from the euphoria that followed the eventual negotiated (or otherwise) release of the remaining 130 pupils of the St Mary’s Private Catholic School, Papiri, Niger State, exactly one month after their kidnap on November 21, 2025, a supposedly Christmas bonfire was happening at a terrorists’ enclave in Sokoto State. This was occasioned and engineered by the Donald Trump-led American government.

It would be recalled that on November 1, 2025, Trump had in a tweet threatened to invade Nigeria with ‘guns-a-blazing’ in retaliation of an alleged Christian genocide ongoing in the country if the President Bola Tinubu-led Federal Government continues to do nothing about it.

“If the Nigerian Government continues to allow the killing of Christians, the USA will immediately stop all aid and assistance to Nigeria, and may very well go into that now disgraced country, ‘guns-a-blazing,’ to completely wipe out the Islamic Terrorists who are committing these horrible atrocities,” Trump posted on social media. “I am hereby instructing our Department of War to prepare for possible action. If we attack, it will be fast, vicious, and sweet, just like the terrorist thugs attack our CHERISHED Christians!,” Trump said.

The threat followed an earlier declaration of Nigeria as a Country of Particular Concern (CPC) to which Tinubu pushed back, saying that the characterization of Nigeria as a religiously intolerant country does not reflect the national reality.

“Religious freedom and tolerance have been a core tenet of our collective identity and shall always remain so.

“Nigeria opposes religious persecution and does not encourage it. Nigeria is a country with constitutional guarantees to protect citizens of all faiths.”

But the explanation, and resultant diplomatic visitations of Nigerian delegation led by the National Security Adviser, Nuhu Ribadu, to Washington, did not assuage the Americans. But with congressional hearings and fact-finding visit to Nigeria, the Americans made their own conclusions.

And so, on the night of Christmas, and while President Tinubu was holidaying in Lagos, faraway from the seat of power, the United States carried out airstrikes against Islamic State militants in northwest Nigeria, claiming the group had been targeting Christians in the region.

A message on X by President Trump however, said the operation was at the request of Nigeria’s government, U.S. President Donald Trump and the U.S. military.

“Tonight, at my direction as Commander in Chief, the United States launched powerful and deadly strike against ISIS Terrorist Scum in Northwest Nigeria, who have been targeting and viciously killing, primarily, innocent Christians, at levels not seen for many years, and even Centuries!” Trump said in a post on Truth Social.

The strike was an aftermath of US consistent intelligence-gathering flights over large parts of Nigeria shortly after the threat in November.

His post went on to say U.S. defence officials had “executed numerous perfect strikes.”

The U.S. military’s Africa Command also said on X that the strikes were conducted at the request of Nigerian authorities and killed multiple ISIS militants in Sokoto state.

It is instrumental to note that in all statements released by either Trump or any US agency, the name of the Nigerian president was never mentioned or given credit to as respectfully deserved, sparking conversations on the role of the Nigeria’s Commander-in-Chief in the entire operation, and raising new questions as to what the real agenda of America in Nigeria is.

Again, in his tweet, Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth thanked the Nigerian government for its support and co-operation and added: “More to come…Grateful for Nigerian government support & cooperation.”

Intelligence indicated the camps were being used by foreign ISIS elements working with local affiliates to plan large-scale attacks inside Nigeria. No civilian casualties were reported, although debris fell in two towns in Sokoto and Kwara states.

While Nigerians were expecting Tinubu to address the strike on Nigerian soil by a foreign power, it was a Ministry’s spokesperson, Kimiebi Ebienfa, that signed a statement to the regard informing that the government is aware of the strike, and adding that Nigeria provided intelligence needed for the action.

The Foreign Affairs Ministry said that precision air strikes hit “terrorist targets” in the country’s northwest, adding that it remains engaged with Washington in “structured security cooperation.”

Earlier, while the Nigerian government has refuted US assertion of Christian genocide, it corrected that the terrorists do not discriminate but target both Muslims and Christians, agreeing however, to work with the US to bolster its forces against militant groups. The resultant effect was the Christmas Day attacks on ISIS facilities and men.

But more worrying is the fact that unlike what is expected, the Nigeria’s president has maintained an undignified silence when “he should be having meetings with his generals”, but rather allowed his aides to run riot with discordant narratives of the situation.

Speaking on behalf of the government, the Minister of Information and National Orientation, Mohammed Idris, noted as follows, in part:

“The precision strike operations were executed between 00:12 hours and 01:30 hours on Friday, 26 December, 2025, following explicit approval by the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, His Excellency President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, GCFR,” the statement reads.

“The operation was carried out under established command and control structures, with the full involvement of the Armed Forces of Nigeria and under the supervision of the Honourable Ministers of Defence and Foreign Affairs, as well as the Chief of Defence Staff.

“The strikes were launched from maritime platforms domiciled in the Gulf of Guinea after extensive intelligence gathering, operational planning, and reconnaissance.

“A total of 16 GPS-guided precision munitions were deployed using MQ-9 Reaper unmanned aerial platforms, successfully neutralising the targeted ISIS elements attempting to penetrate Nigeria from the Sahel corridor.”

In total contradiction, a presidential spokesperson, Daniel Bwaya, denied intelligence sharing between US and Nigeria, saying he wasn’t sure who thw US strike hit, and asking for time to elapse to decipher what exactly took place. This was even as the Information Minister and Defence headquarters have explained what they know.

The defence headquarters (DHQ) had earlier confirmed that the armed forces of Nigeria, in collaboration with the US, carried out the strike operations.

Samaila Uba, director of defence information, confirmed the joint Nigerian-US operations in a statement.

“The strikes followed credible intelligence and careful operational planning aimed at degrading the operational capabilities of the terrorists while minimising collateral damage,” the defence spokesperson said.

Most Nigerians, including veteran journalists, Dele Momodu, have asked the whereabouts of Tinubu in all that have happened so far.

In a statement he titled, Where’s Our Commander-in-Chief, Momodu insisted that Tinubu should be at the forefront of speaking to the people of Nigeria if actually he is in the know of the US military strikes in the country, noting that leaving the act of war narrations in the hands and voices of his lieutenants, who may know little or nothing does not speak well of a war general, and in war time.

Momodu wrote: “WHERE’S OUR COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF?

“In the middle of last night, while rounding up our CHRISTMAS jollification, we received news from far away USA that PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP has ordered some military operations on the soil of our country, with the cooperation of the Nigerian government. The message was foggy and brief.

“In normal climes, we would have expected our own President to immediately abort his vacation and return to the Presidential villa in Abuja, surrounded by his war cabinet, and his media team rolling out updates to a usually under-informed nation…

“We implore our Master Strategist not to abdicate responsibility and our sovereignty at this crucial, and historic moment, but to stand beside America, in this fight against terrorism…

“The country is in our prayers…”

Nigerians are worried as to the reasons the Americans should be the ones to announce the attacks carried out on Nigerian soil even when it is assumed that it was a joint operation involving the Minister of Defence, Minister of Foreign Affairs and the Chief of Defence Staff.

According to Segun Sowunmi, a member of the ruling party and Tinubu loyalist, while speaking during a Channels Television programme on Sunday, it doesn’t matter who announced the strikes so long as it happened. He added that the announcement is better with the Americans since it was carried out by them, and they have better knowledge of the specifics.

THE ISREALI ANGLE AND INVOLVEMENT

One of the most dangerous angles of the American airstrikes in Nigeria is the direct or remote involvement of the Israeli government.

It could be recalled, though no one seems to be connecting the dots, that barely 24 hours before the American airstrikes, Jerusalem, a hundred percent allied of Washington has lean heavily on the America’s side in its condemnation of the ‘Christian genocide’ in Nigeria.

The Isreali Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, in a Christmas message message, has condemned the alleged genocide, and issued a stern warning to Islamic cells and jihadists perpetrating terrorism across the world, especially in Nigeria, saying it must stop.

“The persecution of Christians or members of any religion cannot and must not be tolerated, and Muslim militant displacement and attacks against Christians in Nigeria, that too must end, and it must end now,” Netanyahu warned.

The Israeli leader, who is hell bent on exterminating Hamas, criticised the global persecution of Christians, citing the Middle Eastern countries of Iraq, Syria, Lebanon and Turkey.

It is worthy of note that Netanyahu’s statement makes Israel the first and only country to publicly support the United States Presidnet Doanld Trump on his claim of a “Christian persecution” in Nigeria.

So why Netanyahu made the statement, and it was followed by military response remains shrouded in mystery, making analysts wondered the relationship between Netanyahu’s statement and Trump’s immediately military response. Both countries have e collaborated heavily in the fight against Hamas in Palestine and other areas of mutual interest.

Observers and analysts have said that possible involvement of the Israeli government could spell a different narration to the entire conversation, and sponsor in detail to quest to discover Trump and America’s real interest in Nigeria beyond helping the country to battle its multiple armed groups, ‘including at least two affiliated with IS, an offshoot of the Boko Haram extremist group known as the Islamic State West Africa Province in the northeast, and the less-known Lakurawa group prominent in the northwestern states, where the gangs use large swathes of forests as hideouts’.

And now, Nigeria’s President, Bola Tinubu, on Sunday departed the country for ‘Europe’.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Headline

Transformation College Celebrates Excellence at Its 2025 Virtual Graduation Ceremony

Published

on

By

Transformation College of Business and Technology successfully held its 2025 Virtual Graduation Ceremony on Friday, 20 December 2025, marking another milestone in its mission to develop globally competitive professionals across business, technology, and emerging digital fields.

The virtual event brought together graduating students, faculty members, guest speakers, industry leaders, and members of the Transformation College community from different parts of the world. The ceremony served both as a celebration of academic achievement and a reaffirmation of the institution’s commitment to delivering accessible, high-quality professional education.

Graduates were celebrated across a wide range of industry-relevant programmes, reflecting the College’s multidisciplinary approach to skills development. The graduating programmes included the Certificate in English Language and Communication Skills, Diploma in Microsoft Office 365, Diploma in Marketing and Digital Innovation with Google Suite, Certified AI and Automation Specialist, Certified AI Business Analyst, Entrepreneurship and Business Management, as well as Software Application Development and Cybersecurity. Each programme was structured to equip learners with practical competencies, global best practices, and career-ready skills aligned with the demands of the modern workplace.

The ceremony opened with welcome addresses and institutional reflections from the College’s leadership, who highlighted the academic journey of the graduating cohort. Speakers commended the resilience, discipline, and commitment demonstrated by the students throughout their training, particularly as many balanced professional responsibilities alongside intensive learning schedules. The leadership also reaffirmed Transformation College’s founding vision of democratizing access to professional education while empowering learners with skills that translate directly into relevance, value, and employability.

A major highlight of the ceremony was the keynote address delivered by Dr. Dayo Sobowale, Ph.D, Dean of Computer and Information Engineering at the Federal University, Oye-Ekiti. In his address, Dr. Sobowale stressed the importance of continuous learning, ethical practice, and adaptability in an increasingly technology-driven world. He urged graduates to view their certificates not as endpoints, but as foundations for lifelong professional growth and leadership.

The ceremony also featured an industry-focused address by Mr. Wale Adedeji, Chief Executive Officer of Datamellon. Drawing from his experience in entrepreneurship and technology leadership, he challenged the graduates to remain innovative, solution-oriented, and courageous in applying their skills to real-world challenges. He emphasized the growing demand for professionals who can effectively combine technical competence with business insight and integrity.

One of the most anticipated moments of the event was the formal presentation of certificates to graduating students. In line with Transformation College’s tradition, the certification segment celebrated academic effort, personal growth, and professional readiness. Graduates were acknowledged for their perseverance, commitment to learning, and successful completion of programmes designed to meet global professional standards.

Beyond individual accomplishments, the ceremony highlighted the broader impact of Transformation College across Africa and the global professional space. Reflections shared during the event illustrated how the College’s programmes have supported career transitions, enhanced workplace performance, and expanded opportunities for learners from diverse backgrounds.

As the event drew to a close, graduates were formally inducted into the Transformation College alumni community, joining a growing network of professionals positioned to drive innovation, ethical leadership, and sustainable development across various industries.

Founder of Transformation College of Business and Technology, Dr. Orlando Olumide Odejide, said, “Transformation is a deliberate commitment to growth, relevance, and excellence. As our graduates step into the world, this moment marks not an end, but the beginning of a journey to continually evolve, create value, and lead with purpose in an ever-changing global landscape.”

The 2025 Virtual Graduation Ceremony stood as a clear testament to Transformation College of Business and Technology’s continued commitment to excellence, relevance, and empowerment. As the institution expands its offerings in business, technology, artificial intelligence, and professional development, it remains focused on shaping a new generation of skilled, confident, and globally competitive professionals.

Continue Reading

Headline

Tax Law Controversy: National Assembly Orders Re-gazetting

Published

on

By

Amid the ongoing controversy regarding alleged discrepancies in Nigeria’s gazetted tax laws, the National Assembly has ordered the re-gazetting of the tax laws and the issuance of Certified True Copies (CTCs) of the versions duly passed by both chambers.

The legislative arm said this is part of an ongoing institutional review of the legislative process.

Spokesman of the House of Representatives, Akin Rotimi, who disclosed this in a statement on Friday, said that the directive was jointly issued by the President of the Senate, Godswill Akpabio, and the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Abbas Tajudeen, in the interest of clarity, accuracy and the integrity of the legislative record.

According to the House, the Clerk to the National Assembly has been mandated not only to re-gazette the Acts but also to issue Certified True Copies of the authenticated versions passed by the Senate and the House of Representatives.

The laws in question are the Nigeria Tax Act, 2025; the Nigeria Tax Administration Act, 2025; the Joint Revenue Board of Nigeria (Establishment) Act, 2025; and the Nigeria Revenue Service (Establishment) Act, 2025.

The development follows revelations that provisions contained in the gazetted versions of the Acts differ materially from those passed by the National Assembly.

The alarm was first raised by a member of the House of Representatives, Abdulsamad Dasuki, who during a plenary session alleged discrepancies between tax laws passed by the National Assembly and the versions subsequently gazetted and made available to the public.

He said his legislative rights had been breached because the content of the gazetted tax laws did not reflect what lawmakers debated and approved on the floor of the House.

The tax bills were passed by the House in February after months of debates, public hearings, and clause-by-clause consideration, and were later harmonised with the version passed by the Senate.

On 26 June, President Bola Tinubu signed the four bills into law.

Since then, opposition parties and civil society organisations have been calling for investigation into the matter.

This triggered the House to establish a seven-member ad hoc committee to investigate the alleged discrepancies.

The committee is headed by Aliyu Betara, while members include Idris Wase, Sada Soli, Adedeji Faleke, Igariwey Iduma, Fred Agbedi and Babajimi Benson.

Rotimi explained that the move to re-gazette the tax reform laws passed by the National Assembly and to issue Certified True Copies (CTCs) is administrative in nature and intended to ensure that the official records available to the public accurately reflect the legislative decisions of the National Assembly.

He said: “The Ad Hoc Committee, alongside other relevant committees of the National Assembly, working in collaboration with the Management of the National Assembly, is undertaking an institutional review to establish the sequence of events and to identify any factors that may have contributed to the circumstances surrounding the legislative and administrative handling of the Acts.

“This includes a careful examination of any lapses, irregularities, or external interferences, should any be established. The review is being conducted in full conformity with the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, the Acts Authentication Act, Cap. A4, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, the Standing Orders of both Chambers, and established parliamentary practice.

“In the course of this review, and in the interest of clarity, accuracy, and the integrity of the legislative record, the leadership of the National Assembly, under the President of the Senate, Distinguished Senator Godswill Obot Akpabio, GCON, and the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Rt. Hon. Abbas Tajudeen, PhD, GCON, has directed the Clerk to the National Assembly to re-gazette the Acts and issue Certified True Copies of the versions duly passed by both Chambers of the National Assembly.

“This administrative step is intended solely to authenticate and accurately reflect the legislative decisions of the National Assembly.”

He stressed that the review does not imply any defect in the exercise of legislative authority by either chamber, noting that it is strictly confined to institutional processes and procedures.

The statement added that the exercise is being conducted in line with the Constitution, the Acts Authentication Act, the Standing Orders of both chambers and established parliamentary practice, without prejudice to the powers of any other arm or agency of government.

Rotimi added: “This review is strictly confined to institutional processes and procedures. It does not constitute, imply, or concede any defect in the exercise of legislative authority by the House of Representatives or the Senate.

“It is undertaken without prejudice to the powers, functions, or actions of any other arm or agency of government, and without prejudice to any rights, obligations, or legal processes arising under the Constitution or any other applicable law.

“The House of Representatives, under the leadership of the Speaker, Rt. Hon. Abbas Tajudeen, PhD, GCON, remains firmly committed to the principles of constitutionalism, separation of powers, due process, and the supremacy of the rule of law.

“Where procedural or administrative refinements are identified, appropriate corrective measures will be taken in accordance with the law and established parliamentary conventions.”

He urged Nigerians to respectfully allow the National Assembly’s institutional processes to proceed without speculation or conjecture.

“The leadership of the House of Representatives remains committed to transparency, accountability, and the faithful discharge of its constitutional responsibility as custodian of the legislative authority of the Federal Republic of Nigeria,” he added.

Continue Reading

Headline

Petition: Dangote Gets Dec 29 Date to Appear in Person Before ICPC

Published

on

By

The Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) has told Africa’s richest man, Aliko Dangote, to appear personally to adopt his corruption allegation petition.

The business mogul filed a petition before the agency against the former Chief Executive of Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority (NMDPRA), Alhaji Farouk Ahmed, alleging fraud.

The agency said the Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Act, 2000, does not allow proxy representation on criminal matters.

It gave Dangote December 29 deadline to appear before it.

Reports said the anti-graft commission conveyed its decision to Dangote’s lawyer, Dr. Ogwu Onoja (SAN), through a December 24 letter.

Onoja had, on December 22, gone to the ICPC office to adopt the petition.

But in a letter to Onoja by the Chief of Staff to ICPC Chairman, Rouqayya Ibrahim, the commission said it is necessary for Dangote to come in person.

The letter reads in part: “The commission acknowledges the appearance of your good self…, wherein you adopted the petition in respect of the allegations made against Engr. Farouk Ahmed on behalf of your client, Alhaji Aliko Dangote.

“While the commission appreciates your representation, we are constrained to draw your attention to the fact that the matter under investigation is criminal in nature, being conducted pursuant to the provisions of the Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Act, 2000.

“As you are aware, criminal investigations may culminate in criminal proceedings before a court of competent jurisdiction.

“In such circumstances, the statement and personal adoption of the petition by the complainant may be required to be tendered in court as part of the evidentiary process.

“It is, therefore, essential for purposes of procedural integrity and admissibility, that Alhaji Aliko Dangote personally adopts his petition before the commission.

“Accordingly, we respectfully request that you kindly facilitate the appearance of Alhaji Aliko Dangote at the Commission’s Headquarters on 29th December 2025 at 10am, for the purpose of formally adopting his petition. Thank you for your anticipated cooperation.”

Dangote had alleged that Ahmed spent over $7million of public funds on his four children’s education at elite Swiss schools, with fees paid upfront for up to six years.

He alleged: “That Engr Farouk Ahmed spent without evidence of lawful means of income humongous amount of money of over $7million of public funds, for the education of his four children in different schools in Switzerland for a period of six years upfront.”

The cold war between Dangote and the petroleum regulator had resulted in a N100billion suit.

The Dangote Petroleum Refinery and Petrochemicals FZE filed a N100 billion lawsuit at the Federal High Court in Abuja, challenging import licences issued by the Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority (NMDPRA) and others, including the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPCL).

The refinery accused the regulator of granting licences to import refined petroleum products despite domestic production capacity.

It alleged that the action of the regulator violated some sections of the Petroleum Industry Act.

But the suit, FHC/ABJ/CS/1324/2024, was discontinued in July by Dangote’s lawyers.

ICPC’s petition guidelines say: “Any person anywhere in the world may make a complaint against any other person (corporate or non-corporate) in Nigeria, where reasonable grounds exist for suspecting that such a person has conspired to commit or attempted to commit or has committed an offence under the Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Act 2000.

Continue Reading

Trending