Featured
How Innocent Taxi Driver Was Sentenced to Death + Evidence That Kept Him Behind Bars for 13 years
Published
1 year agoon
By
Eric
By Hezekiah Deboboye Olujobi
“I am not an armed robber, I am a taxi driver, I left home in the morning of 28/2/2011 for my daily survival, my car broke down and I was arrested by the members of OPC who said armed robbers came to robbed in that vicinity last night, that was how I was arrested and never return to my family again”
He was sentenced to death based on his confessional statement and claimed innocence on the allegations of armed robbery. He denied the confessional statement. It was obvious from the record that the police lied in his evidence against him. No other police officer corroborated his evidence. A robbery occurred within 2 hours in the same vicinity against PW 1 and PW 2. No evidence to corroborate PW 1 and PW 2’s evidence regarding the separate robberies on that day. Both PW 1, PW 2, PW 3 & PW 4 provided contradictory evidence. In this case there are 2 civilians and 2 police. The police officer at the local station where the incidence happened and the police officer at Eleweran SCID. Based on the suspect’s confessional statement, he was sentenced to death by the Court.
The defendant appealed against the judgment to the Court of Appeal but the appeal failed. While an appeal was filed with the Supreme Court, the appellant sought our intervention at the Centre for Justice Mercy and Reconciliation. While reading through the proceedings here are my findings and analysis of the case.
In my opinion, the appellant did not deserve to be in prison for 24 hours. We obtained both the judgement of the trial court and the Court of appeal for review and analysis.
According to section 135(2) of the Evidence Act, 2011, “the burden of proving that any person has been guilty of a crime or wrongful act is, subject to Section 139 of this Act, on the person who asserts it, whether the commission of such act is or is not directly in issue in the action.” This provision has been applied in numerous cases by the Supreme Court, including the case of JUBRIL v. FRN (2020) 4 NWLR (Pt. 1714) @ 315 Paras. D-F, where the Apex Court stated thus:
“By the provisions of section 135 (1) of the Evidence Act 2011, to secure a conviction in a criminal charge, the burden is on the prosecution to establish the guilt of the accused person beyond reasonable doubt.”
Courts have consistently held that the existence of certain situations can show reasonable doubt in the case of a prosecution. These situations include:
1. When the prosecution could not prove all the essential elements/ingredients of the offense, and
2. Where evidence adduced in the case is consistent with the guilt of the accused person as well as his innocence.
It is important to note that the prosecution’s case theory, as contained in both statements and oral testimonies of PW1, PW2, PW3, and PW4 concerning the Defendant- Adeyemi Faleye, which the prosecution is relying on, are inconsistent and at variance with each other’s testimonies and also at variance with the oral testimony of the DW1 in court during trial.
While it is not our duty as an Organization to prove the innocence of an accused person or criticize the judgment of the court, in cases where an appellant persistently claims innocence, we offer our listening ears. Without sentiment, we carry out our investigation by reviewing the judgment and the court processes to ascertain the possibility of telling the truth or lying.
This Organization visited the appellant in Kirikiri Maximum Custodial Centre, where he maintained his innocence on the allegation he was convicted on. We shall focus our evaluation on four cardinal points as follows:
1. The way of arrest of the accused and how he was pinned into this crime
2. The statement made by the PW1, PW2, PW3 and PW4 witnesses in this case
3. The confessional statement of the appellant and who made it?
4. The decision of court in sentencing the accused to death
It is evident that there were two separate robbery incidents on 27/2/2011, occurring at approximately 8 pm and 10 pm. The complainants- PW1 and PW2 in these cases were the owners of the two petrol stations. The PW3 and PW4 were the investigation police officers in Idiroko and Eleweran Abeokuta Police Stations where the complaints were lodged.
THE WAY OF ARREST: The appellant was connected with the robbery incidents through his arrest on 28/2/2011 at around 8:30 am by three members of the OPC at Mede area enrooted from Aferiku to Idiroko when his vehicle broke down. However, there are conflicting accounts of the appellant’s arrest provided by PW1, PW2, PW3 and the appellant himself.
Regarding the timing of the robbery incidents, PW1 stated that the first incident occurred at about 8 pm on 27/2/2011, while PW2 claimed that it happened before 10 pm on the same day at different places. The appellant’s defense counsel, on pages 18 to 20 of the appellant’s brief of argument, presented evidence that PW1 was informed by the police on 28/2/2011 that vigilantes had arrested some robbers, which was corroborated by PW2’s testimony that the accused person was brought to the station by the vigilantes.
The conflicting accounts raise questions about who actually arrested the defendant and where the arrest took place. The appellant repeatedly stated that he was arrested by the three members of the OPC vigilante by the roadside beside his car at around 8:30 am at Mede, while his car had broken down and he was waiting for his mechanic as he was never arrested at the scene of the crime on the day of the incidence.
However, PW1 and PW2’s evidence suggested that the vigilantes were responsible for the appellant’s arrest on 28/2/2011. The evidence of the police officer at Idiroko is also crucial in this case, as police evidence is considered sacred in the temple of justice. The judge’s recording of the police officer’s evidence will be essential in determining the facts of the case and ensuring justice is served. And I quote below:
“The PW3 said he was in the station at about 1310 (meaning about 3.10 am in the dead of night) when a case of Conspiracy and Armed Robbery was reported by the PW1. After that, a team of police investigators led by Inspector Lawal Hassan went on the trail of the armed robbers. He said that upon being sighted, the armed robber opened fire on him and that during the exchange of gunfire, one of the robbers was shot dead, while the appellant was arrested at the scene.”
How would you describe the evidence of this police officer who lied recklessly to the court, claiming that the prosecution witnesses had brought their report at 3.10 a.m. and that he saw the armed robbers at gunpoint and killed one of them at the exchange of gunfire? No other police officer corroborated his claim from the Idiroko police station and the evidence is at variance with where the appellant was arrested or the date of his arrest. Also, while describing the scene where the armed robber was arrested, he said about 100 meters to the scene of crime. This is unbelievable. That armed robbers will go for an operation and still remain in that environment for good 12 hours?
PW4 who was also a police officer from Eleweran where the case was transferred has this to say. PW4’s testimony under oath: Under cross-examination [page 75 of the record], PW4 testified as follows:
The exact date that the incident happened was 28th February 2011”. PW4 also stated thus [page 75 of the record]: “The incident happened in the morning at about 01:00 hours, at another point he said he could not ascertain the date because he lost his diary” The PW4 went ahead and said “I visited the scene of crime. The accused person was arrested beside a church close to the scene of crime where Gbenga aka Lakor a member of the gang was short dead during the robbery operation.
The interesting part of the evidence given was that none of the witnesses- PW1 and PW2 mentioned that someone was shot dead during the operation. It was also cleared that the robbery incidence took place on 27/2/2011 and the witnesses met the appellant in the station on 28/2/2011, and none of them mentioned about someone being shot dead during the operation after the complaint was lodged.
There is no any IOTA of truth in the evidence of both PW3 and PW4. No iota of truth I repeated. The fact being that you stated that a robbery incidence happened on the 27/2/2011 between 8pm and 10 pm and you still find the culprit on the scene of crime, while one was shot dead when the other was captured alive?
From the record of the court also, it is easy to surmise the following versions from the prosecution witnesses:
a) PW1- The robbery happened on 27/2/2011 at about 8pm.
b) PW2- The robbery happened on 27/2/2011 before 10pm.
c) PW3- The robbery was reported by PW1 on 28-02-2011 at about 0310hours.
d) PW4 – The exact date that the incident happened was 28 February 2011 in the morning at about 0100 hours.
The four disparate versions of events above raise a doubt in the case of the prosecution, which ought to have been resolved in the Appellant’s favour as enunciated by the Supreme Court in UGBOJI v. STATE (2017) LPELR-43427(SC), Per Eko, J.S.C., Pp. 54-55, paras. E-A:
“The elementary rule in our adversarial jurisprudence or in the administration of criminal justice is; where there exists any doubt in the case of the prosecution, such doubt must be resolved in favor of the accused person…” See also IGBIKIS v. STATE (2017) LPELR-41667(SC).
How credible are the evidence of the PW1 who claimed that his petrol station was robbed at 8:00 pm without any of the petrol attendants or people in that vicinity testifying that there was a robbery incident at that time in his Petrol Station? The same question goes for the PW2 who was robbed before 10pm at his Petrol Station; nobody came forward to support the claim.
In our humble opinion and observation from a layman’s point of view, the totality of the evidence before the court has not established the charge against Adeyemi Faleye beyond a reasonable doubt. We are not even sure if there was a robbery incident on that day. The OPC vigilante who arrested the appellant did not even show up during the trial.
We further submit that strong suspicion of the appellant based on hearsay evidence of the PW1, PW2, PW3 and PW4 without more against them from the investigative officers pinning him to the scene of the crime 12 hours after the robbery incident, could never be true but far from justice to prove any crime against the appellant in this case.
The questions that need to be clearly answer are:
• Was the appellant arrested at the scene of the crime? NO!
• Were the police officers the ones that arrested the appellant? NO!
Thus, if the evidence of the police officers is not credible to hold water, how did the judge conclude to convict the appellant because he denied his confessional statement?
THE CONFESSIONAL STATEMENT: How does the confessional statement sound like?
“On Sunday 27th February 2011 at about 1200 midnight I slept at the house of Aragberi called Ifajimi Agbotifayo when Lakur came to wake me up and they instructed me to get on the motorcycle brought by them. They said they are going somewhere that they may likely want to make mistake by missing the road that I should lead them. I led them to the Yusuf filling station… ”
How true is the confessional statement? From the above, it stands to reason that the only time the Appellant could have led others to the robbery was after 12 mid-night of 27tn February, 2011; that is sometime in the wee hours of 28h February, 2011.
However, PW1 during his cross-examination [page 51 of the record] testified under oath that the incident happened around 8:00pm and that tallies with his evidence-in-chief [at page 50 of the record] that the incident occurred on 27/2/2011 at about 8:00pm.
PW2, also, in his evidence-in-chief [page 51 of the record] stated as follows: “On 27/2/2011, we were in our filling station that is Samuraf Filling Station along Omotedo Road at Ajegunle, before 10:00pn the Attendants were attending to the customers when the robbery incidence happened.
But in the so-called confessional statement the appellant said “I led them to the Yusuf filling station at about 1.00am? How true is the confessional statement?
WHO MADE THAT CONFESSIONAL STATEMENT? PW3 and PW4, admitted that they ‘graciously’ wrote the confessional statements for him on the spurious excuse that the appellant authorized them to write for him (page 75 of the Record].
PW4 said that the appellant made the statement to him in English Language [page 63 of the record] and in another breadth told the court that the appellant spoke to him in both English and Yoruba language and he recorded it in English Language [page 75 of the record]. It is curious and suspicious that the purported authority for PW4 to write the appellant’s statement was written by PW4, not the person who gave him the authority.
ON THE CHARGE OF CONSPIRACY: Who are the people charged along with the appellant at the initial stage?
“At the police station, the police officers asked me to take them to my mechanic, and I led the police to my mechanic. That was how my mechanic was arrested.
I did not know the three other people in this case. We were charged to the Magistrate Court at Ipokia. At the Magistrate Court, the three of them were granted bail, including my mechanic, while one of them was struck out for no case to answer.
We hereby, in conclusion respectfully submit this humble appeal on behalf of Mr. Adeyemi Faleye, with the utmost humility and in the interest of justice and humanity. We urge the Board to re-examine the case from the perspective of inconsistent and unclear evidence, particularly regarding the appellant’s arrest. It is evident that the prosecution’s case against Adeyemi Faleye is based on a fabricated story and unfounded suspicions, aimed at implicating him in a crime he did not commit.
The appellant told us that while his car broke down at Mede, he was arrested by the vigilantes. Which means that Adeyemi Faleye’s arrest was a mere suspicion by the OPC Vigilantes.
It is noteworthy that in criminal cases, the burden of proof lies with the prosecution to prove the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Suspicion alone is not enough to secure a conviction; rather, the prosecution must present sufficient evidence to meet the standard of proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
As often stated in judicial quote “Suspicion of the defendant, no matter how strong is not a substitute of proof beyond reasonable doubt. See NWALU v. STATE (2018) 14 NWLR (Pt. 1638) Page 178, Paras C-D. The law is clear as stated in the case of MAJOR HAMZA AL-MUSTAPHA v. THE STATE (2013) LPELR-20995 (CA) where the Court held that:
” No matter the Suspicion and its degree, no matter the grievance or grouse, no matter the height of conjecture, no matter the depth of hatred, even the strongest SUSPICION can never be found convicted in law. The Prosecution must prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. T his is a fundamental aspect of the criminal justice system and ensures that individuals are not wrongfully convicted based on mere suspicion.
Our organization has presented the case of Adeyemi Faleye to the Ogun State Board of Mercy to judiciously exercise its constitutional power and recommend to the Executive Governor of Ogun State, His Excellency, Prince Dapo Abiodun, as recorded on page 107 of the record of the judgment, where the presiding judge recommended the Governor to exercise the power of the prerogative of mercy in favor of Mr. Adeyemi Faleye, for his remorseful demeanor during the trial, to kindly grant Adeyemi Faleye total freedom in the upcoming amnesty exercise according to the constitutional power confided on him.
In cases of wrongful conviction, there can be multiple factors and individuals who may share responsibility. It is important to conduct a thorough investigation to determine the specific circumstances that led to the wrongful conviction.
According to the letter of Adeyemi Faleye to the CJMR “The Bible says “Whoever shall cover his sin shall not prosper” I am begging the team of the Centre for Justice Mercy and Reconciliation, CJMR and the true lover of Justice in Nigeria to come to my rescue from this injustice. Over this case, my wife has abandoned me for another man. From age 3 my mother left my father to another man, I was the only child of my mother in my father’s house. I am from a polygamous family, I have nobody and no money to seek for Justice further. I did not rob anybody. The father of twins said “On the night of 27/282/2011 I slept with my wife in my house, on the morning of 28/2/2011 I left home to go and struggle for survival before I ended up in the prison. I shall be grateful if you can assist me and rescue my life from this injustice. I shall be grateful at your visit to me at Kirikiri Custodial Centre where I can explain full details of my story to you”
Should we keep quiet on his crying for justice?
This is not an attempt to ridicule our judicial system but to point out how our judges are being misled everyday to misapply justice to the wrong person. When justice is lost, there is need to find it and when it is found there is need to restore it to the rightful owner. Thus, my concept of restorative justice is the absent of justice. You can only restore something back to its original position when it is found in the wrong position.
Prov 31:8-9. Speak up for those who cannot speak for themselves,
for the rights of all who are destitute. Speak up and judge fairly;
defend the rights of the poor and needy.”
Don’t keep quiet.
Reach out to us on phone calls or whatsapp: 08025782527 / 08030488093
Visit our website at www.cjmr.com.ng
Donate to our cause 1012189729, Zenith Bank, 2013454021 First Bank : Name: Centre for Justice Mercy and Reconciliation.
Related
You may like
Featured
Ribadu’s Office Denies Arming Miyetti Allah in Kwara
Published
6 hours agoon
December 19, 2025By
Eric
The National Counter Terrorism Centre (NCTC), under the office of the National Security Adviser Mallam Nuhu Ribadu, has refuted claims that it armed members of the Miyetti Allah group for counter-terrorism operations in Kwara State.
The Head of Strategic Communication at NCTC, Mr. Michael Abu, issued the rebuttal on Wednesday in Abuja.
Abu described the reports circulated by some online platforms as false and misleading, saying they misrepresented ongoing security operations in forested areas of the state.
He said that in line with the Terrorism Prevention and Prohibition Act, 2022, it continued to coordinate and support law enforcement, security and intelligence agencies in countering all forms of terrorism across the country.
NCTC spokesman explained that Nigeria’s counter-terrorism efforts guided by the National Counter Terrorism Strategy (NACTEST), involved the deployment of hybrid forces comprising regular security personnel and trained auxiliaries such as hunters and vigilante elements, particularly in difficult terrains.
According to him, the hybrid approach, which was previously deployed with the Civilian Joint Task Force in the North-East, is currently being applied in parts of the North-West and North-Central, including Kwara State, and has recorded several successes against banditry and other criminal activities.
He stressed that the Federal government was not conducting kinetic operations with any socio-cultural group, adding that claims that the Office of the National Security Adviser provided arms to such organisations are unfounded and should be disregarded.
According to him, all auxiliary personnel involved in hybrid operations were recruited directly by authorised security and intelligence agencies after due diligence, and that all operations were conducted strictly in line with the law and established standard operating procedures.
He urged the media to exercise responsibility by protecting sensitive security information and seeking clarification through designated official spokespersons, while advising the public to ignore unverified reports capable of undermining ongoing operations.
He reaffirmed the centre’s commitment to transparency and stakeholder engagement to deepen public understanding of Nigeria’s counter-terrorism efforts.
Related
Featured
Respite As Court Stops Police, IGP from Enforcing Tinted Glass Permit Nationwide
Published
9 hours agoon
December 19, 2025By
Eric
A Delta State Court sitting in Orerokpe has restrained the Inspector General of Police (IGP) and the Nigeria Police Force from resuming the enforcement of the tinted glass permit policy nationwide.
Justice Joe Egwu, while ruling on a motion ex-parte in a suit marked HOR/FHR/M/31/2025 filed by Isreal Joe against the IGP and two others, through his counsel, Mr. Kunle Edun (SAN), who led other lawyers, restrained, stopped and barred the respondents from resuming the enforcement of the tinted glass permit policy nationwide.
The order was sequel to the announcement by the Nigeria Police of its decision to resume the tinted glass permit enforcement on January 2, 2026.
Aside from the IGP, the court also restrained the Nigeria Police Force and the Commissioner of Police, Delta State Police Command, from resuming the enforcement of the tinted glass permit policy nationwide.
Justice Egwu also barred the police from harassing, arresting, detaining or extorting citizens and motorists on account of the said policy, pending the hearing and determination of the substantive suit.
The case has also reignited a dispute between the Nigeria Police and the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA). The NBA has maintained that the matter remains before the courts and warned that enforcement could constitute contempt.
The association said a suit challenging the constitutionality of the policy had been filed at the Federal High Court, Abuja, and that a judgment had been reserved following the conclusion of hearings.
The NBA further cited a Federal High Court order in Warri directing parties to maintain the status quo pending an interlocutory injunction. The association accused the police of disregarding the rule of law and urged President Bola Tinubu to intervene. “Any contrary executive action amounts to overreaching the Court and undermines the rule of law,” NBA President Mazi Afam Osigwe (SAN) said.
The police, through Force Public Relations Officer CSP Benjamin Hundeyin, insisted that no court order barred enforcement and defended its planned resumption on grounds of public security. Hundeyin noted a rise in crimes facilitated by vehicles with unauthorised tinted glass, citing incidents ranging from armed robbery to kidnapping.
“The Inspector-General of Police, out of respect and understanding, temporarily suspended enforcement to give Nigerians additional time to regularise their tinted glass permits.
That decision was not based on any court order but was a discretionary move to accommodate public concerns,” he said.
The announcement prompted warnings from the NBA that enforcement could trigger committal proceedings against the IGP and the Force spokesperson. The police, however, maintained that enforcement continues until directed otherwise by a court, highlighting recent incidents in which occupants of vehicles with tinted glass allegedly attacked officers.
The ruling by the Delta State High Court now legally bars the police from implementing the tinted glass permit policy nationwide while litigation on the policy’s constitutionality continues.
Related
Featured
Operation Wetie of the Western Region in Sweet Retrospect: Its Metaphors and Lessons
Published
11 hours agoon
December 19, 2025By
Eric
By Hon. Femi Kehinde
History, it has been said, is a reflection seen through the eyes of others into events of the past.
The world rotates around its history, and the universality of its lessons and constancy. Like beauty, history is in the eyes of the beholder.
In the old Western Region, attempts were made to stifle democracy, and give the region a government she did not vote for; that really drove the people wild, and justifiably so.
The disturbance was confined to the floor of the House; it did not extend to other parts of the city, and all other parts of the region were completely at peace and were not in the least aware of what was happening in the House of Assembly, until they heard the broadcast of the Prime Minister from Lagos.
The trail that started from the crisis in the Action Group went on to cause at the federal level, a major crisis between the coalition partners that destabilized the Western Region, ultimately leading to the intervention of the military and the collapse of the First Republic. The ramifications and scars of that crisis are still visible today.
The crisis in the Action Group was in retrospect, a watershed in the course of Nigeria’s journey to nationhood. All countries that became Nation-states have their watersheds, which at the time they were happening looked insignificant. Their significance is usually realized long after they have happened. The storming of the Bastilles in France was a spontaneous reaction to the excesses of the monarch and his wife, but it led to a revolution. This revolution, which caused the death of Louis the sixteenth and his wife – Marie Antoinette.
The Action Group crisis which started as a localized brawl, catalyzed into a bloody civil war and much more. During the debate on the motion which was to authorize the state of emergency in the western region, Chief Anthony Enahoro warned against setting in motion a chain of events, the end of which nobody could see or desire. What a prediction! So prophetic, so profound and so historic. He was not taken seriously then. The protagonist of the state of emergency could not see through their noses. They forgot to take to heart the lessons of history.
Ibadan is anything but far away, in fact below 100 miles to Lagos. Just about three years later, not only the prime minister, but two regional premiers, several civilians and military leaders lost their lives. Had the warning of Chief Anthony Enahoro been heeded and had there been no precipitous rush to declare state of emergency in the region, the course of Nigerian history might have been different and certainly less bloody.
A French philosopher, Paul Valery said “History is the science of things which do not repeat themselves”. History does not repeat itself. It is fools who are forced by their folly to repeat history.
The West was demonized and the plot to create disorder was hatched to give a pretext to take over running of the government and use that period to install a puppet government.
Nigeria has always suffered for lack of courage and conviction on the part of those whose duty it is to advise and counsel. Sycophancy, spinelessness, and lack of moral courage, intellectual dishonesty in the ivory tower are commonplace characteristics in all echelons of life in the country and the leadership has to be acutely focused, courageous and discerning not to fall victim.
The leaders did have moments to pause and reflects on the catastrophe they were about to unleash on themselves, but they failed to utilize these opportunities because they were blinded by their own self-interest and personal aggrandizement. They walked into the trap set for them with their eyes wide open. It was a tragedy of errors.
The Western Region, gradually going into the abyss, formally inaugurated the Egbe Omo Olofin, as against the well known Egbe Omo Oduduwa at the Mapo hall, Ibadan. Very prominent dignitaries and first class Yoruba Obas, Oba Akran, Oba Olagbegi, Oba Gbadegbo, the Alake of Egba Land, Oba Abimbola, the Oluwo of Iwo, were very prominent. Chief S.L.A Akintola and the highly partisan Chief Justice of the Federation- Justice Adetokunbo Ademola were the host. The leader of the opposition, Alhaji D.S Adegbenro, a man with few words, regarded these developments as “a sad mistake”. It should be well noted that the Supreme Court of Chief Justice Adetokunbo Ademola had in 1964 affirmed the treasonable felony jail sentence imposed on Obafemi Awolowo by Justice George Sodeinde Sowemimo in 1963.
The Federal Cabinet in its super belief of being all in all, accepted the census result and asked NCNC members, unwilling to accept the result to resign.
The Ogunde Concert Party organized a theatre tour of the Western Region, to show Yoruba Ronu, its new play from March 28 to April 25, 1964. The concert was to kick off at Ile-Ife and thereafter, move to Abeokuta, Ibadan, Oyo, Owo, Shagamu, Ilesha Ikare, Oka, Osogbo, Gbongan, Iwo, Ado-Ekiti, Ijebu Ode. In the midst of this Concert Tour, the epic play, Yoruba Ronu, was banned by the Government of the Western Region and thus, another gradual descent into anarchy.
Earlier, on the 27th of March, 1964, Kola Balogun lost his seat as a special member of the House of Chiefs, following the withdrawal of recognition of his Chieftaincy title as Jagun of Otan Ayegbaju, by the NNDP Government of the Western Region. Kola Balogun had lost face with the Akintola Government. The electioneering campaign towards the 1965 election had started. The Premier, Samuel Ladoke, was on tour of Ijesha Division on Saturday, the 4th of April, 1964. At Ilesha, in front of Ilesha Grammar School, the Premier and his entourage were booed by students of Ilesha Grammar School, perhaps with the encouragement of their principal – Rev. Josiah Akinyemi, a staunch member of the Action Group and father of Prof. Bolaji Akinyemi.
Rev. Akinyemi was the following morning, transferred to Oyo to replace Bishop Seth Kale as Principal of St. Andrews College, Oyo. An NNDP Chieftain in llesha and a member of the Western House of Assembly- Barrister Oladiran Olaitan, had his car severely damaged and in an attempt to escape the onslaught, bottles and stones were thrown at him.
Ilesha Grammar School was eventually shut down and was only reopened after the intervention of prominent Ilesha elites, like Chief S.T Adelegan, the Deputy Speaker of the House of Assembly and also Principal of Ipetu-ljesha Grammar School, the Attorney-General, Chief Olowofoyeku and the Governor, Sir Odeleye Fadahunsi.
Also in April, 1964, a scion of the Agbaje Family, Mojeed Agbaje, was removed as Minister for Information and the Odemo of Isara, Oba Samuel Akisanya, a first class Oba, was removed as a member of the House of Chiefs.
On the 8th of June, 1964, Chief SLA Akintola, the Premier, was driving to Mapo hall, when a pregnant woman hopped her head out of the crowd and shouted, “SLA OLE! SLA THIEF!” The visibly disturbed Premier, ordered his driver to detain the woman, who was put in the Land Rover that carried the Premier’s Body guards. The accused, Kehinde Arowolo, a native of Ikenne, was charged before the Ibadan Magistrate Court for conduct likely to disturb public peace. The accused pleaded not guilty, and she denied the charge. The case was subsequently adjourned to the 4th of November, 1964.
Alhaji Busari Obisesan for the defence said, “don’t forget to bring Chief Akintola to court as his evidence would be vital to the case!” What an audacious statement.
Around this period, an Oba in one of the Ijebu towns was burnt to ashes for being sympathetic towards Akintola’s cause. Ayo Rosiji, an Akintola apologist in July 1964, had his car stoned at a car park in Marina Lagos. His confidant in his constituency, Shittu Bamidele, had also been killed by thugs, who drove a six-inch nail through his forehead. Rosiji eventually lost the Federal Election in 1964.
When there is a quarrel, even ordinary songs would have added meanings and political songs, drums, its coinages and interpretations were now being stronger than even bazooka guns. To Awolowo’s loyalist, the popular sing song was “Se lo lo ko ogbon wa o hee, Se lo lo ko ogbon wa haa, Awolowo, baba layinka i.e. Awolowo has gone to the Prison to be fortified. Interestingly, Awolowo had no child by the name Layinka.
The Federal General Election of 1964 conducted by E. E. Esua as Federal Electoral Commissioner had showed that the Government had lost control of the Western Region, but it also introduced violence throughout the electioneering campaign, arson and assault featured throughout the election. It was a precursor of what was to be expected at the Regional General Elections coming up in 1965.
In some towns and communities, arson visited upon dwelling houses, and public buildings were also added to public roasting of government supporters in the so called “operation weti e”.
The petrol poured on human beings, and such individuals were left to be burnt to death. Indeed, law and order had broken down and perhaps irretrievably and yet, NNDP was declared the winner of a massively rigged general election and his leader, was called upon by the Governor of the Western Region, Sir Odeleye Fadahunsi to form the new government.
Undoubtedly, the region was in an uproar and tumoil. Security had broken down and no one was safe on the road. There were several unofficial road blocks, everywhere and the high level of fear, indignation and security was heightened. When the Chief Justice of the Federation, Sir Adetokunbo Ademola was manhandled on the road between Abeokuta and Lagos, the gravity of the situation became very apparent to all. It became urgent that something must be done to restore law and order to the Western Region. The NNDP was a member of the COALITION – the Nigerian National Alliance (NNA), which it had formed with the ruling NPC and so it was difficult for the Federal Government to intervene to remove a regional Government formed by its surrogate, the NNDP. Yet, something must be done.
The events in the Western Region was certainly laying the foundation to the apocalypse, that was to engulf the country. The Premier of the Eastern Region, Dr. Michael Okpara told his counterpart in the Western Region, Chief SLA Akintola, that he was coming on a visit to Ibadan. SLA Akintola told him he would not be welcome, because he could not guarantee his safety.
The visit took place nevertheless, and as an act of defiance, Premier Michael Okpara still went ahead to visit the Premier at the Premier’s lodge, Iyaganku, Ibadan. The host Premier, SLA Akintola, was nowhere to be found. Michael Okpara nonetheless, signed the visitors register and left.
It was an irony of circumstance, that Premier Ladoke Akintola, who in 1962 was prepared to defile his Party, to welcome a Northern Premier and aristocrat, on the grounds of protocol and hospitality, could not do the same thing for the Premier of the Eastern Region, who was his ally not too long ago. It would be recalled that Okpara had now joined forces with the Action Group, led by Chief (Mrs) H.I.D Awolowo and Alhaji D.S Adegbenro to form UPGA.
In the north, in the west, and in the mid-west, all was confusion. A team of lawyers sent to northern Nigeria by the United Progressive Grand Alliance (UPGA) for the purpose of looking after the legal interest of AG members was not allowed to function.
In the Western Region, trenches were dug, all in order to prevent political opponent the freedom of expression and movement. In October 1965, the Western Region went to the polls to elect a new House of Assembly, the first regional election since the Action Group crisis, an opportunity for Chief Akintola to test his popularity.
The conduct of the election caused wide spread anger which resulted in so much incidence of arson, murder, rioting and general insecurity that the army was sent to the region to maintain law and order. More than 2000 people were killed during and after the election.
After winning the 1965 election, Samuel Ladoke Akintola was called by the governor, Sir Odeleye Fadahunsi to form the new government in October 1965. His taped recorded acceptance speech and message to the people of western region to be rebroadcast by the Nigerian broadcasting corporation (NBC) had been removed and replaced with another recorded message by a mystery gunman who had stepped into the studio and made his own broadcast, denouncing Akintola. This popular gunman was later alleged to be a popular playwright, Wole Soyinka.
On the 15th of October, the newsroom of the Nigerian Broadcasting Corporation (NBC) was more fortified than ever. It was a fortress which was armed to the teeth. In the newsroom was a cubicle where the whole activity normally took place. That evening, the occupants of the cubicle, apart from the leader of the crew were Lajide Ishola, Stephen Oyewole and John Okungbona. The crew men had in their possession the recording of the speech of the Premier of the western region of Nigeria, Chief Ladoke Akintola, which had earlier been recorded at the premier’s lodge at lyaganku. The recordings which contained the message of the premier were made in both English and Yoruba. The premier had finished with the recording a few minutes before 7 o’clock in the evening and he was looking forward to listening to his speech which he had regarded as a masterpiece that will explain the situation of things in the western region.
At about quarter past 7 in the evening, Oshin breezed in into the studio cubicle with his crew men, taking with him the 2 recorded tapes which contained the premier’s speech i.e. both the English and the Yoruba version. Funnily and interestingly, just as Oshin was about to slot in the first tape, a bearded man appeared at the door, and suddenly from nowhere produced a gun and held it to Oshin’s head. There was an abrupt silence. The gunman, goatee-bearded and unmasked, demanded that the radio technician hand over the two tapes he was holding. Oshin quietly handed over the tapes to him, while the other three men in the cubicle, watched the unfolding drama with apparent shock and disbelief.
The gunman handed a tape over to Oshin and ordered him to play it. For fear of his life, Oshin slotted in the gunman’s tape and played it. The gunman listened to part of the content and quietly disappeared as mysteriously as he had come in. The whole operation was swift, brief, effective and decisive.
Pandemonium broke in as soon as members of the public heard the recording on air. Oshin had apparently run out of the studio and the gunman was nowhere to be found. The other three occupants of the cubicle were arrested and taken to the police station, where they made statements to the effect that they had no clue to who the gunman was. They had a clinical description of what exactly happened and the near unanimity about the description of the unmasked mystery gunman. The mystery gunman was eventually arrested and brought before a newly appointed Judge of the High Court, Justice Kayode Esho, sitting in High Court 6. Justice Esho was a stern, disciplined and incorruptible judge. Before the trial, the Chief Justice of the western region, Justice Adeyinka Morgan called Kayode Esho, and straight to the point said, “I have an assignment for you. It is this very important case of the hold-up of the radio station and the robbery of the premier’s tapes. It is a very sensitive assignment, which I would have undertaken myself, having regard to the importance and sensitivity, but the accused person, Wole Soyinka, is a relation of mine. I have full confidence that you will handle it very well’.
Interestingly, the Chief Justice further said, “by the way” and in a measured tone said “they are already saying you will not be able to jail this man”, Justice Kayode Esho wondered ” who are the “they”, “they” “they”. Who are those that the pronoun “they” represent.
According to Esho, why should those “they” be talking to the Chief Justice? why according to Esho? If the “they” talked to the Chief Justice, should he mention it to me while I was trying such a sensitive case, or even any case, for that matter? I got up, pretending not to have been ruffled by the statement, thanked the Chief Justice again, and left for my chambers.”
On the 26th of October, 1965, i.e exactly two weeks after the general election, Akintola lost his most cherished daughter and confidant, Omodele. Omodele died as a result of an overdose of sleeping pills.
After Omodele’s death, Akintola was beginning to have a second thought about his ability to continue with the crisis, and asked rhetorically “whether the whole warfare was worth it at all”. It was apparent then that Ladoke Akintola was greatly distressed.
According to one of the sentries at the Government house, Mr Olabode, a regional police officer attached to the government’s lodge, the premier was in a state of utter confusion, and after meetings, however late, will still travel to Ogbomoso to sleep, and come back to Ibadan in the morning. The Premier’s driver confided in the young police officer, Olabode, that the premier was fond of this trip, because the late night trip from Ibadan afforded him the opportunity of a thoughtful silence and a deep sleep.
Prince Adewale Kazeem, another known confidant of the Premier, also noticed a premier whose hands were shivering and could no longer append his signature on a straight line. Prince Adewale noticed this again and advised the premier, “Baba, why don’t you resign?” and the soberly premier replied “Adewale, O ti bo, iku lo ma gbeyin eleyi- Adewale, it is too late, it is only death that will end this feud.”
Chief Samuel Ladoke Akintola was in this state of disillusionment when on the 14th of January 1966, he asked his aide, R.A Obaleke, upon resumption of duty to get prepared for a trip to Kaduna. There was a plane already waiting for them at the Ibadan Airport, arranged from Lagos. On the premier’s entourage to Kaduna were Chief Lekan Salami, Alhaji Lamidi Adedibu, R. A. Obaleke, N.A.B Kotoye and a host of others, to meet with the Premier of the Northern Region, Sir Ahmadu Bello. At this meeting at the Premier’s lodge in Kaduna, the two premiers went into a long private session. Before the commencement of the meeting, Premier Ladoke Akintola had given some money to his Personal assistant, R.A Obaleke to buy some books for him at the bookshop.
After a long while, Obaleke came back to still find the two premiers in a very serious dialogue. Obaleke informed the premier of the need to go back to Ibadan in a good time, because there was no night landing facility at the Ibadan Airport. Premier Ladoke Akintola immediately proceeded to the Kaduna airport and was seen off by his host- the Premier of the Northern Region, Sir Ahmadu Bello. On arrival in Ibadan, the Premier and his entourage proceeded to the premier’s lodge. The cook, Effiong, a Calabar man, provided dinner for the premier, before their departure. On the 14th of January 1966, the Premier had earlier told his wife, Faderera to proceed to Ogbomoso to prepare their Ogbomoso residence for a private visit of Emperor Haile Selassie of Ethiopia. In the Premier’s lodge were Yomi, his eldest son and his wife Dupe, and their son, Akinwumi, and Gbolahan Odunjo, Omodele’s son, and the visiting Tokunbo Akintola, who came in on holidays from Eton College London. It will be recalled once again, that the British Prime Minister, Harold Wilson, at the Commonwealth Prime Ministers’ Conference in Lagos in January 1966, warned the host of the conference of an impending military insurrection and offered the Prime Minister, Tafawa Balewa, asylum in one of the British frigates on the Atlantic water.
The Prime Minister rebuffed this intelligence report and Akintola’s report, fears and apprehensions, as mere hearsay and unfounded.
In the early hours of January 15, at about 2am, and as predicted, the army struck like a thief in the night. The army mobilized from the Alamala Abeokuta Garrison of the Nigerian Army. It was led by Captain Nwobosi, to effect a change of government in the Western Region.
The Military officers after picking Deputy Premier, Fani Kayode, moved to the Premier’s Lodge. At the Premier’s lodge, with their Military trucks, they forcibly entered the lodge. The head of sentries/Police security, Chief Inspector Sokunbi, an Ijebu man, immediately put off the flood light and was chased by the soldiers. The officer manning the back of the premier’s lodge, Police Corporal Bernard Olabode, a native of Gbongan, was equally chased, but was not discovered inside the drainage where he hid.
The Military officers, immediately put off the electricity supply to the Premier’s lodge. The officer from the ministry of works, posted to the Premier’s lodge, and whose responsibility was maintenance of the two generators at the Premier’s lodge, thought it was a power outage and immediately went to put on the manual generator, since the automatic generator could not come up immediately after the power outage. He was shot on the forehead by one of the officers and he died instantly.
The leader of the Military officers, shouted the name of the Premier, “Akintola come out you are under house arrest.” They also asked his Deputy, already in their custody, to call him, “Sir, Ladoke Akintola, it is me Fani Kayode please come out.” After hearing this voice, the Premier who had immediately upon the arrival of the army officers moved his family through the walkway from the official residence, to his office in the Premier’s lodge, knew there was real danger.
A maid of one of his children, started crying saying “E jo woooo E jo woooo” meaning “please please.” The outcry of this maid exposed the location of the Premier. There was then a gunshot from the Premier to the rampaging soldiers.
According to the Police Officer, Bernard Olabode, in his hiding location he saw bullet shots going towards the Premier’s Office. One of the shots, hit the Premier on the wrist and the Officers were still insisting that he must come out of hiding. They had promised to finish the entire family.
For the Safety of his children, the Are Ona kankanfo of Yoruba land had no choice, but to come down. He was instantly arrested by the soldiers. The leader of the group according to PC Olabode, asked Fani Kayode to identify the Premier. Apparently, they didn’t even know him. Fani Power identified him as the Premier.
According to Olabode, two Officers were placed on his right and left hand, as if facing a firing squad and volley of bullets were hurled at him. The first shot hit the Premier on his forehead, some on his chest and later the Premier gave up.
When he fell down, the leader of the group placed his leg on the Premiers forehead and asked some of his soldiers to rain further bullets on the lying Premier. The group leader, speaking in various languages, said according to Olabode, “he is a juju man, perforate him further with bullets” and thus the end of Are-Ona Kankanfo, who had fought a bitter struggle with his tongue, pen and strength.
The army had also arrested Lt. Col Largemma of the Ibadan Garrison and killed him. Col. Largemma was very close to the Premier of the Western Region, and also Premier of Northern Region. The Federal Brigade of Guards Commander in Lagos, was also killed. Major Okafor had ordered the abduction and eventual murder of the Prime Minister, Tafawa Balewa, the Minister of Finance, Okotie-Eboh, whilst Major Chukwuma Nzeogwu, also invaded the Premier’s lodge in Kaduna and killed Sir Ahmadu Bello, one of his wives, Hafsat and some Military Officers, like Brigadier Ademulegun, Col. Ralph Sodeinde and several other officers and thus the end of Civil Government in Nigeria and the beginning of Military interregnum, that did not end effectively until the 29th of May 1999, when another Military man and former Head of State, Olusegun Obasanjo, became President of the Civilian Government.
In retrospect, the state of emergency on the Western Region was declared on the 29th of May 1962 by the Federal Government of Prime Minister Tafawa Balewa. No wonder, George Santyana rightly said- “those who do not know history are doomed to repeat its failures”. The “operation weti e” of Western Region certainly left its metaphors and lessons for the discerning minds!
Hon. (Barr.) Femi Kehinde is the
Principal Partner, Femi Kehinde & Co (Solicitors), and Former Member, House of Representatives, National Assembly, Abuja, representing Ayedire/Iwo/Ola-Oluwa Federal Constituency of Osun State, (1999-2003).
Related


Defence Gulps Lion Share As Tinubu Presents N58.47trn 2026 Budget to NASS
Ribadu’s Office Denies Arming Miyetti Allah in Kwara
NNPCL Slashes Fuel Price by N80
Respite As Court Stops Police, IGP from Enforcing Tinted Glass Permit Nationwide
Friday Sermon: Religion: Reflecting the Violence and Desperation of Our Time
Operation Wetie of the Western Region in Sweet Retrospect: Its Metaphors and Lessons
Mike Adenuga, Emmanuel Macron Hold High-Powered Meeting in Paris
Corruption! Tinubu Tackles ‘Buhari Boys’
Threat Against Nigeria’s Multi-Party Democracy: Atiku, Obi, George, Others Accuse Tinubu of Plot to Annihilate Opposition
Voice of Emancipation: Nicolas Maduro is a Goner
Alleged Corrupt Practices: Dangote Petitions ICPC Against NMDPRA MD Farouk
OAU: MicCom Institutes Financial Awards for Best Graduating Student, Producing Dept
Book Launch: Tinubu Vows to Sustain Buhari’s Legacies
Senator Olubiyi Fadeyi, Wife Olajumoke, Bag Top Yoruba Titles in Ile-Ife
Trending
-
Headline5 days agoCorruption! Tinubu Tackles ‘Buhari Boys’
-
Headline5 days agoThreat Against Nigeria’s Multi-Party Democracy: Atiku, Obi, George, Others Accuse Tinubu of Plot to Annihilate Opposition
-
Voice of Emancipation5 days agoVoice of Emancipation: Nicolas Maduro is a Goner
-
Headline3 days agoAlleged Corrupt Practices: Dangote Petitions ICPC Against NMDPRA MD Farouk
-
News5 days agoOAU: MicCom Institutes Financial Awards for Best Graduating Student, Producing Dept
-
National3 days agoBook Launch: Tinubu Vows to Sustain Buhari’s Legacies
-
Events5 days agoSenator Olubiyi Fadeyi, Wife Olajumoke, Bag Top Yoruba Titles in Ile-Ife
-
Headline3 days agoTinubu Didn’t Win 2023 Election, Will Lose in 2027 – Abaribe

