Connect with us

Headline

Tinubu: Hitting Ground Running or Supervising Hardship?

Published

on

By Eric Elezuo

In 30 days that President Bola Tinubu has been in power, a lot of water has passed under the bridge. While the loyalists and supporters of the president believe that he has taken steps in the right direction, the generality of the Nigerian population are groaning in what many described as consciously inflicted hardship.

The Tinubu administration kicked off on May 29, 2023, with a blanket removal of subsidy on petroleum products; a move many analysts believed has been the pivot through which all other counter effects have emanated.

During his inauguration speech, Tinubu noted that “fuel subsidy is gone”, bringing an end to what a section of Nigerians agree was the only lifeline enjoyed by the public from any government. They argued that with its removal, and without any tangible fall back or palliative, it means the Tinubu administration has removed the only connection between the people and the government of the day in terms of cushioning effect of economic meltdown.

However, Tinubu had insisted that subsidy was a fraud enjoyed by only the rich at the detriment of the poor, and must be removed, the level of protestations from the public notwithstanding. He added that he was only a mouthpiece to the subsidy removal, as the process was not captured in the 2023 budget, which was the ground work work the immediate past government of Muhammadu Buhari.

“We commend the decision of the outgoing administration in phasing out the petrol subsidy regime which has increasingly favoured the rich more than the poor. Subsidy can no longer justify its ever-increasing costs in the wake of drying resources.

“We shall, instead, re-channel the funds into better investment in public infrastructure, education, health care and jobs that will materially improve the lives of millions,” he said.

The payment of subsidy on petroleum products, everyone agreed, has, however, threatened the nation’s fiscal position and impacted the government’s ability to fund developmental projects across the nation, but what is in contention is the timing of the removal as it has adversely affected the already impoverished population rather than ameliotating their hardship.

A cross section of Nigerians, including organised labour vis a vis the Nigerian Labour Congress (NLC) and the Trade Union Congress (TUC), the former presidential candidates of the Labour Party, Mr. Peter Obi and Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Atiku Abubakar among many other influential Nigerians, have reasoned that though the removal was a necessity, its method of introduction by the Tinubu government was not people-friendly. They argued that measures could have been laid bare to cushion the effects before its removal.

But in defence, Tinubu, in his first broadcast to the nation, to commemorate June 12 Democracy Day, said though he recognised the sufferings Nigerians were going through, the removal of fuel subsidy was necessary to save the country from going under. He promised to give succour through a combination of reliefs in different sectors of the economy.

“I feel your pain. This is one decision we must bear to save our country from going under and take our resources away from the stranglehold of a few unpatriotic elements. Painfully, I have asked you, my compatriots, to sacrifice a little more for the survival of our country. For your trust and belief in us, I assure you that your sacrifice shall not be in vain. The government I lead will repay you through massive investment in transportation infrastructure, education, regular power supply, healthcare and other public utilities that will improve the quality of lives,” the president said.

But the amid the severe and biting pains, Nigerians are worried that the sacrifice Tinubu and his government called for is only being borne by the people while the government and officials still live large and in visible opulence.

The suspicion Nigerians had of the administration further heightened when news hit the media space that Tinubu has approved 114 per cent salary increment for himself, the Vice president, political office holders, members of the legislature and judicial officers. The story was however, denied by the presidency.

“We state, without any equivocation, that President Bola Tinubu has not approved any salary increase, and no such proposal has been brought before him for consideration,” a statement signed by the Special Adviser to the President on Special Duties, Communication and Strategy, Dele Alake, read. The statement blamed enemies of the administration for the false narrative, saying that it was “contrived to create ill-will for the new administration, slow down the upward momentum and massive goodwill the Tinubu-led administration is currently enjoying among Nigerians as a result of its fast-paced, dynamic and progressive policies.”

Other draconian or anti-people policy that has made media rounds, but denied by the administration, include increase in electricity tariff and supposed hike of petrol price to N700.

A cross section of Nigerians, who bared their minds to the The Boss, said there’s no smoke without fire, adding that most of these things begin as a rumour, then denied, and later resurrect to become the norm.

With the notion that it was moving on fast-paced, dynamic lane, having sacked, arrested and detained the Central Bank Governor, Mr. Godwin Emefiele and the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) chairman, Abdulrasheed Bawa, Tinubu had dished out policies that have further reduced the purchasing power of the naira, and enlisted the ordinary Nigerian in the lowest wrung of the poverty index. With the prices of food items, services and transportation hitting the roof, the masses are just left to wonder what line of ‘sacrifice’ the Tinubu government will come up with next in the guise of making things better. He had installed Folashodun Shonubi, a deputy governor in charge of operations in place of Emefiele.

Making good his promise of a “thorough house-cleaning” of the CBN during his inauguration, Tinubu, on June 14, through the CBN, announced the unification of all segments of the foreign exchange (FX) market, replacing the old regime of multiple exchange rate “windows” for different purposes with, in effect, a market rate.

African Business reported that naira immediately fell 36% against the dollar on the official market. The liberalisation of the market signalled the removal of some of the restrictions on the foreign exchange rate in the official market.

Tinubu’s wand wave led to the jumping of Nigeria’s stock market to its highest level in 15. The index of the Nigerian Stock Exchange soared 4% higher on the day to a closing price of 58,164 points, sending stocks’ year-to-date gains to 13.5%. The stock market continued its rally after the CBN liberalised the market, with market capitalisation climbing 3.26% to reach N32.7 trillion on 15 June, demonstrating the increased value of listed companies on the stock exchange.

The number of deals executed on 14 June showed a 15% increase compared to the previous trading period, with volume of trade rising by 9.28% to show increased market participation and increased liquidity, according to African Business.

But stakeholders across labour and traditional commerce have asked how the measures have affected the standard of living of the average Nigerian. The answer is farfetched as prices continue to reduce Nigerians to second class citizens, making families remain continually unsure of where and how the next meal (if any) will come.

But Tinubu seems optimistic, and while being hosted by the Lagos State governor, Babajide Sanwo-Olu, reiterated that his policies, as harsh as they seem at the moment, will in the long run, benefit Nigerians.

“We will work together in an open door policy that will bring Nigeria from the brinks back to a resilient economy; be ready.

“You governors, I know what I am going to do from Monday, Tuesday, up. I want us to be partners so that we can rescue our country and make it whole again.

“We shall receive the joy of giving, the joy of perseverance, the joy of resilience and endurance. You will see the reward. For this country is going to be prosperous for us.

“I am happy that the legislature, the executive arms of government are here. I appreciate it and I will continue to appreciate it more when we work together to dissect the possible economic prospects of our nation in favour of our children,” Tinubu said.

Meanwhile, operators within the downstream oil and gas sector have said the federal government has raked in N400 billion due to fuel subsidy removal in the last 30 days. This was disclosed in an interview with Daily Post by Chinedu Okonkwo, National President of the Independent Petroleum Marketers Association of Nigeria (IPMAN). That was a cheering news as that is the amount Group Managing Director of Nigeria National Petroleum Corporation Limited, Mele Kyari, claimed Nigeria spends on subsidy every month.

A socio-economic analyst, who spoke with The Boss of the basis of anonymity, informed that “most Nigerians, especially the market men and women are not interested in the bogus figures being paraded by the administration; they want to take a bus and pay affordable price, they want to go market buy food items without breaking the bank. Anything other than that, will mean an extension of the disastrous eight years of Buhari.”

With one month gone, the tangible things Nigerians have witnessed are the sack and arrest of Emefiele and Bawa; sack of service chiefs and their replacements.

“That is not an achievement,” the analyst said.

Nigerians are looking forward to better days ahead as the hardship bites harder.

Tinubu was inaugurated as the 16th Nigerian leader, on May 29, 2023, having defeated the duo of Atiku Abubakar of the PDP and Peter Obi of the LP with what observers noted as the smallest number of winning votes since 1999.

However, Atiku and Obi are in court challenging the emergence of Tinubu as president, praying the judiciary to ‘do the right thing’.

The 180 days judicial window for the litigation, which will terminate in October, will put paid to the contention of who won the election.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Headline

Why Nigerians Must Reject INEC’s Revised Timetable – ADC

Published

on

By

By Eric Elezuo

The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), during the week, released a fresh elections timetable, with major amendments to accommodate the just passed and signed Electoral Act 2026 by the National Assembly and President Bola Tinubu respectively.

Following the repeal of the Electoral Act, 2022 and the enactment of the Electoral Act, 2026, which introduced adjustments to statutory timelines governing pre-election and electoral activities, the Commission has reviewed and realigned the Schedule to ensure full compliance with the new legal framework.

Accordingly, the Commission has resolved as follows:

  1. Presidential and National Assembly Elections will now hold on Saturday, 16th January 2027 as against the earlier stated February 20, 2027
  2. Governorship and State Houses of Assembly Elections will now hold on Saturday, 6th February 2027 as against the former date of March 6, 2027

Also in accordance with the approved Schedule of Activities, the electoral bidy noted in the revised timetable that:

Conduct of Party Primaries, including resolution of disputes arising from primaries, will commence on 23rd April 2026 and end on 30th May 2026.

Presidential and National Assembly campaigns will commence on 19th August 2026.

Governorship and State Houses of Assembly campaigns will commence on 9th September 2026.

As provided by law, campaigns shall end 24 hours before Election Day. Political parties are strongly advised to adhere strictly to these timelines. The Commission will enforce compliance with the law.

But in a swift reaction, the opposition coalition, African Democratic Congress (ADC), rejected the revised 2026–2027 general election timetable, describing it as a politically biased schedule designed to favour the re-election agenda of President Bola Tinubu, and calling on all Nigerians to speak up enmasse to reject the revised timetable.

The ADC, in a statement by its National Publicity Secretary, Bolaji Abdullahi, on Friday argued that the new deadlines and compliance requirements under the Electoral Act 2026 create near-impossible hurdles for opposition parties seeking to field candidates.

On February 13, INEC initially scheduled the 2027 Presidential and National Assembly elections for February 20, 2027, while the Governorship and State Houses of Assembly elections were fixed for March 6, 2027.

The timetable, however, faced objections from some Muslim stakeholders who noted that the dates coincided with the 2027 Ramadan period.

Following the concerns, the National Assembly amended Clause 28 of the Electoral Act Amendment Bill, reducing the required election notice period from 360 to 300 days, allowing INEC to adjust the election dates.

Subsequently, INEC released a revised schedule on Thursday, signed by its Chairman, Joash Amupitan, moving the Presidential and National Assembly elections to January 16, 2027, and the Governorship and State Houses of Assembly elections to February 6, 2027.

Reacting, the ADC said the requirement that political parties submit a comprehensive digital membership register by April 2, 2026, effectively bars opposition parties from participating.

The party stated: “The African Democratic Congress rejects the updated 2026–2027 electoral timetable released by the Independent National Electoral Commission. What has been presented as a routine administrative schedule of the upcoming general elections is, in fact, a political instrument carefully structured to narrow democratic space and strengthen the incumbent administration ahead of the 2027 general elections.

“According to the timetable, party primaries are to be conducted between April 23 and May 30, 2026, just 55 to 92 days from today. However, more significant is that, pursuant to Section 77(4) of the Electoral Act 2026, political parties are required to submit their digital membership registers to INEC not later than April 2, 2026.

“That is only about 34 days away. Section 77(7) further provides that any party that fails to submit its membership register within the stipulated time shall not be eligible to field a candidate. These are not routine administrative rules but are deliberately constructed barriers designed to exclude the opposition from participating in the election.”

The party further noted that Section 77(2) of the Electoral Act 2026 requires the digital register of members to contain name, sex, date of birth, address, state, local government, ward, polling unit, National Identification Number (NIN) and photograph in both hard and soft copies, while Section 77(6) prohibits the use of any pre-existing register that does not contain the specified information. It warned that failure to meet these requirements would lead to disqualification.

The ADC questioned the fairness of the digital membership requirement, noting that the ruling All Progressives Congress began its registration process in February 2025, long before the requirement became mandatory.

“It is not a product of foresight but insider advantage. They knew what was coming. They therefore had one full year to carry out an exercise that other political parties are expected to complete in one month, during which they must collect, process, collate and transmit large volumes of digital data to INEC under the threat of exclusion. This is practically impossible.

“Democratic competition is based on a level playing field that does not give any contestant an undue advantage. A system where one party exploits incumbency to gain a one-year head start on a requirement that other parties only became aware of when it was nearly too late is a rigged system.”

The ADC said it has joined other opposition parties in rejecting the Electoral Act 2026, adding that the INEC timetable is equally rejected as it appears designed to serve what it described as a self-succession agenda.

“Let it be clear that ADC will not take any action that appears to confer legitimacy on a fraudulent system. We are reviewing our options and will make our position known in the coming days,” the party said.

The party also called on civil society organisations, democratic stakeholders and Nigerians to scrutinise the timetable and demand fairness, stressing that democracy cannot survive when electoral rules are structured to produce predetermined outcomes.

The party has consistently accused the Tinubu-led All Progressives Congress (APC) of scheming to silence the opposition as the 2027 General Elections draw closer, citing his manipulation of state governors and Assembly members from jumping ship, and settling with the ruling party.

Presently, the president’s party has a total of 31 out of 36 states governors, more than majority of the national and states Houses of Assembly.

A frontline publisher and chieftain of the ADC, Chief Dele Momodu, has warned that Tinubu is gradually transforming into full-blown dictatorship, stressing that his second term in office would turn state governors into ‘total slaves’.

Continue Reading

Headline

Second Term for Tinubu Will Turn Governors into Total Slaves, Dele Momodu Warns

Published

on

By

Chairman, Ovation Media Group, and former presidential aspirant, Aare Dele Momodu, has expressed strong concern over what he described as growing political support for President Bola Ahmed Tinubu among state governors across the country.

Speaking during an interview on News Central TV, Momodu said he was shocked by the level of backing the president is reportedly receiving, warning that Nigeria’s democracy could face serious risks if the current political trend continues.

The media entrepreneur cautioned that allowing Tinubu to secure a second term in 2027 could, in his view, lead to excessive concentration of power. He particularly criticized what he described as a growing wave of opposition figures aligning with the ruling All Progressives Congress> (APC).

Momodu referenced reports of opposition governors, including Ahmadu Umaru Fintiri, allegedly moving closer to the ruling party, describing the development as politically troubling.

According to him, some governors are allegedly competing to demonstrate loyalty to the president ahead of future elections.

“The governors are fighting to ensure Tinubu wins a second term, fighting to be the biggest thug for him. If a man in his first term can capture the bodies and souls of Nigerians this way, imagine what he would do with a second term. It will be a full-blown dictatorship, and the governors will regret it as they become total slaves to him,” Momodu said.

He concluded by urging Nigerians to remain vigilant and actively protect democratic institutions, warning that unchecked consolidation of political power could threaten the nation’s democracy and future stability.

Gistmania

Continue Reading

Headline

Court Validates PDP 2025 Convention in Ibadan, Affirms Turaki-led NWC

Published

on

By

The Oyo State High Court sitting in Ibadan has affirmed the validity of the 2025 Elective Convention of the Peoples’ Democratic Party (PDP), which produced Dr. Kabiru Turaki as the substantive National Chairman of the party.

Delivering judgment on Friday, Justice Ladiran Akintola upheld the convention in its entirety, ruling that it was conducted in full compliance with the relevant constitutional and statutory provisions governing party elections in Nigeria.

The decision marked a significant legal victory for the party’s leadership and brought clarity to the dispute surrounding the convention’s legitimacy.

The ruling followed an amended originating summons filed by Misibau Adetunmbi (SAN) on behalf of the claimant, Folahan Malomo Adelabi, in Suit No. I/1336/2025.

In a comprehensive judgment, the court granted all 13 reliefs sought by the claimant, effectively endorsing the processes and outcomes of the Ibadan convention.

Justice Akintola held that the convention, organised by the recognised leadership of the party, satisfied all laid-down legal requirements as stipulated in the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, the Electoral Act 2022 (as amended), and the relevant provisions of the Electoral Act 2026.

The court found no breach of due process or statutory non-compliance in the conduct of the exercise.

In the same proceedings, the court dismissed the Motion on Notice seeking a stay of proceedings and suspension of the ruling, filed by Sunday Ibrahim (SAN) on behalf of Austin Nwachukwu and two others. The applications were described as lacking merit.

Earlier in the proceedings, the court had also rejected a bid by Ibrahim to have his clients joined in the suit.

Justice Akintola ruled at the time that the joinder application was unsubstantiated and consequently dismissed it.

Continue Reading

Trending