Headline

Ikoyi Building Collapse: Stakeholders Sue Lagos Govt, Others for Negligence, Unlawful Expropriation

Published

4 years ago

August 20, 2022

Eric

By Eric Elezuo

Stakeholders associated with the building that collapsed on Gerrard Road, Ikoyi, better known as 360 Degrees, on November I, 2021, have sued the Lagos State Governor among a host of others for what they called Negligence of the Lagos State Building Control Agency and Unlawful expropriation of equitable interests in the property.

In a letter dated August 8, 2022, and signed byTope Adebayo, LLP and
Joseph Uche Anyebe, Esq, the stakeholders, who identified themselves as members of class of subscribers of various units, are seeking an order of perpetual injunction jointly and severally either by themselves, servants, agents, privies or otherwise howsoever called from disturbing, interfering with, taking, receiving or in any way taking possession of, demolishing, divesting and/or revoking the title, disposing of all or any part of the property, landed or otherwise, known as “360° Ikoyi” situate, lying and being at 44BCD, Gerrard Road, Ikoyi-Lagos State.

Read the letter in full:

8th August 2022.
The Honourable Commissioner
Lagos State Ministry of Physical Planning & Urban Development
Alausa, Ikeja
Lagos State.
Dear Sir,

MEMORANDUM OF CLAIM PURSUANT TO THE HIGH COURT OF LAGOS STATE (EXPEDITIOUS DISPOSAL OF CIVIL CASES)

PRE-ACTION PROTOCOL

We refer to the above subject matter.

We act on behalf of Mr. Oluwemimo Adepoju Ogunde SAN, Pastor Adetola Odutola, Mr. Bola Odutola, Mrs. Bunmi Odutola, Mr. Ghandi Olaoye, Ms. Zahra Temitope Motomori, Kwara Business School Limited, Saikoyi Property Limited, Mr. Adewale Folowosele, Mrs. Foluso Folowosele, Mr. Moses Anibaba, Mrs. Margaret Anibaba, Dr. Oladipo Oluyomi, Mrs. Adepeju Oluyomi, Mr. Tayo Oladapo (members of class of subscribers of various units of flats/penthouses/terraces/apartments in the 3 towers/high-rise buildings on the land known as “360° Ikoyi” at 44BCD, Gerrard Road, Ikoyi-Lagos State). It is on their definite and express instructions we notify the Governor of Lagos State, the Attorney General of Lagos State, Lagos State Ministry of Physical Planning and Urban Development, Lagos State Building Control Agency and Edge of Design Limited of the Claimants’ intention to commence legal proceedings against them.

BASIS OF CLAIM

The basis of this claim is grounded on the following cause of action:
Negligence of the Lagos State Building Control Agency.
Unlawful expropriation of equitable interests in the property (landed or otherwise) by the Government of Lagos State or any of its agencies.

SUMMARY OF FACTS

The summary of facts culminating in the aggregate action to be instituted by the Claimants against the Defendants is as follows:
The Claimants are members of the class of subscribers of various units of flats/penthouses/terraces/apartments being constructed in the 3 towers/high-rise buildings on the land known as “360° Ikoyi” at 44BCD, Gerrard Road, Ikoyi-Lagos State and have parted with monies as consideration for the various units of flats offered to them by Fourscore Heights Limited.
The Claimants were encouraged and motivated to take up the offers for the various units of flats in Towers of the high-rise buildings on the land known as “360° Ikoyi” at 44BCD, Gerrard Road, Ikoyi-Lagos State and made payments in respect of same on the understanding that the properties are to be constructed in Lagos State under the thorough and strict supervision of a prime regulator, the Lagos State Building Control Agency established pursuant to the Urban and Regional Planning and Development Law, 2010 of the State.

Despite their well-founded belief that the 3 Towers of the high-rise buildings on the land known as “360° Ikoyi” lying, being and situate at 44BCD, Gerrard Road, Ikoyi-Lagos State would be structurally sound, the construction of same which by their nature would have been adequately regulated and the engineering activities constantly probed, Tower 1 on the construction site however collapsed on 1st November 2021 leading to the unfortunate death of the Managing Director of Fourscore Heights Limited, Mr. Olufemi Osibona and other persons.
The Government of Lagos State through the Lagos State Ministry of Physical Planning & Urban Development and Lagos State Building Control Agency stopped all building works on the construction site of Fourscore Heights Limited, and took over the construction site.

Lagos State Building Control Agency was negligent in the proper performance of its statutory duties which led to the eventual collapse of one of the three towers on the construction site at 44BCD, Gerrard Road, Ikoyi-Lagos State.

Having made payments for the purchase of the various units of flats in the 3 Towers of the high-rise buildings on the land known as “360° Ikoyi” at 44BCD, Gerrard Road, Ikoyi-Lagos State in line with their individual agreements/contracts of sales with Fourscore Height Limited, the Claimants have acquired equitable interest in the property.

Had the 1st tower not collapsed owing to the negligence of Lagos State Building Control Agency, the subsequent take over of the construction site and prevention of further works in respect of the 2nd & 3rd towers, the Claimants would have taken full benefits of the interests that have accrued to them after having purchased several units of flats in the 3 Towers. The Claimants would have further taken steps in addition to their equitable interests to ensure that they acquire the legal interests in their property.

Owing to Lagos State Building Control Agency’s abdication of its duty of reasonable care and skill in the performance of its statutory functions and the resultant damage following the collapse of Tower 1 on the construction site on 1st November 2021, the subsequent cessation of building works and taking over of the construction site, Lagos State Building Control Agency has caused the Claimants to lose the chance to take full benefit from their investments in the property.

Despite the apparent negligence of Lagos State Building Control Agency in the proper performance of its statutory function, after having taken over the construction site, there are plans in top gear by the Lagos State Government to revoke the title of Fourscore Heights Limited in the entire property lying, being and situate at 44BCD, Gerrard Road, Ikoyi-Lagos State and deem the said property as having been forfeited to the government pursuant to LABSCA Regulations, 2019.
The Lagos State Government has gone ahead to appoint Edge of Design Limited to immediately take steps to demolish the 2nd & 3rd Towers of the high-rise buildings on the land known as “360° Ikoyi” lying, being and situate at 44BCD, Gerrard Road, Ikoyi-Lagos State when independent evidence of an unfavourable non-destructive test results has not been produced.

Any compulsory acquisition of the property at 44BCD, Gerrard Road, Ikoyi-Lagos State by way of forfeiture in favour of the Lagos State Government would amount to rewarding the Lagos State Government by making them take benefit from the negligence of one of its agencies and in complete disregard of the equitable interest of the Claimants which is worthy of protection by the Court.

RELIEFS AND REMEDIES

WHEREOF the Claimants would urge the Honourable Court to grant the following claims:
A DECLARATION that the agreements between Fourscore Heights Limited and each of the Claimants to acquire units of flats with agreed considerations paid, entitle the Claimants to equitable rights and interests in the property known as “360° Ikoyi” at 44BCD, Gerrard Road, Ikoyi-Lagos State by virtue of the legal title conferred on Fourscore Heights Limited by the 1st Defendant in the Certificate of Occupancy Number 48/48/2020A dated 3RD February 2020 and registered as Number 48 at age 48 in Volume 2020Aat the Land Registry, Alausa, Ikeja, Lagos State.

A DECLARATION that the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th Defendants were negligent in the performance of their duties by failing and/or neglecting to supervise the construction of one of the three towers at 44BCD, Gerrard Road, Ikoyi-Lagos State in line with Regulations and the negligence led to the eventual collapse of the tower.
A DECLARATION that the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th Defendants cannot benefit from their negligence by compulsorily, wrongfully, illegally and punitively acquiring or threatening to acquire the property known as “360° Ikoyi” at 44BCD, Gerrard Road, Ikoyi-Lagos covered by Certificate of Occupancy Number 48/48/2020A dated 3rd February, 2020 and registered as Number 48 at Page 48 in Volume 2020A at the Land Registry, Alausa, Ikeja, Lagos State through forfeiture and/or purported forfeiture to the Lagos State Government following the collapse of one of the towers.

A DECLARATION that the provisions of the Lagos State Urban and Regional Planning and Development Law & the Lagos State Building Control Agency Regulations, 2019 being relied upon to compulsorily acquire the property known as “360° Ikoyi” at 44BCD, Gerrard Road, Ikoyi-Lagos State covered by Certificate of Occupancy Number 48/48/2020A dated 3rd February, 2020 and registered as Number 48 at Page 48 in Volume 2020A at the Land Registry, Alausa, Ikeja, Lagos State by way of forfeiture cannot apply in the face of the negligence of the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th Defendants to perform their duties and when the Claimants’ interests (as third parties) would be adversely affected.
A DECLARATION that any demolition of the 2nd and 3rd Towers on the land known as “360° Ikoyi” at 44BCD, Gerrard Road, Ikoyi-Lagos State covered by Certificate of Occupancy Number 48/48/2020Adated 3rd February, 2020 and registered as Number 48 at Page 48 in Volume 2020A at the Land Registry, Alausa, Ikeja, Lagos State by the 5th Defendant on the instructions of the 1st – 4th Defendants or any other persons claiming to represent the Lagos State Government when independent evidence of an unfavourable non-destructive test results has not been produced will adversely affect the equitable interests of the Claimants in the said properties.
A DECLARATION that the Claimants’ equitable interests in the property (landed or otherwise) at 44BCD, Gerrard Road, Ikoyi-Lagos State covered by Certificate of Occupancy Number 48/48/2020A dated 3rd February, 2020 and registered as Number 48 at Page 48 in Volume 2020A at the Land Registry, Alausa, Ikeja, Lagos State cannot be expropriated and/or divested by the Government of Lagos State or any of its agencies.

A declaration that the overt move and the action taken and being embarked and contemplated to be embarked upon by the 2nd to 5th Defendants on behalf and at the instruction of the 1st Defendant to demolish or preparing to demolish the structures of Towers 2 and 3 of the property situate at No.44BCD Gerrard Road Ikoyi Lagos State is a flagrant violation of the Claimants’equitable interest in the aforesaid property.

AN ORDER restraining the 1st to 5th Defendants either by themselves, servants, agents, or privies from trespassing or further trespassing, demolishing or further demolishing the properties known as Tower 2 and Tower 3 lying, being and situate at No.44BCD Gerrard Road Ikoyi Lagos State covered by Certificate of Occupancy Number 48/48/2020A dated 3rd February, 2020 and registered as Number 48 at Page 48 in Volume 2020A at the Land Registry, Alausa, Ikeja, Lagos State until an independent audit of the property is carried out by the Council For The Regulation of Engineering in Nigeria (COREN).

AN ORDER OF PERPETUAL INJUNCTION restraining the 1st – 5th Defendants jointly and severally either by themselves, servants, agents, privies or otherwise howsoever called from disturbing, interfering with, taking, receiving or in any way taking possession of, demolishing, divesting and/or revoking the title, disposing of all or any part of the property, landed or otherwise, known as “360° Ikoyi” situate, lying and being at 44BCD, Gerrard Road, Ikoyi-Lagos State covered by Certificate of Occupancy Number 48/48/2020Adated 3rd February, 2020 and registered as Number 48 at Page 48 in Volume 2020A at the Land Registry, Alausa, Ikeja, Lagos State.
General damages against the Defendants in favour of the Claimants in the sum of N200,000,000.00 (Two Hundred Million Naira) only
The sum of N50,000,000 (Fifty Million Naira) only being the cost of this suit.

EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT OF THIS CLAIM

The 1st Claimant’s offer letter dated 19th December 2019.

The letter of 17th January 2020 wherein Fourscore Heights Limited acknowledged receipt of the payment of $111,111.11, the trail of WhatsApp messages between Mr. Femi Osibona and the 1st Claimant acknowledging further payment of $120,000 and the acknowledgement of the receipt of $20,000 received by Ayodele Nifemi to be given to Mr. Femi Osibona.

The 2nd Claimant’s offer letter of 19th December 2019.

The acknowledgement letters of the receipt of the sum of $315,586.78 and $7,708 both dated 25th August 2021
Fourscore Heights Limited’s letter dated 05/12/2019 acknowledging receipt of the 1st instalment payment and its subsequent letter dated 5th May 2021.
The unexecuted contract of sale and the trail of WhatsApp messages between the 3rd Claimant and Mr. Femi Osibona, the late Managing Director of Fourscore Heights Limited.

The unexecuted contract of sale between the 5th Claimant and Fourscore Heights Limited.

6th Claimant’s offer letter dated 28th January 2019 and the signed document showing receipt of payment.

The offer letter (letter of allocation) dated 3rd August 2020 and the 7th Claimant’s evidence of payment of the consideration.

The offer letter (letter of allocation) dated 3rd August 2020 and the 8th Claimant’s evidence of payment of the consideration.

The 9th & 10th Claimants’ offer letter dated 23rd October 2019 and the various GTB online transfer advice.
The 11th & 12th Claimants’ offer letter dated 6th August 2019 and the signed document showing receipt of one of the payments.

The 13th & 14th Claimants’ offer letter dated 27th February 2019 and some of the payment debit advice.

The 15th Claimant’s offer letter dated 15th January 2019 and the signed document showing receipt of one of the payments.

The online newspaper publication of the CABLE with the caption “REWIND: In 2020, Femi Osibona resisted the sealing off of his 21-storey Ikoyi building (video)” published on 4th November 2021 on https://www.thecable.ng/rewind-in-2020-femi-osibona-resisted-the-sealing-off-of-his-21-storey-ikoyi-building.

PROPOSAL FOR SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTE

The Claimants hereby propose a negotiated settlement where parties would meet on a date, time, and venue to be agreed upon within 7 days of the receipt of this memorandum. At this meeting, you are also at liberty to come up with reasonable suggestions on how we can amicably resolve this dispute to prevent this matter from degenerating to a full-blown litigation.

TAKE NOTICE that by the provisions of the Practice Direction No 2 of 2019 (Expeditious Disposal of Civil Cases) Pre-Action Protocol of the Lagos State High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules 2019, THE DEFENDANTS shall respond to this Memorandum of Claim not later than 7 days from service of the Memorandum and not later than 7 days from the service of the Claimants’ reminder.
Please accept the expression of our warmest regards.
Yours faithfully,

For: Tope Adebayo, LLP
Joseph Uche Anyebe, Esq.

Headline

Court Dismisses Abejide’s Suit, Upholds Mark-led Leadership of ADC

Published

3 hours ago

July 2, 2026

Eric

The Federal High Court in Abuja on Thursday affirmed Sen. David Mark’s leadership of the African Democratic Congress (ADC).

Justice Musa Liman, in a judgment, also dismissed the suit filed by Rep Leke Abejide challenging Mark and Ogbeni Rauf Aregbesola as national chairman and national secretary of the party for lacking merit.

Justice Liman upheld the preliminary objections filed by ADC, Chief Ralph Nwosu, Mark and Aregbesola which challenged Abejide’s suit.

The judge held that the court lacked the jurisdiction to dabble in the internal affairs of ADC, as the suit was non-justiciable.

He also held that Abejide lacked the legal right to have instituted the suit, having failed to show to the court that his rights had been violated in any way as a result of the emergence of Mark-led leadership.

He equally held that Abejide, who is a member of the House of Representatives, failed to explore the party’s internal mechanism for dispute resolution.

Justice Liman also resolved the three issues in the substantive suit in favour of the defendants.

On whether Mark, the former Senate president and Aregbesola, who was the former Governor of Osun, emerged as leaders of the party in compliance with the enabling laws, the judge resolved this against Abejide, the plaintiff in the suit.

He held that the handing over of the leadership of the party by Nwosu to Mark did not violate the provisions of the party’s constitution.

The judge agreed that the disputed July 2, 2025, meeting of the party was a stakeholder meeting which preceded the party’s National Executive Council (NEC) meeting held on July 29, 2025, which produced Mark and Aregbesola as the party’s leaders and was monitored by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).

Justice Liman, therefore, declared that the emergence of Mark and Aregbesola as leaders of ADC was valid and in accordance with the constitution, the Electoral Act, 2026 and the party’s law.

The judge consequently awarded a fine of N2 million each in favour of all the defendants which shall be paid by Abejide.

He also awarded a N10 million fine against Abejide’s lawyer in compliance with the Electoral Act, 2026.

The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that Abejide had instituted the suit to stop the Mark-led leadership of ADC.

In the originating summons, marked FHC/ABJ/CS/1637/2025, filed on Feb. 15 by Idris, the lawmaker sued ADC, Ralph Nwosu, Mark, Aregbesola and INEC as 1st to 5th defendants respectively.

NAN reports that Nwosu was the former national chairman of ADC who stepped down for Mark, the ex-Senate president.

Abejide, among the eight reliefs, sought an order nullifying Nwosu’s handover or transfer of ADC’s leadership to Mark and Aregbesola as interim national chairman and interim national secretary respectively on July 2, 2025, at Shehu Musa Yar’adua Centre, Abuja, for being illegal, unlawful, null and void.

He sought an order of perpetual injunction restraining Mark and Aregbesola from parading themselves as leaders of the party “as their purported appointment, selection or election was unlawful, illegal, null and void.”

He also sought perpetual injunction restraining INEC from recognising Mark and Aregbesola as ADC’s interim national chairman and interim national secretary.

He alleged that their appointment, selection or election did not meet the requirements of Section 82 of the Electoral Act, 2022, among other prayers.

NAN

Headline

Alleged N27.4bn Scandal: Presidency Exonerates Gbajabiamila, Says Adeyemi Matthew is a ‘Con Artist’

Published

7 hours ago

July 2, 2026

Eric

The Presidency has volunteered details on how a certain Prince Adeniyi Adeyemi Matthew, allegedly built an elaborate web of forged documents, fake government appointments and fictitious agencies to deceive public officials and present himself as a senior presidential appointee under the administration of President Bola Tinubu.

The Presidency, in a statement issued on Wednesday by the Special Adviser to the President on Information and Strategy, Bayo Onanuga, described Adeyemi as “a con artist” who allegedly used forged appointment letters bearing the name of the Chief of Staff to the President, Femi Gbajabiamila, to create and operate a non-existent Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council, later referred to as the Presidential Economic Advisory Council.

According to the statement, the alleged scam was uncovered after officials of the Nigerian Investment Promotion Council raised concerns that another purported government agency appeared to be operating alongside it.

The Office of the Chief of Staff subsequently alerted security agencies, accusing unnamed individuals of forging official appointment letters purportedly issued from his office.

“The attention of this office has been drawn to the activities of certain individuals and groups engaged in the forgery of official appointment letters purportedly issued from my office,” Gbajabiamila said in a petition dated October 17.

“The fake documents, bearing falsified signatures, reference/folio numbers, and seals, have been used to claim leadership appointments to non-existent entities, with particular reference to the Presidential Foreign Intervention Promotion Council.”

The Chief of Staff disclosed that Adeyemi had allegedly established an office at the Federal Secretariat Complex in Abuja, where he reportedly hosted meetings with Nigerians and foreign nationals while presenting himself as the Director-General of the fictitious agency.

According to the petition, the group even sought diplomatic support from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to facilitate United States visas for its purported staff.

“The above development not only constitutes a serious criminal act but also undermines the integrity of the Presidency and the credibility of official government communication,” Gbajabiamila wrote.

“I therefore urge you to initiate a thorough investigation to identify and apprehend those involved and also to uncover the network facilitating the forgery.”

Foreign Affairs Ministry raises red flag

The statement revealed that concerns over Adeyemi’s activities had also reached the Federal Ministry of Foreign Affairs after he reportedly convened a meeting with ambassadors at the Wells Carlton Hotel and Apartments in Abuja on October 10, 2025, without the ministry’s knowledge.

In a letter dated October 15, 2025, signed by Ambassador Anderson Madubuike and addressed to the Office of the National Security Adviser and the Office of the Chief of Staff, the ministry sought clarification regarding the status of the purported agency.

“This act contravenes extant rules and regulations guiding diplomatic practices globally,” the ministry stated.

The enquiries triggered correspondence among the Office of the National Security Adviser, the Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation and the Office of the Chief of Staff.

Responding to the enquiries, Gbajabiamila categorically denied appointing Adeyemi or recognising the agency.

“Prince Adeniyi Matthew, Director-General of the Presidential Foreign Investment Promotion Council, is unknown to any office, nor do we have any dealings with the said council,” he wrote.

“My attention was drawn to a letter of this purported application, which is fake, and my office has instructed the police and other relevant security agencies to carry out investigations on the person and the entity he claims to represent.”

The Presidency stressed that the Chief of Staff could not have issued any appointment letter because appointments into government offices are the exclusive responsibility of the Office of the Secretary to the Government of the Federation.

Police uncover alleged forgery network

Following the petition, the Police launched an investigation and arrested Adeyemi on October 27, 2025, at the Abuja office from where he allegedly operated the scheme.

Searches conducted at both his office and residence in Suleja reportedly yielded several documents and exhibits believed to be connected with the operation.

Investigators said Adeyemi claimed that one Dolapo Babatunde Tanimola assisted him in procuring the forged appointment letter.

However, police investigations established that Tanimola had died in a fire incident at Kachi Hotel in Abuja on October 22, 2025, five days before Adeyemi’s arrest.

According to the State House, investigators established that the agency Adeyemi claimed to head never existed, while the appointment letters and several official documents recovered during the investigation were allegedly forged.

Police also accused him of falsely presenting himself as a presidential appointee and fraudulently requesting a diplomatic note verbale from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to facilitate visa applications for himself and members of his organisation.

Investigators further alleged that Adeyemi operated no fewer than 34 bank accounts, including nine accounts opened in the names of fictitious organisations, including the FCT Investment Promotion Agency and Public Private Partnership (FIPA-APP).

The investigation also found that he allegedly succeeded in opening a Central Bank of Nigeria account by misleading the Office of the Accountant-General of the Federation using forged documents.

The Presidency, however, noted that investigators confirmed no government funds were ever paid into the account.

“The act of the suspect constitutes criminal forgery, impersonation and obtaining by false pretence, thereby bringing the office of the Chief of Staff to the President and the Presidency to disrepute before the public and international community,” the police report stated.

Eight-count charge filed

Based on the outcome of the investigation, police filed an eight-count charge before the Federal High Court in Abuja against Adeyemi and two alleged accomplices on November 27, 2025.

The matter is scheduled for hearing on July 27.

According to the Presidency, Adeyemi, while on police bail, recently resurfaced with fresh claims that the Chief of Staff had genuinely appointed him as Director-General of the agency.

The statement noted that the claim directly contradicted the statement he voluntarily made to investigators during the police probe.

It said the renewed allegation prompted Gbajabiamila to issue another public disclaimer on June 8, reaffirming that Adeyemi was an impostor.

Presidency urges caution

The Presidency said Adeyemi had a history of alleged fraudulent misrepresentation, recalling that in 2016 he allegedly presented himself as President-General of the World Youth Organisation, claiming it was affiliated with the United Nations before the UN reportedly disowned the organisation.

Describing the case as that of “a con artist who appears to have built a web of false claims to deceive unsuspecting government officials and the public,” the Presidency urged politicians and members of the public to avoid drawing conclusions before the ongoing criminal trial is concluded.

It further advised that, since the matter is before the court, interested parties should allow the judicial process to determine the allegations against Adeyemi and his co-defendants.

Headline

Parties’ Deregistration: ADC, Not NDC, is the Target

Published

3 days ago

June 29, 2026

Eric

By Eric Elezuo

As the 2027 presidential election draws closer, intrigues, manipulations and maneuvers have continued to be the order of the day as political parties engage in one gimmick or another to outdo and undo one another.

While some are playing politics of numbers and conviction, others are engaging tendencies that tend to question the status quo and established principles under which genuine democracy is formed. As a matter of fact, fingers have been pointed at the President Bola Tinubu-led Federal government as the brain behind all machinations that have attempted to derail multi-party democracy, and institute a one-party state, which is alien to the Nigerian democratic roots. This is as a result of the constant imbroglio that has consistently engulf almost all the major political parties in the country.

Fresh facts have however, emerged to prove that every act of frustration thrown at the opposition has been indirectly aimed at the main opposition party, the African Democratic Congress (ADC), and its presidential candidate, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar.

According to reliable sources, the recent deregistration of parties, especially the Nigerian Democratic Congress (NDC), was actually targeted at the ADC.

Recall that the Federal High Court in Lokoja, Kogi State, on June, 26, set aside its earlier judgement directing the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to register the NDC as a political party. A ruling that put a question mark on the eligibility of the party presenting candidates in the forthcoming 2027 elections

The presiding judge, Isah Dashen, held that all relevant parties must be heard before any substantive decision can be made in the matter.

The court upheld the application filed by a certain organization, the Peace Movement Party (PMP), ruling that the party was a necessary party to the suit.

According to the judge, the earlier judgement was constitutionally defective as it was delivered without hearing from all interested parties.

He declared that such an omission rendered the entire process null and void.

Mr Dashen further ruled that the status quo be restored to what it was before the December 10, 2025 judgement, pending the determination of the substantive suit.

He also observed that certain material facts were suppressed in the earlier proceedings, which justified the decision to set aside the judgment.

Consequently, the court ordered that the substantive suit should begin afresh, with the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), the PMP and the NDC as parties to the case.

According to NAN’s reports, the applicant’s lawyer, Chikezie Ekeocha, told journalists that the PMP approached the court after discovering that NDC’s registration was based on a logo it had previously submitted to INEC before the commencement of the suit.

According to Mr Ekeocha, the court agreed that the applicant’s rights had been affected and consequently vacated the earlier judgement.

“The court has ordered all parties to return to the position they occupied before the judgment of 10 December 2025, and directed the claimants to join all necessary parties to ensure the issues in dispute are effectually and completely determined,” he said.

He explained that the implication of the ruling is that every action taken by INEC in compliance with the now-vacated judgment stands reversed.

“The recognition of the NDC, the issuance of its certificate of registration, its inclusion in INEC’s records, and any appearance on ballot papers arising from that judgement must be withdrawn pending the final determination of the substantive suit,” Mr Ekeocha stated.

He, however, clarified that the substantive case remains before the court and has not been decided.

“The matter has not been concluded. The court merely set aside its previous judgment and directed that the party whose interests were affected be joined so that all sides can be heard before a fresh decision is reached.”

Mr Ekeocha also dismissed suggestions that the court merely ordered parties to maintain the status quo, insisting that the ruling specifically directed a restoration of the position that existed before the 10 December 2025 judgement.

The ruling effectively returns the dispute over the registration of the NDC to the Federal High Court for a fresh hearing, with all relevant parties expected to participate before a new determination is made.

It would also be recalled that a few weeks earlier, the Federal High Court in Abuja, had ordered the deregistration of five political parties including the African Democratic Congress (ADC). The others are Action People’s Party (APP), Action Alliance (AA), Zenith Labour Party (ZLP) and Accord Party.

However, on June 16, the Court of Appeal in Abuja halted the enforcement of the judgement, ruling that it violated its earlier ruling staying proceedings before the Federal High Court.

While INEC awaits the release of the Certified True Copy (CTC) of the judgment to deregister the NDC, the NDC has reacted, rejecting the judgment as travesty of justice.

Lending credence to the notion that the President Tinubu-led administration is basically targeting the establishment of the ADC as a party, and the candidature of its presidential flagbearer, former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar, who is also the presidential candidate of the ADC, has stated categorically that there are plots to prevent the party from participating in the 2027 general election.

Atiku’s position is stated in a statement issued by his Senior Special Assistant on Public Communication, Phrank Shaibu on Monday, notifying the public that he had received credible information suggesting that political and legal manoeuvres were being deployed against the ADC, stressing that the persecution that has been thrown towards the NDC was a clear distraction as the main target is the ADC.

Atiku alleged that anti-democratic elements within the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) were working to ensure that the ADC is excluded from the ballot.

“We are fully aware of their plots. While they seek to sow confusion within the opposition, we know their real target is the ADC because it represents the most credible alternative,” he said.

Atiku called on Nigerians to reject any attempt to determine which opposition parties participate in the election.

“We therefore call on all Nigerians — not just ADC members and supporters — to rise in defense of democracy and reject any attempt by the ruling party to cherry-pick which opposition parties are permitted to participate in the next general election,” he said.

“Our message to the APC and the hooded men plotting in dark chambers is simple: you may conspire, but you will not succeed.

“If the APC is truly confident in its popularity, why is it so terrified of the ADC?”

He said he hoped the information available to him would not materialise but argued that recent political developments made such concerns difficult to dismiss.

“The pattern has become all too familiar. First, institutions that ought to be neutral are drawn into partisan contests,” he said.

“Then, frivolous litigations suddenly gain unusual momentum. Administrative powers are selectively deployed.

“Political pressure is mounted behind closed doors. Before long, democracy itself becomes the casualty.”

Atiku alleged that the ruling party has focused more on weakening the opposition than addressing the country’s economic and security challenges.

“The obsession with silencing the opposition has become so consuming that governance itself has taken a back seat,” he said.

“At a time when Nigerians are battling hunger, inflation, unemployment, insecurity, and collapsing purchasing power, those entrusted with public office appear preoccupied with political survival rather than national survival.”

Nigerians recall that ever since the official rejuvenation of the ADC in June/July of 2025, where the duo of Senator David Mark and Ogbeni Rauf Aregbesola emerged as the party’s chairman and secretary respectively, the party has not known moments of peaceful coexistence as litigations from corners unknown have sprang up in a bid to destabilize the party and deprive it of the opportunity of featuring on the ballot paper come 2027.

ADC, as a child of circumstance emerged from the rumbles of the litigation-ridden former main opposition party, the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), where two factions have consistently remelained at loggerheads over leadership. While the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Nyesom Wike, who is working assiduously to ensure the reelection of Bola Tinubu, leads one faction, Oyo State Governor, Seyi Makinde, who became a defacto head, leads the other faction. In all, PDP appeared to have no direction, forcing many of its members to jump ship, thereby birthing the ADC, and to a large extent, the NDC, which is presenting Peter Obi as the presidential candidate, with former Kano governor, Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso, as his running mate.

Sources also informed The Boss that the hasty reading and passage of the Electoral Act 2026 by the Godswill Akpabio-led National Assembly, with many great areas left unattended to, were also part of the grand design to deprive the ADC the constitutional rights of presenting candidates for the 2027 elections.

But both the ADC and the NDC has vowed that they would follow every process to ensure that the crackdown on opposition parties by the Tinubu administration comes to an abrupt end.

But beyond the intrigues, Nigerians are gearing up to participate fully in the forthcoming election with cross sections of the population either hailing Tinubu for his policies or knocking him for the untold hardship in the land.