Connect with us

Headline

Ondo 2020: The Battle of Two SANs

Published

on

By Eric Elezuo

Things may not once again go the way it went on November 26, 2016 when Governor Rotimi Akeredolu of the All Progressives Congress (APC) stepped into the ring, contesting and defeating his Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) rival, Eyitayo Jegede with an accumulated 244, 842 votes as against the PDP candidate’s 150, 380 votes. This may be so because of the governor’s dwindling profile as well as reported under performance over the years; a notion the governor’s team has since rebutted.

Howbeit, stakeholders are predicting a tough contest as the two legal luminaries test their strengths one more time, four years after, on October 10, 2020 even as the race for who occupies the highest office in the state gets underway.

Prior to the APC primary election, discordant tunes played from the camps of the contestants and party stalwarts, with many deriding the governor bringing his supposed inability to govern the state to the fore. Akeredolu’s ordeal reached a crescendo when his deputy, Mr. Ajayi decamped to the opposition PDP, creating a political vacuum in his administration. To add salt to injury, the governor and Party’s attempt to impeach met a brick wall in the state’s house of Assembly as members became divided, pledging their loyalties to different camps. As at the present, Akeredolu is running the government of Ondo with an opposition deputy.

As if the torments are not enough, one of the aspirants who contested primary election, Nathaniel Adojutelegan, has challenged Akeredolu’s victory as the party’s flag bearer.

Only yesterday, Adojutelegan appeared before the nine-member Chris Ibe-led Appeal Committee at the party’s National Secretariat, Abuja, brandishing a two-page petition dated July 22, challenging the outcome of the primary election that produced Akeredolu. He said the primary election fell short of the party’s constitution, guidelines, rules and regulations and electoral laws of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.

Toeing Adojutelegan’s line, another aspirant, Olusola Oke, issued Akeredolu a seven days ultimatum to conclude all reconciliation efforts with a view to uniting all aggrieved members of the party if he needs his support.

Mr Oke, who came second in the election, said the exercise was predetermined and organised to favour the governor.

“Whatever negotiations should be done timely, we are expecting that within the next seven days all reconciliation efforts, all terms and conditions would have been agreed upon,” he said.

Meanwhile, the Southwest caucus of the party led by Osun State governor, Adegboyega Oyetola, is working round the clock to see that aggrieved members are reconciled with as the October 10 draws closer.

A former President of Nigerian Bar  Association (2008), Oluwarotimi Odunayo Akeredolu, SAN, better known as Rotimi Akeredolu, was born on July 21, 1956. He is at twilight of completing his first tenure as governor of Ondo, and hopeful of winning a second term.

A product of Reverend J. Ola Akeredolu of the Akeredolu family and Lady Evangelist Grace B. Akeredolu of Aderoyiju family of Igbotu, Ese Odo, in Ondo State, Akeredolu started his primary education at Government School, Owo. He proceeded to Aquinas College, Akure, Loyola College, Ibadan and Comprehensive High School, Ayetoro, for his secondary school education and Higher School Certificate, respectively. He went on to the University of Ife (now Obafemi Awolowo University) to study Law, graduating in 1977. He was called to the Nigerian Bar 1978.

Akeredolu was also a Managing Partner at the Law Firm of Olujinmi & Akeredolu, a Law Firm he co-founded with Chief Akin Olujinmi, a former Attorney General and Minister for Justice in Nigeria.

Akeredolu became the Attorney General of Ondo State from 1997–1999. In 1998 he became a Senior Advocate of Nigeria, and was Chairman of the Legal Aid Council between 2005 and 2006. 

In 2012, the Nigerian Bar Association named its new secretariat in Abuja after him with its president citing the reason being the need for “generational identification and recognition of those who had contributed immensely to the development of the association.”

Leveraging on his rising profile and popularity, he contested in November 2011, for Governor of Ondo State in the 2013 elections. He however, lost to the incumbent, Olusegun Mimiko of the Labour Party.

Against all odds including snubbing the party’s national leader, Asiwaju Nola Tinubu, Akeredolu picked the party’s ticket for the 2016 Governorship Election, and went ahead to win the election.

But the candidate of the PDP, Eyitayo Jegede, has raised his hopes of defeating Governor Rotimi Akeredolu.

Jegede, who won the PDP primary with 888 votes to defeat seven other contestants including the state’s deputy governor, Agboola Ajayi, believe that the stage today is different from 2016 when he was cleared as the governorship of the part just days to the election. He had been embroiled in a tussle with billionaire businessman, Jimoh Ibrahim, who for something was the Party’s recognised candidate.

Like Akeredolu, Jegede is also a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) and a former Attorney-General and Commissioner for Justice in the state. But unlike Akeredolu, Jegede is enjoying the support of his co-aspirants, who had pledged to work with him.

“By this victory, we serve a notice on the APC that for them, the end has come. By the grace of God, with the assistance of the people and with the support of all the co-aspirants, we will take over the government of Ondo State come October 2020.”

Eyitayo Jegede, Senior Advocate of Nigeria, SAN, was born to the family of late Chief Johnson Bosede, the Odopetu of Isinkan, Akure, and Mrs C.O Jegede (née Asokeji) from Ipele town, near Owo.

He attended St. Stephen’s “SA” Primary School, Modakeke, Ile-Ife and was at Aquinas College, Akure between 1973 and 1978 for his secondary education where he served as Senior Prefect and participated actively in sports. He obtained his Higher School Certificate Education at Christ’s School Ado Ekiti.  He studied Law at the University of Lagos between 1980 and 1983, and was posted to Yola, Adamawa State for his National Youth service Corps scheme.

He graduated from Law School in 1984, and over the years metamorphosed into a dynamic and seasoned lawyer. In 1992, he was appointed a Notary Public by the Chief Justice of Nigeria and in the space of less than 10 years was elevated to the rank of Senior Advocate of Nigeria. He was deeply and actively involved in political cases and election petition matters, an area of law where his industry and practice is noted and respected.

He worked in the law firm of Murtala Aminu & Co. Yola. After twelve years practice in the law firm, six years of which he was the Head of Chambers, he established his own law firm, Tayo Jegede & Co in 1996. He was heading his law firm of Tayo Jegede & Co in Abuja and Yola before he took his previous appointment as Chief Law Officer in Ondo State.

In May 2009, he was appointed the Hon. Attorney-General and Commissioner for Justice. The ministry reportedly witnessed an unprecedented positive change in all ramifications during his days in office.

He is also very religious, and was a former Chancellor of Anglican Communion of Jalingo, Taraba State, as well as a former Chancellor of Anglican Dioceses of Yola and a member of Implementation Committee of American University, Yola, Adamawa State, as well as a member, Chairman Board of Governors, ABTI Academy International School and member, Board of Trustees, Elizade University, Ilara-Mokin, Ondo-State.

As the October 10 date draws dangerously close, observers, analysts, bookmakers, theorists, political followers and stakeholders can easily tell on whose table the governorship ticket will drop.

 

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Headline

Military Finally Confirms Coup Plot Against Tinubu’s Govt

Published

on

By

The Nigerian Armed Forces has said some officers will be arraigned before a military judicial panel to face trial over an alleged plot to overthrow the government.

The Director, Major General, Samaila Uba, said it is in accordance with the Armed Forces Act and other applicable service regulations.

Maj.-Gen Uba said: “It would be recalled that the Defence Headquarters issued a press statement in October 2025 regarding the arrest of sixteen officers over acts of indiscipline and breaches of service regulations. The Armed Forces of Nigeria (AFN) wishes to inform the general public that investigations into the matter have been concluded and the report forwarded to appropriate superior authority in line with extant regulations.

“The comprehensive investigation process, conducted in accordance with established military procedures, has carefully examined all circumstances surrounding the conduct of the affected personnel.

“The findings have identified a number of the officers with allegations of plotting to overthrow the government which is inconsistent with the ethics, values and professional standards required of members of the AFN.”

According to the statement, the measures being taken are purely disciplinary and part of ongoing institutional mechanisms to preserve order.

“Accordingly, those with cases to answer will be formally arraigned before appropriate military judicial panel to face trial in accordance with the Armed Forces Act and other applicable service regulations. This ensures accountability while upholding the principles of fairness and due process.

“The AFN reiterates that measures being taken are purely disciplinary and part of ongoing institutional mechanisms to preserve order, discipline and operational effectiveness within the ranks. The Armed Forces remain resolute in maintaining the highest standards of professionalism, loyalty and respect for constitutional authority,” it added.

The latest military action came more than three months after it announced on October 2025, that 16 officers had been arrested over alleged acts of indiscipline and violations of service regulations.

It explained that preliminary investigations revealed that the officers’ actions were tied to frustrations stemming from repeated failures in promotion examinations and concerns over stalled career progression.

In a statement issued by the Directorate of Defence Information, the conduct of the affected officers was described as falling short of the standards expected within the military.

It further noted that some of the officers were already under investigation for various offences and were either facing trial or awaiting court proceedings.

“The Armed Forces of Nigeria wishes to inform the public that a routine military exercise has resulted in the arrest of sixteen officers over issues of indiscipline and breach of service regulations. Investigations have revealed that their grievances stemmed largely from perceived career stagnation caused by repeated failure in promotion examinations, among other issues.

“The Armed Forces will not tolerate behaviour that undermines the integrity of the institution or threatens its constitutional role under democratic authority. The Armed Forces of Nigeria remains fully committed to its constitutional responsibilities and will remain professional at all times,” the statement read in part.

The planned military trial also came after months of speculation over an attempt to overthrow the Federal Government, linking it with the cancellation of the 65th Independence Anniversary parade.

The Defence Headquarters (DHQ) had earlier dismissed a report that claimed that 16 military officers, ranging from the rank of Captain to Brigadier General, were taken into custody by the Defence Intelligence Agency over alleged involvement in covert meetings to plan a coup against the government.

It had said that the parade was cancelled to allow President Bola Tinubu to attend a strategic bilateral meeting outside the country, and to enable members of the Armed Forces of Nigeria (AFN) to sustain momentum in the ongoing fight against terrorism, insurgency, and banditry.

“The Federal Government, the legislature, and the judiciary are working closely for the safety, development, and well-being of the nation. Democracy is forever.

“The Armed Forces of Nigeria remains firmly loyal to the Constitution and the Federal Government under the leadership of the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, GCFR,” a statement signed by the Director of Defence Information, Brigadier General Tukur Gusau, in October had added.

But in the same month, soldiers from the Nigerian Army reportedly stormed the Abuja residence of former Bayelsa State governor, Timipre Sylva, over an alleged link to a coup plot.

‎According to multiple security sources, the operation was carried out by a special military team.

‎It was gathered that the raid followed intelligence reports linking the former Minister of State for Petroleum Resources to a series of secret meetings allegedly held with some of the detained military officers accused of plotting to overthrow the government.

‎‎A top security source familiar with the development had disclosed that the operation also extended to Sylva’s Bayelsa home, where his brother, identified as one Paga, was arrested.

‎“The Nigerian Army special team ransacked the home of Timipre Sylva, who is believed to have fled Nigeria.

“He is the South-South former governor frequently mentioned in the case. His brother, Paga, was picked up during the raid,” the source had revealed.

Consequently, the opposition African Democratic Congress (ADC) called on the Federal Government to immediately clarify the true nature of the alleged coup plot involving the arrested military officers.

In a statement signed by its National Publicity Secretary, Bolaji Abdullahi, it voiced worry over “conflicting signals” from government sources, noting that the Defence Headquarters publicly denied ever referencing a coup plot despite widespread media reports to the contrary.

“The ADC is particularly concerned that the federal government has not deemed it fit to make a categorical statement on this very serious matter, especially after the military authorities repeatedly denied that there was such a threat to the government.

“By keeping quiet, the government has deliberately allowed the coup story to fester for whatever reason,” the ADC had said.

Continue Reading

Headline

DSS Has Denied Me Right to Fair Hearing, Malami Laments from Detention

Published

on

By

Former Minister of Justice and Attorney-General of the Federation, Abubakar Malami (SAN), has accused the Department of State Services (DSS) of actions he said were aimed at frustrating his constitutional right to fair hearing and effective legal defence.

In a statement signed by his Special Assistant on Media, Mohammed Bello Doka, Malami said the continuous denial of access to his lawyers had impaired his ability to consult, prepare court filings and give instructions to his legal team.

He described the actions of the DSS as a clear frustration of due process.

“This sequence of events clearly suggests a pattern where arrest precedes investigation, with evidence sought after detention, an approach that is a blatant violation of the rule of law and constitutionally guaranteed rights,” the statement said.

“It is deeply troubling that the DSS appears to be adopting a similar practice of arrest, detention, and then evidence gathering.”

Malami recalled that following charges filed against him by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), the Federal High Court granted him bail.

However, he alleged that the EFCC delayed submitting his international passports to the court for about one week, despite the documents being a key condition for the perfection of bail.

According to him, the delay unnecessarily prolonged his detention and obstructed the execution of a valid court order.

“Immediately after Mr. Malami eventually perfected his bail and was released from Kuje Custodial Centre, he was rearrested by the Department of State Services,” the statement said.

“He was thereafter detained for five days without access to his lawyers or family, and was only allowed to meet his legal team on Friday after prolonged isolation, delays, and grave violations of his fundamental human rights.”

The statement added that the detention occurred at a critical time when Malami was required to prepare and open his defence in an EFCC interim forfeiture proceeding before the Federal High Court.

It stressed that bail granted by a court must be respected.

“No agency should be permitted to neutralise judicial orders through coordinated delays, rearrests, or denial of access to legal representation. Such actions undermine the authority of the courts and pose a serious threat to fundamental human rights,” it said.

Malami reaffirmed his readiness to defend himself in court.

“Mr. Malami remains ready to defend himself fully in court and in accordance with the law, and calls on all state institutions to respect court orders, constitutional guarantees, and the rule of law.”

Continue Reading

Headline

Fubara’s Impeachment Suffers Setback As Judge Rejects Invitation to Set Up Probe Panel

Published

on

By

The Chief Judge of Rivers State, Justice Simeon Amadi, has declined to set up a judicial panel to investigate Governor Siminalayi Fubara, citing a court order.

The Rivers State House of Assembly had requested that Amadi set up a seven-member panel to probe Fubara and his deputy, Ngozi Odu, over allegations of gross misconduct.

However, in a letter dated January 20 and addressed to the Speaker of the House, Martins Amaewhule, the chief judge cited two court orders barring him from receiving, forwarding, or considering any requests to form such a panel.

The judge stated that the orders were served on his office on January 16, 2026 and remain in force.

The chief judge emphasised that constitutionalism and the rule of law require all authorities to obey subsisting court orders, irrespective of their perception of the orders’ validity.

He referenced legal precedents, noting that in a similar case in 2007, the Chief Judge of Kwara State was condemned for ignoring a restraining court order when setting up an investigative panel, a decision later voided by the Court of Appeal.

Justice Amadi further observed that the Speaker has already filed an appeal against the court orders at the Court of Appeal, adding another layer to the ongoing legal proceedings surrounding the allegations.

“By the doctrine of ‘lis pendens’, parties and the court have to await the outcome of the appeal,” he said.

Justice Amadi further stated that the existence of the injunctions and the pending appeal had effectively tied his hands.

“In view of the foregoing, my hand is fettered, as there are subsisting interim orders of injunction and appeal against the said orders. I am therefore legally disabled at this point from exercising my duties under Section 188(5) of the Constitution in the instant,” he said.

The chief judge appealed to the lawmakers to recognise the legal constraints surrounding the matter.

Justice Amadi, therefore, urged the state assembly to be “magnanimous enough to appreciate the legal position of the matter.”

Continue Reading

Trending