Connect with us

Headline

How Clean is Danladi Umar to Preside over Corruption Cases?

Published

on

By Eric Elezuo

On Monday, January 14, 2019, Mr. Danladi Yakubu Umar, will be presiding over the false asset declaration case and other sundry issues levelled against the Chief Judge of Nigeria, Mr. Walter Onnoghen, in what many has described as a rape of the judiciary.

Mr. Umar, who himself has a corruption case dangling over his head, will be heading the panel of three judges on this assignment.

Public opinion has however, not only frowned at the executive muscling of the other arms of government, but insinuated that it is improper for an officer with a huge corruption case to preside over corruption related matters.

Umar is on EFCC’s administrative bail.

On February 2, 2018, the Economic and Financial Crime Commission (EFCC), through a private lawyer, Mr. Festus Keyamo (SAN ), who is now the official spokesperson of the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC), filed bribery charges against the Code of Conduct Tribunal (CCT) chairman, Mr. Danladi Umar, before the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja.

The prosecution in the case marked, CR / 109/18, accused Umar of demanding N10 million as favour from a defendant standing trial before the CCT, Rasheed Owolabi Taiwo, in 2012.

The anti- corruption agency accused Umar of receiving, through his personal assistant, Alhaji Gambo Abdullahi, the sum of N1.8 million out of the N10m demanded from Taiwo in the same year.

The offences were said to be contrary to Section 12 (1 )(a ) & (b) of the Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Act, 2003. Even as the chairman was arraigned on March 16, the case has remained inclusive.

Consequently, a group, The Kingdom Human Rights Foundation International filed a suit requesting the Federal High Court to declare that the CCT, which Umar leads, “was established to enforce the code of conduct for public officers and preside over cases of those accused and charged with failing to maintain a high standard of morality in the conduct of government business and for having failed to conform to the highest standard of public morality and accountability,” it therefore, sought an order, “directing /compelling the chairman of the Code of Conduct Tribunal, Mr. Danladi Yakubu Umar, who has put himself in a situation where his personal interest conflicts with his official duty to immediately vacate the office and cease to act as the chairman of the Code of Conduct Tribunal having been accused and charged to court in charge number CR / 109/18 at the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja.”

In its report, the EFCC said, “There are indications that the Tribunal Chairman (Mr. Umar) might have demanded and collected money from the complainant through his said Personal Assistant. However, efforts to recover the telephone handset used by Justice Umar proved abortive as he claimed he lost the phone in 2012.

“This has made it impossible to subject it to independent analysis with a view to corroborating the allegation. In the same vein, the complainant could not also make available his telephone set on the grounds that he had lost it.”

This also died a natural death.

While undergoing trial at the mercy of Umar, Senator Abubakar Bukola Saraki filed a lawsuit seeking for the CCT chairman to be excused from the trial on asset declaration, because the judge has been on administrative bail with EFCC for allegedly receiving bribe.

The EFCC had earlier dropped charges against Danladi Umar, but some very incriminating documents emerged later on, which tends to substantiate the Senate president’s case against Mr Umar. At this, Umar reportedly went berserk in court, and ordered Saraki’s lawyer arrested. It appeared that from several independent sources, Danladi Umar was in fact guilty of accepting bribes and is tainted. (Refer to Naij.com’s publication https://www.legit.ng/806354-cct-vs-saraki-controversy-see-evidences-cct-chairman-photos.html)

But that passed and the chairman resumed his duties as if nothing was amiss.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Headline

Amid Denials, ADC Reportedly Secures Rainbow Event Centre As Venue for National Convention

Published

on

By

Baring any last minute change, the leadership of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) under Senator David Mark and Rauf Aregbesola as National chairman and National Secretary respectively will hold the party’s National convention at the National Rainbow Event Centre in Garki on Tuesday, 14 April 2026.

The African Democratic Congress (ADC)  has being denied two venues without any cogent reasons despite early arrangements, according to sources.

First, it was alleged that the Abuja Transcorp Hilton Hotels, which was initially approached, turned down the ADC request to use it’s facility.

The ADC, having sensed sabotage, has kept the Rainbow Event Center under rap as it’s definite venue.

The last National Executive Committee (NEC) of the party was held at the same venue.

Located adjacent the Nigerian Police Force Headquarters, the event centre will host the second NEC meeting of the ADC and it’s forthcoming national convention.

According to The Guardian’ report, the ADC leadership has communicated the venue to state chapters with the caveat not to escalate it.

The ADC is in a battle of survival against the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) and has approached the Supreme Court for intervention.

The INEC national chairman Prof Joash Amupitan has suspended recognition of the David Mark-led ADC rendering a leadership vacuum in the party.

INEC said it’s decision was on the basis of an Appeal Court pronouncement that ordered statusquo ante-bellum be maintained.

Sources said the ADC has officially written the Inspector General of Police (IGP) Olatunji Disu for police protection, the Director of State Services and the Comptroller of Civil Defence Corps.

Reports say that why the venue is being quietly decorated moderately for the event, the ADC intends to fully move in the early hours of Tuesday.

The Guardian

Continue Reading

Headline

Shettima Lacks Respect, I Won’t Engage Him, Atiku Responds to VP’s Challenge

Published

on

By

Former Vice President, Atiku Abubakar, has hit back at incumbent Vice President Kashim Shettima over the latter’s poser over achievements in office, saying he won’t take the challenge because Shettima was disrespectful.

Shettima had reportedly challenged Atiku to provide details of eight projects he executed for the development of Northern Nigeria during his tenure as vice president for eight years, as well as name eight individuals he empowered while in office.

But, speaking in an interview with GTA Hausa podcast, Atiku said he would not engage the vice president on the matter.

“I will not respond to Kashim Shettima because he is disrespectful. I am older than him and I have more experience in governance than he does, so I will not respond to him,” he said.

The former vice president further argued that cultural values in Northern Nigeria discourage younger individuals from publicly challenging their elders in such a manner.

“It is not part of our tradition in the North to disrespect elders. You cannot look at someone who is above you in both age and accomplishments and start taunting him. That is not our tradition, so I won’t engage with him,” Atiku emphasised.

Continue Reading

Headline

2027: ADC Leaders Plan Massive Coalition Against APC, Tinubu

Published

on

By

There are indications that the ongoing dispute in the leadership of African Democratic Congress (ADC) may lead to the formation of a 10-party coalition, far bigger than what was initially envisaged, reports quoting sources close to the opposition have said.

The Senator David Mark-led leadership of the ADC was removed from the portal of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) on account of what the election umpire said was its interpretation of the ruling of the Court of Appeal, which directed it to maintain status quo ante bellum in a suit involving the Mark-led executive and Nasiru Bala Gombe, a claimant to the national chairmanship seat of the party.

While Senator Mark-led team has argued that the said Bala Gombe lacks the locus standi to institute the suit or lay claim to the party’s chairmanship seat, having resigned his position in May 2025, INEC insisted it would no longer recognise either of the parties in the ADC.

Following the imbroglio, a source, however, said that those pushing the ADC might end up leading it to a bigger coalition, as the development has opened the eyes of many opposition leaders to the possibility of a broader coalition.

Last week, leaders of the ADC engaged a group of leaders from the Peoples’ Democratic Party (PDP), while it also engaged with leaders of the Peoples Redemption Party (PRP), aside from what was called ongoing cross-party discussions with the newly formed National Democratic Congress (NDC).

“What we are seeing is that the loss of ADC on one hand could be the gain of the opposition in this country. What those fighting the ADC don’t know is that you cannot keep the people silent when they are determined to exercise their rights of association. The ADC will be on the ballot in 2027 with a coalition bigger than earlier envisaged,” a source in the know stated.

The source stated that already, the ADC coalition looks good to benefit from the travails of the Tanimu Turaki-led PDP, as well as the resolve of members of other parties whose leaders believe they can benefit from a broad-based coalition in 2027.

It has earlier been reported that the attempt by the leaders of the ADC to rally a strong party behind the possible choice of former President Goodluck Jonathan or in the alternative, a Peter Obi/Rabiu Kwankwaso presidential ticket, is upsetting the ruling party, whose strategists were said to have activated cells of internal opposition within the emerging coalition.

A leader of the ADC, however, said that those pursuing the coalition party are surely pushing it into better things. The way things are going, we may end up with at least a 10-party coalition. That would be bigger than what we initially set out to do,” the source stated, adding that such a development would amount to a masterstroke against the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) and the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), which he said had chosen to interpret the court ruling awkwardly.

Continue Reading

Trending