The Oracle

The Oracle: Tinubu’s Forest Guard: Who Will Guard the Guard?

Published

7 months ago

July 4, 2025

Eric

By Prof Mike Ozekhome SAN

INTRODUCTION

WHEN THE FOREST HIDES MORE THAN TREES

To paraphrase an old African proverb, “when the forest is silent, beware, it may be plotting”. Nigeria’s forests are no longer just a canopy of trees sheltering wildlife and whispering winds; they have become a theatre of terror. Armed bandits, kidnappers and insurgents have “discovered” what ancient wisdom already knew: that the forest is the perfect hideout. In response, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has proposed a bold and ostensibly visionary plan, the deployment of a national forest guard corps. This move has since sparked hope, skepticism, and fierce federalism-versus-unitarism debates.

At the heart of this strategy is the ambition to reclaim over 1, 129 forest reserves scattered across Nigeria’s sprawling terrain, most of which now serve as havens for terrorists and criminal syndicates. With over 130,000 armed operatives to be recruited and deployed, it is easy to view this initiative as the long-overdue solution to Nigeria’s security woes. But this move is not just about logistics and boots in the bush; it is about sovereignty, legality, and local legitimacy. Is Tinubu’s forest guard plan a federal solution to a national emergency, or is it an ill-fated centralization of local security challenges, enabling the federal government to breath down the necks of State governments?

To answer this, we must examine the legal, constitutional, and operational frameworks of Tinubu’s initiative, evaluate historical precedents, and analyze the potential risks of imposing a federally controlled paramilitary force in forests that historically and legally belong to the states. We must also interrogate whether security can be bought with arms alone; or whether it grows from the grass roots up.

But before we venture into the thicket of policy and power, let us consider the context that birthed this proposal. Nigeria’s forests, which were once ecological sanctuaries, have gradually degenerated into lawless zones of bloodbath. The green expanse that should echo with bird calls and animal grunts now reverberate with gunfire. Insecurity in rural and agrarian communities has reached such alarming heights that farmers have virtually abandoned their lands, leading to food insecurity, economic stagnation, and mass displacement. The forests no longer nurture life; they generate death.

BETWEEN POLICY AND IMPLEMENTATION

The government’s decision to respond with a large-scale recruitment of forest guards may indeed seem intuitive, after all, it aligns with the global trend of ecological militarization in fragile states. Yet, the structure of implementation matters deeply. If the architecture of this plan disregards Nigeria’s federal nature, it risks exacerbating the very crisis it was intended to solve. Forests may be rooted in soil; but the guardianship of that soil is rooted in law, identity, and community ownership. The principle of quic quid plantatur solo solo cedit applies. Forest guards who do not share the language, culture, history or kinship of the terrains they are sent to police will surely be seen as outsiders. And such outsiders in the forest may become either victims or villains.

Furthermore, this proposal arrives at a critical moment in Nigeria’s democratic evolution. Debates over state and community policing, restructuring, devolution of powers and regional autonomy are no longer intellectual abstractions; they have become national imperatives. See sections 215 and 216 of the 1999 Constitution. Tinubu’s plan whether deliberately or inadvertently, intersects with these gaping fault lines. To superimpose a federally-managed forest force without recognizing the nuanced relationships between state, land and community is to risk uprooting fragile peace and replacing it with more severe antagonism.

Now, are we really a federation in truth or merely in name? I dare say what we operate in the guise of federalism is actually a unitary form of government. Can national unity be enforced through uniformed patrols, or is it better than it be cultivated through shared values and governance? As we delve deeper, the question is not just who guards the forest, but who decides who guards the forest, and in whose name. Indeed, a deeper question: Who will guard the Guard?

THE FOREST, THE FEDERALIST AND THE FEDERATION

CONSTITUTIONAL REALITIES: THE POWER OF THE STATES OVER FORESTS

In any federal system, the distribution of power especially over land and internal security is a defining hallmark. Nigeria’s federalism is no exception. The country’s current structure, codified under the 1999 Constitution (as amended), clearly delineates the powers of federal, state and local governments.See sections 2(2),3(1-6) of the 1999 Constitution. A close reading of section 7 and the Fourth Schedule ( paragraph 2( b) to the Constitution highlights the responsibilities of Local Government Councils, including the control and regulation of agricultural and natural resources and by extension, includes forest land not reserved to the Federal Government. This immediately places forests, by default, under the control of the states, unless specifically designated otherwise,since Local Governments are located in states.

Furthermore, the Land Use Act,1978, which is incorporated into the Constitution by reference (section 315), gives state governors control over all lands within their territory, excluding those under federal use, to hold them in trust for the people of their States. The Act empowers governors to allocate land in urban areas to individuals and organizations, and to oversee the use of non-urban land through Local Government Councils. Consequently, the direct implication is that any forest or land not classified under national parks, Federal Reserve zones, or military controlled areas, falls squarely under the jurisdiction of the state.

FEDERAL V. STATE POWER

Of Nigeria’s 1, 129 officially gazetted forest reserves, the vast majority are managed by state forestry departments under their ministries of agriculture, rural development or environment. These include large forest blocks in states like Cross River, Ondo, Ogun, Taraba, and Ekiti, many of which are vital to local economies, ecological sustainability, and food security. The federal government only controls forest areas designated as National Parks(such as Gashaka-Gumti National Park, Kainji Lake National Park, Cross River National Park, and Old Oyo National Park), administered under the National Park Service, an agency of the Federal Ministry of Environment.

Attempts to impose direct federal recruitment and control over forest guards in state-managed forests without legislative amendments or formal agreements risk violating both the spirit and letter of the law. Even within the federal legislative framework, forest policing is not explicitly listed on the Exclusive Legislative List, meaning that it falls under either the Concurrent List (shared responsibilities between the federal and states) or, in most practical scenarios, the Residual List, which is left to states’ discretion.

UNITARISM IN DISGUISE?: THE DANGER OF A FEDERAL PARAMILITARY FORCE

Unitarism masquerading as federal security cooperation is a deeply sensitive issue in Nigeria, where ethnic plurality, historical grievances, and political mistrust run deep. The idea that over 130,000 armed operatives could be centrally recruited, trained, and deployed under federal command while ostensibly operating within state territories is understandably alarming to many stakeholders. It evokes painful memories of other federally-controlled agencies that have operated with little or no regard for local dynamics and often with tragic consequences.

The Special Anti-Robbery Squad (SARS) is a case in point. Established as a unit within the Nigeria Police Force, SARS was accused of gross human rights violations, including extra-judicial killings, torture, and extortion. Its federal command structure meant little accountability to state governments or communities. The #EndSARS protests of 2020, which began as youth-led demands for police reforms, quickly morphed into a broader call for systemic change, highlighting the dangers of over-centralized security control architecture.

Similarly, the Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps (NSCDC), while useful in its community protection mandate, has often been accused of operational inefficiencies and jurisdictional clashes with state authorities. Cases of NSCDC operatives acting with impunity or engaging in power struggles with local law enforcement agents are well documented.

Against this backdrop, Tinubu’s forest guard plan raises critical concerns. How can a federal command effectively manage such a force across diverse terrains, languages, and cultures without falling into the same trap of over-centralization and under-accountability? What happens when these guards act outside the law, or when federal and state authorities disagree on deployment priorities? Who investigates complaints of misconduct, especially in remote rural areas? Who has the final say?

These questions are not merely theoretical. In countries with similar federal structures, such as India and the United States, forest protection and environmental policing are almost always handled at the state or provincial level, often under decentralized bureaucracies with state-specific laws and enforcement mechanisms. For instance, India’s Forest Protection Committees are embedded in local governance structures, while U.S. State Park Rangers operate independently of federal policing units unless specific interstate or federal crimes are involved.
Nigeria’s own federal structure should offer no less sophistication. The creation of another federal paramilitary force, especially one that operates deep in the natives’ forests without local allegiance or accountability, risks becoming not a solution but a security liability and worse, a political tool in the hands of a powerful centre.

INDIGENOUS SECURITY MODELS: THE CASE FOR LOCAL RECRUITMENT

The wisdom of local recruitment is both practical and cultural. Insecurity in Nigeria’s forests is not just about guns and patrols, it is about intelligence, relationships and trust. Bandits and criminal syndicates thrive in environments where locals are alienated from the security structure. Conversely, they are more easily repelled when local vigilantes, hunters and indigenous operatives form part of the security fabric.

The Nigerian Hunter and Forest Security Service (NHFSS), which operates across the 36 states and the FCT Abuja, provides a compelling model. Comprised largely of traditional hunters and forest dwellers, the NHFSS brings a unique blend of tactical expertise and cultural affinity. In states like Kogi, Kebbi and the FCT, NHFSS operatives have been instrumental in intercepting kidnap gangs, uncovering illegal encampments, and collaborating with security agencies. Their effectiveness is rooted not in superior weaponry, but in their deep understanding of their peculiar terrain, their loyalty to the community, and the trust they command from locals.

A retired Army General, Peter Aro, hailed the development as a critical step in addressing rising insecurity within Nigeria’s forested regions, particularly the scourge of banditry, kidnapping, and insurgency. Forest guards must possess field survival skills, terrain literacy, and community integration. These are not qualities one can mass-produce in Abuja through crash course training programmes. Furthermore, security should be intimately linked to traditional institutions, such as village heads, district councils, and traditional rulers, who provide crucial intelligence and moral authority.

Security analyst Chidi Omeje has also pointed out the danger of sending “fresh recruits with basic firearms” into forest zones where criminal elements are known to possess military-grade weapons. He advocates for a dual-layered model, where locally embedded forest guards work alongside the military and police but under local command structures.

There are also precedents for success. The Amotekun Corps in the South West, and the Benue Community Volunteer Guards, are examples of locally-driven initiatives that have shown promising results. While not without their challenges, these corps are better attuned to the local environment and have the legitimacy to act swiftly in ways that federal forces cannot.

Furthermore, a decentralized approach would stimulate local economies. Recruitment of indigenes provides employment, instills civic pride and strengthens the social contract bond. It also ensures that the guards see themselves as protectors, not as occupiers, a distinction that is vital in volatile communities where the line between security agent and aggressor is often thin.

In summary, while the federal government has a legitimate role in coordinating national responses to threats, its approach must be that of a facilitator, not a commander. Support through training, funding, surveillance technology (e.g., drones, forest mapping systems), and standard setting is invaluable. But command and control must remain at the state level, rooted in the soil, culture, language, idiosyncrasies and rhythms of the communities the guards are sworn to protect.

Between The Forest And The Firepower: Finding The Right Strategy

The Forest As Nigeria’s New Battlefield
Nigeria’s forests, once treasured for their ecological richness and environmental contributions, are increasingly viewed through the lens of national security. Spanning over 10 million hectares which is about 10% of the total land area of Nigeria, Nigeria’s forest reserves are now being infiltrated by violent actors and used as operational bases for bandits, insurgents, arms traffickers, and cross-border criminal networks. These reserves especially those in Kwara, Niger, Benue, Taraba, Zamfara, Kaduna, and Oyo have morphed into de facto war zones, where traditional policing is rendered ineffective and the military often finds itself in reactive mode.

One particularly troubling example is the Kainji Lake National Park, a protected area that spans the borders of Kwara and Niger States. Though it is officially under federal protection, its vast and difficult-to-monitor terrain makes it a prime corridor for terrorist and bandit movements. According to security reports from the Nigerian Army’s 8 Division, several armed groups have taken advantage of the park’s proximity to Nigeria’s northwestern and central states to establish hidden bases, smuggle arms, and coordinate attacks.

Similarly, the Old Oyo National Park, which straddles Oyo, Kwara, and Niger States, has become a hotspot for criminal activity. Local intelligence from communities surrounding the park indicates that bandit groups expelled from Zamfara and Katsina have found refuge in this forest. These criminal elements exploit the remoteness of the area and the absence of a permanent security presence to regroup and launch attacks on nearby settlements.

Beyond national parks, numerous ungazetted forests especially in the Middle Belt serve as strategic hideouts for Fulani militia groups, foreign mercenaries, and rogue elements linked to organized crime. In Benue State, Governor Hyacinth Alia has repeatedly warned of incursions by foreign terrorists, allegedly linked to cross-border herder militias. The Upper Ogun Forest Reserve, a large forest block in Kwara, has also come under scrutiny following reports that Mahmuda terrorist group members used it to transit between Nigeria and the Republic of Benin.

The implications of these developments are profound. Without forest security, Nigeria not only risks losing its forests to environmental degradation but also ceding large swaths of land to non-state actors, thus turning forest reserves into breeding grounds for violent extremism. Yet, while the urgency to act is undeniable now, the quality of response matters more than its speed.

Deploying undertrained or poorly equipped forest guards into these volatile environments would be akin to sending lambs into a lion’s den. The intelligence, terrain mastery, and firepower required in such engagements go far beyond the remit of conventional paramilitary forces. You cannot send men with shotguns into a forest ruled by terrorists with RPGs. This is not hyperbole, it is a stark reality, backed by recurring video evidence of bandits showcasing sophisticated weaponry, satellite communication tools, and, in some cases, armored vehicles.

Military Might Vs. Paramilitary Prowess: A Strategic Dilemma

At the heart of Nigeria’s forest security conundrum lies a fundamental strategic mismatch. On one side is the proposal to deploy lightly armed forest guards; on the other is a threat landscape populated by insurgent groups with military-grade capabilities. Nigeria remains one of the most affected countries by terrorism, with Boko Haram, ISWAP, and multiple bandit groups shifting focus from urban bombings to rural forest insurgency.

Reports confirm that many of these groups are now entrenched in forests stretching from Zamfara to Taraba, taking advantage of limited surveillance and sluggish security response. These criminal outfits reportedly employ rocket-propelled grenades (RPGs), improvised explosive devices (IEDs), drones and night-vision equipment, a sophisticated arsenal far superior to the basic AK-47s or pump-action rifles many forest guards are expected to wield. This power disparity raises a serious question: Can forest guards, even in significant numbers, hold their ground against such adversaries?

A Desirable Narrative

The answer, quite evidently, is no, at least not alone. This does not render the forest guard model irrelevant, but it necessitates a reimagining of their role. Forest guards should not be conceptualized as primary combatants but as intelligence operatives, terrain scouts, and first responders. Their role must be complementary, not confrontational, with local guards. Embedded within local communities, they are best positioned to detect unusual movements, provide early warnings, and assist in planning police or military interventions.

Such integration would mirror the highly successful model employed by the Civilian Joint Task Force (CJTF) in the North-East, which supported the Nigerian military in combating Boko Haram. The CJTF did not go to war with terrorists alone. Rather, they provided community intelligence, identified suspects, and enabled smoother military operations.

The same should apply to forest guards. Deployed as community embedded liaisons, their greatest strength lies not in brute force but in proximity, familiarity, acculturation and adaptability. They must work in synergy with the local guards, Army, Police, DSS, and NSCDC, ensuring that information gathered at the grassroots level informs strategic planning at the federal level.

Another vital element is equipment and communication infrastructure. In many rural areas, mobile networks are poor, and emergency communication is non-existent. Forest guards should be equipped with satellite phones, GPS trackers, surveillance drones, and bodycams. Training must include combat survival, hostage negotiation, and tactical withdrawal protocols. It’s not enough to train them how to fight; they must also learn when, where and how not to fight.

The Path Forward: A True Federal Partnership

While President Tinubu’s forest guard initiative is ambitious and well-intentioned, its execution must be shaped by constitutional fidelity, operational pragmatism, and community trust. Nigeria’s diversity requires policies that are locally adaptive but nationally coordinated. A strategic roadmap should therefore include the following:

Legislative Reform and National Forest Security Act

This act should define the parameters of forest security across the federation. It must empower states to create, manage, and control forest guard units while providing room for federal assistance in the form of funding, training standards, and interoperability protocols with federal security services. The act should also clarify jurisdictional boundaries, ensuring there’s no operational conflict between federal and state forces.

Indigenous Recruitment and Decentralized Command

Only indigenous recruits, drawn from host communities, should serve in forest guard units. This principle ensures language proficiency, cultural awareness, and community acceptance. State governments, in partnership with local traditional rulers, should drive recruitment processes, with background checks vetted by local police and DSS operatives. This will mitigate risks of infiltration by criminal elements.

Technology-Driven Surveillance Infrastructure

Equipping forest guards with modern tools is not optional; it is imperative. Drone surveillance, motion-triggered cameras, satellite-linked walkie-talkies, and forest mapping systems should be deployed. The National Space Research and Development Agency (NASRDA) and Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC) can play a supporting role in developing and deploying such technologies.
Strategic Federal Support, Not Operational Control

The role of the Federal Ministry of Environment and Office of the National Security Adviser must be clearly coordinative, not administrative. Federal agencies should support states through centralized training academies, logistics depots, and intelligence sharing platforms, but the command structure should remain domiciled in state ministries or specially created state security commissions.

Community Accountability and Oversight Boards

Every state should establish Forest Guard Oversight Committees composed of community leaders, the youth, civil society groups, religious figures, and security agencies. These committees would track operations, address complaints, and ensure that forest guards act within the bounds of law and ethics. Regular town hall reports and audits should be mandated.

Integrate Environmental Protection and Counter-Insurgency Goals

One major flaw in Nigeria’s security strategy is the siloed approach to environmental policy and national security. The forest guard initiative offers a unique opportunity to bridge this divide. Forest guards should be cross-trained in both environmental protection and tactical field surveillance, thereby serving a dual purpose: preserving Nigeria’s biodiversity while countering environmental crimes that fund insurgent activities.

Illegal logging, poaching, and charcoal trading are multi-billion-naira black-market economies that fuel insecurity in rural areas. According to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, environmental crimes in West Africa generate funds that are often funneled to criminal cartels and armed groups. A forest security force that understands these dynamics can better dismantle such networks.
It is imperative to partner with the Federal Ministry of Environment, Nigerian Conservation Foundation, and international organizations like UNEP to embed environmental crime detection into forest guard training modules.

Establish a Centralized Forest Intelligence Command

Given the complexity of forest based criminal operations and their links to wider terrorism and transnational crime, it is essential to build a dedicated forest intelligence infrastructure. This unit, the Centralized Forest Intelligence Command (CFIC), should be a joint inter-agency platform bringing together the Police, NCDC, DSS, Military Intelligence, Nigerian Immigration Service, local guards and Forest Guard Commanders from each state.

CFIC would use advanced tools such as geospatial intelligence (GEOINT), signals intelligence (SIGINT), and drone reconnaissance to provide real-time threat mapping, track insurgent movements, and anticipate forest-to-urban migration of threats. Such an initiative would vastly improve response time and prevent security breaches before they happen.
The CFIC should be integrated into Nigeria’s National Security Architecture under the supervision of the National Security Adviser, but operated through a state federal coordination model with joint personnel and interlinked command centres.

Promote Cross-Border Forest Security Cooperation

Given that Nigeria shares porous forest borders with Benin Republic, Niger, Chad, and Cameroon, it is vital to recognize the transnational dimension of forest insecurity. Bandits and militants frequently move across these borders, exploiting weak surveillance and diplomatic inertia.

Nigeria must lead in establishing a Regional Forest Security Pact in collaboration with ECOWAS and the African Union (AU) security platforms. This pact would promote joint patrols, shared intelligence, coordinated raids, and the establishment of joint forest monitoring stations in border regions like Borno, Taraba, Cross River, and Sokoto.

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs should work with ECOWAS to initiate bilateral and multilateral forest security agreements, underpinned by joint training programs and extradition protocols for forest-based offenders.

Conclusion

Where The Trees Stand Tall, So Too Must The Constitution

In the final analysis, Nigeria’s forest guard initiative under President Bola Tinubu offers more than just a policy experiment; it presents a litmus test for the country’s commitment to federalism, local empowerment, administration and smart security strategy. The forests in question may be dense with trees, but the issues surrounding them are denser still: constitutional authority, operational viability, regional identity, and national unity.

We have seen how the forests have evolved from mere ecological zones into the dark sanctuaries of insurgents, traffickers, and mercenaries. We have seen how well meaning central interventions, if not delicately structured, can become bulldozers flattening both local agency and constitutional principles. And we have seen how a locally grounded, technologically equipped, and constitutionally-compliant model can actually work transforming the forest guard idea from a controversial headline into a security legacy.

But let us be clear, you do not fix a leaky roof by installing a chandelier. You do not solve rural insecurity with a flood of centrally deployed gunmen unfamiliar with the peculiar terrain or the tongues spoken therein. Instead, Nigeria must adopt a model that blends local trust with federal muscle, traditional knowledge with modern technology, and constitutional wisdom with operational pragmatism.

The forest is watching, as are the communities who live by it, feed from it, and now fear it. Let us ensure that the guardians we appoint are not strangers in camouflage, but sons and daughters of the soil; trained, trusted, and tethered to the trees they are sworn to protect. After all, if we cannot see the forest for the law, we may end up losing both. And in that case, the trees would not be the only casualty left standing in silence; our Democracy may also be.

The Oracle

The Oracle: The University As Catalyst for Societal Development (Pt. 6)

Published

1 week ago

January 30, 2026

Eric

By Prof Mike Ozekhome SAN

INTRODUCTION

The last episode of this intervention examined the following core functions of universities as tools for societal development; character formation and value inculcation; research and innovation; economic development; civic engagement and social responsibility; cultural and global influence; social mobility and equity. This week, we shall continue with same theme-focusing on political development; cultural and social transformation. We will thereafter outline the challenges posed to those roles by such factors as underfunding and infrastructural decay and academic brain-drain. Enjoy.

CORE FUNCTIONS OF UNIVERSITIES AS TOOLS FOR SOCIETAL DEVELOPMENT (CONTINUES)

Social Mobility & Equity

One of the most profound contributions of the university to societal development is its role in advancing social mobility and equity. At its best, the university serves as a ladder, a structure through which individuals can ascend beyond the limitations imposed by birth, background, or circumstance. For those born into poverty, marginalization, or restricted opportunity, the gates of a university are not merely doors into lecture halls—they are portals to a transformed life. Education at this level arms the disadvantaged with skills, credentials, and networks that can dramatically alter the trajectory of both their personal fortunes and the fortunes of the communities from which they come.

Empirical evidence substantiates this reality. Research by The Sutton Trust reveals that young people from low-income homes who attend university are four times more likely to achieve upward social mobility than their peers who do not. The study further notes that while elite institutions play a role, even less selective universities are critical engines of social advancement, enrolling large numbers of disadvantaged students who go on to secure higher-paying roles and greater social standing. This shows that the university does not merely reproduce privilege. It has the capacity to disrupt it, provided it remains accessible and responsive to the needs of wider society.

Beyond individual ascent, universities contribute to societal equity by narrowing class-based disparities. They create a relatively level platform where students from diverse backgrounds can compete on the same intellectual field. In this regard, the OECD report Equity in Education: Breaking Down Barriers to Social Mobility emphasizes that when educational systems are designed to promote fairness, students from different socio-economic backgrounds achieve more comparable outcomes in learning, well-being, and professional life.

This is not only a moral good; it is a civic necessity. A society where upward mobility is possible is a society less fractured by resentment, instability, and despair.

In the wider sense, the university’s pursuit of equity strengthens the social fabric itself. Graduates who have risen through the crucible of disadvantage often become symbols of possibility for their communities. Their success challenges fatalistic narratives that consign the poor to perpetual poverty, inspiring others to strive. Furthermore, by producing leaders, innovators, and professionals from diverse backgrounds, universities ensure that the corridors of power, policy, and influence are not monopolized by the privileged few, but reflect the pluralism of the society they serve.

In sum, the university as a catalyst for social mobility and equity is not a theoretical ideal but a demonstrable fact. It provides the opportunity for disadvantaged individuals to rise, contributes to a fairer society, and in doing so, strengthens the moral, economic, and political foundations of a nation. As long as universities remain committed to widening access and supporting success across socio-economic divides, they will continue to be engines not merely of knowledge, but of justice and transformation.

Political Development

One of the most profound contributions of the university to societal development lies in its role as a crucible for political development. A healthy society does not stumble into good governance; it must intentionally raise leaders, nurture public servants, train policy experts, and instill civic consciousness in its citizens. The university is the most natural and potent environment for this training because it combines intellectual discipline with exposure to real societal challenges. Within its walls, young minds are sharpened not only by textbooks but by debates, student politics, and the constant testing of ideas against reality. Thus, the university is not merely a factory of professionals but a nursery of statesmen.

Universities function as training grounds for political leaders, administrators, and policy thinkers who later become the architects of national progress (Time, “It’s Time Africa Had Its Own Harvard.’ Inside a University Training African Leaders to Solve African Problems” https://time.com/5603886/african-leadership-university-mauritius-fred-swaniker/). Institutions such as the African Leadership University (Mauritius) and Senghor University (Egypt) were designed with this vision in mind. The former grooms young Africans to tackle pressing issues like climate change, governance, and entrepreneurship by applying knowledge directly to leadership challenges. The latter, founded in 1990, deliberately trains cadres in public administration, international cooperation, and policy development to equip Africa with leaders capable of addressing its development needs. These examples reveal that universities are more than academic sanctuaries; they are political incubators shaping the competence and vision of future governance.

Equally important, universities act as laboratories of democracy and civic activism. History demonstrates that some of Africa’s greatest liberators and political thinkers first tasted civic responsibility in the university environment. The University of Fort Hare in South Africa stands as a monumental example (Wikipedia, “University of Fort Hare” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Fort_Hare?utm). It produced Nelson Mandela, Oliver Tambo, Robert Sobukwe, Julius Nyerere, and Robert Mugabe—figures who later became the faces of African liberation and governance Fort Hare was not simply an academic space; it was a political furnace where the ideas of freedom, equality, and justice were hammered into steel. This legacy underscores that the democratic consciousness of nations is often first awakened in their universities.

In contemporary Africa, universities continue to serve as strongholds for human rights, democracy, and civic resilience. The University of the Western Cape has institutionalized this role by hosting the African Universities Hub for Human Rights (AUH). Through summer schools and training programs, it equips human rights defenders and civic actors with strategies to strengthen democracy and resist authoritarian drift.

In sum, the university plays a catalytic role in political development by producing leaders, sharpening public administrators, cultivating policy expertise, and incubating civic consciousness. Societies that neglect this function risk raising generations of technically skilled graduates but politically barren citizens.

Cultural and Social Transformation

Universities are not merely academic institutions; they are crucibles of cultural and social transformation, playing powerful roles in shaping values, identities, and movements that redefine societies. Through their educational and research activities, universities nurture and reinforce social norms. Subjects like sociology, anthropology, and gender studies help students understand societal dynamics; whether appreciating the need for democratic governance or confronting entrenched caste and class structures, thus guiding reflection and change (https://teachers.institute/higher-education-its-context-and-linkages/higher-education-social-stability-change/? > Accessed on 9th September, 2025). Institutions also foster identity formation through community rituals, academic traditions, and public intellectualism. Universities that actively promote diversity and inclusivity further shape institutional culture. For example, the University of Rijeka in Croatia has implemented a Gender Equality Plan (2021–2025) (https://uniri.hr/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/University-of-Rijeka-Gender-Equality-Plan-2021-2025_signature.pdf> Accessed on 9th September, 2025), embedding gender perspectives across its curriculum, institutional policies, and organizational culture. Similarly, Nelson Mandela University in South Africa has made deliberate efforts to normalize female leadership, appointing women to key roles such as Vice-Chancellor, Chancellor, Deputy Vice-Chancellor, and most deanships—demonstrating how universities can lead shifts in cultural expectations and identity norms (https://iol.co.za/news/south-africa/2025-01-14-nelson-mandela-university-leads-gender-transformation-in-academia/> Accessed on 9th September, 2025).

Across the globe, universities have also become battlegrounds and incubators for gender equality and inclusion. Times Higher Education’s 2025 list of top universities advancing the UN SDG 5 (gender equality) includes institutions like Walailak University in Thailand, which actively supports this (https://www.timeshighereducation.com/student/best-universities/top-universities-tackling-gender-equality? > Accessed on 9th September, 2025). Charles Darwin University in Australia shows a different but equally impactful example: it partnered with Our Watch—a national violence prevention organization—to eliminate gender-based violence and promote gender equality across its campuses through curriculum updates, staff training, revised policies, and outreach programs (https://www.couriermail.com.au/subscribe/news/1/?sourceCode=CMWEB_WRE170_a_GPT&dest=https%3A%2%2Fwww.couriermail.com.au%2Fnews%2Fcdu-partners-with-our-watch-to-combat-gender-violence-and-promote-equality-across-campuses%2Fnews-story%2F9d46cdfc400682895c08f1cd11fa01aa&memtype=anonymous&mode=premium&v21=GROUPA-Segment-2-NOSCORE> Accessed on 9th September, 2025). In Africa, Honoris United Universities has played a notable role in promoting gender equity across its campuses and alumni network. Their gender-focused programs, including a virtual bootcamp that engaged 540 women entrepreneurs, and sustained efforts to increase female participation in STEM, demonstrate the power of inclusive education to catalyze socio-economic transformation (https://honoris.net/education-for-impact/community-initiatives/gender-equity-pan-african-initiatives-for-catalyzing-change/ > Accessed on 9th September, 2025).

Universities are also frequently epicenters of protest, resistance, and reform. More recently, European campuses have become rallying grounds for political expression, as seen in widespread protests against the Gaza war in 2024 (https://www.lemonde.fr/en/international/article/2024/05/17/protests-against-gaza-war-take-hold-across-european-campuses_6671727_4.html> Accessed on 9th September, 2025). Indian higher education has produced thought leaders such as Dr. B.R. Ambedkar and Medha Patkar, who used their university experiences as platforms for social justice and environmental activism, demonstrating how campuses can nurture reform-minded leaders committed to equity and democracy (https://teachers.institute/higher-education-its-context-and-linkages/universities-social-change-leadership/google_vignette> Accessed on 8th September, 2025).

Taken together, these examples demonstrate that universities wield profound influence beyond academics. They shape societal values, challenge entrenched norms, and foster identity through scholarship and inclusive culture. They promote social justice and gender equality via proactive institutional policies, outreach, and partnerships. Most importantly, they serve as vibrant spaces for social movements and reform, giving rise to leaders and movements that transform nations.

CHALLENGES HINDERING UNIVERSITIES AS CATALYSTS

Underfunding and Infrastructural Decay
In the grand drama of societal progress, the university ought to be the altar where knowledge is forged, innovation is sparked, and ethical leadership is nurtured. Yet, this noble sacrament is desecrated when the institutions themselves are starved, starved of funds, starved of capacity, starved of dignity. Underfunding is not a mere budgetary gap; it is the severance of the lifeline that binds society’s promise to its tomorrow.

Across Nigeria, the scars of neglect are unmistakable. At the University of Ibadan, once a temple of learning, lecture theatres now bear cracked walls, peeling paint, and leaking roofs; roofs under which the flicker of erudition struggles to glow. Trenchard Hall, symbol of legacy, is now more memorial than monument. Students endure broken seats, dim lighting, erratic power that forces reliance on noisy generators, and water scarcity that sullies hygiene. The libraries (vaults of intellect) are diminished by antiquated facilities and limited spaces. This is no allegory. It is the everyday reality (Independent, “University Of Ibadan: A Legacy Under Threat Of Decaying Infrastructure” https://independent.ng/university-of-ibadan-a-legacy-under-threat-of-decaying-infrastructure/?utm).

Brain Drain of Academics

The university, ideally a crucible of ideas, innovation, and national advancement, is being hallowed out, not by design, but by neglect. The exodus of academics from Nigeria, committed scholars, researchers, lecturers emigrating in search of sustenance and scholarly dignity, is not a mere migration. It is a hemorrhage of the mind and conscience. A man of the world must call this what it is: a betrayal of potential, a systemic failure, and a moral wound.

In Nigeria, the push factors are undeniable: chronically low salaries, delayed allowances, incessant strikes, insecurity, and the corrosion of academic autonomy all conspire to drive brilliant minds abroad. Lecturers earning a mere ₦195,000 monthly (around US $195), while their peers in Niger or Chad earn more, demonstrate the absurd disparity that compels intellectual flight (Dateline, “The Persistent Brain Drain in Nigeria’s University System” https://dateline.ng/the-persistent-brain-drain-in-nigerias-university-system/?utm). The weight of poor compensation, compounded by delayed Earned Academic Allowances (EAA), overwhelm moral appeals; the youth of academia (the most promising) flee when their dignity is denied. (To be continued).

THOUGHT FOR THE WEEK

“Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world” – Nelson Mandela

The Oracle

The Oracle: The University As a Catalyst for Societal Development (Pt. 5)

Published

2 weeks ago

January 23, 2026

Eric

By Prof Mike Ozekhome SAN

INTRODUCTION

The last instalment of this treatise examined the theoretical frameworks and models linking university education to Societal Developments; Modernization Theory; Social Learning Theory; Dependency Theory and Knowledge Economy Theory. This week’s feature continues same theme with the Tripple-Helix Model. Later, we shall examine The Role of Universities as Tools for Societal Development. Enjoy.

CORE FUNCTIONS OF UNIVERSITIES AS TOOLS FOR SOCIETAL DEVELOPMENT (CONTINUES)

Character Formation and Values

One of the most profound contributions of the university to societal development lies not in laboratories or lecture halls, but in the shaping of character and the cultivation of values. A nation does not collapse because it lacks resources; it collapses because it lacks men and women of integrity to administer those resources. Thus, while universities are often celebrated as centers of intellectual training, their deeper and more enduring mandate is to mold individuals whose lives are governed by honesty, responsibility, discipline, and accountability. A degree may secure a desk, but only character secures trust—and trust is the currency of every lasting institution.

The university, when functioning at its highest ideal, is not merely a dispenser of certificates but a forge of virtue. It is a place where the youthful energy of students is refined into principled citizenship. Within its walls, young men and women are exposed not only to technical skills but also to systems of discipline, codes of conduct, and ethical debates that prepare them to lead with conscience as well as competence. In shaping values such as respect for truth, fidelity to promises, and reverence for justice, the university forms the bedrock upon which any sustainable development must rest. Research confirms that this role is neither abstract nor ornamental. A mixed-method study on Iranian universities found that moral character—encompassing virtues, social responsibility, and ethical learning—significantly influenced both academic performance and civic maturity. The study concluded that fostering moral character within the university environment directly enhances students’ contributions to society.

Similarly, the Jubilee Centre for Character and Virtues at the University of Birmingham emphasizes that higher education must cultivate “holistic character development” as a foundation for societal flourishing. Their Framework for Character Education in Universities stresses that virtues like integrity, resilience, and empathy are not optional add-ons, but essential outcomes of a complete education.

The implication is clear: societies that neglect character education, even while producing skilled professionals, risk raising a generation of clever rogues—men and women who know how to manipulate systems but not how to steward them. Corruption, injustice, and exploitation are rarely the fruits of ignorance; they are the products of unformed character. By contrast, a university that deliberately prioritizes moral formation produces leaders who are trustworthy, citizens who are responsible, and professionals who recognize that true progress is not measured merely in profit, but in justice, dignity, and accountability.

In this sense, the university is a moral compass for the nation. It does not simply transmit knowledge—it transmits values that safeguard the soul of society. And where such values are missing, no amount of technical expertise can prevent decay. Therefore, strengthening universities in their role as cultivators of character is not just an academic necessity; it is a national imperative.
Research and Innovation

The university as aforementioned is a hub for research and innovative discoveries that further mankind in different spheres. Research promotes critical and analytical thinking leading to new knowledge and better understanding of one’s field of study. Further, the significance of research is compounded by the fact that it often leads to innovation which in turn contributes to a growing national economy. The university system in basic and applied researches has made significant contributions to the world/field of science, technology and policy. Student and educators alike, involve themselves in deep research amounting advances in important fields such as the medical field, helping with the formulation of vaccines and medications as well as helping to deepen the understanding and understanding of diseases, bringing us a step closer to formulating cures.
Courses such as robotics have aided in the creation of machines which have helped in the development of the society and nations at large by allowing for ease and speed in certain tasks, even in the creation of Artificial Intelligence which now aids research amongst a number of things in vast fields of study.
The university in providing the intellectual foundation, empirical evidence, and innovative ideas necessary for informed decision-making and progress, allows for innovative thinking amongst humans aiding the development of societies in policy formulation that better the coexistence of nations and societies.
Universities often provide resources and support for both faculty and students to develop entrepreneurial skills and launch new ventures, including spin-off companies. They administer research grants and funding opportunities to support faculty in exploring new research ideas and developing innovative solutions, thereby encouraging innovation and creative thinking.

Economic Development
The university system aids economic development through the creation of job opportunities in its various faculties. It allows for employment of teachers, researchers, even down to construction workers and cleaning services, thereby reducing unemployment rates in societies. The University is usually of hub of commerce and serves as a local economic stimulus through the creation of demand by the students and staff as well the institution itself spending on local goods and services, and by increasing the “supply side” of the economy through the development of human capital (skilled graduates) and innovation (research and technology). These contributions enhance the local workforce, attract new businesses, help existing ones innovate, and generate a multiplier effect from increased local expenditures. They also attract students from other region who will be in need of housing, food and other services encouraging the building of infrastructure.

This directly create the need for the establishment of businesses necessary for the smooth running of the university, such printing businesses, restaurant, demands which are then supplied by the local populace of the location of the university, reducing unemployment in the area and serving as an opportunity for a sustainable source of income for the local populace.
Human capital development is another major way in which universities contribute to economic growth. By educating a skilled and adaptable workforce, universities equip individuals with the knowledge and competencies needed to meet the demands of an evolving labor market. Regions with strong university systems tend to attract employers looking for a well-educated workforce, which can lead to higher wages, increased productivity, and greater economic competitiveness.
Furthermore, universities create an opportunity for regional development. As aforementioned, due to sudden demand in the region due to the establishment of the university, there is attraction talents, influx of entrepreneurs as well as the building of infrastructure, this inevitably urbanizes the region. This urbanization transforms economically depressed regions into vibrant innovation hubs, demonstrating the strategic importance of higher education institutions in shaping regional economies.

1. Civic Engagement and Social Responsibility
Universities affect not only the intellectual prowess of individuals but engages their sense of civic engagement and social responsibility. Being an institution of higher learning it focuses not only on being an incubators for critical thinking, but encourages ethical reasoning as well as social awareness. Through the structured academic programs, extracurricular activities, and community-based initiatives, universities help students understand their role within society and encourage them to become active and responsible citizens.
On one hand, many universities partner with local governments, non-profits, and schools to address pressing community needs. These partnerships often include joint research projects, educational outreach programs, and economic development initiatives. By aligning academic resources with social impact goals, universities demonstrate a model of institutional responsibility that extends beyond campus boundaries, and serve as first hand examples to the students. Universities provide a platform for democratic dialogue and sharing of ideas, through events, publications, or reports to policy makers.

Through the encouragement of unions for students, the university allows for a civic, social and political consciousness. The conduction of electoral campaigns, elections as well as other student union affairs such as altruistic activities, the university helps to fight civic apathy and awakens the sense of responsibilities of individuals.

The universities being such a diverse community exposes individual to an innumerable number of cultural backgrounds and ideologies, and nurture a broader worldview in the minds of individuals as well as cultivates tolerance and empathy. This is a necessary attribute for the creation of a society of responsible citizens. The diversity forces individual to confront their biases and see things from different viewpoints and broaden their knowledge of issues and concepts. It allows for the learning of peaceful exchange alternatives ideas, laying the groundwork for more inclusive and equitable civic participation.

Universities significantly influence civic engagement and social responsibility by shaping students’ values, knowledge, and actions. Through academic programs, community partnerships, and diverse campus experiences, they prepare individuals to participate meaningfully in public life.

2. Cultural and Global Influence
Modern universities are a power force for cultural sharpening as well as preservation and exerting global influence. Universities contribute significantly to how societies develop, preserve, and share their cultural identities. The presence of students from diverse cultural backgrounds enriches campus environments, it allows for cross-cultural dialogue and provides the opportunity for deepened understanding of diverse cultural experiences among domestic students and communities. Universities often engage with the local community, serving as important partners in regional growth and cultural activities.

Culturally, universities serve as custodians and creators of knowledge, history, art, and language. They preserve cultural heritage through research, archives, museums, and literature while simultaneously pushing cultural boundaries through new forms of artistic and academic expression. Faculties of humanities, fine arts, and social sciences explore cultural practices, critique societal norms, and inspire reflection and change. Through lectures, exhibitions, performances, and publications, universities influence public discourse and help shape national and international cultural narratives.

Universities are key contributors to cultural vitality and global influence. They promote cultural preservation and innovation, foster international understanding, and serve as bridges between nations and peoples. As the world faces increasingly complex and interconnected challenges, the cultural and global role of universities becomes not just beneficial but essential for a more cooperative and enlightened future.

3. Social Mobility & Equity
One of the most profound contributions of the university to societal development is its role in advancing social mobility and equity. At its best, the university serves as a ladder, a structure through which individuals can ascend beyond the limitations imposed by birth, background, or circumstance. For those born into poverty, marginalization, or restricted opportunity, the gates of a university are not merely doors into lecture halls—they are portals to a transformed life. Education at this level arms the disadvantaged with skills, credentials, and networks that can dramatically alter the trajectory of both their personal fortunes and the fortunes of the communities from which they come.

This is not only a moral good; it is a civic necessity. A society where upward mobility is possible is a society less fractured by resentment, instability, and despair.

The Oracle

The Oracle: The University As a Catalyst for Societal Development (Pt. 5)

Published

3 weeks ago

January 16, 2026

Eric

By Prof Mike Ozekhome SAN

INTRODUCTION

CORE FUNCTIONS OF UNIVERSITIES AS TOOLS FOR SOCIETAL DEVELOPMENT (CONTINUES)

Character Formation and Values

Research and Innovation

Further, the significance of research is compounded by the fact that it often leads to innovation which in turn contributes to a growing national economy. The university system in basic and applied researches has made significant contributions to the world/field of science, technology and policy. Student and educators alike, involve themselves in deep research amounting advances in important fields such as the medical field, helping with the formulation of vaccines and medications as well as helping to deepen the understanding and understanding of diseases, bringing us a step closer to formulating cures.

Courses such as robotics have aided in the creation of machines which have helped in the development of the society and nations at large by allowing for ease and speed in certain tasks, even in the creation of Artificial Intelligence which now aids research amongst a number of things in vast fields of study.

The university in providing the intellectual foundation, empirical evidence, and innovative ideas necessary for informed decision-making and progress, allows for innovative thinking amongst humans aiding the development of societies in policy formulation that better the coexistence of nations and societies.
Universities often provide resources and support for both faculty and students to develop entrepreneurial skills and launch new ventures, including spin-off companies. They administer research grants and funding opportunities to support faculty in exploring new research ideas and developing innovative solutions, thereby encouraging innovation and creative thinking.

This is not only a moral good; it is a civic necessity. A society where upward mobility is possible is a society less fractured by resentment, instability, and despair.