Headline
Where is Abacha Loot + Delta Owns Ibori’s Money, Not FG
Published
5 years agoon
By
Eric
By Eric Elezuo
While every succeeding Nigerian administration has preached against corruption and looting of the treasury, none has as a matter fact lived up to expectation, though arguably. This is even more obvious since the advent of the Fourth Republic in 1999. The civilian administrations, where adequate accountability was required, has without a doubt betrayed the confidence.
As the administrations from Chief Olusegun Obasanjo to the Muhammadu Buhari in the present dispensation, corruption and looting of the commonwealth has not ceased, but what is more worrisome is the effrontery to reloot the recovered loots, especially that from late head of State, General Sani Abacha, who ruled from 1993 to 1998 when he died in office. Abacha’s sudden death in office did not allow him to cover up his stealing tracks, more so, as he was in the process of translating to a civilian president.
Consequently, administrations that came after had remained in the forefront of recovering the stolen funds stashed away in various foreign accounts including Switzerland, Liechtenstein, the United Kingdom and the United States of America.
As at February 2020, at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, Nigeria was said to have recovered an estimated total of $4.6 billion in the following categories according to Transparency International on its verified Twitter handle.
Former President Olusegun Obasanjo recovered $2 billion from the looted fund as follows; $1.2 billion in 2002; $149 million from Jersey Island, UK in 2003; $500 million in 2004 from Switzerland and another $458 recovered in 2005 from Switzerland, while former Head of State, General Abdulsalami Abubakar, recovered $750 million just as former President Goodluck Jonathan succeeded in recovering $277 million among others.
In the same vein, President Muhammadu Buhari, who was part Abacha’s administration when the funds were looted, serving then as the Chairman of Petroleum Trust Fund has so far recovered $630 million as follows $322 million from Switzerland in 2017 and $308 million from Jersey Island, United Kingdom in February 2020. Records also have it the Abacha family voluntarily returned $1bn, rounding up a grand total of the so far recovered loot to $4, 607, 000, 000.
It was only late former President, Umar Yar’adua, who ruled between 2007 and 2010, that did not succeed in recovering anything from the Abacha loot.
However, more recoveries were made afterwards. For instance, in May 2020, at the peak of the Coronavirus scourge, another $311m was released to Nigeria. It was like a grace from the grave.
But there are concerns that the funds have not been injected into the economy, making not a few Nigerians to believe that they may have been ‘re-looted’ and squandered by the government of the day.
it would be recalled that an agreement was signed by the federal government, the government of Jersey and the United States when a certain $308m was to be repatriated.
The Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Mr. Abubakar Malami, who signed the agreement behalf of Nigeria, projected that three major projects across Nigeria would gulped the funds. The projects include the Lagos-Ibadan Expressway (Western Region), Abuja-Kano Road (Northern Region), and Second Niger Bridge (Eastern Region).
The administration of Buhari has accused the governments before it of mismanaging the recovered funds during their regimes, saying that it has no records of the exact amount of public funds stolen by Abacha, and no records of the spending loot recovered between 1999 and 2015. This was in response to Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) enquiries to the offices of the Ministers of Justice and Finance, regarding the recovered looted funds.
“We have searched our records and the information on the exact amount of public funds stolen by Abacha and how recovered loot was spent from 1999–2015 is not held by the Ministry,” Malami said.
SERAP had expressed: “concerns that substantial part of the estimated $5 billion returned Abacha loot since 1999 may have been diverted, re-stolen or mismanaged, and in any case remain unaccounted for.”
While attempting to exonerate the Buhari administration and indict the previous administrations of Obasanjo, Yar’dua and Jonathan, Malami added: “However, a total of $322 million was recovered from Switzerland in January 2018 and the funds were used for Social Investment Project. Also, $308 million was recovered from the Island of Jersey in collaboration with the USA. While awaiting the transfer of the money to Nigeria, it has been designated for the following projects: Lagos—Ibadan Expressway; Abuja—Kano Expressway, and Second Niger Bridge.”
But according to SERAP’s Deputy Director, Kolawole Oluwadare said: “The failure to provide information on the exact amount stolen by Abacha and on spending of recovered loot for the period between 1999 and 2015 implicitly amounts to a refusal by the government. The government also failed to provide sufficient details on the spending and planned spending of the $630 million it said it recovered since 2018.”
SERAP also quoted a panel as saying that the Abubakar administration “recovered some $635 million, £75 million, DM 30 million and N9 billion as well as several vehicles and properties in Abuja, Lagos and Kano together with 40% interests in West African Refinery in Sierra Leone. Other assets were recovered from the Abacha family and associates.
“Furthermore, former president Olusegun Obasanjo administration also reportedly recovered over $2 billion of Abacha loot. Mr Obasanjo would seem to confirm this fact when he stated in the second volume of his book titled My Watch that: ‘by the time I left office in May 2007, over $2 billion and £100 million had been recovered from the Abacha family abroad, and N10 billion in cash and properties locally.
“Similarly, former president Goodluck Jonathan administration reportedly recovered $226.3 million and €7.5 Million from Liechtenstein. Some £22.5 million was also recovered from the Island of Jersey while $322 million and £5.5 million from the Abacha loot were reportedly returned to the government.
“The government of president Muhammadu Buhari has also recovered several millions of dollars of Abacha loot since assuming office in May 2015, including $321 million from Switzerland, and $300 million from the US and Jersey.”
While the whole world, especially Nigerian citizens continue to wonder what has become of the recovered loots, the Buhari government announced that the sum of $311 million repatriated to Nigeria following the tripartite agreement with the United States and the Bailiwick of Jersey earlier in 2020, has been handed over to the Nigeria Sovereign Investment Authority for investment in road projects.
One of the government’s unsubstantiated claims however, is that the recovered Abacha loot was distributed to Nigerians through the cash transfer programme.
Even with the massive mismanagement and re-looting of the economy and recovered loots respectively by successive administrations, especially the present government, the Buhari government has insisted that the about to be recovered money stolen by former Delta State governor, James Ibori, will not be returned to its original owners, Delta State, but retained by the Federal Government, a move many Nigerians have cried foul about.
Ibori was convicted by a court in the United Kingdom in 2012 for various offences ranging from gross misconduct, money laundering and other financial crimes. It would be recalled that Nigerian courts have already had exonerated and acquitted him of all crimes before the UK court’s judgment. His conviction, no doubt elicited mixed reactions. He was jailed 13 years, but was released on December 9, 2016 after serving a fraction of the jail term.
Today again, on account of Ibori, another mixed reactions are playing out. This is with regards to the British Government’s resolve to return to Nigeria £4.2million (about N2.2 billion) funds recovered from friends and family members of the former governor.
In a sad twist, the Attorney General and Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami, who many believed has supervised a lot of controversies in recent times, disclosed that the £4.2million will not be returned to Delta State from where it was stolen, but would be kept by the Federal Government, and be deployed to complete the second Niger Bridge in addition to other projects, he added that the money would also impact significantly on the Lagos-Ibadan and the Abuja-Kano expressway projects.
“In consonance with existing framework engaged in the management of previous recoveries, the Federal Executive Council has directed that the instant repatriated funds should be deployed towards the completion of the Second Niger Bridge, Abuja-Kano expressway and the Lagos-Ibadan expressway under the coordination of the Nigeria Social Investment Authority (NSIA),” Malami said.
Malami and the Federal government’s desire to hold on to the Ibori loot, instead of handing over to the rightful owner, the government of Delta State, may not be unconnected to the fact that the fund is huge. The British High Commissioner to Nigeria, Ms. Catriona Laing, while concluding a Memorandum of Understanding with Malami, had said the money was the first tranche of such a planned refund, noting that the Ibori case is complicated and the United Kingdom authorities were still working on the total and actual amount involved in the case.
Malami’s insistence is hinged on the fact other than projects that federal government had all along provided the required mutual assistance and back up to the British authorities while the prosecution of James Ibori lasted in London.
Critics have however, questioned the rationale behind ploughing the fund into the same projects that previous recovered Abacha loot had been allocated to.
Reacting through the Commissioner for Information, Charles Aniagwu, the Delta State government described the Federal Government’s plan to siphon the recovered fund as the height of wickedness.
“Why should Delta State money be used in building Lagos-Ibadan Expressway or Abuja-Kano rail? Is the Federal Government saying it doesn’t know the origin of the money? The money belongs to Delta State. We would have understood if the Federal Government had said it wants to receive 20 per cent, but to take all the money is wrong,” he said.
Lending credence to the commissioner’s assessment, the Chief Press Secretary to Governor Ifeanyi Okowa, Olise Ifeajika, reminded that Ibori was never a Federal minister, but Delta governor, and consequently, there was no basis to share the money, not to talk of forfeiting it to the federal government in totality. He insisted that the government has “no business handling the money or spending it for any projects whatsoever without consulting the state, because the money is for the state. Even, the project they are talking about is not in Delta.”
Other prominent Nigerians have also lent their voices in condemnation of the Federal Government’s decision to deny Delta State of the recovered looted fund. Among them is the Chairman, Presidential Advisory Committee Against Corruption (PACAC), Prof. Itse Sagay, who in recent times, has been having a running battle with Malami, leading to the Justice Minister expressing a desire to disband the committee.
PACAC had accused Malami of interfering in the committee’s works, especially on their report on some corrupt Nigerians.
The committee also incurred Malami’s wrath when it declared public support for the reappointment of Ibrahim Magu, former acting chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) against Malami’s desires.
Malami, in a memo to President Buhari, had accused Magu of a myriad of contraventions, especially “diversion of recovered loot, insubordination and misconduct”, alleging that he was not transparent enough in the management of the recovered assets.
Magu was later probed, found guilty and sacked. With the appointment and confirmation of Abdulrasheed Bawa as replacement, PACAC again suggested that Malami will not allow the new EFCC boss perform his duties as a result of his constant interferences.
Nigerians from all walks of life have said that Malami’s argument that the committee has outlived its usefulness, is just another ploy to have it disbanded, and its duties transferred to his office as was the case of the Special Presidential Investigation Panel for the Recovery of Public Property (SPIP) formerly under the supervision of Okoi Obono-Obla. Buhari disbanded the SPIP in September 2019 and transferred the duties of the panel to Malami.
Sagay, in a Guardian report, supported Delta State government, saying “The money is Delta State money and must be returned to Delta State. Federal Government cannot appropriate it for any reason whatsoever. Delta State should officially demand it, failing which the court can be activated for a judicial pronouncement in that regard.”
Tension remains high as to the steps the Federal Government would take considering that the High Commissioner has said that the £4.2 million would be made available to Nigeria “in the next couple of days”.
Related
You may like
Headline
LP: Nenadi Usman Floors Julius Abure at Appeal Court
Published
1 hour agoon
April 21, 2026By
Eric
The Court of Appeal in Abuja has dismissed the appeal filed by Julius Abure challenging the legitimacy of the Nenadi Usman-led leadership of the Labour Party (LP).
A three-member panel of the appellate court, in a Tuesday judgment, unanimously affirmed the January 21 judgment by Justice Peter Lifu of the Federal High Court in Abuja, which upheld the legitimacy of the 29-member caretaker committee of the LP, led by Senator Usman.
In the lead judgment delivered by Justice Oyejoju Oyewumi, which Justices Abba Mohammed and Eberechi Nyesom-Wike agreed with, the appellate court held that the earlier Supreme Court judgment conclusively settled the leadership dispute within the LP by nullifying the convention that purportedly returned Abure as National Chairman.
Justice Lifu had, in the January 21 judgment, relied on an April 4, 2025, decision of the Supreme Court, which held that Abure’s tenure as the party’s National Chairman had expired. The judgment directed the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to recognize Senator Usman and other members of her committee as the legitimate leaders of the party, to the exclusion of all others.
The court further held that the lower court had the power under Section 251 of the Constitution to compel a statutory Federal government agency to perform its functions when it ordered INEC to recognize Senator Nenadi Usman as the National Chairman of the Labour Party.
It was equally agreed with the trial court that constituting the LP’s caretaker committee, headed by Usman, was a doctrine of necessity required to provide leadership in the party when a vacuum appeared to exist.
The court faulted Abure’s claim that the trial court denied him a fair hearing and accused him of abusing the court process.
The court also accused Abure of forum shopping by appearing before the Nasarawa State High Court in a case already decided by the Supreme Court, and of persisting in the claim the party’s leadership despite the apex court’s clear and unambiguous pronouncement.
It held that the appeal, marked: CA/ABJ/CV/255/2026, was devoid of merit and constituted an abuse of court process.
“On the whole, I agree with the decision and conclusion of the trial court as the same, being in accordance with the Constitution,” Justice Oyewumi held, adding that the lower court reached a reasonable conclusion that the Court of Appeal cannot fault.
While dismissing the appeal, the court awarded him costs of N10 million for wasting the court’s time on an issue that had already been conclusively determined.
Earlier, the court held that Nenadi Usman, as a juristic person, had the right to file the case before the trial court, and that the trial court had jurisdiction to hear and determine the case.
The court also rejected Abure’s allegation that the lower court denied him a fair hearing, noting that the claim lacked any basis.
Related
Headline
Tinubu Sacks Edun, Appoints Oyedele As Finance Minister
Published
2 hours agoon
April 21, 2026By
Eric
President Bola Tinubu has approved a minor cabinet reshuffle in the membership of the Federal Executive Council (FEC).
According to a memo signed by the Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Senator George Akume, two cabinet members, Mr. Wale Edun and Arc. Ahmed Musa Dangiwa are to leave the cabinet while their replacements have been named.
A statement signed by the Special Adviser, Media and Publicity to the Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Yomi Odunuga, on Tuesday evening, said Edun, until the latest development, was the Minister of Finance and Coordinating Minister for the Economy.
“He has been directed to hand over to Mr. Taiwo Oyedele, who is now to take over as Minister of Finance and Coordinating Minister of the Economy. Oyedele was formerly a Minister of State in the ministry.
“Also Mr. Muttaqha Rabe Darma (PhD.) has been named as the ministerial nominee and minister-designate for the Housing and Urban Development Ministry,” Odunuga stated.
The memo also directed Dangiwa to hand over to the Minister of State in the ministry pending Darma’s confirmation.
The memo stated that “all handing over and taking over processes should be completed on or before close of business on Thursday 23rd April, 2026.”
Explaining the President’s decision, Odunuga quoted Akume as saying: “These changes are aimed at strengthening cohesion, synergy in governance as well as achieving more impactful delivery on the economy to Nigerians, through the Renewed Hope Agenda.”
He said the President, in approving the cabinet reshuffle, has fully exercised his powers as conferred on him by Sections 147 and 148 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (1999, as amended).
The President thanked the outgoing ministers for their services to the nation while wishing them the best in all their future endeavours.
The President, Akume noted, equally assured all cabinet members that “the process of reinvigoration shall be continuous.”
Related
Headline
Tinubu, Victim of Historical Amnesia – Atiku
Published
2 days agoon
April 19, 2026By
Eric
By Eric Elezuo
True to political permutations, the National Convention of the opposition African Democratic Congress (ADC) amid Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) derecognition and leadership litigation, set a chain reaction in the political space, including a former Vice President and one of the leaders of the ADC, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar, berating President Bola Tinubu as lacking a good knowledge of history.
Against all odds, the party went ahead on April 14, to host a Convention, where over 3000 delegates attended, and where the leadership of Senator David Mark and Ogbeni Rauf Aregbesola as National Chairman and National Secretary respectively were ratified.
Since the April 14 event, the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) has reacted in a manner political stakeholders and analysts categorized as panicky with statements from the presidency, and President Bola Tinubu himself. Though these responses were tagged correctional of ill-made utterances by ADC chieftains, observers have however said they portray comments by a team faced with an ultimately new challenge.
At the convention, the secretary of the ADC, Aregbesola, had dismissed Tinubu’s administration and his renewed hope policy as a scam. He lambasted the administration as a government of “scammers”, urging Nigerians to block it from retaining power in 2027.
“If allowed, this regime will continue to chant renewed hope till eternity. We have a duty to stop these scammers from retaining power,” Aregbesola said.
The former vice president followed up the convention statements, accusing Tinubu’s presidency of attempting to subvert democratic principles and silence opposition voices ahead of the 2027 elections, a position that further set the ruling party on edge, eliciting tons of reactions.
Beyond Presidential spokesman, Bayo Onanuga’s criticism of Aregbesola for failing to reflect on his own record before attacking his “former boss and benefactor”, Tinubu himself made remarks against the person’s of the leaders of the ADC and their convention, calling it ‘street convention’.
“Unfortunately, Aregbesola did not undertake any honest self-reflection on his own record in public office — as governor or as Minister of Interior,” Onanuga stated in his statement.
He alleged that Aregbesola’s tenure as governor of Osun State was marked by hardship and poor economic management.
“His eight years as governor of Osun State were characterised by unmitigated hardship for the people. Under his half-baked socialist policies, civil servants went unpaid for months, and those who were paid received only a fraction of their salaries,” Onanuga said.
Tinubu, on his part, while hosting the Hope Renewal Ambassadors, took a swipe at some opposition figures, especially Atiku, ridiculing and questioning their records for criticising his administration, and saying that many of them have held strategic positions in the past without delivering lasting results.
He boldly retorted that “If you look at one of them, no one without history among them – no one without history. The head was the chairman of the privatisation council of Nigeria in this country one time.
“He privatised the steel industry in Delta. Is it working today? No. Is anything they privatised working today? They want to privatise another man’s political party. That one says no.”
Responding therefore, the former Vice President launched a fierce counterattack on Tinubu, accusing him of hypocrisy, historical distortion, and political desperation.
In a statement issued by his Senior Special Assistant on Public Communication, Phrank Shaibu, Atiku described the President’s remarks as a “reckless tirade” that reflects “a troubling pattern of hypocrisy and historical amnesia.”
The statement began with “Atiku Abubakar’s attention has been drawn to the latest reckless tirade by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu—a performance that exposes not just desperation, but a troubling pattern of hypocrisy and historical amnesia.”
Atiku expressed surprise that a leader facing persistent scrutiny over his own credentials would attempt to discredit others with what he described as well-documented records of public service.
On the issue of privatisation, Atiku’s camp argued that Tinubu’s criticism does not stand up to scrutiny, noting that the President had previously opposed reforms he now appears to be implementing.
The statement maintained that Atiku had long advocated the privatisation of the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) and the sale of refineries to credible private investors—a position it claimed Tinubu resisted at the time.
It, however, alleged that the current administration is now overseeing a system that has effectively commercialised the national oil company “without transparency, clear valuation, or accountability.”
“This is not reform; it is privatisation without accountability,” the statement said.
Defending Atiku’s economic legacy, the statement cited several companies as examples of the success of the privatisation programme he supervised, including Oando Plc (formerly Unipetrol), Conoil Plc, African Petroleum (now Ardova Plc), Indorama Eleme Petrochemicals, Benue Cement Company, and Transcorp Hilton Abuja.
The statement also took a swipe at the President’s intellectual posture, suggesting that his comments reflect a failure to engage with documented history on Nigeria’s economic reforms.
“It is not our fault that the President does not and cannot read,” the statement said, while also referencing past controversies surrounding Tinubu’s academic records.
It added that Tinubu’s remarks could only have been made in disregard of publicly available records and credible accounts of the privatisation process.
“You cannot oppose reform when it demands courage and then execute a shadow version of it in power,” the statement added.
Atiku’s camp further criticised the tone of the President’s remarks, arguing that resorting to mockery reflects a deeper leadership concern.
“The President’s attempt to reduce a serious economic legacy to ridicule underscores a leadership more comfortable with insults than with facts,” it stated.
The statement also highlighted the current economic situation in the country, pointing to rising cost of living, inflation, and insecurity as evidence of policy failure.
“Across the country, families are skipping meals, businesses are shutting down, and citizens are struggling under the weight of inflation and declining purchasing power. What has been presented as reform has translated into hardship without relief,” it said.
The statement concluded by asserting that Atiku’s record remains “clear, documented, and defensible,” while noting that unresolved public concerns about the President’s background persist.
“A leader who has not fully addressed questions about his own background should exercise restraint before casting aspersions on others,” it added.
The statement ended with a cautionary note: “Nigerians are watching.”
While the ADC is fighting for their life, and an opportunity to feature on the ballot during the 2027 general elections, and APC solidifying their grip on the political space, the atmosphere still exudes evidence of palpable tension. The APC maintains that they are on homerun to victory, ADC counters that nothing will save the ruling party from being defeated in the coming elections.
But as it stands today, both parties are locked in battle of wits recreating the tension and bad blood that was the hallmark of the 2015, and to a large extent, the 2023 elections.
But on April 22, the Supreme Court will rule on the leadership of the ADC; this will set the motion to the credibility of the ADC to participate in the 2027 election.
But fears pervade the political terrain as Tinubu made veiled reference to the judiciary while mocking Atiku and other leaders of the ADC.
“We cannot submit to the disobedience of unlawful orders in court. We must embrace the judiciary, whether it favours us or it doesn’t, we submit to this principle of democracy, separation of powers and understanding of the dynamics of it and the nation that Nigeria is,” Tinubu had said, insinuating that the ADC had gone against the judiciary.
The coming week will determine in totality the direction the 2027 situation will take.
Related


LP: Nenadi Usman Floors Julius Abure at Appeal Court
Tinubu Sacks Edun, Appoints Oyedele As Finance Minister
Timi Frank Petitions US, Demands Gbajabiamila’s Resignation over ‘Anti-Democratic’ Remarks
Alleged Coup Plotters Get April 22 Date for Trial, Slammed with 13-Count Charge
Court Admits Nine Exhibits Against Malami, Family in EFCC Fraud Trial
2027: APC Sets Dates for Primaries, Pegs Presidential form at N100m, Governorship N50m
Okechi Releases “Iga Eme” (Journey Man)
Leadership As Decisive Force in Regional and Continental Security
Why MTN, Airtel Suspended Airtime, Data Borrowing Services + the FCCPC Connection
Tech and Humanity: When the System Has No Answer, Build One
2027: Why Nigeria Can’t Afford to Lose Atiku’s Experience and Expertise
African Heritage Awards: Honours Galore for Ex-AfDB President, Akinwumi Adesina
Again, Iran’s Military Closes Strait of Hormuz
Adding Value: Have a Winning Mentality by Henry Ukazu
Trending
-
Opinion4 days agoLeadership As Decisive Force in Regional and Continental Security
-
Business2 days agoWhy MTN, Airtel Suspended Airtime, Data Borrowing Services + the FCCPC Connection
-
Tech and Humanity4 days agoTech and Humanity: When the System Has No Answer, Build One
-
Opinion3 days ago2027: Why Nigeria Can’t Afford to Lose Atiku’s Experience and Expertise
-
Boss Of The Week3 days agoAfrican Heritage Awards: Honours Galore for Ex-AfDB President, Akinwumi Adesina
-
World3 days agoAgain, Iran’s Military Closes Strait of Hormuz
-
Adding Value3 days agoAdding Value: Have a Winning Mentality by Henry Ukazu
-
Featured5 days agoMan Rescued Amid Attempt to Jump into Lagos Lagoon

