Connect with us

Featured

Injustice Against Humanity: Jelili Raji, Victim on Death Row, Cries Out for Justice

Published

on

By Hezekiah Olujobi

Despite the fact that the real suspect of the crime cleared his innocence during the trial, he was still sentenced to death. Even though there was no direct evidence linking him to the crime, he was still sentenced to death. Failing to investigate a credible alibi can lead to a serious miscarriage of justice, resulting in an innocent person being wrongfully convicted and sentenced to death for a crime they did not commit. This underscores the importance of thorough and impartial investigations in criminal cases, especially those involving severe penalties like the death sentence.

What is an Alibi?

An alibi is a defense used by an accused person in a criminal charge, claiming to have been at another place at the time relevant to the charge. It was established in law that in a case of murder, the burden is heavily placed on the prosecution to prove the following:

(i) That the deceased died.

(ii) That the accused person unlawfully killed the deceased.

(iii) That the death of the deceased was directly caused by the defendant.

Once the prosecution is able to prove all the existing ingredients of murder, the court will be held accountable to ground conviction.

Now, on the issue of alibi. An alibi is a defense available to a Defendant standing a criminal trial, calling the attention of the court that at the actual time the alleged offense took place, he was somewhere else. To prove an alibi, the Defendant must state:

1. Where he was.

2. With whom he was.

3. The exact time he was there.

4. The address of where he was.

5. What he went to do there.

This defense of alibi must be strongly corroborated by the person(s) with whom the Defendant had a meeting. Don’t forget, you cannot put something on nothing and expect it to stand; it will collapse. Having mentioned an alibi, it must be proved.

Most importantly, during cross-examination, the Defendant’s counsel is expected to ask questions revolving around the IPO’s investigation of the Defendant’s claim.

If from the trial, the Defense established his alibi with corroborative and compelling evidence and the court still embarked on the voyage of convicting him, the law allows the Defendant to go on appeal within 90 days.

Now, in this particular case, Jelili Raji has this to say: ‘I was arrested in my house by the DSS, Oshogbo division on 11 January 2017 on the allegation of Conspiracy and Murder which occurred on 23/12/2016. I was traced to my house through my phone number found on a taxi driver’s phone that I chartered to Eleweran, Abeokuta on 2/1/2017. At the time of the incident, I was in the police station in Eleweran, Abeokuta, Ogun State between 15 to 28 December 2016. All my pleas of innocence in this case fell on deaf ears of the Court until I was sentenced to death along with the taxi driver on 2/4/2020.

I think the defense of alibi of where he was, with whom he was, the exact time he was there, the address of where he was has been answered. The next question is ‘what he went to do there?’

According to Jelili Raji, ‘I was similarly arrested by the police in Abeokuta due to my name being found in a suspect’s phone, who was involved in fraudulent activities and had absconded with money defrauded. He was being pursued by the police, leading to the arrest of his wife. The police were also making arrests based on the contacts in his wife’s phone, which included one of her husband’s SIM cards. I was arrested by the police in Abeokuta on the night of 15th/16th December 2016. We left Oshogbo around after 12 in the night and we arrived Eleweran in the dead night. Very early in the morning on 16, I was opened out from the cell to sign a record. I was released on bail on December 28, 2016, with instructions to report back after the new year on January 2, 2017.

Now, in this particular case, the Nigeria Police becomes the witness of Jelili Raji to corroborate his evidence. The evidence remains intact. The Police Prisoner Record PPR becomes his evidence; revisiting the overlooked alibi is very important to uncover fresh information. There is no way you can lock up a suspect without recording his details, and there is no way a suspect can be released from the police cell, either on bail or release without signing out. In this case, the Ogun State Commissioner of Police should help us look for the record of Eleweran dated 16th December 2016 to confirm if Jelili Raji is telling a lie or the truth.

We have a similar case in Agodi prison in Oyo State where the Federal SARS arrested different people from different locations and accused them of armed robbery. During our separate interviews with the inmates, we realized that one was arrested in Apata on 19 December 2012, another one claimed he was arrested in Lagos at Ore Falomo in his Barbing shop on 16th April 2013, another person said he was arrested on 18th of May 2013, the other 2 persons were arrested after the said robbery. Five of them were charged for conspiracy and armed robbery. Five of them have been standing trial endlessly. Our investigation revealed that these people did not know each other. The record shows a lot of contradictions. It was the guy who was arrested in December 2012 that even suggested to us to demand the record of the police in Apata police station that we will find his name there; the one that was arrested in Lagos said if we can demand the police record on 16 April 2013 at Oyo Dubar Police Station that we will find his name there. They were all charged for the robbery incident that happened on 10 of June 2013. When a suspect is raising the police as his alibi, I think that statement should not be overlooked by the court.

It takes our intervention to secure the freedom of those people during our case presentation to the Chief Judge of Oyo State Hon Justice Muntha Abimbola, and they were released. In this particular case, the appellant raised his alibi as the police, but because of political tussle, the police in Oshogbo, Osun State refused to investigate his alibi, the judge refused to listen to his claim of alibi, his lawyer kept mute on his claim of alibi.

According to Jelili Raji, ‘The police released the rest of the people arrested in this crime and charged me and the real suspect to court based on the influence and instruction of the king of our town, the Akirun of Ikirun, Late Oba AbdulRauf Olawale Adedeji, who insisted that I must be charged along with the real suspect in this case. He came to the police station in Oshogbo to ensure that I was charged to Court. Throughout the trial, the king always attended the Court until I was sentenced to death along with Elijah on 2/4/2020. The underlying reason for my persecution was a result of my conflict with the late king of my town who viewed me as a rival in the town since 2014 and due to political ideological differences. The king used his influence to sway the court against me, attending every court appearance until I was sentenced to death along with Elijah Oyebode on 2/4/2020.

According to Jelili Raji’s case mate Elijah Oyebode, a Taxi driver who took Jelili to Eleweran on the 2nd of January 2017 shed more light on this case: ‘I took Mr. Jelili to Abeokuta Eleweran police station on chartered, on 2/1/2017 and we returned the same day.

On 8 January 2017, I saw one of my friends with the DSS officers from Oshogbo on the allegation of Murder of a passenger that I carried to my house who died overnight, which occurred on 23/12/2016. Police traced the phone number of the deceased to my friend who stole the phone in my car unknowingly. The lady died in my house mysteriously on the night of 23/12/2016. When I was arrested, the police made arrests of everyone that I had called on my phone since the day of the incident, including Mr. Jelili Raji. Mr. Jelili Raji has no knowledge of the crime he was convicted of along with me on 2/4/2020 by the Ikirun High Court of Justice. I made this known right from the police station and before the Hon Court that I met Mr. Jelili Raji on the 1st of January 2017 for the first time in my life.

On 2/1/2017 I carried him to Eleweran. In the conspiracy, the lawyer kept mute. Our investigation to the Akure Court of Appeal to know the stages of the case shows his appeal is yet to be mentioned. Contact with his wife shows the agony the family is going through. Quite unfortunately, the king who orchestrated his misfortune has died.

Unfortunately, many Nigerian police officers do not inquire about or investigate a suspect’s alibi to secure a conviction. Few lawyers take the initiative to investigate their clients’ claims of innocence, let alone dedicate time to investigate their alibis. In capital offenses, many inmates are sentenced to death due to the deliberate efforts of the police to keep the victim in the dark. Not many lawyers take the time to investigate their clients’ alibis, and not many police officers ask suspects about their whereabouts at specific times for fear of jeopardizing their cases.

Where injustice seems to have prevailed despite the presence of a credible alibi as in this case. In situations where individuals are wrongfully convicted and sentenced to severe penalties like death, it is crucial that thorough and impartial investigations are conducted.

When you become aware of injustice or hear someone crying out for justice in your community, what concrete steps do you take to address the injustice? When justice confronts injustice, the unjust are thrown into panic.

Give us your support to amplify our voices.

www.cjmr.com.ng

Check out *Prison Diary* on YouTube to. Watch our investigative activities

https://youtube.com/@cjmrprisondiary6467?si=JmO-rYUXOsK_0laB

08025782527

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Featured

El-Rufai to Remain in ICPC Custody Till June

Published

on

By

Justice Darius Khobo of the Kaduna State High Court has adjourned the bail hearing of former Governor of Kaduna State, Mallam Nasir El-Rufai, to the first week of June, 2026.

El-Rufai is being arraigned on multiple charges bordering on alleged financial crime and abuse of office by the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC).

“Similarly, another charge, number KDH/KAD/ICPC/01/26, against Mallam Nasir El-Rufa’i and one Amadu Sule (LEDA) has also been filed before a Kaduna State High Court in the Kaduna Judicial Division,” the ICPC said last month.

“The charges in the State High Court case range from abuse of office, fraud, and intent to commit fraud to conferring undue advantage, among others. Both charges were filed by the ICPC on the 18th of March, 2026.”

Speaking after the court session, counsel to the former governor, Ukpon Akpan, kicked against the lingering adjournment of the bail hearing by one presiding judge as politically motivated.

The high-profile case has drawn significant public attention, with heightened security presence observed around the court premises.

The former governor had arrived at the court at about 9 am in a convoy accompanied by ICPC officials and operatives of the Department of State Services (DSS).

During the proceedings, supporters of the former governor gathered outside the courtroom, while security agencies maintained order and restricted movement within the vicinity.

Inside the courtroom, journalists, as usual, were not allowed, as proceedings are expected to focus on arguments presented by both the defence and prosecution regarding the bail request.

At the last sitting, the defence team had maintained that their client poses no flight risk and is willing to comply with all conditions set by the court.

Meanwhile, the prosecution has urged the court to carefully consider the gravity of the charges.

The 66-year-old former governor of Kaduna has been in ICPC custody since February 19 following his release by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

El-Rufai, a former minister of the FCT, was, however, released on March 27 based on compassionate grounds following his mother’s death.

Continue Reading

Featured

Timi Frank Petitions US, Demands Gbajabiamila’s Resignation over ‘Anti-Democratic’ Remarks

Published

on

By

Political activist, Comrade Timi Frank, has called on the United States government to investigate and sanction the Chief of Staff to the President, Femi Gbajabiamila, over alleged actions capable of undermining Nigeria’s democracy.

Frank’s demand followed a viral video in which Gbajabiamila was quoted as telling Hon Leke Abejide, during his wife’s 50th birthday that: “Don’t come to APC. Stay in ADC and scatter them. We like what you’re doing… stay in ADC and win your election… bring Bala Gombe, and we’ll support him. Good luck in court.”

Describing the remarks as “reckless” and dangerous, the former Deputy National Publicity Secretary of the All Progressives Congress (APC), said they point to a deliberate attempt to weaken opposition parties and erode democratic institutions.

“Your statement, as Chief of Staff, raises serious concerns about the determination by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s regime to truncate democracy,” he said, adding that “inference can be made that there is an infringement on the independence of the judiciary.”

He warned that any suggestion that courts could be influenced “undermines public confidence in democratic institutions,” citing references to political actors, including Leke Abejide, as requiring clarification to avoid “dangerous interpretations.”

Frank argued that Gbajabiamila’s comments effectively confirm the Presidency’s involvement in crises rocking opposition parties such as the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Social Democratic Party (SDP), New Nigeria Peoples Party (NNPP), and the African Democratic Congress (ADC).

“When a Chief of Staff speaks, it reflects the body language of the President. This points to a deliberate attempt to weaken opposition and consolidate power,” he said.

He further claimed that state influence, including the use of the judiciary, is being deployed against opposition parties. “The audacity of the statement suggests nothing will happen even if opposition parties are destabilised. That is dangerous,” he added.

Frank described Gbajabiamila as “an alter ego of the President” who had “displayed the arrogance of power,” insisting that public office holders must uphold restraint, respect for the rule of law and constitutional order.

He also urged U.S. authorities to probe Gbajabiamila’s activities and financial dealings.

“As an American citizen, he should be held accountable. We want to know if he is meeting his tax obligations in line with his earnings in Nigeria,” Frank said, describing him as “a bad ambassador of the United States.”

“We want to be sure that all earnings, including those from official and business engagements in Nigeria, are properly declared and taxed,” he added.

On accountability, Frank insisted resignation was the only honourable option.

“We call for your resignation with immediate effect. If such a statement were made in the United States, the official involved would have resigned forthwith,” he said.

He disclosed plans to petition the U.S. Embassy in Nigeria, stressing that “those entrusted with leadership must reflect humility, constitutional awareness and respect for separation of powers.”

“Power is transient, but institutions must endure. Any comment that diminishes their independence must be corrected,” he added.

The call comes amid rising concerns over the stability of Nigeria’s multiparty system and allegations of increasing pressure on opposition parties.

Comrade Timi Frank is the ULMWP Ambassador (East Africa and Middle East) and Senior Advisor, Global Friendship City Association (GFCA), USA.

Continue Reading

Featured

Alleged Coup Plotters Get April 22 Date for Trial, Slammed with 13-Count Charge

Published

on

By

The Federal Government has filed a 13-count charge before the Federal High Court in Abuja against a retired Major General, a retired Naval Captain, a serving police inspector, and three others over an alleged coup plot and acts of terrorism.

The alleged coup plotters, are scheduled to be arraigned tomorrow (Wednesday), April 22, before Justice Joyce Abdulmalik of the Federal High Court, Abuja.

Those named in the charge are Major General Mohammed Ibrahim Gana (rtd), Captain (NN) Erasmus Ochegobia Victor (rtd), Inspector Ahmed Ibrahim, Zekeri Umoru, Bukar Kashim Goni, and Abdulkadir Sani.

Also listed as a defendant, but said to be at large, is former Minister of State for Petroleum Resources, Timipre Sylva.

The charge, filed by the Office of the Attorney-General of the Federation and signed by the Director of Public Prosecutions of the Federation, Rotimi Oyedepo, SAN, accuses the defendants of offences ranging from treason and terrorism to failure to disclose security intelligence and money laundering linked to terrorism financing.

At the centre of the case is an allegation that the defendants conspired in 2025 to undermine the Nigerian state.

According to the charge, they “conspired with one another to levy war against the state to overawe the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria,” an offence punishable under Section 37(2) of the Criminal Code.

The prosecution further alleged that the defendants had prior knowledge of a planned treasonable act involving one Colonel Mohammed Alhassan Ma’aji and others but failed to alert authorities.

The charge stated that they, “knowing that and intended to commit treason, did not give the information thereof with all reasonable despatch to either the President or a Peace Officer.”

In another count, the defendants were accused of failing to take preventive steps, as they allegedly “did not use any reasonable endeavours to prevent the commission of the offence.”

Beyond treason, the Federal Government is prosecuting the defendants for terrorism-related offences under the Terrorism (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, 2022.

The charge alleged that they “conspired with one another to commit an act of terrorism in the Federal Republic of Nigeria.”

Particularly, Inspector Ahmed Ibrahim and Zekeri Umoru are accused of participating in meetings linked to terrorist activities.

Prosecutors claim they acted “in a bid to further a political ideology which may seriously destabilise the constitutional structure of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.”

The charge also accused the defendants of providing support for terrorism, alleging that they “knowingly and indirectly rendered support” to facilitate acts of terror.

In addition, the prosecution alleged a deliberate suppression of intelligence, stating that the defendants “had information which would be of material assistance in preventing the commission of the act of terrorism but failed to disclose the information to the relevant agency as soon as practicable.”

The case further traced financial transactions allegedly linked to terrorism financing, with multiple defendants accused of handling proceeds of unlawful activities.
Bukar Kashim Goni is alleged to have “indirectly retained the aggregate sum of N50,000,000, which forms part of the proceeds of an unlawful act, to wit: terrorism financing,” while Abdulkadir Sani allegedly retained N2 million from a similar source.

Zekeri Umoru, according to the charge, “without going through a financial institution accepted a cash payment of the sum of N10,000,000,” and also retained an additional N8.8 million suspected to be proceeds of terrorism financing.

Inspector Ahmed Ibrahim was also accused of taking possession of N1 million linked to the same alleged scheme.

All financial-related counts were brought under the Money Laundering (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, 2022.

The 13-count charge presents what prosecutors describe as a coordinated network involving security personnel, civilians, and a politically exposed individual, allegedly connected to activities threatening national security.

Continue Reading

Trending