Connect with us

Headline

I Did Not Send Thugs To Attack Osolo of Isolo Palace-Hon Hakeem Muniru

Published

on

Former Member of the House of Representatives and a Chairmanship aspirant, Hon. Hakeem Muniru has dissociated himself from the alleged attack on the Osolo of Isolo palace by suspected thugs.

In a statement made available to the media, Hon Muniru noted that he holds the Osolo in high esteem.and would not be involved in such an act but urged the monarch to remainin his exalted position and not dabble into politics

The statement by Muniru’s aide, Hakeem Adeboye reads:

The attention of the former Member of House of Representatives representing Oshodi/Isolo Federal Constituency II. Hon Hakeem Abiodun Muniru has been drawn to an online interview granted by the Osolo of Isolo, Oba Kabiru Adelaja Agbabiaka wherein the monarch falsely accused the former MHR of being responsible for the invasion of his palace by armed thugs.

Though it is not in the character of the erstwhile MHR to join issues with constituted authorities in the media particularly the Osolo, but for the wrong impression being cast on the minds of the general public, it therefore calls for a prompt response.
The former MHR holds the Osolo in the highest esteem as the custodian of traditional authority in Isolo Kingdom and therefore deserves to be respected and adored by all and sundry. But as a father to all, we expect the Osolo to be dispassionate in handling matters that bother on peace and tranquility of Isolo community.

It is untrue and complete fallacy that Hon. Muniru led armed thugs to invade the Osolo’s palace because he was nowhere near the palace on the day of the incident.
For the avoidance of doubt, Hon. Muniru was granting interview to an on-line radio programme named: ‘Ni Ile Awori’ on Facebook. Many who monitored the programme would attest to the fact that the former MHR could not have been the one who led thugs to invade the Osolo’s palace.

Besides, the political ward where the ugly incident took place was not Muniru’s ward, so he couldn’t have attended a visitation by an aspirant at another ward.

For good conscience and clarity, we advise Osolo to look inward to decipher those behind the attack on his palace if there was any. Who was the aspirant who came on visitation to Akinbaiye Ward on that particular day? Who was the D.G. of the aspirant campaign team who usually goes about with thugs and motor park touts?

An honest and sincere answers to these questions would help figure out the perpetrators of the dastardly act if there is any.
It is also a complete fallacy that Osolo claimed he was the one who introduced Hon. Muniru to Asiwaju Bola Tinubu.

Nothing can be farther from the truth. Hon. Muniru has been working with Asiwaju as a protocol officer since the APC National leader’s days as Governor. He has a personal and official relationship with the APC National Leader and therefore does not need Osolo or anyone to introduce him to his boss.
Again, it is also a wrong allusion for the Osolo to claim he was the one who introduced Hon. Muniru to the former APC State Chairman, Barr. Oladele Ajomale. This is clearly untrue as the former state Chairman was the chairman at the wedding reception of Hon. Muniru in 2005.

As much as we restate our utmost respect for the Osolo, we nonetheless implore him to wear his royal apparel and act as a father to all by being a neutral observer rather than meddling into strictly political matters.

While we reckon this accusation is another calculated attempt by political shenanigans to soil the good image and public acceptance of Hon. Hakeem Abiodun Muniru ahead of the council chairmanship primary election, we call on the good people of Isolo and our party members not to be distracted by the opposition who are out to change the course of destiny.

Together We Shall Reach The Promised Land.

 

 

 

 

 

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Headline

UK Court Clears Ex-Petroleum Minister Alison-Madueke of All Corruption Charges

Published

on

By

Former Nigerian oil minister Diezani Alison-Madueke was on Wednesday found not guilty ​by a London jury of six bribery charges, after ‌a rare corruption trial of a high-profile former energy official.
Alison-Madueke, minister for petroleum resources between 2010 and 2015 under then-president Goodluck Jonathan, stood trial ​charged with five counts of accepting bribes and a ​charge of conspiracy to commit bribery, which she denied.
Prosecutors ⁠alleged Alison-Madueke, 65, was given “a life of luxury” in London ​from oil and gas industry figures seeking lucrative contracts in Nigeria, ​which has long grappled with mismanagement and corruption.
But the former minister, who was also briefly president of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, ​said she never took any bribes and had no real ​influence over the awarding of lucrative government contracts.
After a trial at London’s Southwark ‌Crown ⁠Court, Alison-Madueke was acquitted by a jury of all six charges she faced after more than 46 hours of deliberation.
The not guilty verdicts are a major blow to British authorities, which began their ​investigation into corruption ​allegations against Alison-Madueke ⁠more than a decade ago.
Alison-Madueke stood trial alongside oil industry executive Olatimbo Ayinde, 54, who was ​charged with one count of bribery relating to ​Alison-Madueke ⁠and a separate count of bribery of a foreign public official.
Alison-Madueke’s brother Doye Agama, 69, was charged with conspiracy to commit bribery ⁠with ​his sister relating to payments made to ​Agama’s church.
Both Ayinde and Agama denied the charges against them and were also ​acquitted by the jury.

Source: Reuters

Continue Reading

Headline

INEC Heads to Appeal Court, Seeks Suspension of Judgment on Deregistration of ADC, Others

Published

on

By

The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has asked the Court of Appeal in Abuja to stay the execution of the judgment that ordered the deregistration of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) and four other political parties.

The Commission also threw its weight behind a notice of appeal lodged by the political parties.

Addressing a three-member panel of the appellate court on Tuesday, the electoral body said it was shocked by the decision of Justice Peter Lifu of the Federal High Court in Abuja to deliver the judgment despite an order that stopped him from doing so.

INEC, through its team of lawyers led by Mr. Haliru Mohammed, decried that it was not notified that the judgment would be delivered, saying it only heard about the court’s decision through media reports.

“My Lords, we are aware of an order that this court made on May 22, which stopped the delivery of the judgment of the lower court, which was initially reserved for delivery on June 5.

“We were not aware of any notice from the court regarding the delivery of the judgment. We only saw it as breaking news in the media.

“We therefore do not oppose the application of the appellant to stay the execution of the judgment.”

Likewise, counsel to the ADC, Mr. Shuaibu Aruwa, SAN, told the appellate court that Justice Lifu notified the party of the delivery of the judgment via WhatsApp.

Insisting that the decision of the high court was an invitation to anarchy, counsel to the ADC urged the appellate court to invoke its powers and sanction Justice Lifu for disrespecting the judicial hierarchy.

“Sincerely, my Lords, a lot has happened to the judiciary and this profession. What the trial judge did was dare this Court of Appeal by insisting that no one could arrest his judgment, even after his attention was drawn to the stay order from this court.

“The action of the trial judge calls for swift and extraordinary measures from this court. We have come to the stage where this court should press the reset button.

“We are calling on this court to exercise disciplinary jurisdiction under Section 6 of the 1999 Constitution, as amended.

“We urge this court to take disciplinary steps by immediately suspending that judgment. This court has the power to protect its own integrity. We pray this court suspends the judgment immediately without further delay,” ADC’s lawyer submitted.

The other parties also drew the attention of the appellate court panel to the fact that on June 20, INEC would conduct by-elections across six states of the federation.

They contended that if the judgment were not stayed, it would create problems across the country, maintaining that the Court of Appeal has inherent powers to act in a supervisory capacity and not allow its orders to be disregarded by lower courts.

The appellate court is still hearing submissions from the other parties in the matter.

It will be recalled that aside from the ADC, the other parties the high court directed INEC to deregister are the Action Peoples Party (APP), Action Alliance (AA), Accord Party (AP), and Zenith Labour Party (ZLP).

According to the court, the five political parties failed to meet the constitutional requirements to warrant their continued existence and participation in future elections.

It barred INEC from further according recognition to the parties, accepting nominations of candidates from the affected parties, or giving effect to their activities for the purpose of participating in the 2027 general elections.

Moreover, Justice Lifu ordered the defendants to stop parading themselves as registered political parties in the country.
He held that there was merit in a suit filed against them by the National Forum of Former Legislators (NFFL).

The group, in the suit marked FHC/ABJ/CS/2637/2026, prayed the court to determine whether INEC has a constitutional obligation to remove political parties that fail to meet the electoral performance thresholds set out in Section 225A of the 1999 Constitution (as amended), as reinforced by the Electoral Act 2022 and INEC’s regulations.

It was the position of the plaintiff that the five political parties listed as defendants had persistently failed to meet the constitutional benchmarks required to retain their registration.

The former legislators stressed that the requirements include winning at least 25 per cent of votes in a state during a presidential election or securing at least one elective seat at the national, state, or local government level.

They told the court that the ADC and the four other parties performed poorly in both the 2023 general elections and by-elections conducted by INEC, thereby failing to win seats across key tiers of government.

The litigants insisted that the continued existence of the ADC and the other defendants as recognised political parties is unlawful and undermines the integrity of the country’s electoral system.

Continue Reading

Headline

2027: Atiku Picks Rotimi Amaechi as Presidential Running Mate

Published

on

By

The African Democratic Congress (ADC) presidential candidate, former Vice President Atiku Abubakar, has picked former Rivers State Governor and former Minister of Transportation, Rotimi Amaechi, as his running mate.

Announcing the decision, ADC National Publicity Secretary, Bolaji Abdullahi, said Amaechi’s emergence followed broad consultations within the party and reflected his strong performance as runner-up in the party’s presidential primaries as well as his track records of service to his state and the country.

According to the ADC, Amaechi’s extensive experience across both the legislative and executive arms of government, as former Speaker of the Rivers State House of Assembly, two-term Governor of Rivers State, and former Minister of Transportation, makes him uniquely qualified to complement Atiku’s leadership, strengthen the party’s national appeal, and bolster its campaign to offer Nigerians an experienced and credible alternative ahead of the 2027 presidential election.

The party said the choice of Amaechi underscores its commitment to presenting a leadership team with proven governance experience and national appeal as it prepares for the 2027 presidential contest.

ThisDay

Continue Reading

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨

Trending