Connect with us

Opinion

Mike Adenuga – A Septuagenarian Like a Mighty Oak: Life As a Destined Journey

Published

on

By Hon. Femi Kehinde

On the 6th of March 1979, Chief Jeremiah Oyeniyi Obafemi Awolowo attained a septuagenarian status of 70 years. The Military government of General Olusegun Obasanjo in 1978 lifted ban of party politics, and Obafemi Awolowo and his Committee of Friends had formed the Unity Party of Nigeria (UPN), perhaps as an off-shoot of the defunct Action Group (AG). At a campaign rally in Mapo Hall Ibadan, attended by a mammoth crowd of jubilant party stalwarts, Awolowo was erouded into the campaign rally with deafening shouts of the usual “Awo! Awo!! Awo!!!’. The impressed Obafemi Awolowo in appreciation of the large attendance decreed that being now a septuagenarian i.e. as a 70 year old man, he should now be addressed as “Papa Awo”, and the crowd instantly changed the tune to “Papa Awo! Papa Awo!! Papa Awo!!!” in ecstasy and frenzy.

Micheal Adeniyi Agbolade Ishola Adenuga, a Nigerian successful business man, a philanthropist and an entrepreneur attained the septuagenarian status age of 70years on the 29th of April, 2023, and thus like Obafemi Awolowo at 70, has now become “Papa Mike Adenuga”. What a sweet elevation in God’s grace, splendor and magnificence.

Yoruba epistemology and mores believe that whatever happens to Man, whatever happens in life, has already been predestined. Man chooses his destiny -‘AYANMO’ while coming into the world, and man knees down to choose his lot – ‘AKUNLEYAN’ before the presence of God. The great music maestro and philosopher – Chief Ebenezer Obey, had sung in a beautiful lyrics – “Ayanmo mi latowo oluwa ni, eda aiye kan ko le yi mi ni po pada…”
Man’s destiny is Unalterable. Navigating through the labyrinths of Mike’s destiny is certainly “Ori olowo, Ori olola, Ori oloro” – The head that has a Midas touch – a Greek myth in which King Midas turned anything he touched to gold.

Here is the chronicle;

Micheal Adeniyi Agbolade Ishola Adenuga Jr. was born on wednesday, 29th of April, 1953 to Oloye Micheal Agbolade Adenuga Sr. who was a school teacher, and Omoba Juliana Oyindamola Adenuga (nee Onashile) who was a business woman. They were both natives of Ijebu-Igbo in Ogun State. Micheal grew up in Ibadan where he had his early life (infancy and adolescence) in Oke-Ado Ibadan, which was then Ibadan’s epicenter before the advent of Bodija Estate in 1958.
Oke-Ado was the home of Ibadan elites, academicians, entrepreneurs, business men and women of the moments. It was the home of the first sets of Indegenous intelligentsias – the men and women who would eventually shape the cause of Nigeria’s history. Oke-Ado was where the noveaux riches who arrived with independence lived, it was home to Chief Obafemi Awolowo – First Premier of the Western Region, Pa T. L. Oyesina – Foremost Educationist, Proprietor of Ibadan Boy’s High School and Ibadan City Academy Eleta, Ibadan, Akin Deko, S.A Tinubu of Iresi, Justice Morgan – Chief Justice of the Western Region who succeeded the Ghanian Quarshie Idun as Chief Justice, Justice Olujide Somolu – Chief Awolowo’s best man on the 26th of December 1937, Daniel Olorunfemi Fagunwa on Ajanla street – Author of “Ogboju Ode Ninu Igbo Irumole”, Amos Tutuola – Author of
“the palm wine drunkard”, The Otudekos, J. B. Oye (GoodWear Tailors), Chief Ogunsola – Premier Ladoke Akintola’s private secretary, the Craigs, the Italian Construction Firm of L. Dalberto, the home of popular textile trader and woman activist, Alhaja Humoani Alaga built in 1951, Bola Babalakin, Surveyor Ososami, Bola Ige, Wole Soyinka, Chief Isamosta Ashiru, Victor Esan – one of Ibadan’s first early lawyers, while his wife Wuraola Esan was the founder of People’s Girls Grammer School, Molete-Ibadan and Ibadan first woman senator, Chief T.A Oni (Oni and Sons) – the popular Ibadan Construction giant, Omololu Olunloyo, Duro Ogundiran – Lawyer and First Republic Minister in the Werstern Region, and a host of others. Oke-Ado was also then the fleet street of legal practice in Ibadan that had the law firms of Obafemi Awolowo and Abiodun Akerele, Bola Babalakin and Co, Olu Ayoola and Co, Duro Ogundiran and Co, Rosiji and Co, Ogunkeye and Co and a host of other legal titans. Many entrepreneurs thrived on this popular road – Titi Oke Ado. There was the popular Ogunkoya Stores, the Osibodu’s House, the Rab and Lally Chemist of the Irabors, the Toye Chemists, the Palms Chemist of the Akinkugbes, the Trumed Chemist, Mama Oyin Adenuga Stores – the mother of the communication guru, Micheal Adenuga. It was behind Dr. Doherty’s hospital, which was also close to the Owuru family house, the Ladega Family House.

Ladega later became the Ayangburen of Ikorodu. Not very far was the home of Rev. T. T. Solaru, whose wife was the leader of the Action Group Women Association. In the belly of Oke-Ado was the Palm Tree Club, almost opposite the Odeon Cinema and also Rex Cinema that kept Oke-Ado bubbling. Shortly before the Odeon Cinema was the Seven Sisters Club and Independence Club. Oke-Ado then bubbled with actions and activities. This is a reflection of the environment Mike grew up. He attended Ebenezer African Church Primary School, Oke-Ado Ibadan, between 1959 and 1964. The school was a grade one primary school under the headmastership of Mr. F. Owo Adekoya, a stern disciplinarian. The school was the elementary school of the children of popular Ibadan elites at the time – The likes of Gabriel Rusewe (Rusewe Motors), Theophilus Adediran Oni (Oni & Sons), Chief Z. A. Koya (CEO Abiodun Printing Works), the Agbejas, the Fagunwas, and the Sanyaolus, among others. Also, children of Top Civil Servants, Politicians and “who is who” in Ibadan and within the Oke-Ado neighbourhood attended Ebenezer African Church Primary School. Interestingly, Oni & Sons would bring his children of about 15 to school in a bus. The school apart from its seasoned and highly disciplined headmaster, had good teachers – Mr. Akinpelu, Mrs. Makinde, Mrs. Onafuwa, Mr. Ojosipe, Mr. Odeyemi, and Mr. Olorunisomo (the games master).

After successful completion of his primary education in December 1964, Micheal Adeniyi Agbolade Adenuga was admitted to Ibadan Grammar School in January 1965 to begin another phase of life.

Ibadan people value and treasure education. In 1901, the Baale of Ibadan, Baale Fajinmi (1897-1902) made a proclamation that made it compulsory for every household to send at least one child to school or pay a fine of 5 pounds; following the example of the Akinyele Brothers – Alexander Babatunde Akinyele (1875 -1968) and Isaac Babalola Akinyele (1882 -1964). The two brothers bestowed the environment of Ibadan in the field of education, religion, tranditional monarchy, social responsibility and politics, each like a colossus. Alexander Babatunde Akinyele was the first Ibadan university graduate in 1911, having graduated at the Fourah Bay College in Sierra leone with a Bachelor of Arts degree of the University of Durham in England. He was a clergyman and later became a bishop. Bishop Alexander Akinyele on the 31st of March 1913 founded the Ibadan Grammar School single-handedly, he was its first principal until 1933. Whilst as principal, he encouraged wealthy men and Ibadan elites to take their children to school. Two of Sanusi Adebisi Idikan’s children – Azeez Zakariyyah and Salawu Adebisi attended Ibadan Grammar School under the principalship of Bishop Alexander Akinyele. There were no higher educational institutions then in Ibadan after Ibadan Grammar School. Bishop Akinyele visited Sanusi Adebisi Idikan to encourage him and also intimate him on the prospects of gaining a university admission for his two sons in Europe, who had just left his college, with the hope that it would be an encouragement to other Ibadan wealthy men and elites. But Adebisi whilst thanking Bishop Akinyele for his concern and also acknowledging his episcopal visit, told the Bishop and Principal, that he would not like to expose his children to the danger associated with schooling abroad. According to him, the man of means would always employ the man of Knowledge. Sanusi Adebisi Idikan – First Ibadan notable entrepreneur and philanthropist born in 1882, died in 1938 at the age of 56years. Following his elevation to the position of Assistant Bishop of Lagos Diocese, Alexander was succeeded by Reverend Latunde, later Reverend E.A Odunsanwo, and later his son in-law, the legendary Archdeacon (then Reverend) E.O Alayande in 1948. Archdeacon E.O Alayande was the principal until 1968, when he was succeeded by Rev. Ayo Labiyi, former Principal of Lagelu Grammar School, Ibadan who assumed duty in January 1969, when Mike Adenuga was in his final year.

Ibadan Grammar School started in 1913, in the first 31years of its establishment, it only admitted boys, it officially became co-educational in 1941, and later 1966. It moved from Alekuso, later to Oke-Are, and permanently moved to its present site in Molete, Ibadan. It was at the molete site that the school blossomed. In 1965, Mike joined his senior brother, Ademola Adenuga who was already a top senior student of the school. He was admitted into Form 1C. His school hostel was at the Olubadan house. There were four (4) hostels – Akinyele House, Olubadan House, Irefin House and Olubi House.

One of Mike’s classmates, a Russian trained Medical Doctor and retired Permanent Secretary in the Osun State Civil Service, Dr. Olufemi Adefioye has a fond memory of their studentship in Ibadan Grammar School between 1965 and 1969. According to Dr. Adefioye, among Mike’s roommates in Olubadan House were – Olagoke (Bros Jenko) who was the House Captain, Late. Olusegun Kokumo Agagu (former Governor of Ondo State), Prof. Seye Odebiyi (Late) – Prof. of Biochemistry at the Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, (the school headboy, 1965), Titus Ajayi, Dr. Adeola Mohammed (now Pastor (Dr.) Adeola Bankole), Adewale Akinloye, Abiodun Abodunwa (Retired Banker), Engr. Siji Oluwole, Shipeolu. Mike’s classmates were – Dr. Oladapo Samuel (Orthopaedic Surgeon, Newcastle in UK), Dr. Adeola Mohammed (now Bankole), Arch. Alexander Adedotun Dedeke, Arch. Sasore (Late.), Muyiwa Kupoluyi, Titus Ajayi, Bolaji Fowler, Chief Femi Lanleyin (Solan) (son of Chief Owoola Lanleyin) – A First Republic top Politician, Femi Peace Ojaere, Nwosu Effiong, Muyiwa Esan, Prof. Archdeacon Kolawole Jayeoba (former Vice Chancellor, Ajayi Crowther University). Prof. Kolawole Jayeoba has an interesting story, his grandfather and his father, himself and his two children attended Ibadan Grammar School. The school again became a mixed school with the admission of girls into the school in early 1966. The girls who joined them in class were – Ibiyemi Fakunle (now Prof. Mrs Ogunlade) a retired Professor of Chemistry, Nurse Kehinde Ladapo (now Mrs. Arojojoye), Elizabeth D’Amelda, Omowunmi Owolabi (now Mrs. Ogundele), Taiwo and Kehinde Olomojobi. Mike was a friend to everyone in school, but was personally close to James Babatunde Daudu (JayBeeDee) and Titus Ajayi. Mike’s teachers who turned out to be old boys were – Prof. Fakuade (Mathematics), Bode Alalade (Literature), Bayo Akinnola, Mr. Adekanmbi, Mr. Akinbanji (English), Mr. Adepeju (Geography), Late. Pa Wusu (Fine Art), and Saka Bamidele (Physics). The school sponsored Saka Bamidele and Bode Alalade for Post Graduate Diploma in England in 1969. There were also many expatriate teachers – Mr & Mrs Wood Robbinson (Biology), Mr. Tyler (Physics), Mavin Powell (Geography), Late Rev. Fletcher (Economics) who was also the Football Coach and Vice Principal in 1965, Mrs. Fletcher (French), Miss Jackson (French), Miss Bull (Basic french and Latin), Mr. Aigbokai (Geography), Mr. Schurff (Chemistry). Mike’s Seniors in school then were – Olusegun Kokumo Agagu (5years ahead), Late. Col. Alalade (4years ahead), Engr. Foluseke Somolu who was Chairman Nigerian Society of Engineers (5years ahead), Ademola Adenuga (5years ahead).

The students of Ibadan Grammar School during Mike Adenuga’s time were under a stern mentorship, training and discipline of their Principal, Archdeacon Alayande. He knew the students could be rascally, and that the boys could be boisterous, and he was ready for them. Most times, Archdeacon Alayande would drive to Ibadan City hangouts in the night to fish out some of his boys who sneaked out of the school hostel, usually slanged ‘Gbofe’. He would catch some and a few of them would escape before driving them back to school. There was a story of a son of a foremost Nigerian politician that was caught at the popular Mokola hangout with some of his friends, he caught them, and asked them to sit at the back of the Pick-up Van. Rev. Alayande drove them back to the school, only to discover that the boys had disappeared, jumping out of the Pick-up van. The students ran to the hostel, Rev. Alayande found out that they were already asleep on their beds, he denied ever being caught by Baba Alayande at any Mokola hangout. Abdulahi, an albino was sighted in town by the Principal, Baba Alayande. The school bell rang, and Baba Alayande asked Abdulahi to come out, that he saw him at Molete some moments ago, Abdulahi denied ever moving out of the school premises, that the principal probably saw an Albino who was his look alike in Molete, but he was actually the one the principal saw, he had ran back to school before the school bell rang. Some boys upon the sight of the Principal would dive into the nearby Kudeti River (popularly called River Jordan by the students) close to St. Luke’s Teachers Training College. They would swim across the river, and landed straight at the back of Irefin House. A prolific and fruitful mango tree in front of the office block was a forbidden tree. Baba Alayande would say “man plucks mango, man goes” that is, immediate suspension from the school for whoever plucks mango. Boys would sneak out of the hostel in the night to eat Itele (cow foot), and there were city hangouts, clubs and cinemas that were patronized by the boys – Skala in Sabo, Odeon Cinema in Oke-Ado, Queen Cinema in Adamasingba, Rex Cinema in Okebola, Premier Hotel swimming pool, Seven Sisters Club and Independence Club in Oke-Ado, Chrisboh Garden in Odo-Ona.

Ibadan Grammar School was of great delight and patronage with sufficient and well trained teachers and adequate staff quarters in a serene environment, well mowed and luscious lawns that were of horticultural delights, sufficient classrooms and laboratories, halls, dinings, libraries and so many other facilities that made learning very conducive. Those were the good days of public schools. No wonder, Mike Adenuga’s set did outstandingly well in the School Certificate Examination of 1969. Ibadan Grammar School was really cosmopolitan with students from all over Nigeria. The likes of children of Audu Bako (former Governor of Kano State), Nwosu Effiong made the school register. Amongst Ibadan Grammar School products are – Justice Franklin Atake, Chief Ayo Rosiji (a consummate first republic politician and lawyer), Prof. Micheal Omolewa, Oba. Adedotun Aremu Gbadebo III (Alake of Egba Land), Chief Bola Ige (former Governor of Oyo State), Prof. Akinmaboogunje – Emeritus Professor of Geography, Urban and Regional Planning, Justice Atinuke Ige, Chief Gbadegesin Ajeigbe, Chief K.O. Latunji, Chief Odelana, Justice Ayotunde Phillips (former Chief Judge of Lagos State), Ken Nnamani, Alfred Diete-Spiff (former Governor of Rivers State), Alex Ibru, Abdul Hamid Adiamoh, Olusegun Agagu (Former Govenor of Ondo State), Barr. Yinka Ogungbemi and Dimeji Mako (Late.) – Immediate past president, Ibadan Grammar School Old Students Association.

After a sterling performance in his Secondary School Certificate Examination, Micheal Adeniyi Adenuga proceeded to Comprehensive High School, Ayetoro, Ogun State for his Higher School Certificate (HSC). Comprehensive High School, Ayetoro was established in 1963 by the United State Agency for International Development (USAID), the Ford Foundation, the defunct Western Region Government, through the ideas of the founding fathers, Chief B. Shomade and Dr. Adams Skepson. He did very well in his A-level studies, and proceeded to the United States of America for further studies. He attended Northwestern Oklahoma State University and Pace University, New York, with degrees in Business Administration. Whilst in America, as an undergraduate, he drove taxi cab to augment his income to support his university education aside from parental supports from home.

After completion of his university education, a world of business in Nigeria attracted him, having been a son of a very successful business woman, Chief Mrs. Juliana Oyindamola Adenuga. He came back to Nigeria to follow the footsteps of his hugely successful business woman mother by selling soft drinks and lace materials amongst many other business ventures, and made his first million at a young age of 26 years. In his early days, Mama Adenuga had shown her children (Olu, Folashade, Ademola, Yetunde and Mike Adenuga) the way of commerce. According to Mike’s immediate senior sister, Chief Mrs Yetunde Olubunmi Adegbola, “We all remember selling special bags mama brought from London, and sold by all the children with Niyi making more profit than all of us. We didn’t actually come from a poor family, the money was there, but our parents made us to work and value hard-work and money. We were made to appreciate money; that it is not easy to get money. In those days, Niyi was a very good footballer as a child. They called him goalkeeper. Our mother made us to hawk chaff after school. I would go and hawk mine, he would be playing football, after selling mine, I would come and take his and help him to sell”.

Money is like a ravishing vapor, whenever it smiles on you, you must hold it with a hand of steel, hence it disappears, beautifully conceptualized in Yoruba myth as “Alejo lowo”. Mike did just that, following the Adenuga’s philosophy of money and financial husbandry and made it when mother luck smiled on him. As soon as Mike Adenuga completed his studies in the United States, he returned to Nigeria. Mama Adenuga was fully entrenched in business and it was under Mama’s tutelage that he began trading. Mike Adenuga began by selling removable car stereos, ran the family sawmill factory in Ogun State, grew the business, and included importation of sawmill equipments, most especially, CD machine’s bandsaws, circular machines, etc. He also veered into importation of beer and lace materials (fabrics) where he made it big. It was a business he picked up through chance, destiny and mother luck. He had missed his British Airways flight when returning home from a trip in the United States and had to fly Swiss Air. On the flight, he was lucky to sit next to the owner of one of the biggest lace manufacturing companies in Austria. It was the man who convinced him before the flight touched down to give lace importation a shot. He took his advice and he made it big. He also later ventured into tomato puree and vegetable oil.

Success begets success. Success like life itself could be an aphrodisiac. When life is pleasant and pleasurable, it could be an aphrodisiac, spurring you to more successes and greater heights. But when life is sad, hard, and sordid; everyday looks like a gloom and apocalypse.

Micheal Adenuga at the age of 26 years had seen success and made money, which he wanted to sustain. He decided to re-brand and reshape his business enterprise into a conglomerate – Micheal Adenuga Group of Companies, where he is the chairman. Trading, importation, banking & finance, oil & gas, real estate, investments in critical sectors of the economy and all sorts were his avidity.

General Ibrahim Babangida as the President of Nigeria at a time, decided to break the monopoly of foreign operators in the oil and gas business in Nigeria by encouraging indigenous operators to come on board and apply for license. Micheal Adenuga applied for one (Mike Adenuga’s company) – Consolidated Oil applied and was granted some oil blocs. It was a very risky and novel decision that even the business guru mentor, his mother, Mama Oyin Adenuga advised against throwing money into the Atlantic. Mike’s company spent over $100million on evaluation, interpretation and drilling. This courage, tenacity, aciduity and audacity paid off at the long run, nothing ventured, nothing gained. This unique courage paid when Consolidated Oil became the first Nigerian company to explore, discover, and produce oil in large commercial quantities, now known as Conoil Producing Limited, which is currently the leading Indigenous oil and gas exploration and producing company in Africa. Mike Adenuga’s venture into the oil and gas sector became successful as one of the wells that was being drilled struck oil on Tuesday, December 24, 1991 making his company the first Indigenous company to discover oil in commercial quantities.
Before the advent of Consolidated Oil, Micheal Adenuga had also forayed into the banking sector by founding and promoting Equitorial Trust Bank Nigeria Limited and Devcom Merchant Bank Nigeria Limited. In the year 2000, Micheal Adenuga’s Consolidated Oil bought over National oil of the Federal government by acquiring majority shares and renamed the company “Conoil Plc” after injecting fresh funds. Conoil Plc has over 450 retail outlets all over the country. Interestingly, Senator Abiola Ajimobi (Late.) (former Governor of Oyo State) before he ventured into politics was once Managing Director of National Oil and Conoil Plc respectively.

Adenuga ventured into telecommunications and mother luck also smiled on him but not without some bruises, skirmishes and hiccups. He had applied for the first GSM license and lost money, but was persistent until he made it the second time. He however ran into heavy power play by men of the moments at the time. The Awujale of Ijebu-Land – Oba Sikiru Kayode Adetona acknowledged the pivotal role of his maternal aunt, Chief Mrs Oyindamola Adenuga who according to him was the force behind his mother – Chief (Mrs.) Wulemotu Ajibabi Adetona’s determination to see him educated. In his growing up years, Oba Sikiru had lived at various points in time with Mike’s mother, Chief (Mrs.) Oyin Adenuga in Ibadan. In reciprocating this motherly love and affection of his mother’s younger sister in his early upbringing, Oba Sikiru had always been protective of her interest and that of her children. On the 9th of July, 2006, according to the Awujale, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) had come brusquely on Mike Adenuga; they broke his gate and swarmed into his house, and also kept him under house arrest. The Awujale swung into action and raised a legal team to defend him. Consequently, Mohammed, son of Ibrahim Babangida (former Head of State) was also quizzed, because of an allegation that Atiku Abubakar, the Vice President of Nigeria and Chairman of Petroleum Trust Development Fund (PTDF) had placed some of PTDF’s funds in Mike Adenuga’s Equitorial Trust Bank which had assisted Mike in paying for the Globacom license. Mike debunked this and showed evidence of payment for the license through a loan from the BNP Paribas Bank of France. Former President, Ibrahim Babangida was also suspected to be a shareholder in Globacom. Mike subsequently went on exile to London and whilst in London went on vacation with the Awujale to France. Coincidentally, President Olusegun Obasanjo was also in France to attend a Conference of African Presidents on the invitation of President Chirac of France. The Awujale used this opportunity to visit Chief Obasanjo to further explain Mike’s case and how he was just being a pawn in a political chess game and conundrum. At the lobby of the Embassy Hotel where Mike had waited for the Awujale who had gone for a private meeting with Chief Obasanjo, he told Mike that he had nothing against him and a clever Mike, replied back to the Man of Power “Your Excellency, I understand, thank you”. Through thick and thin the Awujale fought for Mike’s cause until it was finally resolved. The Globacom later became a big brand and a big player in Nigeria and African Continent.

Globacom is now the second largest telecommunications in the country. Despite the fact that he was 2 years behind the others when he launched the network his entry strategy was to wage a price war by introducing per second billing rather than per minute billing of earlier operators; it was a master stroke. He demystified Telecommunications Services by making his services available and affordable by slashing the price of Sim Cards. Mike Adenuga now earns income per second. Glo innovately was the only operator in Africa to launch his operation on 2.5G network which now enables the convergence of voice, data, and multimedia technologies. Globacom now has a network base of about 60.7million subscribers as at January 2023 in a country with a population of about 200 million. It has a vast network already laid fiber crisscrossing all parts of the country. It has highly successful subsidiary networks operating in other West African Countries: GLO-1 (Globacom-1) – This is the only solely-owned high capacity submarine with connection to the USA and running from the UK through African and European countries. It has been and continues to be a huge commercial success at the heart of the socio-economic development of Nigeria.
Mama Oyin Adenuga – Mike’s mother was a hugely successful business woman of her time, who apparently nurtured and encouraged her children (Olu, Folashade, Ademola, Yetunde and Micheal Adenuga) to be successful in life. She could certainly be placed alongside Ibadan business women of her time. In the women folks were the likes of Alhaja Humoani Alaga, Madam Janet Alatede Aboderin (Mother of Moyosore Aboderin, Olu Aboderin and Ajibola Ogunsola), Alhaja Rabiatu Adedigba Akindele (Mother of Chief Bode Akindele) and the first Ibadan woman to go on holy pilgrimage; these were great Ibadan women of great business acumen in the early days. Mama HID Awolowo was also prominent in the textile business and her textile store was located in Gbagi, Ibadan known as “Awolowo Corner”. As resentment to non-admission of non-christian girls to a Girls Mission School in Ibadan, Alhaja Humoani Alaga single-handedly established Isabatudeen Girls Grammar School in Ibadan in 1964. She established her textile trading business in 1928 and by 1933 she had become one of the most successful merchants who had properties in the United Kingdom. In 1961, Mama Oyin Adenuga had built a magnificent four (4) flats storey building somewhere in Molete, Ibadan ready for occupation. Alhaji Jimoh Odutola of Ijebu-Ode, a great Nigerian business pathfinder and industrialist had come to claim that the land was his and that she should remove her building from the land. The visibly disturbed business woman – Mama Oyin Adenuga visited the Governor of the Western Region, who was also the Ooni of Ife – Oba (Sir.) Adesoji Tadeniawo Aderemi, to report this incident to him and ask for his Royal intervention. Oba (Sir.) Adesoji Aderemi had then succeeded Olola Sir. John Rankine as the Governor of the Western Region in 1960. The Adenugas had lived in Ile Ife before relocating to Ibadan and had courted a friendly relationship with the Royal Palace and more particularly, Mama had been friends with Olori Rebecca Morenike Aderemi – mother of the Late Justice Aderoju Aderemi and Prince Towo Aderemi. Olori Rebecca Morenike Aderemi took the visiting business woman and friend to see the Governor and the Ooni of Ife at the Government House, Agodi, Ibadan. She narrated her story. The Ooni immediately called Alhaji Jimoh Odutola who also had once lived in Ile-Ife and Royally advised him to leave Mama Oyin Adenuga alone. He admonished him to forget about the land dispute. That was the end of the matter.
Otunba Ademola Adenuga, an Elder brother of Micheal Adenuga nourishes and relishes a fond memory of their mother. According to him “My mother had one credo, that what she had in her lifetime should go to all her children. She bought houses for all of us apart from the ones we shared after her death. She bought houses and warehouses in Ibadan for her children. For Christmas, she normally gave us fat cheques to help us in our lives and in our businesses. I remember there was a time each child got forty thousand pounds, which was a very big amount. There was a time each child got 1.5million before she died. Even when she died, we shared money too. She was the best mother ever. We cannot forget her and our father; may their souls continually rest in peace”. Otunba Ademola Adenuga is a graduate of Biochemistry from the University of Ibadan, also, an old student of Ibadan Grammar School and an accomplished business man. He is the Chairman of Demus Mayor Group of Companies and was once the Chairman, National Salt Company Plc. In March 1974, he was employed by the Nigerian Breweries and according to him “My Sister (Mrs Folashade Akande) and Mama, without telling my father bought me a brand new Toyota Corona. I started work in the Nigerian Breweries with the brand new Toyota Corona, courtesy of my sister and mum”.

Micheal Adeniyi Adenuga enjoys a close-knit relationship with his siblings, even till date.
Mike’s immediate elder sister, Mrs Olubunmi Yetunde Adegbola also reminisces on her growing up years with her younger brother and last child of their parents. She said “I keep going back to Mike’s years as a kid growing up, because that is the part I am very nostalgic about. As a kid, his favorite food was eba. I remember we had this radio announcer next to us called Brother Dipo, he was so close to Deniyi – you all call him Mike, I call him Deniyi. Deniyi loved this I.K Dairo song, Osupa roro loju orun (meaning the moon is shining in the night sky). On coming on air he would put on that record and Deniyi would stand by the rediffusion box like he wanted to enter it. He loved singing. He enjoyed the music of Victor Uwaifo and I.K Dairo. They were his favorites when he was young. The radio announcer would play that record and he would be so happy. Let me end by saying, “I am proud to be his sister”. I love him for his person not for his name, not for his achievements, but what he has been to me. We are not talking about today. He has always been generous from his childhood. He would spend all his money on his friends. He had so many friends he was looking after. “That’s Deniyi for you. He is still childish at heart”.

A childhood friend of this writer and former staff, and later Executive Director of Equitorial Trust Bank nourishes a sweet memory of his work relationships with his boss – Mike Adenuga for about 18 years. I informally and briefly asked him to give me a brief narration of his working experience, and quite unprepared for my question, after exchanging some social banters and our own early days memorabilias, he went into sweet eulogies and down memory lane, and he said “some of the things I can tell you about him is that “he’s a very hardworking man, a workaholic, he works till 1.00 am, 2.00 am and he could have his meeting up to 2.00 am. He’s just somebody that doesn’t joke with his business. Most of the office work passes through his table. He knows virtually all the subjects: banking, commerce, economics, etc; he knows everything. You can’t beat him in all the subjects. If you know your job, you know your onions, and if he notices you to be very hard-working, you will be seriously rewarded. He doesn’t hesitate to reward his staff for excellent Job done and his reward system should I say is strange or funny, because it is uncommonly surprising and usually unexpected. You know sometimes they will just call you from his office as a staff, saying you have something waiting for you in the Chairman’s office. Mike Adenuga listens, he seeks opinion of people before taking decisions. I remember before I became Executive Director, I never expected it; it was the time we had issues with Lamido during the administration of President Yaradua. I thought the issue was taken to him and President Yaradua pleaded that CBN should regulate us, I was about the most senior person in the bank then. Most of the people had left; those who were GM and above were relieved of their jobs while some resigned because of the crisis, but I decided to stay back. He sought opinion on who he could use as E.D., so some people suggested me. So, on one Saturday afternoon, I was called to hold on for the Chairman (I was even at a party then, so I told the person to hold on because I was in a noisy place). The next voice I had was from my boss (Mike Adenuga). He said, Sola how’re you? Ah! It‘s been a while. Did you eat anything left for us? Very humorous and pleasant character. I replied, “not at all, Sir, we are just managing, Sir”. Then he said “You know this problem we have with the CBN and I have been trying to resolve it. We have just decided to make you one of the Executive Directors; just keep it to yourself. Don’t tell anybody; congratulations!”. That was it. My hand was shaking. I came out of the car. A friend, Kunle who was with me at the party asked me, what happened? I told him not to worry, that it was something good that was coming. Before long, I was asked to submit my CV and it was taken to CBN. Approval was received by CBN. Behold, that was how I and one other guy represented him at the board for two years. Mike Adenuga values integrity and transparency. He is a man of morals and mores, he respects culture a lot. He is blessed and he blesses people. I remember when I did my father’s burial, he gave me money. The following year, my mother died, he also gave me money. I didn’t spend anything because the money was more than sufficient enough for me. He is an indoor person, very shy, but if you have an opportunity to go out with him, you will not be tired. Infact, he will serve you whatever you want to eat or drink. If you’re talking about someone who likes to hide himself, he is. He is very kind and generous. I’ve stayed in one of his houses in Ibadan free of charge despite paying my housing allowance as a component of my salary. He recognizes people doing something special. He doesn’t forget his helpers. He is very warm and affable, he is fun to be with; very jovial. He’s a special person. You know sometimes, you can’t also be successful if you’re not very strict in Nigeria. Some of the things we learnt from him is that he is serious minded and result oriented. In the meeting, if you don’t have anything reasonable to say, you better keep quiet. Once he knows you’re good, then you’re good. If you are focused and committed, you will steal his heart. He gives room for development for his staff. He is happy at everyone’s progress. Then in terms of pay package, he does us well. If he finds out you’re going because of the pay you’re receiving, he will just tell you to go find out the top three paying banks in Nigeria. He will ensure no one is shortchanged but instead his staffs are better paid than their counterparts. He has this unique style of operation which puts his staff at an advantage over colleagues in other organisations.

A very prominent Nigerian and Legend, told this writer of Mike’s benefaction; and gleefully said “Whenever I wake up every morning, I report him to God to continually bless him and uphold him for his numerous act of kindness and benefaction towards me”.

Another Childhood friend and brother of this writer – Akinrogun Dele Momodu has the following sweet words on Mike Adenuga when he was 70 years old last year – “every man should wake up and pray to meet and become good friend with the spirit of Africa. Trust me, it is worth every second of it. Just imagine a man who dashes out the same kind of cars he drives to his friends. He buys his expensive cars in multiples. I have a friend who got a Range Rover, while his wife got another jeep. How nicer and kinder can one be? No amount of money is too much for Adenuga to shell out on his family and friends. And he really does not expect anything in return. If you have done him a favor, then you are truly triply (not doubly) blessed. Dr. Adenuga never forgets such favours and offers recompense even beyond your wildest dreams. He believes that his friends are entitled to the same kind of material things that he wishes for and buys for himself. He has no jealous or mean streak in him in that respect”.

Micheal Adeniyi Adenuga has certainly dispelled the popular Yoruba aphorism “Owo ko niran”- Money has no pedigree. Money certainly has pedigree if it is well tended. Culturally, the Oak tree is a symbol of strength.

Wishing Dr. Micheal Agbolade Adeniyi Ishola Adenuga further successes in his chosen and destined Journey of creating wealth for the benefits of mankind, on his 71st Birthday Anniversary.

Hon. (Barr.) Femi Kehinde, former Member, House of Representives, National Assembly, Abuja 1999-2003 representing Ayedire/Iwo/Olaoluwa Federal Constituency of Osun State. Principal Partner Femi Kehinde & Co (Solicitors).

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Opinion

Rivers’ Crisis: Wike’s Illegal Impeachment Plot Against Fubara Distabilizes Your Administration, Timi Frank Tells TInubu, APC

Published

on

By

Former Deputy National Publicity Secretary of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Comrade Timi Frank, on Friday, warned that the current illegal impeachment plot against the Governor of Rivers State, Sim Fubara, would have devastating effect on the President Bola Tinubu’s administration.

He therefore called on President Tinubu to call Wike to order in his bid to install another Ikwere man as Governor in Rivers State through the back door.

Frank made these assertions in a statement made available to reporters in Abuja. He underscored the critical and strategic importance of Rivers State to the economic, social and political survival of the country.

According to him, Fubara was freely elected by Rivers’ people during the last general election, “so any attempt to illegally remove him will lead to a very serious political crisis in the state that may not only affect the economy but setback the present administration’s revenue and development drive.”

He declared that the renewed orchestration by Wike to illegally remove Fubara, is an attempt to undermine the Ijaw people in Rivers State.

Frank said: “Since 1999, this is the first time in Rivers State when you have a Governor from the Ijaw ethnic extraction.

“Every other person who has become governor since 1999 had successfully done two tenures of eight years.
So, Wike must allow Fubara to do his own term
peacefully.

“Even though it is common knowledge that he was one of those that were instrumental and backed Fubara to become governor, that does not mean Fubara will now become his stooge and neglect to carry out his constitutional duties as the governor of Rivers State.”

Frank, who represents the United Liberation Movement for West Papua (ULMWP) in East Africa and the Middle East, added: “Fubara was not elected for the sole purpose of protecting the interests of a godfather or a dictator.

“I dare say that the same way Wike feels that he supported Fubara to become governor is the same way he was supported by ex-President Goodluck Jonathan and his wife, Patience, to become governor of Rivers State which he ruled for eight years.

“So, God will always use people to support anybody to become governor or whatever position they aspire to, but that does not mean those who emerged will now become slaves to those that helped them to power.

“During Wike’s time, he was not a slave to Jonathan nor his wife, Patience that helped him to become governor but rather he displayed ingratitude to Jonathan and his wife.

“Therefore, we are using this opportunity to call on Tinubu to call on his Minister Wike to stop his illegal and devilish plot against Fubara.”

He noted that even the Rivers State House of Assembly members now being engineered by Wike to impeach Fubara are not known to law in line with the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria by reason of their defection from PDP to APC.

“The only constitutionally recognized members are the few ones that did not defect to APC. These are the only members vested with the rights to carry out legislative activities in Rivers State.

“Therefore, Tinubu must make sure that there is peace, law and order in Rivers State to allow Fubara to work and deliver on his campaign promises to the people.

“The President must not allow this illegal impeachment being masterminded by Wike against Fubara to trigger the wrath of Ijaw people against his administration.

“Already the Ijaw people are unhappy with his administration because they believe he has handed over the entire Niger Delta region to Wike to dictate and decree according to his whims and caprices.”

According to him, the perception is not not good for Tinubu’s administration “because Wike does not have the capacity to control or influence any Ijaw man or the people of Niger Delta.”

“Let the President advise and restrain Wike to stay out of Rivers’ political activities otherwise what is about to befall his government will come from Rivers state because what is happening is clear tribalism as Wike want to install another Ikwere man as governor through the back door,” he said

Besides, he said that the Niger Delta people will do everything to stand by Fubara and the people of Rivers state.

He called on the President to heed the call of Ijaw people who called on him to end Wike’s present desperation and madness in Rivers State, like Chief E.K. Clark, Alhaji Asari Dokubo and others who are insisting that Wike’s shenanigans and impunity must stop.

He added: “If this crisis is allowed to degenerate into an ethnic war in Rivers State, it would affect both the state and the entire country negatively.”

Between Fubara and Wike,
If there is anybody that Tinubu’s government should hold to account, it is Wike following revelation that he was declaring N12billion monthly as Internally Generated Revenue during his tenure, which has now risen sharply by over N25 billion IGR monthly under Fubara’s administration.

“So if there is anybody that should have been questioned and facing trial it is somebody’s like Wike.”

He warned Wike attempt to use Federal Might to gain political mileage in Rivers State will not work because Ijaw people are not known to be afraid and they will surely fight to safeguard their political interests.

Comrade Timi Frank is the ULMWP Ambassador to East Africa and Middle East

Continue Reading

Opinion

Yahaya Bello: Victim or Aggressor?

Published

on

By

By Prof Mike Ozekhome SAN

INTRODUCTION

The nation has been agog with news of the ongoing face-off between the EFCC and the immediate past Governor of Kogi State, Alhaji Yahaya Bello and the others over the (EFCC)’s attempt to arrest Bello in connection with alleged official corruption involving the sum of 80.2 billion naira which he allegedly misappropriated while in office for eight years as Kogi State Governor.

Accusations and counter-accusations have raged back and forth between both camps (with not a few officious by-standers proffering gratuitous, ill-informed advice in the guise of opinions). As usual, the truth is always the first casualty. In this case, it is worsened by the fact that the matter is the subject of on-going litigation before at least two different courts: a High Court in the former Governor’s home State of Kogi and the Federal High Court in Abuja. The situation has been compounded by the order of injunction granted by a Kogi State High Court restraining the Commission from arresting or attempting to arrest the former Governor. The alleged breach of the order so irked the judge who issued it that he apparently had no option but to cite the EFCC boss for contempt. That order has been stayed by the Court of Appeal. Because these proceedings are ongoing, no more will be said on them.

Let me stress here that I am neither on the side of Yahaya Bello, nor that of the EFCC, or the Government of Kogi State whose funds are allegedly at the heart of the dispute. I will not cry more than the bereaved. My intervention here is limited to the legal ramifications and propriety of the steps taken so far by both sides of the divide.

BACKGROUND

Before Bello’s Abuja house was raided in a gestapo-like manner on April 17, 2024, Bello had, believing that his fundamental human rights were being threatened, approached a Kogi State High Court seeking an interim restraining order against the EFCC (Commission) pending the determination of a substantive suit before the court.
Justice Isa Abdullahi (presiding), who was satisfied with the grounds upon which the relief was sought, on February 9, 2024, gave an interim restraining order against the EFCC from taking any action against Bello, pending the determination of the substantive matter.

The Commission, dissatisfied, approached the Court of Appeal, Abuja, on March 11, 2024, requesting the appellate court to set aside the interim restraining order. It argued that the lower court lacked the requisite jurisdiction to assist Bello escape his deserved justice. It also argued that Bello could not stop the Commission from carrying out its statutory duties, nor use the lower court to escape its invitation, investigation and possible prosecution as the court’s order directed.

The Appeal Court adjourned hearing to April 22, 2024, while refusing to hear EFCC’s application for a stay of the order of interim injunction. In further affirming its earlier interim orders, the Kogi State High Court on April 17, 2024, delivered judgment in the substantive suit and directed the Commission to first seek the leave of the Court of Appeal before taking further steps against Bello. It granted some injunctive reliefs against the Commission “from continuing to harass, threaten to arrest or detain Bello”. The court directed the Commission to file a charge against Bello in an appropriate court if it had some reason to do so. The Commission later obtained a warrant of arrest against Bello from the Federal High Court presided over by Justice Emeka Nwite. On April 22, the anti-graft agency filed a notice of withdrawal of its appeal, predicating it on the ground that events had overtaken the appeal; while admitting that the appeal was filed out of time.

Bello’s team promptly challenged the arrest warrant by the Federal High Court and Justice Emeka Nwite has adjourned for his ruling on the propriety of his warrant of arrest against Bello.

WHEN AND HOW TO SUMMON A SUSPECT FOR INVESTIGATION BY LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES

I condemn any brute and sensational arrest of a suspect such as Bello. It does not matter the station of life of such suspect, whether high or low. Hooded DSS operatives once did it to some Justices of the Supreme Court and other Judges on 8th October, 2016, when they viciously and savagely broke into their homes in the wee hours of the morning. I had condemned it in very strong words. (See https://www.bellanaija.com/2016/10/falana-ozekhome-melaye-react-to-arrest-of-judges-by-dss/) (October 10, 2016). Some of the victims like Justice Sylvester Ngwuta, JSC (of blessed memory) never recovered from the shock. He later died. Others took early premature retirement. Was the Commission therefore right in attempting to arrest Bello in the manner it did as some commentators have approved in their writeups? I think not. The relevant provisions of the law such as Sections 8(1) of the Anti-Torture Act, 2017; Section 6 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA) 2015 (applicable in Abuja, the FCT); and Section 35(2)&(3) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999, as amended, the sum total of which enjoin the fair and humane treatment of a suspect whether during his /her arrest, investigation, detention pending trial and arraignment. Was a bench warrant necessary against a suspect on whom charges had not been served as in the Bello scenario? I think not. Let us look at some decided cases on this.

In USANI V. DUKE [2006] 17 NWLR (Pt.1009)610 the Court of Appeal held thus:
“A bench warrant is a discretionary power of a court invoked to secure the attendance as in this case of an unwilling witness under the threat of contempt of court to give evidence on any area of a suit within his knowledge. It is not a discretion which is exercised as a matter of course. The court has to be satisfied that there is absolute necessity to procure the appearance of the witness in court. The lower tribunal based its refusal to issue bench warrant on non-compliance with section 229(2) of the Evidence Act.” Per ADEKEYE, J.C.A. (P. 38, paras. B-E)”.

In APUGO V. FRN (2017) LPELR-41643 CA, the Court of Appeal eruditely held that:
“Section 382 (4) and (5) of the ACJA provides for how to serve a Charge and notice of trial on a Defendant, who is not in custody, … In this case, the Respondent had filed a motion exparte under section 382(5) of the ACJA 2015 to serve Appellant by substituted means. That motion was not argued, but the trial court jumped the gun and ordered for the bench warrant to arrest the Appellant: and when it found out that that was wrong, it suspended the implementation of the bench warrant (instead of setting it aside) the trial court yet still ordered the Appellant to appear on the next adjourned date to answer to the Charge against him, pursuant to section 87 of the ACJA 2015. As earlier discussed and held above, I do not think the trial court had the vires to make such order, in the circumstances as I think it went beyond its role as impartial adjudicator, to that of the Prosecutor or Police or EFCC to forcefully produce the Accused person, without serving him with any charge or notice of trial. See NWADIKE v. State (2015) LPELR- 24550 (CA), Ededet v. State (2008) 14 NWLR (Pt 1106) 52. I do not think section 87 of the ACJA 2015, can apply without recourse to section 382 of the same Act which requires a Defendant to be served personally or by substituted means with the charge or information and notice of trial. I believe it is upon compliance with section 382 (3) (4) and (5) of the Act where there is a pending charge, that the trial court can have the powers to apply the section 87 of the Act which says: “ A court has authority to compel the attendance before it of a suspect who is within the jurisdiction and is charged with an offence committed within the state Federal or the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, as the case may be or which according to law may be dealt as if the offence had been committed within jurisdiction and to deal with the suspect according to law”. Per MBABA J.C.A J.C.A (Pp. 46-48, paras. F-F)’’.

See also sections 113, 131, 394, 398 and 399 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act 2015.

These domestic laws are reinforced by a regional (in fact, continental) statute – the African Charter on Human and Peoples Rights – Article 7 of which obliges the State (and all other persons) to respect the rights of every individual to have his (or her) cause heard. This right encompasses the following, inter alia:
(i) The right to appeal to competent national organs against violating his fundamental rights;
(ii) The right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty by a competent tribunal;
(iii) The right to defence including by Counsel of one’s choice;
(iv) The right to be tried within a reasonable time by an impartial court or tribunal.

The importance of this statute is often overlooked by many Nigerians because, apart from the Constitution, it is superior to virtually every local or municipal law – including the EFCC (Establishment) Act itself. See ABACHA VS FAWEHINMI (2000) 6 NWLR part 660, pg 228, where the Supreme Court held that the Charter possesses “greater vigour and strength than any other domestic statute… (accordingly if there is a conflict between it and another statute its provisions will prevail over those of the other Statute”)

It is in this context that I believe the Commission’s tactics in attempting to arrest Bello ought to be situated. While no one quarrels with the Commission’s full mandate to tackle economic crimes, the way and manner in which it does so must however, not portray any impunity or suggest that it is above the law. After all, the Commission’s motto is “No one is above the Law”. To that extent, the fact that the person at the centre of the present controversy is a former Governor is irrelevant: it merely hugs the headlines for that reason. Afterall, he has since lost his immunity under section 308 of the 1999 Constitution, upon vacating office. However, once a person has been charged to court as Bello has, he becomes the subject of the court which becomes seized of the matter. His availability in court is thereafter controlled by the trial court, and not another through a bench warrant.

Many a time, it is argued that the court cannot restrain government agencies from arresting, investigating or prosecuting suspects. This is far from the truth as it depends on the facts of each case. For example, the Court of Appeal in OKEKE v. IGP & Ors (2022) LPELR-58476(CA) 1 at Pp. 9 paras. A, Per NWOSU-IHEME, J.C.A (as she then was), relied on a decision of the same Court to hold that the Police can be restrained from the improper use of its powers. In the unreported case of LUNA V. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE RIVER STATE POLICE COMMAND in Appeal No CA/PH/216/2004, the Port-Harcourt Division of the intermediate court held:
“… Notwithstanding the power of the Police as spelt out in Sections 4 and 24 of the Police Act, where this Power is improperly used, the Court can stop the use of the power for that improper purpose, as that would no longer be covered by Section 35(1) (c) of the 1999 Constitution. In other words, an order restraining the Police from arresting on some particular occasion or for some particular improper purpose may be made by the Court.”

THE EVILS OF MEDIA TRIAL

The Yahaya Bello case evinces a clear case of media trial which should never be. The notion “Media Trial” or “Trial by Media” got its name in the United States of America during the period of 19th Century and became familiar with the Indian legal system in the famous, case of K.M Nanavati v. State of Maharashtra AIR 1962 SC 605.

I have, on my part, always kicked against media trial, for it presumes a person guilty even before his trial in open court. At the first National Anti-Corruption Stakeholders’ Summit held in 2017 with the theme, “Building national anti-corruption consensus in a multi-agency Environment”, which was organised by the Commission at the EFCC Academy, Karu, Abuja, I made the following remarks:
“…. All my life that is what I have done. I take it very seriously when we talk about the issue of rule of law. I do not believe in media trial. For example, a case is being investigated in EFCC, the suspect is being interrogated, tomorrow it is in a particular newspaper as to the statement made by that suspect. That suspect may never be tried. Even if he is arraigned and tried, he may never be found guilty but you have destroyed his image, his reputation. We should run away from that, it is not good. There is the need in this anti-corruption war to make an example; just one example with one person in government. I am aware of many, many petitions against people in this government”. See Nigerian Tribune edition of 28th March, 2017. (https://tribuneonlineng.com/stop-media-trial-suspects-ozekhome-tells-efcc/).

I had also in 2017, written to the Commission and presented a paper at CACOL Roundtable, titled “The A-Z and 24 “Dos” and “Don’ts” of how to fight corruption”. (See Daily Times of 24th April, 2017 – https//issuu.com/dailytimes. ng/docs/dtn-24-04-17/19). This paper is still relevant today, as it represents my contribution to the fight against corruption which I personally believe in. But, such war must be within the confines of the law. At the time of my lecture, the Commission under Ibrahim Magu had not made any attempt to try government functionaries; and I challenged it to do so. I do not know, whether it was my wakeup call that made the Commission to finally start charging people in government, especially Governors and Ministers, to court. Or, do you? I had also clashed with the former Chairman, Magu, on this sore issue on 19th December, 2017, at the Federal High Court, Abuja, at its end of year event. (See: https://www.vanguardngr.com/2017/12/anti-graft-war-magu-ozekhome-clash-fhc-end-year-event/)

THE DANGER INHERENT IN MEDIA TRIAL

Media trial which has become the order of the day in Nigeria is simply the act of using media coverage to vilify and portray a suspect or an accused person as a criminal, even without trial. In the context of Nigerian jurisprudence, a trial is an avenue to challenge the innocence of an accused person. A Media trial is an improper use of the media to tarnish the image of an accused person before, during or after a trial. It is used to dampen the resilient spirit of an accused person. The Commission used this craft greatly, especially during the tenure of Ibrahim Magu; and it greatly chipped away some nobility in its patriotic war against corruption.

The public applauds media trial. The downtrodden guffaws when the rich also cry. With this, there are more media convictions than actual convictions in the courtroom. Unfortunately, Yahaya Bello, has become the latest victim of media trial. If he is eventually acquitted, people will attribute his non-conviction to “a complicit judiciary”, (the whipping orphan).

Bello’s present ordeal may have undoubtedly brought some people immense joy. This submission has been tacitly corroborated by the Commission’s Chairman, very hard working and dedicated Mr Olanipekun Olukoyede, who stated, in a now-viral video, that the former Governor of Kogi State declined to come to the agency’s office because he complained that a female Senator had allegedly gathered journalists together to humiliate him anytime he appeared in the office of the agency for interrogation. Obviously, Bello was scared of media trial; so he avoided it. The evils of media trial are galore.

Media trials, especially in places like Nigeria, can be highly dangerous and prejudicial to a fair trial for several reasons:

1. Presumption of Innocence: Under the provisions of Section 36(5) of the 1999 Constitution, every accused person is presumed innocent until he is found guilty. Media trials often disregard the principle of “innocent until proven guilty.” When suspects are portrayed as guilty before they have had a fair trial, it can prejudice public opinion and undermine the legal process. The Muhammadu Buhari government specialised in this Goebel’s propaganda style under its “Name-and-shame” mantra. Such removes the Anglo-Saxon accusatorial system we operate and whimsically substitutes it with the French inquisitorial system.

By the provisions of section 36(5) of the 1999 Constitution, every person who is charged with a criminal offence shall be presumed to be innocent until proven guilty. This is unequivocally the position of the law, and has not changed. Article 7(1) (b) of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights 1981, also guarantees the presumption of innocence when it states as follows: every individual shall have the right to fair-hearing, that is; to have his cause heard including a right to an appeal, to be presumed innocent until proven guilty by a competent court or tribunal, and also the right to defence, including the right to be defended by Counsel of his choice. These are provisions that guide the trial of any person suspected to have committed a crime. It further extends to the right to be tried within a reasonable time by an impartial court or tribunal Thus, the presumption of innocence is the legal principle in criminal cases that one is considered innocent until proven guilty. This therefore means that until a judicial pronouncement is made, a suspect or defendant as the case may be should be treated with dignity as an innocent citizen. Anything to contrary would amount to a breach of the fundamental rights of the individual. See the cases of Tosin .v. State (2023) LPELR-59635 (CA); Onyeka .v. State (2023) LPELR-60520 (CA) and OLALERE .V. STATE (2022) LPELR-58103 (CA).

2. Mob Mentality: Inflamed by sensationalized media coverage, the public can form strong opinions and even resort to mob justice. This can lead to violence, whether against the accused or others associated with them.

3. Interference with Legal Proceedings: Judges do not live on the island, Venus, Moon, Neptune or Mars. They live on earth and interact with members of the society. Media attention can influence judges, potentially leading to unfair trials. It can be difficult for a defendant to receive a fair trial when public opinion has been heavily influenced against him by biased media coverage. In the case of Rajendra Jawanmal Gandhi v. State of Maharashtra, (1997) 8 SCC 386, the Supreme Court of India noted that a trial by press, electronic media, or public agitation is the exact opposite of the rule of law. It held further that Judges should protect themselves from such pressure and scrupulously adhere to the rule of law since failure to do so could result in a miscarriage of justice. Parties are entitled by the Constitution to a fair trial in a court of law by an unbiased tribunal that is not swayed by popular culture or media coverage.

4. Violation of Privacy and Dignity: Suspects, especially those who are later found innocent, can suffer irreversible and irreparable damage to their reputation, mental health, and livelihood due to intrusive media coverage. See section 37 of the 1999 Constitution.

5. Impact on Investigation: Media trials can jeopardize investigations by prematurely revealing sensitive information or influencing potential witnesses or suspects.

6. Undermining Trust in the Justice System: When the public perceives that justice is being served through media sensationalism rather than through fair legal processes, it can erode public confidence and trust in the judiciary and law enforcement agencies. This is the situation our judiciary has found itself. When a wealthy man who is accused of looting the state treasury is acquitted of corruption-related charges, some members of the public readily accuse the judiciary of complicity. Because some Nigerians do not trust the judiciary, they believe, courtesy of media trial, that the judiciary is a tool of the ruling class to consolidate or legitimize their hold on power and the society.

7. Political Manipulation: In some cases, media trials may be used as a tool by powerful interests to manipulate public opinion, discredit political opponents, or distract from other issues. The ongoing trial of the former CBN Governor, Mr. Godwin Emefiele, is a perfect example. Virtually all the bad economic policies of the President Buhari government have been attributed to the leadership of the apex bank under Emefiele and the Bank Managing Directors. Was this really the case? Was Buhari not in charge?

There are many instances when suspects who had been subjected to needless media trial were later vindicated by courts of law. Let us see some examples:
(i) The siege and break-in through the roof on the residence, ‘abduction’ and subsequent arrest and arraignment by the EFCC in a clearly orchestrated media trial of former Governor Rochas Okorocha of Imo State. He was later discharged and acquitted.
(ii) The trial and subsequent discharge and acquittal, only last month, by the Federal High Court sitting in Lagos, of the former Director-General of NIMASA, Mr Patrick Akpobolokemi, after over eight years on trumped up charges of conspiracy, stealing and fraudulent conversion involving the sum of ₦8.5billion. The court, coram, Justice Ayokunle Faji, upheld his Counsel’s no-case submission that the Commission had failed to make a prima facie case requiring him to enter his defence in respect of four out of six charges laid against him by the Commission. This was after eight years of gruesome trial and media hype, with Akpobolokemi, being physically dragged on the ground in one instance.

The discharge and acquittal earlier this year of the erstwhile Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice under the Administration of the former President Goodluck Jonathan, Mr Mohammed Bello Adoke and some companies by the Federal High Court, Abuja (Ekwo, J) and the High Court of the FCT (Kutigi J), on charges of money laundering and abuse of office after over four years of hyped media trial which the latter court strongly condemned and for which it excoriated the Commission for the slip-shod manner in which it undertook what, to all intents and purposes, was a persecution rather than precaution. The investigation into the alleged offences was anything but diligent, forcing the Commission’s own Counsel (to his credit) to throw in the towel and admit that he could not, in all honesty, support their continuing trial. I had gotten vacated and set aside the Bench warrant earlier issued against Adoke by Danlami Zama Senchi (now of the Court of Appeal). I was the one who also argued Adoke’s bail applications before Justices Inyang Ekwo and Idris Legbo Kutigi.
Also apposite are the nasty experiences of former Senator Dino Melaye whose cases I also handled; and that of the Supreme Court Justices way back in 2016 (even though the latter was perpetrated by a sister agency, the DSS) .

What about late High Chief Aleogho Raymond Dokpesi? He was later discharged on a no case submission after over eight years of horrid trial in which I secured his bail in 2015! The cases of Col. Sambo Dasuki, El Zakzaky and Elder Godsday Orube are well too known to enlist elucidation here.

The Commission surely had full knowledge of the ex-parte order made by the Kogi State High Court which had restrained the Commission from arresting Yahaya Bello. Yet, it laid a siege on Bello’s Abuja residence. The entire drama (which played out in the full glare of television cameras) was nothing short of disdain for the rule of law and the sanctity of court orders. It is trite law that, until a valid and duly issued court order is set aside either by the same or another court of superior or co-ordinate jurisdiction, it must be obeyed and complied with to the hilt.

The proper remedy open to the Commission which disagreed with the order was to challenge it and seek its reversal at the appellate court as it later did, and certainly not to flout or disobey it under any disguise. Needless to say that disobedience to court orders is a feature of self-help only in a society where anything goes; where life is poor, solitary, nasty, brutish and short, to quote the English Philosopher, Thomas John Hobbes. We must never allow Nigeria to degenerate to such a nadir state where government institutions disobey court orders with impunity. That is a ready recipe for organized disenchantment.

Indeed, so important is obedience of court order that it is given constitutional imprimatur in Section 287 of the 1999 Constitution.

In this regard, in FCDA V KORIPAMO-AGARY (2010) LPELR-4148 (CA), Mary Ukaego Peter-Odili, J.C.A (as he then was) held that:

“The Court frowns at disobedience of its orders; particularly by the executive branch of government and has used rather harsh language such as ‘executive lawlessness’, in describing such acts of disobedience. On the application of an aggrieved party, the Court has in appropriate cases, not hesitated to exercise its coercive power to set aside such acts done in disobedience of its order and restore the parties to the position they were before such disobedience. The rationale for this course of action by the Court is to ensure the enthronement of the rule of law rather than acquiesce in resorting to self-help by a party. The Court also has the power of sequestration and committal against persons disobeying its orders. It is an overgeneralization and therefore wrong to say that an act done in disobedience of a Court order is an illegality”.

See also ALL PROGRESSIVE CONGRESS & 2 ORS V HON DANLADI IDRIS KARFI & 2 ORS [2018] 6 NWLR (Pt 1616) 479, 493 SC and EZEKIEL-HART V EZEKIEL-HART [1990] NWLR (pt 126) 276. where the Supreme Court upheld the same principle.

By the same token, it is also settled that once the court is seised of a matter, it becomes dominus litis (master of the proceedings) and no party is allowed to take any step that will either overreach the court or the other party or present the court with a situation of fait accompli or complete helplessness in which whatever orders it makes might either be rendered nugatory or unenforceable. Such will be an affront on the court. See Ojukwu v. Governor of Lagos State (1986) 3NWLR (Pt 26) 39.

CONCLUSION

The judgment delivered by the High Court of Kogi State on April 17, 2024, finally vindicated Yahaya Bello on this issue as the court pointedly held:
“Thus, the serial action of the Respondent, dating back to 2021, right up to 2024, targeted against the applicant, has corroded their legitimate statutory duties of investigation and prosecution of financial crimes. These collective infractions on the rights of the applicant border on infringement of his fundamental right from discrimination”.

Central to the court’s rebuke is the condemnation of the anti-graft agency’s reliance on media sensationalism, characterized as a form of trial by public opinion. The court firmly asserted the principle that the agency’s role is not to act as both prosecutor and Judge simultaneously; but rather to present evidence within the confines of due procedure. This critique underscores the imperative of upholding the rule of law and granting individuals, including Bello, their rightful day in court devoid of extrajudicial influences.

Beyond the specifics of Bello’s case, there is need for a paradigm shift whereby agencies such as the EFCC, Police, ICPC, DSS et al, adopt a more public-friendly stance akin to their counterparts in advanced jurisdictions such as the United States, the United Kingdom and many European states. The importance of viewing law enforcement as a Service rather than as a Force, underscores the necessity of cultivating public trust and confidence through transparent, law-abiding practices. I hereby emphasize and advocate (as I have always done), strong institutions; not strong men.

We must, therefore, strike a balance between reporting matters that are of public interest and respect for the dignity of persons. In India, the Law Commission in its 200th report, “Trial by Media: Free Speech versus Fair Trial under Criminal Procedure (Amendments to the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971)”, has recommended a law to debar the media from reporting anything prejudicial to the rights of the accused in criminal cases, from the time of arrest to investigation and trial.

No individual, regardless of his position or authority, is above the law. There is no exception in the sense that even those who are protected from prosecution by the immunity clause in section 308 of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, as amended, will after vacating the office be answerable like all other citizens and subject themselves willingly or unwillingly to the law. By holding both governmental and non-governmental actors accountable to the law, a commitment to fostering a culture of accountability and respect for individual rights is built and maintained.

Be that as it may, the laid down procedures must be followed accordingly. Where such laid down procedures are not tenaciously complied with, it will become an agency of government dictating its own rules, procedures and modus operandi. This is only typical of an autocratic, despotic and dictatorial government which we do not operate. It is in the light of this that the Commission and all other agencies established by laws must ensure that they conduct their operations within the ambit of the laws that established them. The concept of rule of law entails that all actions of government must be carried out as spelt out by the law without any form of self-help. In an ideal society where everyone, the leaders, the followers and the law enforcement agencies follow the law, a pattern develops where there can be a reasonable expectation of what will occur in any given situation. And ultimately, this provides security and safety as people do not need to panic out of uncertainty or feel worried about any situation since what will happen is readily predictable.

In the light of these considerations, there is need for a reevaluation of law enforcement practices and a renewed dedication to upholding the rule of law. There must be a balance of the imperatives of justice with the protection of individual rights, particularly in the face of media scrutiny and public pressure.

For now, citizen Yahaya Bello wears the toga of victimhood and not of aggression. He should be allowed to have his fair day in court without the present needless ruckus and brouhaha.

PROF MIKE OZEKHOME SAN, CON, OFR, FCIArb, LL.M, Ph.D., LL.D., D.Litt, D.Sc. is a constitutional lawyer and human rights advocate

Continue Reading

Opinion

To Uncle Mike at 71 by Olusegun Awolowo

Published

on

By

My Dear Uncle,

Happy birthday Chief Mike Adenuga ! The Big Bull himself! Your life is a testament to resilience, determination and unwavering commitment to excellence.
You are certainly a titan amongst men, a visionary whose strides have reshaped industries and inspired countless dreams.

Your remarkable impact on Nigeria transcends mere success; it is a legacy of inspiration and transformation. Through your visionary leadership and entrepreneurial spirit, you have not only built a business empire but have also paved the way for countless others to dream big and achieve greatness.

Your influence has been profound. Your achievements serve as a beacon of hope, reminding me that with hard work and dedication, anything is possible.

As we celebrate another year of your remarkable journey, I am reminded of the words of Nelson Mandela:

“What counts in life is not the mere fact that we have lived. It is what difference we have made to the lives of others that will determine the significance of the life we lead.”

Dear Uncle your life is a testament to this profound truth.
As you continue to bring joy and laughter to the lives of countless people may the good Lord reward you with His grace and mercy .

Here’s to many more years of success, good health and continued impact.

Happy birthday, Uncle Mike

Continue Reading

Trending