Connect with us

Uncategorized

Friday Sermon: Mahdism Messiahship and the Savior: When Cometh Our Redeemer?

Published

on

By Babatunde Jose

As the epochal year 2023 stares us in the face, there are mixed feelings and anticipations about what it will bring. Will it bring the desired leader we want that is expected to meet our hopes, aspirations, and desires for a new Nigeria? Or will it bring chaos and a political calamity unimaginable in the annals of our political history? Will it lead to the disintegration of the fragile neo-colonial state? Or usher in a new millennium and return our lives to one of prosperity and the country to its rightful place in the comity of nations?  Is this a realizable hope, a forlorn hope, or a hopeless hope?

Is it yet uhuru? Is there any hope in any of the presidential aspirants? What are they promising that have never been promised in the past? What new things are they bringing to the table? Twenty-three years of civil rule, we are still importing fuel, refineries are not working, and the regime of subsidy (a veritable avenue of corruption) promise to do us under.

Sixteen years of PDP and seven years of APC has not seen an improvement in the power situation. What are the chances that these same people will bring about a change?

In 23 years, our infrastructural deficits still astound the observer. It has taken 23 years for governments of both major parties to reconstruct the Lagos/Ibadan Expressway, 100 kilometers. And these same parties are contesting to continue ruling us.

Are our educational system and healthcare delivery any better? In the last 23 years, our university students have been home for a cumulative period of 5 years because of ASUU strike. Which of these parties promise to put an end to this?

Is it infrastructural revolution, sustainable economic development, a more robust monetary policy, industrial revolution, agricultural transformation, and many other issues that have been agitating the minds of all of us?

Will they bring an end to poverty? Will they put the 15 million out of school children off the streets? Will they bring about a characterological transformation of the leadership and imbue them with vision and mission capable of bringing about a new Nigeria? Will they usher a more secure country, safe from marauders, insurgents, kidnappers, and so-called cross-border terrorists that have made our lives a living hell?

And most importantly, will they carry out a wholesale restructuring of our political system with a view to equalizing the inherent injustice, inequality, unfairness, and disatikulation inherent in the present structure? Will they usher in a new Nigeria where though tribes and tongues may differ, in brotherhood we will stand?

Because the future is gloomy, bleak and uncertain, despondency has giving rise to messianic expectations among the people. The result of this is the anticipation of miracles come 2023.  People are waiting for the Mahdi or Messiah, the Redeemer, or the Savior.

The concept of Mahdism is an apocalyptic maxim that refers to a messianic figure in Islamic eschatology who is believed to appear at the end of times to rid the world of evil and injustice. Except that the Quran does not mention him: But is mentioned in other hadith literature. The doctrine seems to have gained traction during the confusion and unrest of the religious and political upheavals of the first and second centuries of Islam. There have been a vast number of Mahdi claimants throughout history.

The Mahdi is the symbol of an aspiration and the crystallization of an instructive inspiration through which people, regardless of their religious affiliations, have learned to await a day when a heavenly mission, with all its implications, will achieve their final goal and the tiring march of humanity across history will culminate satisfactorily in peace and tranquility. This is akin to the Jewish expectation of the Messiah or the Shi’ite anticipation of the Hidden Imam.

This consciousness of the expected future has not been confined to those who believe in the supernatural phenomena but has also been reflected in the ideologies and cults which totally deny the existence of what is imperceptible. For example, dialectical materialism which interprets history based on contradictions believes that a day will come when all contradictions disappear, and complete peace and tranquility will prevail. Thus, we find that this consciousness experienced throughout history is one of the widest and the commonest psychological experience of humanity.

Religion, when it endorses this common consciousness and stresses that in the long run this world will be filled with justice and equity after having been filled with injustice and oppression, gives it a factual value, and converts it into a definite belief in the future course of humanity.

This belief is not merely a source of consolation, but it is also a source of virtue and strength. It is a source of virtue because the belief in the Mahdi or the Messiah means the total elimination of injustice and oppression prevailing in the world. It is a source of inexhaustible strength because it provides hope which enables man to resist frustration, however, hopeless and dismal the circumstances may be.

The belief in the appointed day suggest that it is possible for the forces of justice to face the world filled with injustice and oppression, to prevail upon the forces of injustice and to reconstruct the world order. After all prevalence of injustice, however dominant and extensive it may become, is an abnormal state and must in the long run be eliminated. The prospect of its elimination after reaching its climax, infuses a great hope in every persecuted individual and every oppressed nation that it is still possible to change the situation.

The Messiah like the Mahdi is a savior and liberator figure in Jewish eschatology, who is believed to be the future redeemer of the Jewish people.

In a generalized sense, messiah has the connotation of a savior or redeemer who would appear at the end of days and usher in the kingdom of God.

Messianism became increasingly eschatological, which in turn was decisively influenced by apocalypticism, while messianic expectations became increasingly focused on the figure of an individual savior.

The idea that a human being–the Messiah–will help usher in the redemption of the Jewish people has roots in the Bible.

It is not narrated in either the Quran or the Sunnah precisely when the Mahdi or the Promised Messiah will emerge, but he will emerge at the end of time; a view supported by some Hadiths.  There had been claimants to this messiahship in historical past.

Mirzā Ghulām Ahmad (1835 –1908) was an Indian religious leader and the founder of the Ahmadiyya Movement in Islam. He claimed to have been divinely appointed as the ‘Promised Messiah’. Except that he was a pacifist and did not lead a revolt against British rule India.

Other claimants have included Muhammad Jaunpuri, the founder of the Mahdavia sect, Ali Muhammad Shirazi, the founder of Bábism; Muhammad Ahmad bin Abd Allah (1844 – 1885) who led the Mahdist Revolt in the Sudan. In 1881, he claimed to be the Mahdi. He led a successful revolt against British military rule in Sudan and achieved a remarkable victory over the British, in the Siege of Khartoum. He created a vast Islamic state extending from the Red Sea to Central Africa and founded a movement that remained influential in Sudan a century later.

Belief in the Mahdi has tended to receive new emphasis in every time of crisis. Because the Mahdi is seen as a restorer of the political power and religious purity of Islam, the title has tended to be claimed by social revolutionaries in Islamic society.

Eschatological figures of a messianic character are known also in religions that are uninfluenced by Abrahamic traditions. Even as unmessianic a religion as Buddhism has produced a belief, among Mahāyāna groups, in the future Buddha Maitreya, who would descend from his heavenly abode and bring the faithful to paradise. In Zoroastrianism, with its thoroughly eschatological orientation, a posthumous son of Zoroaster is expected to affect the final rehabilitation of the world and the resurrection of the dead.

Although the concept of the Mahdi is more widespread than the Muslim community, they are in greater conformity with the feelings and sentiments of the oppressed and the persecuted of all times.

In conclusion, Mahdism and Messiahship are metaphors describing the Savior who for all purpose is already here, and we simply must look for the day when the circumstances are ripe for him to appear and begin his great mission. The Mahdi is no longer an idea. He is no longer a prophecy. We need not wait for his birth. He already exists, and we only wait for the inauguration of his role.

He is anxiously awaiting the moment when he will be able to extend his helping hand to everyone whom any wrong has been done and be able to eradicate injustice and oppression completely.

Unfortunately, the Obidients. Atikulates and proponents of turn-by-turn leadership, Emilokans, are not our expected Messiahs. Messianism is made of sterner stuff and these tainted people, many of whom are of ignoble and questionable pedigree are unworthy of being equated with the concept of savior.

We should lift our horizon and expectations to more lofty personages. How can those who have been our problems turn out to be the solution? As Banji Ogundele will say:  No way!

Barka Juma’at and Happy weekend.

 +2348033110822

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Uncategorized

In a RUDE World, Organisations Are Learning to Stay CALM

Published

on

By

In an age shaped by volatility, rapid shifts and relentless uncertainty, experts are urging organisations to rethink the very foundations of how they understand and respond to risk. The global business terrain is no longer defined by tidy cycles or predictable patterns.

It has morphed into what analysts now describe as a RUDE world: Random, Unpredictable, Dynamic and Entropic. These forces, once mere academic abstractions, now sit at the heart of every crisis briefing and boardroom conversation.

The consequences of ignoring this reality have been played out repeatedly on the global stage. Companies that cling to reactive strategies find themselves swamped by disruptions that arrive faster and hit harder than anything prior generations endured. Financial shocks, supply chain collapses, cybersecurity breaches and sudden reputational storms have shown that risks rarely stay contained. They jump boundaries, multiply and collide in ways that defy traditional planning.

A growing body of thought argues that the strategic antidote is a CALM response. CALM, which stands for Consistent, Anticipatory, Logical and Measured, offers a deliberate move away from firefighting and towards resilient, disciplined decision making. It urges organisations to stop chasing crises and start building systems that can hold steady even when the world does not.

A new book on the subject crystallises this shift by presenting a panoramic map of organisational exposure: fifty distinct risk categories, grouped into seven interconnected families. Far from being a checklist of threats, this framework functions as a living ecosystem. It invites leaders to stop examining risk as isolated problems and instead see the company as an integrated organism where one failure can cascade into many.

Beyond offering structure, the fifty categories serve as a diagnostic lens that widens an organisation’s field of vision. Each category highlights a particular pressure point, but their real power emerges when viewed together. Patterns surface that no siloed team could detect alone. A technical risk may quietly trigger a reputational issue, which then influences regulatory exposure, which eventually feeds into operational disruption. The framework forces executives to confront an uncomfortable truth: vulnerabilities rarely travel alone. By mapping risks this way, organisations gain an early warning system that sharpens judgment, strengthens preparedness and transforms vague uncertainty into targeted, informed action.

The RUDE characteristics explain why this broader lens is essential. Randomness describes shocks that arrive without pattern, making historical trends all but useless. Unpredictability captures the sudden appearance of new forces, from emerging technologies to cultural shifts, that can upend an industry overnight. The dynamic nature of global systems ensures that a decision made in a single office can send tremors through an entire enterprise. Entropy, the most insidious of the four, reflects internal decay: wasted energy, fading accountability and the slow erosion of organisational purpose.

Each threat finds its counterbalance in the CALM disciplines. Consistency stabilises organisations against random shocks. Anticipation replaces uncertainty with informed foresight. Logic cuts through dynamic complexity with clarity. A measured approach resists the quiet drift into disorder.

The danger of ignoring this interconnectedness is illustrated most clearly in the anatomy of a cybersecurity breach. What begins as a technical problem quickly spirals into a legal battle, a reputational crisis, a financial strain and, ultimately, an internal cultural wound that erodes trust. Treating such a crisis as an IT issue alone blinds organisations to the wider fallout. This fragmentation is the hidden vulnerability of modern business, and it is precisely what the RUDE framework seeks to eliminate.

The authors argue that RUDE creates a shared language for institutions that have long struggled to speak across departmental divides. It exposes the threads that link one risk to another. Most importantly, it embeds foresight into everyday operations, allowing leaders to predict how a small disturbance could morph into a systemic threat.

The message resounding through the research is unequivocal. Risk management can no longer be confined to compliance manuals or crisis playbooks. In a RUDE world, risk is not only a hazard; it is a resource, a source of competitive intelligence and strategic advantage. A mature, integrated risk program becomes less like a brake and more like a steering wheel, guiding organisations with confidence through turbulence that once seemed uncontrollable.

For leaders determined not just to survive disruption but to navigate it with mastery, the shift from RUDE to CALM is emerging as a strategic necessity. The stormy future remains, but with the right framework, it becomes something that can be read, understood and navigated. The waves keep rising, yet the organisation learns how to sail.

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Voice of Emancipation: Can Our Kings Be Trusted?

Published

on

By

By Kayode Emola

For the umpteenth time, it is worth asking ourselves if our traditional rulers can be trusted to serve the interests of the Yoruba people. We recall how Afonja betrayed the Alaafin and sold Oyo-Ile to the Fulani prince Alimi. One would have thought our Yoruba people would have learnt a lot of lessons from that incident, but it feels like we’ve learnt nothing.

Recently, we have seen reports of villagers fleeing their communities in Babanle and other towns of Kwara State circulating on social media. One would have expected the whole world to be outraged, like in the case of the Charlie Hebdo shooting in France in 2015. Where the whole world rallied round the victims of that shooting, but alas, no one seems to be bothered enough to act. By now, we should have witnessed government forces moving into the communities in Kwara State to restore law and order. Giving the villagers succour in the comfort of their own homes.

However, everyone in Nigeria is silent as is it doesn’t affect them directly, emboldening the terrorists to continue their assaults on Yorubaland unchallenged. For other Yoruba people who do not live in the area, they couldn’t be bothered to cry out because danger seems far away in Kwara state and not in the suburban Yorubaland like Oyo, Osun, Ekiti and other places like that.

Truth be told, if we can’t even cry out and be outraged about the numerous deaths that go unaccounted for, who do we expect to cry out on our behalf? The world will stay silent to our plight since we see the decimation of Yorubaland as the norm rather than something to act about.

The worst of it is the recent revelation that two monarchs in Kwara State are directly involved in the kidnapping and killings going on in the communities. The King of Alabe and Babanla is currently in police custody for their roles in terrorist activities going on in their domain. How can we be sure that several other monarchs are not causing similar havoc in their domains?

If two traditional leaders in Kwara are complicit in the atrocities going around them, how many more of our kings and chiefs are involved in criminal activities elsewhere? We have been crying that the Miyeti Allah cattle herders are killing innocent farmers on their own land and destroying their crops.

Instead of the Yoruba traditional leaders banding together, and looking for a lasting solution for their people, they sat on their hands doing nothing. As though if all the people are killed, they will have no subject to rule over.

Obviously, many of our kings and traditional rulers are in bed with these cattle herders, which is why this problem continues to fester. Many of our kings and their kinsmen are themselves the ones inviting the Fulani cattle herders to raise livestock for them, knowing that it is a profitable business.

Every single day, over eight thousand cows are being slaughtered in Lagos State, let alone other Yoruba states, making the trade one of the most profitable businesses outside of crude oil in Nigeria. Had the cattle herders conducted their business like any other businessperson in Nigeria, there wouldn’t have been any reason for clashes and the killings that go with it.

However, the fact that many Yoruba traditional leaders are the ones collecting bribes from these herders to roam the forest and bushes makes the matter a complicated one. How can a king who is entrusted with the safety of lives and properties in his domain be the same one who is endangering them?

Since we now know that many of our kings are themselves the ones putting the lives and properties of our people in peril. I believe it is time to put the spotlight on the custodian of our traditions and culture in check. We need to know those among them who are putting the lives and properties of their communities in danger and call them out.

As such, maybe we can bring some normalcy into our communities and protect the lives and properties of innocent people. If only we could do a statewide evangelism to see which of the kings and traditional rulers are involved with the cattle herders and the terrorists invading Yorubaland. Then we may be able to rid ourselves of the menace that is currently ripping the social fabric of Yorubaland into pieces bit by bit.

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Police Release Sowore after Two Days Detention

Published

on

By

Human rights activist and former presidential candidate, Omoyele Sowore, has been released by the Nigerian police after being detained for two days.

Sowore, who confirmed his release on Friday evening, expressed gratitude to supporters, who stood by him during the ordeal.

In a statement on social media, he said: “Nigeria Police Force has capitulated to the demands of the revolutionary movt, I have been released from unjust, illegal & unwarranted detention. However, it is nothing to celebrate, but thank u for not giving up! #RevolutionNow.”

The activist, known for his unwavering criticism of government policies and advocacy for democratic reforms, has previously faced multiple arrests linked to his #RevolutionNow movement, which calls for sweeping political and economic changes in Nigeria.

Sowore, however, thanked human rights lawyer Femi Falana (SAN), former Vice President Atiku Abubakar, former presidential candidate Peter Obi, Deji Adeyanju, and all other stakeholders who stood up and called for his release.

Continue Reading

Trending