Opinion
A Book That Stirred a Nation by Femi Fani-Kayode
Published
1 year agoon
By
Eric
Much has been said and written since President Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida’s book, titled ‘A Journey In Service: An Autobiography’ was launched.
As to be expected, the reviews are interesting and the commentary has been in some cases good, in some bad and in some ugly.
This is a healthy development because the worst that one can do to a book or an essay is to ignore it.
Whether you agree with it’s contents or not or whether you like the author or not is not the point: what makes it worth writing is the commentary that follows and the oftentimes divided opinions.
This more than anything else makes the literary contribution a success and as the saying goes: it is better for it to be spoken about, even in negative terms, than for it to be ignored.
There is no doubt in my mind that few can ignore either Babangida or his controversial yet factual book and ever since it’s launching on February 20th 2025 it has been the talk of not just the town but the entire nation.
I welcome and encourage such discourse wholeheartedly because it engenders intellectual debate and it enriches and deepens our knowledge of history.
I do however take objection to those that have gone a little too far and that have characterised Babangida as “a coward” and “a weakling” simply because he spoke the truth about the role General Sani Abacha, his Chief of Defence Staff, played in the annulment of the June 12th election.
In the book Babangida displayed humility and remorse and assumed “full responsibility” for the annulment as Head of State.
He also pointed out the fact that he chose to tread that precarious and regrettable path primarily as a consequence of the immense pressure that he was subjected to by General Sani Abacha.
By bringing these facts to public glare and establishing this narrative he was not, as some have argued, “making excuses” for his actions but rather he was attempting to put them in context and, for historical purposes and the record, enlighten the Nigerian people about precisely which personalities and circumstances caused him to make the decision that he eventually made.
This surely ought to be commended and not condemned as it can only enrich the historical discourse and shed more light on the darkest corners of our journey as a nation.
I say this because I believe that the Nigerian people have a right to know about the real causes of the terrible trauma they were put through as a consequence of the annulment with its attendant loss of liberty and life and the 6 long years of suffering, strife, division and misery that it brought our people.
Sadly as a consequence of his submission about their patriach’s role in the whole sordid affair certain members of General Abacha’s family, some very young and some a little older, took umbrage and offence and publicly described Babangida as “weak” and as “a coward”.
This is not only a false characterisation of a man that has proved his courage on several occasions in our history and has put his life on the line for Nigeria many times but it is also very unkind given the strong friendship and trust that Babangida and Abacha themselves shared over the years and given the close relationship that their respective families have enjoyed ever since the Nigerian civil war.
Outside of that anyone that says IBB is “weak” or “a coward” does not know IBB.
It is better that we do not open up this debate because if we do those that are saying these uncharitable things will be worsted.
It really is advisable for them to sheath their swords at this early stage in order to ensure that their father’s tenure is not subjected to even more public scrutiny than it already is.
As they say sometimes silence is golden.
Some of us lived the experience whilst some of those talking today had not even been conceived let alone born.
Between the father and grandfather of those who are throwing bricks today and calling IBB “weak” and a “coward” we know who the monster and cold-blooded killer was.
Granted that it was under his watch that the June 12th election was annuled but what cannot be denied is that the real reign of terror began after Babangida left office and after Abacha toppled the Ernest Shonekan-led Interim National Government in a coup, took power and turned state-sponsored terror and murder into an art.
For five years the entire nation and particularly the Yoruba people were subjected to the worst form of barbarity and tyranny that our nation had ever known.
Many were falsely accused, persecuted, humiliated, killed, incarcerated, tortured and driven into exile to suffer in some foreign land whilst others, like the former military Head of State and later President, President Olusegun Obasanjo, General Shehu Musa Yar’adua (the second in command to General Obasanjo when he was military Head of State and the older brother to President Umaru Musa Yar’adua) and General Paul Oladipo Diya (General Sani Abacha’s second in command) were imprisoned for no just cause and one of them (Yar’adua) was pinned down and forcefully injected with strange and toxic substances, poisoned and murdered whilst there.
Meanwhile Abiola’s wife, Alhaja Kudirat Abiola, along with many others including a young man by the name of Toyin Onagoruwa who was the son of Dr. Olu Onagoruwa SAN (Abacha’s Attorney General and Minister of Justice who had earlier resigned in protest against all the atrocities that the Government he served were committing), were either gunned down in the streets or, like Bagudu Kaltho, blown up with bombs.
What can one say about a man who, according to Onagoruwa himself, could order the murder of his own Minister of Justices’ son simply because the man gave a press conference, criticised his brutal policies and heinous practices and resigned.
Then there was the judicial murder of the activist and environmentalist Ken Saro-Wiwa.
Even after the international community pleaded with him not to hang this man and implored him to at least allow him to challenge his “conviction” for murder before what was to all intents and purposes a kangaroo court and go to the Court of Appeal, Abacha refused to listen and had the poet and human rights activist hanged in the middle of the night.
Worse of all is the fact that Saro-Wiwa was his close friend. This was singularly one of the most wicked and callous acts that took place under Abacha’s watch.
Saro-Wiwa deserved to at least go on Appeal and exhaust the opportunities that the law and the legal system availed to him.
It was a national tragedy and the Commonwealth nations particularly were so shocked that Nigeria’s membership was suspended.
Yet it didn’t end there and there is so much more to say.
For example brutal psychopaths like Colonel Frank Omenka and his gang of heartless cut throats tortured people, including women and children, with sadistic pleasure in the dungeons of the Directorate of Military Intelligence in Apapa, Lagos.
Few left there alive.
Most of the young people talking and writing on social media today know nothing about these ugly events or this time because they were not born and they know NOTHING about the history of the country.
We lived it, we were part of the struggle, we paid the price, it was hell and all of it happened under Abacha’s watch.
Yet how did we get there, what transpired, who were the major actors and who actually annuled the June 12th election and took us down that hideous path?
This is the million dollar question and Babangida finally answered it in his book.
The truth is that had it not been that IBB sheathed his sword, held his peace and conceded to the dark, sinister and evil forces that coordinated, orchestrated, initiated, effected and announced the annulment without his knowledge and behind his back there would have been a very bloody military coup which would have in turn been violently resisted by the IBB faction and thereby result in a long and protracted civil war.
Those that led these dark and evil pro-annulment forces were General Sani Abacha, Brigadier General David Mark, Lt. General Joshua Dogonyaro, Air Vice Marshal Nurudeen Imam, Colonel Lawan Gwadabe, Major General Alwali Kazir, Lt. General Ishaya Bamaiyi, Major General Jeremiah Useni and many others.
Had Babangida resolved to resist them, renounce the unauthorised announcement and de-annul the election (which he could easily have done) I have no doubt that Abiola, his wives, his children, his key supporters, many of those heroes that were to later become the leaders of NADECO, IBB himself and all his key loyalists including Major General Salihu Ibrahim (the Chief of Army Staff), Brigadier General Haliru Akilu, Major General Aliyu Gusau, Colonel Sambo Dasuki, Colonel Abubakar Umar, General Gado Nasko, Air Vice Marshall Hamza Abdullahi, Colonel Habibu Shuaibu, General Abdulsalami Abubakar, General Garba Duba, General Sani Bello, Colonel Nuhu Bamalli (as he then was), Major General Isola Williams, Admiral Augustus Aikhomu and many others would have been targetted for assassination and our country would have been plunged into a cataclysmic bloodbath given the fact that Babangida’s men would have struck back with equal ferocity and in equal measure.
More likely than not few of the main players on both sides, including Abacha, Abiola and Babangida themselves, would have survived the conflagration and the country would have been at war with itself, brother killing brother, for an indefinate period of time.
Anyone that doubts this or the horrific nature of such conflicts should remember what happened during the Nigeria/Biafra civil war and consider what is happening in Sudan today.
When senior and powerful military officers each with a massive following in the Armed Forces refuse to tread the path of compromise, peace and sanity and take up arms against one another EVERYONE loses and the entire country implodes into ashes and crumbles into dust.
I do not seek to justify the annulment and at the time, along with millions of others, I opposed it with all my heart and every fiber of my being but the reality was that IBB was faced with a very difficult choice.
As he said in his book he was indeed “caught between the devil and the deep blue sea”.
He could have done what some may deem right right by resisting the deceit, betrayal, perfidy, pressure and subterfuge from the Abacha faction of the military, refuse to accept the illegal and unconciable annulment, declare it as “null and void” and consequently spark off a bloody chain of events and a civil war or he could have chosen to do what some may deem wrong by keeping his cool, letting Abacha have his dastardly way, conceeding to the dark forces, accepting the annulment and thereby save lives and maintain a tenuous even though short-lived peace.
He chose the latter, saved MKO Abiola’s life and that of many others and maintained the fragile unity of the military and by extention the country by doing so.
Yet whichever option he opted to take, Babangida was not the villainous usurper, traitor and Kingslayer here: Abacha and his vile power-hungry cohorts were.
This is what IBB has now firmly established in his book and we await sensible literary responses from those that are still alive and that were in the Abacha camp.
They are more than welcome to dispute the facts and tell their side of the story and we are eager to hear them.
However until they do so and provide the necessary evidence to establish the veracity of their claims yours truly along with many others are constrained to accept Babangida’s narrative because, in my view, he remains a respected elderstatesman and a man of integrity and secondly his account appears to credible and plausible.
For the benefit of those that may not have the book I would urge them to get a copy and read from pages 274 to 276 in order to get a clear picture of what actually transpired and the truth is that it is shocking!
Due to space constraints permit me to qoute just a portion of it from page 275 where he wrote,
“On the morning of June 23, I left Abuja for Katsina to commiserate with the Yar’Adua family over the death of their patriarch, Alhaji Musa Yar’Adua.
The funeral had taken place, and as I got ready to leave, a report filtered to me that the June 12 elections had been annulled.
Even more bizarre was the extent of the annulment because it terminated all court proceedings regarding the June 12 elections, repealed all the decrees governing the Transition and even suspended NEC! Equally weird was the shabby way the statement was couched and made.
Admiral Aikhomu’s press secretary, Nduka Irabor, had read out a terse, poorly worded statement from a scrap of paper, which bore neither the presidential seal nor the official letterhead of the government, annulling the June 12 presidential elections. I was alarmed and horrified.
Yes, during the stalemate that followed the termination of the results announcement, the possibility of annulment that could lead to fresh elections was loosely broached in passing but annulment was only a component of a series of other options.
To suddenly have an announcement made without my authority was, to put it mildly, alarming.
I remember saying: ‘These nefarious inside forces opposed to the elections have outflanked me!’
I would later find out that the ‘forces’ led by General Sani Abacha annulled the elections.
There and then, I knew I was caught between the devil and the deep blue sea!
From then on the June 12 elections took on a painful twist for which, as I will show later, I regrettably take responsibility.of its worst political crises ever.
Like many of us in government, the political class was stunned.”
All this yet Babangida still opted to take full responsibility for these troubling events and great injustice and kept his lips sealed about the abominable role that General Sani Abacha and his group played in the annulment of the June 12th election and the rape and usurpation of the mandate that was freely given to Chief MKO Abiola and his running mate Ambassador Babagana Kingibe by the Nigerian people.
To drive home the point about how dangerous the situation was for all and sundry permit me to remind those that were alive at the time about the meeting that Babangida had with Abiola after the annulment in which he told him that “these people” meaning the Abacha group would “kill me, you and all the rest of us” if the election result was “de-annulled” and allowed to stand.
His words were leaked to the media and widely reported at the time yet they were never denied by either Babangida or Abiola.
Again there was the infamous contribution from Colonel David Mark (as he then was) who had hitherto been a Babangida loyalist where he was reported to have said “we will not allow Abiola to be sworn in as President and if NEC swears him in we will shoot him”.
Those that doubt this should read Professor Omo Omoruyi’s book titled ‘The Tale Of June 12th: The Betrayal Of The Democratic Rights Of Nigerians’.
Omoruyi, who was the Director General of the Center For Democratic Studies, was not only an Advisor and insider in the Babangida Government but he was also very close to the Head of State and a strong ally and voice of the pro-democracy and anti-annulment movement within the regime.
He was a formidable intellectual who was credible, humane, decent, cerebral and highly respected and I have no reason to doubt his word.
Ironically after the annulment took place and Babangida “stepped aside” from office Mark fell out with Abacha and fled the country for his life.
Then there was the case of Colonel Lawan Gwadabe who actually told one of Babangida’s children that they would pick up his/her father and “deal with him” if he allowed Abiola to take over.
Ironically the same Gwadabe who at that time was in the Abacha camp was later arrested by Abacha and tortured brutally for planning a coup. He was beaten so badly that he almost lost his life.
Both Mark (who 14 years later was elected Senate President) and Gwadabe were originally IBB boys but they turned their back on their mentor, joined the pro-annulment camp and vehemently opposed the election and mandate of MKO Abiola.
Thankfully not all of IBB’s boys shifted camps at that crucial time and most remained loyal to him.
Brigadier General Haliru Akilu, the clinically efficient Director of National Intelligence and the man who detected and prevented numerous coup attempts, exposed many conspiracies and single-handedly kept Babangida in power for 8 years never faltered or failed and remains loyal to IBB till today.
Colonel Sambo Dasuki, IBB’s erstwhile ADC (who became National Security Advisor to President Goodluck Jonathan 20 years later) was as constant as the Northern star and was loyal till the end.
Thankfully there were many others but worthy of mention for his remarkable courage and gallantry at the time was Colonel Abubakar ‘Dangiwa’ Umar (my erstwhile Polo Captain from Lagos Polo Club and the former Governor of Kaduna state) who was the shining star of the Babangida inner circle.
A former ADC to General Hassan Katsina (the Chief of Army Staff when General Gowon was Head of State), Umar was young, tough, outspoken, courageous, suave, sophisticated, dashing and very good-looking.
He was also very pro-June 12th and was one of IBB’s greatest loyalists in the military hierarchy.
Permit me to share a few words that I extracted from my essay titled ‘President Ibrahim Babangida: An Irrepressible Enigma And Enduring Institution’ which I wrote the day after the launch of President Babangida’s book.
I wrote, inter alia,
“Babangida has explained to us his own side of the story and told us exactly what transpired.
He refused to remain silent, he did not shy away from speaking the truth or refuse to accept responsibility and he did not pass the buck.
Instead he came clean, displayed immense courage and did the right and proper thing.
That is what leaders are meant to do and he did it without fear or favour regardless of whose ox was gored. Kudos to him.
We need to appreciate this gesture, eschew all bitterness, let go of all our pent up anger, forgive him for what many perceive to be his sins and move on.
Equally we need to accord him his rightful place in history as one of the the greats despite his fallibility.
He is after all a mere man, albeit a great one, and not God. Only God is free of fault and is infallible and there is not one man that has ever lived, led or ruled that can claim to be perfect.
All those insulting and abusing him for putting the facts and his experiences on record in his book are malevolent, bitter, twisted souls and unenlightened, ignorant, cowards who have no appreciation of history or what this man actually achieved in his 8 years in office.
Again they cannot fully comprehend or appreciate the complex events that led up to the annulment of June 12th.
They only see things in part and have allowed their emotions rather than their heads to rule them.
I was in the NADECO trenches during that difficult time and like many others paid my dues too but I can boldly say that outside of the June 12th matter IBB did more for Nigeria than virtually any other President or Head of State.
He left power 32 years ago and yet every single living former Nigerian President and Head of State bar President Muhammadu Buhari who he had removed from power in a coup in 1985 attended his book launch in person and despite all Buhari actually sent a representative and a warm message.
It was an extraordinary event and I witnessed it with my own eyes because I had the privilege of being invited.
If the number of leaders that attended, which included President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, former Head of State General General Yakubu Gowon, former Head of State General Abdulsalami Abubakar, former President and former Head of State President Olusegun Obasanjo, former President Goodluck Jonathan, former President of Ghana Nana Akufo Addo, former President of Sierra Leone President Koroma, former Vice President Yemi Osinbajo, former Vice President Namadi Sambo and former Vice President Atiku Abubakar does not prove to Nigerians the high esteem that the ruling elites have for him then nothing will.
My prayer is that God continues to be with this great and inspiring man who has displayed immense discipline, resilience, dignity, self-respect, courage and humility throughout his distinguished and illustrious life.
I pray he continues to share his vast reserves of experience, knowledge and wisdom and make his contributions to national development for many years to come.
Whether his numerous detractors like it or not IBB remains an enigma, an institution and the most consequential Head of State and President in our history.
No-one can take that away from him and we are very proud of him. I wish both him and his family well”.
I stand by every word.
Permit me to conclude this contribution with a quote from Babangida’s book which many have chosen to ignore or misinterpret.
For posterity’s sake we must put what he has said on record lest the uninformed, ignorant, unlettered and intellectually dishonest amongst us have a field day and misinform future generations about those that were behind the first coup d’etat in our country which took place on January 15th 1966 and which was led by Major Emmanuel Ifeajuna and Major Chukwuemeka Kaduna Nzeogwu respectively.
On page 39 of the book Babangida wrote the following:
“It was heinously callous for Nzeogwu to have murdered Sir Ahmadu Bello and his wife, Hafsatu, because not only were they eminently adored by many but also because they were said not to have put up a fight. From that moment the putsch was infiltrated by “outsiders” to its supposed original intention and it took on an unmistakable ethnic coloration compounded by the fact that there were no related coup activities in the Eastern Region”.
I hate to burst the bubble of those that are beating their chests like puerile apes and think otherwise but there is NOWHERE in Babangida’s book that he said that the coup of January 15th 1966 was NOT an Igbo one.
In fact he alluded to the contrary when he said the coup had taken on an “unmistakable ethnic coloration”.
That is what he wrote and that is the reality.
The coup was indeed an ethnic one and the ethnic group he was referring to were none other than the Igbo!
Those that have purposely twisted and misinterpreted his words and have said that he wrote that the coup was “not an Igbo coup” are either misguided and misinformed or are being mischievous and patently dishonest.
Most of them have a poor understanding of the English language and have not even read the book and instead are relying on erroneous and nonsensical social media headlines, fake news, fake qoutes and well-crafted propaganda and disinformation.
I suggest that they procure a copy of the book, read it from cover to cover and stop attempting to revise history by misinterpreting the words of the esteemed author.
Babangida, in his characteristic manner, was charitable to the Igbos in his book but that does not give anyone licence to misinterpret his words and conclusions or use them in a self-serving manner in an attempt to revise history.
Whether anyone likes it or not the facts are clear and they are as follows.
99% of the officers that planned and executed the January 15th 1966 coup and that were involved in the execution of the mutiny were Igbo and 99% of those that were murdered by them were non-Igbo military officers and political leaders in some cases including their wives.
We owe it to the memory of those that were so callously slaughtered not to hide, distort or sugar coat the bitter truth, not to revise history and not to tell pernicious lies.
The coup was UNMISTAKEABLY and UNEQUIVOCALLY an Igbo one and Babangida made this very clear when he wrote about its “ethnic coloration”.
I urge all those that have a poor understanding of the English language and that cannot read more than three lines of any book or essay to stop using his words to establish their revisionist and patently dishonest narrative and their futile attempt to perpetuate an age-old mendacity and delusion.
Falsehood, deceit, specious lies and intellectual fraud have no place in a civilised society or the world of the educated and literate.
The truth is that the January 15th 1966 coup WAS an Igbo one and I am glad to say that Babangida has confirmed it.
This is a FACT and as our journalist friends will tell you ‘facts are sacred and opinion is cheap”.
God bless Nigeria!
Chief Femi Fani-Kayode is the Sadaukin Shinkafi, the Wakilin Doka of Potiskum, a former Minister of Culture and Tourism and a former Minister of Aviation
Related
You may like
Opinion
A Cry from the Creeks: A Daughter’s Plea for the Niger Delta
Published
1 day agoon
June 29, 2026By
Eric
By Boma Lilian Braide (Esq.)
The water does not lie. It carries no political allegiance, no corporate agenda, and no capacity for deception. It simply mirrors the truth of what we have allowed to be done to it.
A deeply disturbing video recently shared by veteran actress and social justice advocate Hilda Dokubo has laid bare the agonising reality facing communities in the Niger Delta. In the footage, filmed in Bille Kingdom, Rivers State, clean water is drawn from a private borehole. Within less than sixty seconds, under the pressure of underground gas, the clear liquid undergoes a sickening transformation. It darkens, thickens, and pours out as pitch-black crude oil. This is not a scientific curiosity. It is a damning indictment of a systemic humanitarian catastrophe hiding in plain sight.
As a daughter of the Niger Delta, that video did not merely break my heart. It ignited in me the ancestral fury of a people who have been poisoned, marginalised, and forgotten while the rest of this nation prospers on the wealth extracted from our soil.
For generations, the creeks, wetlands, and rivers of the Niger Delta were our sanctuaries, our markets, and the very foundation of our identity. As Hilda Dokubo rightly recalled, our people once walked to the riverbank whenever they needed to provide for their families. Fishing was not merely a livelihood; it was a covenant between our communities and the natural world that sustained them.
Today, that covenant has been shattered. Our fishermen have abandoned their nets because the rivers are fouled with oil. Our young people, stripped of the traditional occupations their fathers and mothers once practised, are channelled into the grinding machinery of poverty, idleness, and despair.
The Niger Delta has been reduced to an ecological ruin. Crude oil has saturated underground aquifers. Contaminated seafood and poisoned water are now daily realities for millions of people whose only crime is living above one of the most oil-rich territories on earth. International oil companies have abandoned corroded infrastructure that leaks without ceasing, transforming the very resource that was meant to be our salvation into a slow and methodical death sentence. We have raised this alarm for decades. Yet successive administrations have treated our suffering as an acceptable cost of doing business, a tolerable footnote so long as the petrodollars continue to flow to Abuja.
The veteran activist Annkio Briggs has devoted her life to making this injustice visible. For decades, she has documented with precision and moral clarity how the collusion between international oil interests and Nigerian state institutions has systematically dismantled the future of Niger Delta communities. She has shown how pipelines laid through our mangroves, and gas flared across our skies, have become instruments of slow violence, causing respiratory diseases, cancers, and developmental disorders in children who should never have known such afflictions. Annkio Briggs has also exposed a deeply troubling double standard; the disparity between how oil spills are handled in the industrialised world and how they are managed in Nigeria is not a matter of oversight. It is a calculated display of environmental injustice.
When a spill occurs in a Western nation, governments mobilise emergency responses and demand full remediation to international standards. In the Niger Delta, contaminated sites are patched with sand, filed away in bureaucratic reports, or left entirely unaddressed. The regulatory agencies established to protect us have been rendered impotent through underfunding, political interference, and sheer institutional neglect. Meanwhile, oil corporations exploit these weaknesses, leaving communities such as Bille suffocating beneath toxic soot and eruptions of subterranean gas. Grief, in these communities, is not a passing season. It is a permanent condition. And we refuse to allow the slow death of our homeland to be buried beneath corporate disclaimers and government platitudes.
Nigeria cannot claim to be a nation at peace with itself while one of its most productive regions is being chemically erased. We will not stand aside as these foreign companies divest their interests, collect their profits, and depart, leaving our land irreparably damaged. This is not a complaint. It is a demand, issued by a daughter of the Niger Delta who refuses to watch her homeland perish in silence. We are not data points in a corporate environmental impact assessment. We are human beings who breathe poisoned air and draw crude oil from our taps. I am therefore calling on every authority with a mandate and the power to act, to do so immediately, and to end the unconscionable treatment of the Niger Delta as a sacrifice zone.
To the President and the Federal Government of Nigeria; we demand the immediate declaration of an environmental state of emergency in Bille Kingdom and all affected riverine communities across the Niger Delta. The administration must enforce without equivocation the principle that those who pollute bear full responsibility for remediation. The era of negotiations that protect corporate balance sheets at the expense of human lives must end.
To the Niger Delta Development Commission; the mandate for which this agency was created demands urgent renewal. The Commission must redirect its priorities, without delay, toward meaningful environmental remediation, the delivery of reliable infrastructure, and the immediate provision of emergency water purification systems to communities that are drinking poison today.
To the Ministry of Petroleum Resources and NNPC Limited; the continued extraction of national wealth from Niger Delta soil, while leaving communities with nothing but fire and contamination, is morally indefensible. Every abandoned wellhead must be identified, securely decommissioned, and fully removed. There can be no further tolerance of neglected infrastructure that poisons the ground beneath our children’s feet.
To the National Oil Spill Detection and Response Agency; your regulatory authority must be exercised with rigour and without compromise. International clean-up standards are not aspirational; they are the minimum obligation owed to our communities. Any multinational corporation that attempts to exit the Niger Delta without fully restoring the damage it has caused must face enforceable legal and financial consequences.
To international environmental bodies and development partners; the hydrocarbon saturation of freshwater sources in communities across the Niger Delta has reached a scale that demands independent technical intervention and comprehensive ecological auditing. We ask that you bring your expertise and your authority to bear, not in the conference rooms of Abuja and Geneva, but in the creeks and villages where people are dying.
To the multinational oil corporations and local operators who have enriched themselves from Niger Delta resources; you will not walk away from what you have destroyed. No company should be permitted to divest, restructure, or withdraw from this region without having first restored our land, rehabilitated our waterways, and made full and fair reparation to the communities whose lives and livelihoods they have dismantled over decades of irresponsible operation.
Look at the black water pouring from our taps and understand what it represents. Every oil slick that spreads across our rivers is the grief of a mother unable to feed her children. Every gas flare that burns through the night is the laboured breath of a child whose lungs have never known clean air. Bille is in crisis.
The Niger Delta is bleeding. And its waters are bearing witness to crimes that have gone unpunished for far too long. The season of committees, communiqués, and hollow summits is over. We are not asking for sympathy. We are demanding accountability. Give us back our clean water. Restore our ancestral creeks. Save the daughters and sons of the Niger Delta before there is nothing left to save.
Related
Opinion
The Deluge We Built: Rain Does Not Create Catastrophe, It Reveals It
Published
1 day agoon
June 29, 2026By
Eric
By Richard Dablah
At 1:00 a.m., the rain began. By dawn, Accra had become a familiar theatre of submerged roads, stranded commuters, flooded homes, interrupted livelihoods, and the ritual exchange of outrage across television screens and social media. By tomorrow, we will have identified the usual villains: plastic waste, choked drains, irresponsible citizens, climate change, and inadequate enforcement. By next week, the water will have receded, but so too will our memory.
The rain did not surprise us.
Our surprise is the most astonishing part of the story.
Perhaps we have misunderstood what a flood actually is.
A flood is not the moment water overflows its banks. It is the moment decades of invisible decisions become visible. Rain merely serves as the auditor.
The deluge begins long before the first cloud gathers.
It begins when wetlands are described as “vacant land.” It begins when streams disappear beneath concrete because they interrupt commercial ambition. It begins when planning permission becomes more negotiable than hydrology, when maintenance budgets become political opportunities instead of engineering necessities, and when urban expansion is celebrated without asking whether the land itself consented to becoming a city.
Every signature placed on a permit inside a floodplain becomes a future tributary.
Every neglected drain becomes a future river.
Every compromised inspection becomes tomorrow’s emergency.
The rain simply connects decisions that were never meant to meet.
We have become accustomed to describing flooding as a natural disaster. It is an intellectually comforting phrase because it transfers responsibility from institutions to nature. Nature, however, is remarkably innocent in this story.
Water is perhaps the most honest element on Earth.
It negotiates with no political party.
It ignores campaign promises.
It does not recognise ministerial authority.
It simply obeys gravity.
When water returns to places it once occupied centuries ago, we accuse it of invading our communities. Yet rivers have never invaded cities. More often, cities have quietly occupied rivers.
Hydrologists understand something politicians rarely acknowledge: every river possesses memory. A watershed remembers its ancient channels. A floodplain remembers where excess water belongs. Wetlands remember how to absorb storms. We imagine that maps redraw geography. Water disagrees.
Concrete cannot erase memory.
It merely postpones its expression.
We therefore continue to debate blocked drains while ignoring blocked landscapes. We widen roads while narrowing waterways. We celebrate visible infrastructure while dismantling invisible infrastructure—the wetlands, soils, vegetation, lagoons and natural floodplains that quietly performed engineering services long before engineers arrived.
The irony is profound.
A forest can receive extraordinary rainfall and rarely flood because every root, every microorganism, and every layer of soil participates in slowing, storing, and redistributing water. A modern city, by contrast, has replaced absorption with acceleration. Asphalt rejects rainfall. Concrete hastens runoff. Buildings compress the earth. Heat hardens the soil. Every improvement intended to modernise the city simultaneously reduces its ability to behave like land.
The city has become hydraulically impatient.
Perhaps that is our greatest misunderstanding.
We believe cities are machines.
They are not.
Cities are living metabolisms. Like every living organism, they must balance what they consume with what they can process. Accra continuously consumes land, population, vehicles, plastics, concrete, energy, and waste faster than it expands its ecological capacity to absorb them. The consequence is not merely congestion or pollution. It is systemic metabolic failure.
Flooding is one of its symptoms.
Yet the problem extends even beyond engineering.
It is temporal.
Nature operates on geological time. Wetlands require centuries to mature. Rivers evolve over millennia. Soil develops patiently. Aquifers recharge slowly.
Politics operates on electoral time.
Four-year cycles reward ribbon-cutting ceremonies, not invisible maintenance. The culvert that no one notices receives less attention than the flyover everyone photographs. Maintenance loses elections. New construction wins them.
The result is predictable.
Infrastructure quietly accumulates entropy while governments accumulate announcements.
Physics teaches that every system naturally drifts toward disorder unless energy is continually invested to preserve order. Cities obey the same law. Drains clog. Roads crack. Regulations weaken. Institutions decay. Maintenance postponed is entropy invited.
The flood is not merely an engineering failure.
It is entropy-defeating governance.
Then there is the uncomfortable question we seldom ask.
Who benefits from recurring disasters?
Disaster creates contracts.
Emergency procurement.
Reconstruction projects.
Political visibility.
Institutional relevance.
Entire bureaucracies become more active after a catastrophe than before it.
This observation is not an accusation against individuals. It is an invitation to examine incentives. A society that consistently invests more in responding to disaster than preventing it eventually normalises catastrophe as part of governance itself.
The deluge becomes an administrative season.
History offers another warning.
Civilisations rarely collapse because nature suddenly becomes hostile. More often, they ignore environmental feedback until it becomes impossible to negotiate. Rivers shift. Forests disappear. Soils degrade. Cities overreach. Institutions mistake temporary resilience for permanent immunity.
Every civilisation eventually discovers that nature does not negotiate deadlines.
It only delivers consequences.
Perhaps that is what Accra experienced between 1:00 a.m. and dawn.
Not simply rainfall.
Not merely flooding.
But an examination.
An examination of our planning philosophy.
An examination of our political incentives.
An examination of our ecological literacy.
An examination of whether we still understand the land upon which we continue to build our future.
The biblical deluge was remembered not because water fell from the heavens, but because it exposed the moral condition of a civilisation. Whether one reads that account as theology or metaphor, its enduring lesson remains unsettling: catastrophe often reveals what prosperity successfully concealed.
Our modern deluge performs the same function.
It reveals that resilience cannot be legislated after rivers overflow. It must be designed before foundations are poured. It reveals that environmental stewardship is not an aesthetic concern but a constitutional obligation to future generations. It reveals that engineering cannot indefinitely compensate for ecological illiteracy, and that governance detached from geography eventually becomes governance against geography.
Tomorrow the skies will likely clear.
The floodwaters will retreat.
Traffic will resume.
Life will continue.
Until the next storm.
Unless we finally recognise the uncomfortable truth.
.
.
.
R.D
Related
Opinion
Elevating Societies: Leadership As Enduring Bridge from Ruler-ship to Generational Prosperity
Published
3 days agoon
June 27, 2026By
Eric
By Tolulope A. Adegoke PhD
“Real leadership is never about ruling over others—it is about standing beside them, lighting the path forward, and helping them discover strengths they never knew they possessed. Where rulership builds walls to protect power, true leadership builds bridges to a better future. In every choice we make between control and inspiration, we decide what kind of world our children and grandchildren will inherit. Let us choose the harder, nobler path: to lead with humility, vision, and unwavering commitment to the common good.” – Tolulope A. Adegoke, PhD.
Leadership and ruler-ship represent two fundamentally different approaches to power and governance. Ruler-ship tends to emphasize control, hierarchy, personal authority, and the maintenance of dominance, often prioritizing short-term gains or elite interests. In contrast, authentic leadership focuses on vision, service, empowerment, integrity, and the development of collective capacity. It inspires people to rise above immediate challenges and collaborate toward shared, enduring objectives. Far from being a mere management style, leadership serves as the critical systemic foundation enabling sustainable, inclusive, and transformative growth across every domain of human endeavor—political, economic, social, environmental, technological, and cultural—while securing a more prosperous and equitable world for generations to come.
This detailed examination highlights the profound differences between these concepts, analyzes their real-world consequences, showcases compelling examples of success, and proposes practical pathways for embedding genuine leadership at all levels of society.
Understanding the Core Distinction
Ruler-ship often manifests as top-down command, relying on coercion, patronage, or suppression of opposition to maintain order. While it may produce rapid decisions or visible projects, it frequently fosters corruption, stifles innovation, breeds resentment, and leaves institutions vulnerable once central authority weakens.
Leadership, particularly in its transformational, servant, and sustainable forms, operates differently. It seeks to elevate others, build resilient systems, and balance immediate needs with long-term well-being. Transformational leaders motivate people to achieve beyond their perceived limits by fostering purpose, trust, and shared vision. Sustainable leadership explicitly integrates economic vitality, social equity, and environmental responsibility, recognizing their interdependence.
This distinction matters deeply because it shapes outcomes not just for the present but for decades ahead. Ruler-ship extracts value; leadership multiplies it.
Real-World Impacts on Development and Society
History and contemporary evidence consistently show that rulership-driven systems tend toward fragility. Concentrated, unaccountable power may deliver initial stability or growth, but it often leads to elite capture, policy reversals, social divisions, and eventual crises.
Leadership-oriented governance generates self-reinforcing progress. By promoting transparency, human capital investment, innovation, and adaptive institutions, it equips societies to navigate complex global challenges such as climate disruption, technological change, and inequality. Transformational approaches enhance motivation, performance, and cohesion across organizations and nations.
The benefits span key sectors:
- Economic Growth: Leaders who prioritize education, infrastructure, diversification, and fair competition create environments where entrepreneurship and productivity thrive sustainably.
- Social Advancement: Inclusive leadership expands access to quality healthcare, education, and opportunity, strengthening social fabrics and reducing disparities.
- Environmental Stewardship: Forward-thinking leaders align development with ecological limits, driving innovation in clean technologies and responsible resource management.
- Political Stability: They reinforce institutions grounded in accountability, rule of law, and citizen participation, enhancing resilience.
- Cultural and Technological Evolution: Leadership that values creativity and ethics accelerates responsible innovation and enriches societal progress.
Illustrative Cases of Transformational Leadership
Several standout examples demonstrate the power of leadership over ruler-ship:
- Singapore’s Transformation: Under Lee Kuan Yew’s guidance, a small, resource-scarce nation evolved into a global hub of prosperity through disciplined investment in education, merit-based systems, anti-corruption efforts, and pragmatic long-term planning.
- Rwanda’s Post-Conflict Renewal: Facing immense challenges after genocide, focused leadership emphasized good governance, infrastructure, gender equity, poverty reduction, and economic modernization—dramatically improving living standards and positioning the country as a development leader.
- Liberia’s Recovery: Ellen Johnson Sirleaf steered her nation through post-civil war reconstruction by championing reconciliation, institution-building, and inclusive policies, demonstrating servant leadership committed to national healing rather than personal power.
- Broader Inspirations: Figures like Christiana Figueres in climate diplomacy and pioneering corporate leaders at organizations such as Patagonia illustrate systems-oriented leadership that builds coalitions and drives meaningful, large-scale change.
These cases contrast sharply with instances where authoritarian approaches yielded temporary gains followed by setbacks or instability.
How Leadership Functions as a Systemic Ladder
Leadership builds enduring progress through interconnected mechanisms:
1. Clear Vision and Foresight: Articulating inspiring, realistic futures that unite stakeholders around generational goals in areas like sustainability and innovation.
2. Talent Development and Empowerment: Investing in education, mentorship, and broad participation to cultivate capable successors and unlock widespread potential.
3. Strong, Accountable Institutions: Creating frameworks of transparency and integrity that endure beyond any single individual.
4. Collaborative Inclusion: Engaging diverse actors—public, private, and civil society—to generate creative, equitable solutions to complex problems.
5. Ethical, Balanced Decision-Making: Weighing economic, social, and environmental considerations to ensure holistic, responsible advancement.
6. Adaptability and Continuous Learning: Embracing feedback, monitoring results, and adjusting strategies to maintain relevance amid changing circumstances.
These elements create compounding benefits, strengthening societies’ capacity to thrive over time.
Fostering Leadership for Lasting Impact
Shifting from rulership to leadership demands intentional action:
- Integrate ethics, critical thinking, and sustainability principles into education systems at every level.
- Reform institutions to emphasize merit, accountability, term limits, and citizen oversight.
- Actively prepare youth, women, and underrepresented groups for leadership responsibilities.
- Protect civic space, independent media, and participatory governance to sustain pressure for integrity.
- Promote cross-border learning and collaboration among reform-minded leaders and nations.
While obstacles such as entrenched interests and global uncertainties persist, committed coalitions have repeatedly shown that meaningful change is possible.
A Call to Legacy: Building Tomorrow Today
Leadership, rather than ruler-ship, offers the most reliable pathway to sustainable and progressive development. It replaces extraction with multiplication, control with empowerment, and short-term expediency with generational stewardship. By embracing service, vision, and accountability, leaders in every sphere can help construct societies that are more innovative, equitable, resilient, and harmonious with the natural world.
The true test of our efforts lies in the inheritance we pass forward: healthier institutions, empowered citizens, preserved environments, and expanded opportunities. This vision calls for a deliberate cultural and structural shift toward authentic leadership—from local communities to global institutions. The responsibility is collective, the opportunity transformative, and the potential legacy profound. Through courageous, principled leadership, we can climb steadily toward a brighter, more sustainable future for all who follow.
Dr. Tolulope A. Adegoke, AMBP-UN is a globally recognized scholar-practitioner and thought leader at the nexus of security, governance, and strategic leadership. His mission is dedicated to advancing ethical governance, strategic human capital development, resilient nation building, and global peace. He can be reached via: tolulopeadegoke01@gmail.com, globalstageimpacts@gmail.com
Related


Certificate Forgery: Group Seeks Tinubu’s Disqualification from 2027 Election
A Cry from the Creeks: A Daughter’s Plea for the Niger Delta
Remembering Michael Joseph Jackson (1958 – 2009)
Parties’ Deregistration: ADC, Not NDC, is the Target
The Deluge We Built: Rain Does Not Create Catastrophe, It Reveals It
Glamour As Oluwatoyosi Ibirinola and Christopher Oladayo Tie Nuptial Knots in Lagos
Professor Abiodun Adeniyi: An Epitome of Leadership, Scholarship and Media Entrepreneurship
Trump Declares Trade War on Nations Imposing Digital Tax on US Tech Firms
Alleged Coup: Court Orders DSS to Probe VDM over Leaked Trial Video
The Dreams That Died, and the Son Who Was Worth More Than All of Them
Elevating Societies: Leadership As Enduring Bridge from Ruler-ship to Generational Prosperity
Hardship: Remi Tinubu Asks Poor Nigerians to Start Akara, Roasted Corn Business
FG Seeks Foreign Collaboration to Rescue Abducted Oyo Pupils, Teachers
How GLO’s Customer-Centred Innovations’ Keeping Nigerians Connected to the 2026 FIFA World Cup
Trending
-
World3 days agoTrump Declares Trade War on Nations Imposing Digital Tax on US Tech Firms
-
National6 days agoAlleged Coup: Court Orders DSS to Probe VDM over Leaked Trial Video
-
Tech and Humanity3 days agoThe Dreams That Died, and the Son Who Was Worth More Than All of Them
-
Opinion3 days agoElevating Societies: Leadership As Enduring Bridge from Ruler-ship to Generational Prosperity
-
Featured3 days agoHardship: Remi Tinubu Asks Poor Nigerians to Start Akara, Roasted Corn Business
-
National4 days agoFG Seeks Foreign Collaboration to Rescue Abducted Oyo Pupils, Teachers
-
National2 days agoHow GLO’s Customer-Centred Innovations’ Keeping Nigerians Connected to the 2026 FIFA World Cup
-
Headline3 days agoNDC Rejects Court Ruling on Party’s Registration, Heads to Appeal Court

