Connect with us

Opinion

Voice of Emancipation: Britain’s Complicity in Nigeria’s Problem

Published

on

By Kayode Emola

One could look at Nigeria’s problem today and wonder why a country whose people’s talents are so abundant that their benefits are felt across the world; why should such a country be experiencing one of the greatest challenges in the world. It would be expected that these numerous talents, currently scattered abroad, could have been utilised in their home country of Nigeria for the benefit of their kinsmen and country, but alas this is not the case. The shame is that many more talented people living in Nigeria will die without realising their potential, not because of any fault of their own, but because of detrimental decisions made by external forces. By today, it has ceased to be news that Nigeria has overtaken India as the poverty capital of the world – this occurred in 2018 and ever since, a further 6 million people are added to the list of those in poverty every year. What is more shocking is that of those countries, like Britain, who have historically benefitted, and even still today continue to benefit from the rot pervading Nigeria, instead of these countries helping to address the problem, Britain is, in fact, demonstrating to the rest of the world that it is intrinsically involved in Nigeria’s problem.

I am not a person who dwells on people’s body language or the behaviour of government officials nor am I ever focused on “the mood or perception of the people”. However, my stay in Britain has made me realise that these things do matter, especially if it affects other people. When I first came into Britain nearly a decade ago, I and my fellow people with dark skin landed in a country that needed change. The mantra of the then Home Secretary (who later became Britain’s Prime Minister) was “Hostile Environment”. This hostile environment was not directed towards people with lighter skin, but solely to those with dark skin. Many of my friends who had previously been granted a two years post study visa found that the implementation of new legislation made it near impossible to meet the conditions required to remain, and so were forced to relocate to Canada, USA, Australia or Europe. Some others had no choice but to return back to Nigeria where, due to the failing system, their talents went to waste. Others still relocated to anywhere they can find comfort.

The hostile environment meant that a particular set of people were caught in the crossfire. These were the “Windrush generation”: legitimate Britons who could not prove their identity because their stay in Britain was undocumented. Even some who could provide the required evidence were still deported because Britain was fixated on getting migration numbers down. We can say the specific targeting of the Windrush generation had nothing to do with migration numbers, but rather everything to do with the colour of their skin. I believe non dark skin people were also deported but the proportion cannot be compared to the numbers of dark-skinned people who suffered from the hostile environment. Britain would do well to remember that when you put out a policy, it is not just about numbers, it is about people and these people too do matter.

Back to the mood or body language perspective and the unending hardship befalling the Nigerian people. The global ruling powers are aware of the systemic genocide happening in Nigeria under the current leadership of President Muhammed Buhari. Yet, it would appear that most of their citizens are naively unaware, a fact underscored by the lack of western media coverage of the situation. The fact that this is going on in plain view of the western world leaves one to wonder if the world has lost its sense of morality. Various groups and individuals have shouted from the rooftops and to the highest authorities of the world, but no one seems to be listening.

More concerning still is the reaction of players on the global stage to the recent events taking place in the last two months. First, the extradition of a British citizen, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, from a third country (Kenya) – action which if it were undertaken by an individual would be classed as a terrorist act. Next, the invasion of the house of a Yoruba freedom fighter, Sunday ‘Igboho’ Adeyemo, by the Department of State Service (DSS). In the course of this operation, two of his associates were killed and twelve other people illegally detained without charge, still remaining in custody to date. One would have expected a country such as Britain to sternly condemn these actions, but instead Britain shocked observers the world over by inviting the two principal African countries involved to Britain for a meeting in 10 Downing Street.

Whilst it is not clear what happened or what was said behind closed doors, the actions of the current government in Britain appear to suggest to the world that it is complicit in the atrocities going on in Nigeria. When Nigerian activist Ken Saro Wiwa was executed in a sham trial in 1995, the then Prime Minister of the UK, Sir John Major, sent out a strong message to the Nigerian government, even going so far as to suspended Nigeria’s membership of the Commonwealth. The current Nigerian government has committed more crimes than those of previous governments, yet continues to go scot-free with no consequences. If Britain wants the world to believe it does not condone any act of terrorism or slavery, these acts that it ostensibly came to Africa in the 19th century to bring an end to, then these recent actions do not back up that sentiment. If they want to maintain their image, now is the time to put their words into action and prove it to the world.

It is now glaringly obvious to the world that the fate of the hundreds of millions of voiceless people in Nigeria who are trapped in poverty does not matter to Britain. Britain’s concern is that the regular supply of resources from Nigeria continues to flow freely to them unhindered. In addition to the flow of raw materials, Britain also gladly drains the “brightest and the best” talent from Nigeria for the sake of their own development, further depleting the country of resources that could otherwise be used for the progression of their home nation. This cannot be deemed morally right and is an attitude that should be condemned by all worldwide who consider themselves to be people of virtue or proponents of freedom and democracy. Why is the President of Nigeria, who has denied innocent people their freedom, be allowed to freely come into Britain and even have access to the Prime Minister? It shows that the love Britain professes to have for the Nigerian people is nothing more than lip service. The Nigerian people cannot rely on Britain’s compassion to advocate for them, and so they need to rise and stand up for themselves.

Whilst Britain is paying lip service without genuine action to address the atrocities being perpetrated by the Buhari regime, the Yoruba, Igbo and other indigenous people will continue to protest against this injustice. The British people freely held a referendum in 2016 to determine if they wanted to continue their membership of the European Union – a referendum in which the current Prime Minister heavily supported the ‘Leave’ side of the campaign. How can a country and a ruler who so ardently support the right to independence and self-determination of their own people now be the same Britain that stands in the way of over 100 million Yoruba and Igbo people having their own independent countries? A country that championed freedom from the democratic body that is the EU, for the sake of “taking back control of our own country”, will not uphold the right to freedom from the Fulani caliphate, a caliphate that is hell-bent on subjugating the rest of Nigeria in perpetual slavery, but rather offers their endorsement?

The Prime Minister of the UK should realise that the Yoruba and Igbo people are not paupers confined to one corner of West Africa. Rather we are global citizens scattered across several countries of the world, no thanks to the several years of victimisation we’ve suffered in Nigeria. We now employ this advantage of our global presence to help us push for our own independent country, and by God’s grace we will get it. Britain needs to realise that it is in their own interest to begin to forge separate relationships with the southern and northern people independently. The Yoruba people have never been conquered and we will not accept any form of subjugation by any peoples of the world. We will do, and are doing, everything within our power to resist this new form of neo colonisation by Britain. Britain needs to respect our views and stop this attitude of ‘divide and rule’ that they have implemented since the colonial era. Our generation asks for one thing: mutual respect. I do not believe that is too much to ask. Our mass global protest has only just begun. We will not sit down, and we will not be silent. We will press the UK and the rest of the world, who will continue to have us as their guests on a regular basis, until they see the need for justice. Until concrete action is taken. My message to my brothers and sisters: continue to stand strong. We have never been vanquished and we will not start now.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Opinion

Time to Pause and Reason: Open Letter to His Excellency Peter Obi and South East Political Gladiators

Published

on

By

By Dr Sani Sa’idu Baba

Your Excellency, Peter Obi, and the Esteemed Political Leaders of the South-East, I want to take this opportunity to reaffirm my deep love and unwavering support for the South-East region of our great nation. This region holds a special place in my heart, not just because of its rich culture, resilience, contributions to our national development, or the many Igbo friends I have whom I hold dearly, but because I believe in the boundless potential of all Nigerians irrespective of region, tribe, or religion.

My advocacy has always been rooted in the principles of justice, fairness, and unity. I remain committed to the vision of a Nigeria where every citizen, no matter their background, enjoys equal opportunity, is treated with dignity, and has a rightful place at the table of national progress. Only through equity and mutual respect can we build the inclusive and prosperous nation we all desire.

I write this open letter with both conviction and a deep sense of urgency regarding the future of the South-East in the political landscape of Nigeria. As a passionate advocate for justice, fairness, and the political advancement of the Igbo people, I feel compelled to address a critical issue that could define the political trajectory of their region: the need for strategic political alliances in the quest for the future South-East presidency.

Over the years, I have admired the resilience, ambition, and intellectual prowess of the South-East. The region has long been a pillar of Nigeria’s economic and social development. The Igbo people have proven themselves time and again in business, academia, and entrepreneurship. However, despite these contributions, they have struggled to produce a president of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. This persistent political marginalization is both frustrating and unjust. But I believe there is a way forward, and that way lies in strategic political marriages, particularly with the North. I don’t personally believe that the failure of the region to produce a democratically elected president is rooted in their low population, but the weak political alliance especially with the North. No region in Nigeria can do it alone!

Consider the path taken by the South-West in 2015. It was a calculated political maneuver that ultimately led to the emergence of Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu as President of Nigeria. The South-West, under Tinubu’s leadership, understood that the road to power was not about blind ambition or ego, but about forging alliances and making strategic decisions that would serve the collective good. In 2015, Tinubu and his political network aligned with the North, and in return, they secured political capital that eventually paved the way for the South-West to produce a president in 2023. Tinubu’s victory was not a coincidence; it was the result of a careful, calculated alliance with the Northern political establishment, a coalition that was mutually beneficial and rooted in trust.

The same strategy that led to the South-West’s success in 2015 can be employed by the South-East. The truth is, the road to the presidency for the Igbo people cannot be walked alone. It requires a partnership, a coalition, and a commitment to long-term political engagement.

Your Excellency, Peter Obi, you have earned the respect of millions of Nigerians, both in the South-East and beyond. Your presidential bid in 2023 was a historic moment for our region, but it was also a stark reminder that without a strong political alliance, it will be difficult.

It is within this context that I urge you to carefully consider the proposal put forth by His Excellency, former Vice President, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar (if he has actually proposed) to accept the position of Vice President. Some may view this suggestion with skepticism or even disdain, but I believe it presents an opportunity that should not be dismissed outright. Yes, it may come with its own challenges, but it also comes with tremendous potential. If you accept this offer, it will not only position you to serve Nigeria at the highest level of government but will also pave the way for the South-East to produce a president in the near future.

I understand that there are many who will argue against this political coalition, especially those within the ranks of the All Progressives Congress (APC) and its proponents. The detractors will attempt to sow seeds of doubt, creating division and fostering distrust. However, you must not be swayed by the negativity of those who are intent on preventing this coalition from succeeding. They know that a strong North-South-East alliance poses a real threat to their political hegemony, and they will stop at nothing to make it seem impossible.

Very important is that, history has proven the North as a political promise respecter. When the Northern political elite make an agreement, they tend to honor it. This was evident in the 2015 election when the North supported Tinubu and the South-West, as part of a broader alliance to ensure that the region would eventually produce a president. The North understands the power of coalition politics, and it is crucial that the South-East recognize this and strategically align themselves with those who can help bring about a political transformation of the region.

Your Excellency, this is not just about the personal ambitions of any one individual; this is about the future of our country at large, and South-East in particular. It is about securing the Igbo presidency not in the distant future but in the near term. The political marriage between the North and the South-East could be the key to breaking the longstanding political exclusion of the Igbo people. However, to achieve this, the South-East must not only be patient and strategic but must also be willing to make calculated political decisions that may not seem immediately gratifying.

I implore you, Your Excellency, to set aside any personal grievances or doubts that may cloud your judgment. This is about the future of our children and the legacy you leave behind. The Igbo presidency is not an impossible dream, but it will require unity, cooperation, and a clear strategy. You should therefore not allow the naysayers to dictate the course of your history. Instead, pave the way for collaboration with your political associate who you refer to as your elder brother, His Excellency Alhaji Atiku Abubakar and take the bold steps toward the realization of a Nigeria where an Igbo man or woman will sit at the highest office in the land, bringing an end to their palpable marginalisation.

To the political gladiators of the South-East, I call on you to support this vision. The road ahead may not be easy, and the sacrifices may be great, but the reward will be worth every ounce of effort. Let us unite, strategize, and make the future Igbo presidency a reality.

Yours sincerely,

Dr. Sani Sa’idu Baba, a Concerned Advocate for Justice and Fairness, writes from Kano.

Continue Reading

Opinion

Compulsory Voting: A New Bill, Old Tricks

Published

on

By

By Oyinkan Andu

In a move that has ignited widespread debate, the Nigerian House of Representatives is considering a bill that would make voting compulsory for all eligible citizens.

Spearheaded by Speaker Abbas! The same man who introduced the Counter-Subversion Bill in 2024, which proposed severe penalties, including up to 25 years imprisonment, for actions like refusing to recite the national anthem. The proposed legislation would amend the Electoral Act 2022, mandating participation under threat of penalties—up to N100,000 in fines or six months’ imprisonment.

While the proposal claims to target voter apathy, its timing and the political climate suggest it may be more about power retention than civic responsibility.

Compulsory voting is not unprecedented globally. Countries like Australia and Belgium have implemented such laws to combat voter apathy and enhance democratic participation. In Australia, for instance, non-voters face modest fines, a measure credited with maintaining high voter turnout. But those systems function on trust and electoral credibility—two ingredients sorely lacking in Nigeria’s democracy.

In Nigeria, where elections are frequently marred by violence, voter suppression, and manipulation, compulsory voting risks transform civic participation into state coercion. The right to vote should not be weaponised against the citizens it is supposed to empower. This begs the question- Why make voting compulsory in a country where elections are already deeply mistrusted? The answer may lie not in civic virtue but political strategy.

Compulsory voting, in the wrong hands, can be a powerful tool for electoral fraud. Here’s how:
-> Artificial Turnout Inflation: By forcing citizens to vote, the government can create a façade of mass participation, lending legitimacy to results that may have been manipulated.
-> Targeted intimidation: With penalties looming, the law gives local political operatives another excuse to harass, intimidate, or coerce populations, especially in opposition strongholds
-> Suppression Disguised as Enforcement: The enforcement of fines or jail time could be selectively applied to disenfranchise marginalised or opposition-leaning groups under the guise of legal compliance
In short, this bill risks becoming a legal cover for voter suppression, data manipulation, and election rigging—hallmarks of authoritarian democracies in disguise.

The bill’s proponents cite low voter turnout as a justification. In the 2023 general elections, only about 27% of registered voters participated, a decline from previous years. Yet, this approach may overlook underlying issues such as electoral violence, vote-buying, and lack of trust in the electoral system. Instead of addressing these root causes, the bill appears to shift responsibility onto the electorate.

The timing and nature of the bill have led to speculation about its political motivations. Some analysts suggest it could be a strategy by the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) to legitimise future elections and suppress dissent. By mandating participation, the government might aim to project an image of robust democratic engagement, regardless of the electorate’s genuine sentiments. Civil society organisations, including the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP), have condemned the bill, labelling it as oppressive and inconsistent with constitutional rights. They argue that the focus should be on creating a conducive environment for free and fair elections, not penalising citizens for abstention.

Even setting politics aside, enforcing such a law is impractical. How will the underfunded enforcement agencies verify who didn’t vote and why? What constitutes a “valid excuse”? Will overstretched courts prosecute millions of non-voters?

In a country still struggling to issue reliable national ID cards and prevent electoral fraud, enforcement of such a policy borders on fantasy—or worse, it becomes an excuse for targeted harassment. Further still, implementing such a law poses significant challenges. Determining valid excuses for non-voting, ensuring accurate records of participation, and enforcing penalties would require substantial administrative resources. In a country grappling with infrastructural deficits and bureaucratic inefficiencies, these hurdles could render the law ineffective or lead to selective enforcement.

Voter apathy in Nigeria is a symptom, not the disease. Citizens stay home on election day because they believe the process is broken. Forcing them to participate doesn’t restore democracy—it reinforces their disillusionment. While increasing voter turnout is a commendable goal, if well intentioned, mandating participation through punitive measures may not be the solution. Addressing the root causes of voter apathy, such as electoral malpractice, insecurity, and lack of trust in governance—should take precedence. Democracy thrives not merely on participation but on the freedom to choose, including the choice not to participate.

As Nigerias navigates its young democratic journey, policies should aim to empower citizens, not coerce them. Genuine engagement stems from trust and transparency, not compulsion. If the Nigerian Political elite or “Government” as some may call it wants real reform, it must earn participation—not demand it.

Continue Reading

Opinion

Dele Momodu: Charismatic Gentleman @65

Published

on

By

By Yemi Edun

Aare Dele Momodu is undoubtedly one of the most recognisable names, voices, and personalities to emerge from the world’s most populous Black nation Nigeria.

Anyone who has travelled with Bob Dee would understand the magnetic presence he carries from Atlanta Georgia, Accra to Nairobi, down to Central London. He receives nods of admiration, requests for photos, and warm pats on the back wherever he goes. A true cultural ambassador, effortlessly at ease in rich native attire, which his commanding presence makes look truly majestic, he wears native outfits like royalty.

He is a consummate storyteller, an indefatigable workhorse, and one of the most selfless and hospitable people I know. His generosity is legendary. Mention Dele Momodu at any Marriott Hotel in East Africa, and you can expect the red carpet to be rolled out.

I was stunned at Kotoka International Airport as immigration and customs officials broke into chants of “Ovation! Ovation!” while we walked through, it was surreal but perfectly fitting for a man so deeply respected.

Bob Dee is at home with the old and young, with royalty and regular folk alike. There are countless moments that reflect his goodness, but allow me to share just one:

In Summer 2023, while holidaying in Accra with my family, Aare generously assigned his Ghanaian chef to us for two full weeks serving delicious meals until we had to kindly ask him to pause! Not long after, he flew into Accra and hosted us at La Chaumiere his favourite upscale French restaurant, where his presence is evidently cherished.

As my daughter and I prepared to return to London, we discovered shockingly that her passport had expired just a day earlier. I had to remain behind to resolve the issue. By divine timing, Bob Dee called to check in, and upon hearing the situation, immediately sent his driver. We spent that night in his elegant Accra home.

The next morning, using her Nigerian passport, we flew into Lagos. On his advice, I contacted Mr. Governor, and thanks to that call and Bob Dee’s understanding of the terrain, a new British passport was issued the same day.

Happy Birthday, Aare. A charismatic gentleman, who treats all with warmth and deserved respect.

@yemiedundf

Continue Reading

Trending