Connect with us

Headline

Voice of Emancipation: Motivation For Religiosity In Nigeria

Published

on

By Kayode Emola

The average person in Nigeria claims membership of one of the three major religions prevalent across the country: Christianity, Islam or Traditional worship. Some even concurrently subscribe to more than one, as they see fit. In view of this, it is safe to say 90 – 99 percent of Nigerians are ‘religious’. However, before I go any further, we ought to clarify what is meant by the term “religion”, in order to help us understand whether we in Nigeria are truly religious or not.

Religion has been defined as a set of organised beliefs and practices, usually shared by a community or group. In this case, we can expect that those belonging to any one group would behave in the same manner, reason and act alike for the mutual good of said group. I am not very versed in the Qur’an, so I will limit my exposition on that area; however, I do know a few verses in the Bible, and I wonder if those of us who claim to be Christian truly live by the beliefs and practices of Christianity.

For instance, in order to demonstrate our piety to the world, we make our public officials swear on the Bible or Qur’an during the oath of office ceremony. However, I do not think this is a proper thing to do unless we have really grasped what was written in those holy books.

Part of the Bible contains the Ten Commandments, among which are found the “thou shall not”s. These list the things we as individuals must not do, such as stealing, lying, covetousness, bearing false witness etc. Yet those people holding high office of state consistently fail to uphold these Commandments, as so a disregard for their value thus permeates into every aspect of our society. When we wonder why we have a degenerative society today, we have failed to look at where our problem really started. Those in authority who should know better have disregarded their duty to be the shining light that society can rely on.

Apart from the African traditional worship we inherited from our ancestors, Islam and Christianity were both alien religions brought to our shores by foreigners who had their own ulterior motives. In the case of radical Islam, there are people who believe that it is their duty to kill infidels in the name of Jihad, in order to secure their place in paradise. How killing a fellow human being can be considered a laudable act, that can make someone deserving of paradise, remains to be seen.

In the case of Christianity, many countries in the world today have written their constitution based on the tenets prescribed by the Bible, thanks to the European explorers. The Europeans who introduced Christianity also told us that we serve a forgiving God who is willing to forgive us our trespasses every time we commit an offence. As true as this may be, we need to look at the motives underlying the introduction of such religious sentiments.

When we Africans were practicing our traditional worship, we were morally upright and everyone was ready to tell the truth if a matter needed to be taken to the deities for resolution. This was not always borne of our free volition, but rather because circumstances compelled us to, for fear of repercussion from the gods if we did not. However, when the Europeans brought in Christianity and the all-forgiving God, and we did not need to go to the shrines anymore, our true human nature of self-aggrandisement began to reveal itself.

This newfound religion of Christianity, brought to us by the Europeans, allows us to commit sometimes heinous crimes and still be forgiven without repercussions. This today is one of the main motivations for religiosity in Nigeria. Many of us claim to be Christians, however do nothing in our everyday life to demonstrate that we actually follow the tenets laid down in the Bible. It is the reason a politician can get into office and be ready to steal the collective wealth of the people, thereby wantonly breaking one of the Bible’s golden rules. After stealing the wealth, they then go on to lie about it to the people, thus breaking another golden rule. Before you know it, they are wilfully breaking all the rules of same Holy Bible that they swore by.

Considering that this immoral religiosity in Nigeria is the bane of many of our problems, perhaps we need to discontinue this practice of people swearing on the Bible when they take public office. After all, requiring people to swear on any object or religious material throughout this last century has not brought us anything tangible other than looters and liars.

We need now more than ever to build a new society based on heeding our moral conscience to inform us of the right thing. We need to begin a critical education from the cradle in the minds of our people to know that being religious is insufficient to build a decent society. Our people need to know that it is far more imperative that we strive to build a strong moral society for the betterment of all, rather than a corrupt society that only serves a few.

It is a shame that, as much as I believe this is the right way to build a society, the moral degeneration that pervades every aspect of life in Nigeria will make it difficult to achieve. Therefore, as we journey to our new Yoruba nation, it is far better to teach the coming generations that religion cannot be the sole basis for building a morally upright society. Particularly considering the damage that religion has done to the Nigerian state and several other African countries.

Yoruba people must realise that those who brought Islam and Christianity were never motivated by desiring to develop our minds, but rather to capture our hearts. We must now rediscover our purpose as a people and redefine our values based on respect for one another and our society. This stands in stark contrast to the selfishness of our hearts that brings nothing but deprivation, ridicule and shame both to ourselves and to our wider communities.

The truth is, as much good as Christianity and Islam have done for us in Nigeria, we have looked for loopholes in them to destroy our very own society. We must begin to examine for ourselves whether we truly are religious, following the commandments as laid down in the Bible and Qur’an, or whether we are using religion to justify doing our own selfish bidding. If the answer is the latter – which I believe it is for many – then maybe it is time to re-evaluate who really are Christians, Muslims or Traditionalist.

It may be that we can only truly call ourselves religious if we are among those who follow all the principles as laid down in these holy books. Amongst the entire population of Nigeria , they might not even be up to 5%. This is the very reason that we have an immoral society living in denial.

As we enter the new year, seeking also to enter our new nation, let us take time to truly inspect the content of our hearts and the motivation for following our chosen religion. Then let us examine the actions of our leaders, testing whether they measure up to the doctrines to which they claim to subscribe. When we find that they do not, we must take action to root out this disease and ensure that those we imbue with authority in the Yoruba nation are those with strong and sound morals, upright hearts and righteous character, whatever their religion.

Corruption can only take hold in our new nation if we permit it; so it is the duty of every one of us to ensure that we do not. Let us make this new year and new nation one of radical new foundations: foundations of upstanding morals and transparent honesty in all things.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Headline

‘Beer Parlour Fiction’: Fayose Gives Atiku 48Hrs to Disown Statement or He ‘Spills More Beans’

Published

on

By

Former Ekiti State Governor Ayodele Fayose has given former Vice President Atiku Abubakar a 48-hour ultimatum to publicly disown a statement he claimed and thought was issued by his media aide, Paul Ibe, regarding a recent meeting in Minna, Niger State.

In a statement posted on his X account, Fayose expressed amusement at Ibe’s response to his earlier claims about the closed-door meeting involving Atiku, Oyo State Governor Seyi Makinde, and former military president General Ibrahim Babangida (IBB).

Fayose had previously alleged that the gathering involved discussions on political alignments, including Makinde’s interest in a vice-presidential slot on the African Democratic Congress (ADC) platform for the 2027 elections, reportedly tied to financial commitments.

Fayose stated that he assumes Atiku did not authorize Ibe’s rebuttal, which dismissed his account as fabricated. “However, because of my respect for Atiku, I will want to assume that he did not authorise the press statement and I will expect that after seeing it, he will within 48 hours, cause a rebuttal to be issued on it,” Fayose wrote.

He warned that failure to disown the statement would leave him no choice but to disclose additional details from the Minna meeting.

“Should Atiku not publicly disown the statement within the next 48 hours, I will have no option but to spill more beans, the facilitators and executioners of the Minna meeting, particularly what was said about Wike, and by then, I will be doing so without any atom of respect for him,” Fayose added.

The development follows Fayose’s initial post detailing what he described as the “untold story” of the Minna encounter, which Atiku’s camp has rejected as “beer parlour fiction,” “reckless fabrication,” and baseless gossip. Atiku’s team, including aides like Phrank Shaibu and Paul Ibe, has denied any negotiations over vice-presidential tickets, financial contributions, or related deals, insisting no such discussions occurred.

Paul Ibe has since fired back at Fayose, mocking the ultimatum and questioning its basis, with reports indicating he described the 48-hour demand as excessively long and implying Fayose’s claims lack substance.

The exchange highlights ongoing tensions within Nigeria’s opposition political circles ahead of the 2027 general elections, as figures like Atiku, Makinde, and others navigate potential alliances and party switches. Fayose’s threat to reveal more, including alleged comments about former Rivers State Governor Nyesom Wike has intensified speculation about behind-the-scenes maneuvers.

Meanwhile, the said article by Amb Phrank Shauibu, and Paul Iba as Fayose erroneously assumed.

Continue Reading

Headline

El-Rufai Accuses Ribadu of Ordering His Arrest

Published

on

By

Former Kaduna State Governor, Nasir El-Rufai, has accused the National Security Adviser (NSA), Nuhu Ribadu, of masterminding an attempt by security agencies to whisk him away at the Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport in Abuja on Thursday.

​He made this known on Thursday night when former Vice President Atiku Abubakar paid him a solidarity visit at his residence.

​While recounting his ordeal, he said that shortly after he returned from a trip to Cairo, Egypt, operatives of the Department of State Services (DSS), working with the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC), confronted him at the airport and tried to take him into custody.

​He added that he initially thought the DSS officers were working with the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), only to later realise it was the ICPC.

​“It turned out that it’s the ICPC that procured the DSS to abduct me and hand me over to them. The ICPC has never invited me.

​“We now understand that it’s the ICPC, not the EFCC, that’s responsible for what happened today, and the ICPC chairman is acting on the direct orders of Nuhu Ribadu,” El-Rufai said.

​Responding, Atiku expressed sympathy for the former governor and stressed the need for political unity ahead of the next general election.

​He noted that opposition forces must organise themselves to challenge President Bola Tinubu in 2027.

​“We must come together and form a very viable opposition because Tinubu is determined to turn Nigeria into a one-party state,” Atiku said.

Continue Reading

Headline

Kwankwaso, Miyetti Allah, Others Face US Visa Ban over Religious Freedom Violations

Published

on

By

The United States of America has proposed targeted measures, including visa bans and asset freezes, against individuals and groups accused of involvement in religious freedom violations in Nigeria, according to the Nigeria Religious Freedom and Accountability Act of 2026.

On Tuesday, US Congressman, Rep. Riley Moore (R‑West Virginia) announced via X the introduction of the Nigeria Religious Freedom and Accountability Act of 2026, co-sponsored by Rep. Chris Smith (R‑New Jersey).

The bill specifically names the former Governor of Kano State, Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso, as well as Fulani-ethnic nomad militias and associations such as the Miyetti Allah Cattle Breeders Association of Nigeria and Miyetti Allah Kautal Hore.

The bill partly read: “The United States should deliver humanitarian assistance, co-funded by the Government of Nigeria, through trusted faith-based and nongovernmental organisations in Nigeria’s middle belt states; the Department of State and the Department of the Treasury should impose targeted sanctions, including visa bans and asset freezes under the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act, on individuals or entities responsible for religious freedom violations, including (A) Fulani-ethnic nomad militias in Nigeria, (B) Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso, former Kano State Governor (C) Miyetti Allah Cattle Breeders Association of Nigeria (MACBAN); and (D) Miyetti Allah Kautal Hore.”

The legislation directs the US Secretary of State to determine whether certain Fulani militias qualify as foreign terrorist organisations under US law, while also calling for humanitarian aid delivery in Nigeria’s Middle Belt through trusted faith-based and non-governmental organisations.

Moore wrote on X, “Today, I am proud to introduce the Nigeria Religious Freedom and Accountability Act of 2026 with Rep. Chris Smith.

“The US is a Christian nation. As such, we must stand with persecuted Christians around the world.

“Our legislation will build upon the momentum of President Trump designating Nigeria as a Country of Particular Concern and the recent US-Nigeria security framework agreement.”

According to Moore, the legislation builds on previous US measures, including Nigeria’s designation as a “Country of Particular Concern” and the recent US–Nigeria security framework agreement, reinforcing America’s stance on protecting persecuted Christians and other vulnerable communities in the country.

Tensions over religious freedom in Nigeria have escalated amid persistent violence by armed groups in the country’s Middle Belt and northern regions.

In late 2025, US President Donald Trump re‑designated Nigeria as a “Country of Particular Concern” for severe violations of religious freedom, a status reflecting allegations of systematic attacks on communities, particularly Christians.

The characterisation rejected by the Nigerian government, which says the security crisis is multifaceted and not a religious war.

The security situation has also drawn direct US military involvement.

In December 2025, the United States carried out airstrikes against Islamic State‑linked militants in northwest Nigeria in coordination with Abuja, part of broader counter‑terrorism cooperation and intelligence sharing.

Meanwhile, the US has expanded training support and military supplies for Nigerian forces.

Continue Reading

Trending