Connect with us

Headline

On June 12, I’m Guilty – Ibrahim Babangida

Published

on

By Eric Elezuo

“I regret June 12. I accept full responsibility for the decisions taken and June 12 happened under my watch. Mistakes, missteps happened in quick succession. That accident of history is most regrettable. The nation is entitled to expect my expression of regret” – Gen Ibrahim Babangida 

What looked like a playback of what has lived rent-free in the minds of the average Nigerian over the years, was experienced in the capacity filled hall of the Transcorp Hilton Hotel, Abuja, where former maximum leader, who had preferred the title Military President, General Ibrahim Badamasi Babagida, launched his much awaited memoir and autobiography, A Journey In Service.

It was a gathering of the who’s who in Nigeria’s political history, entrepreneurial engagement and socio-economic endeavours, most whom attended more out of curiosity and respect than anything else. Everybody wanted to hear firsthand what the self-styled ‘evil genius’ and profoundly nicknamed ‘Maradona’ had up his sleeves. Every Nigerian wanted to know what Babangida would say much as a good number of people had read the book before hand. It was an opportunity to throw friendly banters, crack seniors jokes and speak of struggles of times past. The convivial atmosphere sustained President Bola Tinubu, who was the Special Guest of Honour, for the three honours the event lasted when many people had thought he would leave after only a while.

From former Presidents Olusegun Obasanjo (who chaired the event) and Goodluck Jonathan to former Heads of State, Yukubu Gowon and Abdullahi Abubakar, light hearted words were created to douse the tension of the what June 12 means to Nigerians. It was the immediate past Vice President, Prof Yemi Osinbajo, who took the opportunity of reviewing the book to bring out salient matters hidden the struggle for the revalidation of June 12. His there’s a gentleman here celebrating with his former teormentors, a bold reference to President Tinubu, elicited laugher and applause from the largely elitist crowd.

Some of guests that attended were President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, former Head of State General Yakubu Gowon, former Head of State General Abdulsalami Abubakar, former President and former Head of State President Olusegun Obasanjo, former President Goodluck Jonathan, former President of Ghana, Nana Akufo Addo, former President of Sierra Leone, Koroma, former Vice President Atiku Abubakar,  former Vice President Namadi Sambo, and former Vice President Yemi Osinbajo, Alhaji Aliko Dangote, Chief Arthur Eze, General TY Danjuma (retd), Alhaji Abdul Samad Rabiu, lawmakers, industrialists, members of the diplomatic Corps and the general public.

But the event, which was anchored by two veteran female journalists, Bimbo Oloyede and Aisha Kadaria, finally proved to be an anti-climax, saying nothing different from popular opinion, and what has over the years been in the public domain. The only difference was that Babangida took responsibility for the annulment of the June 12, 1993 elections, touted as the freest and fairest in the entire history of Nigeria; expressed regret and tactically sought forgiveness.

During his speech, which marks the major highlight at the launch, Babangida reiterated his regret over the annulment and took full responsibility for it.

“The tragic irony of history remains that an administration that devised a near-perfect electoral system and conducted those near-perfect elections could not complete the process. That accident of history is most regrettable.

“The nation is entitled to expect my expression of regret. As the leader of the military administration, I accept full responsibility for all the decisions taken under my watch. And June 12 happened under my watch.

“Mistakes, oversights, and missteps happened in quick succession. But as I said in my book, in all matters, we acted in the supreme national interest so that Nigeria could survive. Our nation’s march to democracy was interrupted, a fact that I deeply regretted, but Nigeria survived, and democracy is still alive – a testament to our resilience and commitment to progress,” he said amid a long stretch of explanations.

But with Babangida’s admission of guilt, and plead for forgiveness, Nigerians via their personal selves or as a group are divided in their reactions. While a cross section feels the confession should be a foreclosure of the 32 years of waiting, others are of the opinion that the confession should be succeeded with reprimands and punishments, not celebration and eulogy.

Reacting during an interview shortly after the book launch, which was also an avenue to raise funds for the proposed Babangida Presidential Library in Minna, the Chairman, Ovation Media Group, who is a celebrated journalist, Chief Dele Momodu, noted that he forgave the former military leader a long time ago, urging Nigerians to do the same in the spirit of leaving the past behind and moving forward.

He applauded Babangida for the boldness to admit his wrong, saying that Abiola does not not need anymore validation, having already been introduced into the hall of deification by the June 12 election, and the incidents surrounding it.

“I think Nigerians already moved forward. I mean, you accept what you cannot change. We accepted it, we didn’t like it, we didn’t forget it, and we’re not likely to forget it. But the principal actor coming out to say, “Hey, I was wrong,” that’s good enough…

“…Abiola’s legacy would always be intact. On June 12th, God decided to purify Abiola and to cleanse him of all his sins, because none of us— we’re all sinners— none of us is perfect. But Abiola became a saint. The deification of Abiola happened on that day, and God gave him that chance. It doesn’t happen to everyone; it’s not everyone that will have that chance while on earth to become a saint and a martyr. That is something very, very special,” Chief Momodu said.

Also toeing Momodu’s is Prof Mike Ozekhome, a legal practitioner and human rights advocate, who says he has “personally forgive him because it takes tons of guts to make public confession of having erred, and atone for same as he has now done.”

Ozekhome, a party to the June 12 struggle recounted the horrendous experience he was made to go through including not being able to cater for his young family as no briefs were coming and his phones were bugged. He noted in all he salute the courage of the former dictator because penance is what leads to confession,  and to restitution and to forgiveness.

“To me, that he has come out to open up to doing something wrong and egregious to a bleeding nation should be appreciated. I believe that Nigerians should forgive him because to err is human and to forgive is divine (Eph 4:32 ). I personally have now forgiven him because I was also a victim of the June12 crisis. It threw up all manners of challenges to me as a person, where in my very youthful age; in my thirties, I found myself marching on the streets of Lagos every day- from Ikeja bus stop roundabout, to Ikorodu road; up to Tejuosho market; from there to Ojuelegba, Surulere; to Mushin; to Shomolu and Igando, Alimosho,” Ozekhome said.

Also granting Babangida a pride of place for owning up, a former Aviation Minister, Chief Femi Fani-Kayode, described him as one of the greats among leaders of Nigeria.

He said: “IBB has told his side of the story and explained to us what actually transpired. He refused to remain silent, he did not shy away from speaking the truth or refuse to accept responsibility and he did not pass the buck. Instead he came clean, displayed immense courage and did the right and proper thing.

“That is what leaders are meant to do and he did it without fear or favour regardless of whose ox was gored. Kudos to him.

“We need to appreciate this gesture, eschew all bitterness, let go of all our pent up anger, forgive him for what many perceive him to be his sins and move on.

“Equally we need to accord him his rightful place in history as one the the greats despite his fallibility. He is after all a mere man, albeit a great one, and not God.”

But quite a good number of Nigerians have dismissed the confession and apology as medicine after death taking into consideration the untold hardship and pains the events preceeding the annulment caused Nigeria and Nigerians; the economic downturn, the deaths and the total distrust that erupted among Nigerians.

Many others belive the apology was another tongue-in-cheek effort on a Maradonic entity as the former dictator classically exonerated himself of all blames, but agreed to take responsibility because he at the helm of affairs at the time.

A social analyst, who prefer anonymity told The Boss that “it is clearly impossible that everything that happened, happened without IBB’s knowledge as he would make Nigerians believe. How could Humphrey Nwosu stop announcing results without the CinC’s knowledge. It was a military rule; all these stories of court did this, and court did that are mere fairytale.

“How could a Sani Abacha be the infante terrible today; all because he’s not alive to speak for himself. Humphrey Nwosu died October 2024, and can no longer speak for himself, and so the duo of Justice Ikp3me and Clement Akpamgbo. Babangida waited for every major stakeholder to die before laying allegations on them in other to appear saintly before Nigerians,” the analyst said.

Expressing her disgust at all the allegations against her father, Abacha’s daughter, Gumsu, took to her X handle to send a message. He wrote one word, ‘weakling’.

In the same vein, MKO’s daughter, Hafsat Abiola-Costello, dismissed the confession as lacking in substance with nothing new, adding that it does not erase decades of injustice.

“For decades, Nigerians have known the truth. This is not new to us. But it is important that history records it from those who played a role in that dark chapter,” she said.

In his remarks, the founder of Stanbic IBTC Bank Plc, Atedo Peterside, also publicly dismissed Babangida’s acknowledgement of MKO Abiola’s 1993 election victory, characterising the admission as trivially obvious and decades too late.

Peterside took to his X handle to dismiss the confession, and the gathering of elites as a farce, saying he doesn’t deserve any accolades.

“IBB admitting, in 2025, that MKO Abiola won the June 12 Presidential elections in 1993, is as significant as him admitting that night follows the day.

“Are we supposed to clap because he told the truth after three decades?” The banker queried.

Also, human rights lawyer, Mr Femi Falana, accused Babangida of deliberate distortions, saying the former Military President ‘packaged lies’, and sold to Nigerians.

He accused Babangida of suppressing dissent during his dictatorship, specifically mentioning the banning of the Nigerian Medical Association (NMA) and the National Association of Resident Doctors (NARD), organisations that advocated for the basic health rights of Nigerians, stating also how he was unlawfully arrested and incarcerated, and remained in detention until when Babangida left office in August 1993.

Also responding, the Centre for Democracy and Human Rights (CDHR), called for the arrest and prosecution of Babangida.

The group, in a statement by its President,  Debo Adeniran, faulted Babangida’s belated admission, saying it was not only an affront to the principles of democracy and justice but also a clear acknowledgment of his direct involvement in an act that plunged Nigeria into years of political turmoil, civil unrest, loss of lives and properties and inestimable economic hardship.

The statement in part: “His actions meet the threshold of crime against humanity, as they resulted in widespread human rights abuses and the repression of pro-democracy activists and ultimately affected huge number of people who were affected by the misrule and misgovernance that followed that inglorious annulment.

“We would also like to remind President Tinubu that just as he said that Babangida lost the opportunity to become a hero with the annulment of the June 12 election, he (President Tinubu) should not lose that opportunity of becoming the hero of the June 12 struggle by announcing MKO Abiola as a past Nigerian president with full privileges of the status posthumously granted him and his family.

“We would also like the government of the day to punish the likes of all beneficiaries of the coup d’état, especially late Chief Ernest Shonekan, and those that served in his kangaroo and illegal cabinet called the “Interim National Government”. His successor, late Gen. Sanni Abacha, Justice Ikpeme, who delivered the midnight verdict to accentuate the journey to perdition, spineless late Humphrey Nwosu, who succumbed to illegal instructions to truncate announcement of the election results and all others who benefitted from the annulment of the election one way or the other.”

From every corner, Nigerians are either the courage of Babangida, condemning his barefaced inconsiderate action or asking him to go a little further to pay retribution to as many that met fatalities as a result of the annulment, especially the Abiola family.

But one thing is obvious, he has finally given voice to the thoughts of Nigerians as regards the June 12, and accepted playing a major role in the fatal crises.

But because some believe that there are distortions here and there in his narrative, surely, the end has not been heard about the 32 years old June 12.

 

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Headline

Akpabio Lashes Out at Tinubu’s Critics, Says Nigeria Safe Despite Insecurity

Published

on

By

The Senate President, Godswill Akpabio, has urged Nigerians to be careful of those trying to kidnap for ransom.

Akpabio argued on Tuesday that those behind kidnapping are perpetuating the activity to create an impression that Nigeria is not safe.

Speaking in Abuja during the commissioning of road projects to mark President Bola Tinubu’s third year anniversary, Akpabio said some of the president’s critics have resorted to paying youths to cause mayhem.

Akpabio accused Tinubu’s critics of focusing on insecurity instead of policy and infrastructure.

“Minister you said that people claimed that nothing is happening in Nigeria under the administration of President Tinubu. If they did not say that, how will they go for election? he asked rhetorically.

“If you realize what is happening recently, when they realized that they can’t talk about projects, performance, good laws, transformation in the Petroleum industry, subsidy removal that have been promised Nigerians for decades, they can no longer talk about the high-rise buildings in Abuja such as the NRS building, they resorted to paying young people and recruiting them to cause mayhem in the country.

“Be very vigilant and be careful about people trying to kidnap for ransom. They are kidnapping in order to give the impression that Nigeria is not safe.

“Our men and women in uniform have done tremendously well but many people will not know and that is why I keep saying that the devil you see today, you will soon see them no more.

“Elections will come and go; elections will never be our end; we will see the end of elections; it will never see our end,” he said.

Continue Reading

Headline

The Search for Justice: ADC vs Tsoho

Published

on

By

By Eric Elezuo

From the first day the African Democratic Congress (ADC) took a new shape in July, 2025, in readiness to wrest power from the government of the day, crises, allegedly engineered by the President Bola Tinubu-led All Progressives Congress (APC), have remained its lot.

From the struggle for leadership positions to the fight to save itself from deregistration, the hitherto coalition and main opposition party, has remained in a battle for its life and existence. And has not relented in the search for lasting justice. This time, it has taken the law itself to court to ensure that justice is not only done, but seen to have been done.

It would be recalled that shortly after the the party ratified the election of Senator David Mark and Ogbeni Rauf Aregbesola as Chairman and Secretary of the party respectively, skirmishes were noticed among the rank and file of the party as a supposedly former deputy national chairman of the party, Nafiu Bala Gombe, claimed chairmanship of party, saying that since the founding chairman had resigned, it is constitutionally incumbent upon him to automatically assume the chairmanship role.

Gombe’s claims came on the heels of his ‘resignation’ from office, which paved the way for a new national executive of the party to be constituted. But his claims did not deter the party from carrying on with the formation and running of the party, including holding a keenly contested presidential primary election, which produced His Excellency, the former Vice President Atiku Abubakar. So Gombe went to court. Yet, Mark and Aregbesola carried on the running of the party.

As a result, Gombe had approached a court for an order restraining Mark leadership from parading themselves as leaders of the ADC pending the hearing and determination of his suit challenging their leadership.

He had also asked the court to issue another order against the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), restraining it from recognizing the Mark leadership.

But in his ruling in the interlocutory application, Justice Emeka Nwite ordered Gombe to put the defendants on notice so that they appear before the court to show cause, why the application should not be granted.

Rather than appearing before the trial court to show cause, the defendant appealed to the Abuja division of the Court of Appeal, challenging the jurisdiction of the trial court to dabble into the matter they described as internal matters of the ADC.

The appellate court in dismissing the appeal for lacking in merit, ordered accelerated hearing in the suit and further ordered all parties to maintain status quo ante bellum.

Dissatisfied, Mark had approached the appellate court but, his appeal was dismissed and the matter returned to the trial court.

With the to and from nature of the cases involving the ADC leadership crisis, the party has accused judges of bias in favoring party detractors and disobedience to court rules among other malice, the party has taken a new route to obtain the much eluded justice, and that involves charging the custodians of the law to court.

Consequently, the ADC has filed a lawsuit before a High Court in Abuja involving the Chief Judge of the Federal High Court, Justice John Tsoho, over concerns arising from the ongoing leadership dispute within the party.

Also joined in the suit is the National Judicial Council (NJC), which the party said had not addressed issues it raised regarding the handling of a case challenging the leadership of former Senate President, Senator David Mark, within the ADC.

The lawsuit, dated June 4, 2026, was filed by the National Welfare Secretary of the ADC, Nkemakolam Ukandu, who is seeking to be joined in Suit No: FHC/ABJ/CS/1819/2025 instituted by Nafiu Bala Gombe against the Mark-led leadership of the party.

According to the suit, Ukandu expressed concerns about the handling of the matter and alleged that the actions of both Justice Tsoho and Justice Peter Lifu, the judge assigned to hear the case, could affect confidence in the proceedings.

The lawsuit further stated that the assignment of the case to Justice Lifu stirred concerns among some members of the party, who believe the process may not guarantee a fair hearing.

The legal action marks a fresh twist in the leadership dispute within the ADC, which has attracted significant political attention ahead of the 2027 general elections.

 

 

Aside Justice John Tsoho, other defendants are the National Judicial Council (NJC), and Justice Peter Lifu, a judge newly assigned to hear the suit challenging the Senator David Mark-led leadership of ADC.

The plaintiff, who was seeking to be joined in the Suit No: FHC/ABJ/CS/1819/2025, brought by Nafiu Bala Gombe against the Mark-led leadership, accused the chief judge and Lifu of manifest bias, and willingness to do the biddings of persons against the interest of the party.

Ukandu, in the suit he personally filed at the Federal High Court, Abuja, faulted the chief judge for reassigning the suit to Lifu, in alleged disregard of the orders of the Supreme Court as well as Justice Emeka Nwite of the Abuja division of the Federal High Court, who initially heard the suit brought by Gombe against the party.

The plaintiff, in the suit marked FHC/ ABJ/ CS/ 1165/2026, recalled that an appeal from an interlocutory decision of Nwite rose to the Supreme Court, wherein the apex court on April 30, 2026, “made an order of remittance of Suit No: FHC/ABJ/CS/1819/2025: Nafiu Bala Gombe VS. ADC & 4 ORS back to Justice Emeka Nwite for continuation of hearing of pending applications challenging the jurisdiction of the trial court.”

He stated that upon resumption of hearing before Nwite, the plaintiff wrote to the chief judge praying for a reassignment of the matter to another judge of the Honourable Court.

Ukandu stated, “All the defendants’ counsel, including counsel to the applicants seeking to be joined in this matter, opposed the said application by the plaintiff’s counsel and Hon. Justice Emeka Nwite thereafter adjourned the matter sine die pending the service of the said letter by the plaintiff’s on all the parties in the matter, outcome of the letter by the 2nd defendant and the furnishing of the CTC of the judgement of the Supreme Court to the court.

“Without complying with the orders of the Supreme Court and Hon. Justice Emeka Nwite, the 2nd Defendant in abuse of his judicial powers reassigned this matter,” to Lifu.

He added that the third defendant, on his part, pretending not to see the order of Nwite, went ahead and fixed the matter for hearing for June 3, 2026.

Ukandu further recalled that ADC had on May 7 informed the public through a press release that the chief judge had planned to reassign the case to another judge favourable to the plaintiff.

He said the party had “warned against such unethical practice but the 2nd Defendant despite the public outcry reassigned the suit to the 3rd Defendant who have been nick-named as ‘Wike Judges’.”

He stated that the third defendant had started presiding over the matter, despite taking judicial notice of the orders of the Supreme Court and Nwite, and that the matter came up for hearing before the third defendant.

Though neither the Federal High Court nor the National Judicial Council had publicly responded to the issues raised so far, it is imperative to to state that the ADC appears to have lost interest in both the judiciary,  which it believe is kowtowing to the dictates of Gombe, and by extension the body language of the Federal Government.

The ADC appears to have managed to draw the sympathy of the public as a group known as the Grassroots Mobilization Network (GMN), has lent their voice to the supposed injustice leveled against the Mark-led ADC, raising concerns about the handling of the matter, and calling for transparency in the judicial process.

The group alleged that the judiciary was being used to target opposition parties.

The group expressed concern over what it described as growing public distrust in the judiciary and called on relevant authorities to ensure fairness and transparency in the handling of politically sensitive cases.

While Nigerians await the outcome of the litigation, and other resolution of other sundry issues arising from the ADC and the judiciary, the party is going ahead making last minute transparent efforts to nominate a suitable running mate to bear the presidential flag with the presidential candidate, Atiku Abubakar.

Among the party’s shortlists are the first runner-up in the presidential primary, Rotimi Chibuike Amaechi, Mrs. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, Akinwumi Adesina, Emeka Ihedioha, Emeka Nwajiuba and Chief Dele Momodu.

Continue Reading

Headline

Gunmen Abduct Ex-Power Minister Adelabu’s Sister, Her Two Sons in Ibadan

Published

on

By

Suspected gunmen have abducted the sister of a former Minister of Power, Adebayo Adelabu, in Ibadan, the Oyo State capital.

The family of former minister and chieftain of the All Progressives Congress (APC) confirmed the abduction, disclosing that Mrs. Olaide John-Paul and her 12-year-old twin sons were kidnapped by the gunmen on Wednesday, June 3, 2026.

According to a statement issued by Adelabu’s media aide, Femi Awogboro, the victims were kidnapped at about 7:30am while Mrs. John-Paul was taking her children to school.

Mrs. John-Paul, the youngest of five children of Mrs. Olufunmilayo Aduke Adegoke Adelabu, reportedly retired voluntarily from her career at First Bank Pension Custodian in 2025 before relocating to Ibadan with her children.

She was said to be making arrangements to join her husband, who had earlier relocated to the US.

The family expressed deep concern over the development but stated that security agencies had already commenced efforts to rescue the victims and apprehend those responsible.

“We are pleased to confirm that security operatives have swung into action and preliminary investigations have commenced in earnest,” the statement partly read.

While appealing for calm, the family urged members of the public to refrain from spreading unverified information that could undermine ongoing rescue operations.

“We are deeply distressed by this unfortunate incident, but remain hopeful that the victims will be rescued safely. We appeal to the public to remain calm, avoid speculation and support ongoing efforts with prayers,” the statement added.

The family also called on anyone with useful information that could aid the rescue operation to promptly share such intelligence with security agencies through the appropriate channels.

It assured that it would continue to cooperate fully with law enforcement authorities and provide updates as investigations and rescue efforts progress.

Continue Reading

Trending