Connect with us

Featured

African Business Interests: When Hindenburg Research Took Neo Colonialism Too Far

Published

on

Leaderboard Ad

…Hindenburg Faces Tingo Group After Raising False Alarm Against Jumia, OPay, Adani Group, To Harm Their Operations

I have read with utter disgust but not with total disappointment how a supposed forensic financial research firm which goes by the name Hindenburg Research goes about tarnishing hard-earned images of rising business interest, especially those with African, Asian and Middle Eastern ownership.

It goes about acting like a colonial master, seeking to conquer and cower African businesses to subservience. Many companies on the continent have been victims of its character assassination and malicious damage for a reason one can hardly decipher. Not everyone is surprised that Tingo Group, one of Nigeria’s leading aggro-tech and fin-tech companies has come come under Hindenburg Research’s criticism that is not short of anything but poorly conducted hatchet job with a nefarious intention. The recent publication of Hindenburg against Tingo Group, where is alleged that the Nigerian-owned firm parades inaccurate accounting record is most disappointing and nauseating.

As a South African that has lived in Nigeria in the past seven years, I have not heard about anything that excites farmers more than the advent of Tingo Group.

Hindenburg Research claimed to have reached out to some persons in Nigeria and they were told there are no farming cooperatives in Nigeria and where one exists, they are less than 100. Really? In a country of 36 states where farming is arguably the largest provider of employment across the country’s various regions?

Hindenburg Research’s blackmail packaged in form of “investment research” should just have been ignored and not attract any response for what it is — fact twisting and outright falsehood.

One would have imagined that in the 21st century when the world knows better, Hindenburg would do itself the favour of not misleading people with malicious publications like it has done in the past just to thwart peoples efforts for its own advantages.

It still carries on with the hangover of the colonial mentality where it believes that nothing good can come out of Africa and anything with African or Asian signature, that will challenge the existing status quo of over-dependence in the West is a “fraud”.

It is really shocking and most appalling that frantic efforts being made by Tingo Group to mop of the agriculture value chain especially in Nigeria is being called out in a negative light in a desperate effort to to plummet its market strength. The age-long obnoxious notion that “as far as it’s black, it’s evil” has continued to becloud Hindenburg.

To tell you their track record of notoriety and deception, Hindenburg published a report alleging that Jumia Group, an e-commerce platform that operates in Africa and the Middle East was a “fraudulent scheme”, accusing it of inflated sales and customer numbers. On the account of this unfounded information which Jumia denied, its stock plummeted by 50% on the New York Stock Exchange.

That is not all, Adani Group, one of India’s largest multinational conglomerates lost $70 billion in market value after this same Hindenburg accused it of manipulating its stock price and falsifying its accounts.

Just in case Hindenburg needs to be tutored, Nigeria has a robust agricultural potentials which has not been fully harnessed over the decades and that is the gap Tingo Group through its Tingo Mobile has come to fill. There are dozens of farmers associations in Nigeria but the mother of them all is All Farmers Association of Nigeria (AFAN) which recently reached a multibillion Naira deal with Tingo on supply and storage of agro produce, particularly rice and wheat.

This deal is targeted at ensuring that farmers do not have a lot of produce that end up a waste in their homes due to lack of storage facility. The deal is to give them value for their efforts and ensure that the rhetoric about food security is not only heard but seen. Apart from targeting adequate supply to under-served regions, Tingo Group has also reached an advanced stage in discourse to supply foreign markets with Nigerian agro products. Where is the fraud Hindenburg is alleging in all these?

A short-sighted imaginary investment research firm like Hindenburg that goes about twisting facts achieved its nefarious aim when the shares of the Tingo Group dropped by 82.85 percent to close at $0.06 on Tuesday after its false claim against the company.

Who would want his country to suffer acute food shortage in the midst of plenty? The Russia-Ukraine war exposed how vulnerable Africa is to food insecurity and it is the same gap that the United States where Hindenburg operates from always exploits, masquerading as saviour of Africa while indeed it is not.

In January 2020, Hindenburg Research released a report about OPay, Opera’s financial services operating in Nigeria and Kenya. Hindenburg’s report suggested that Opera’s U.S.-listed stock was grossly overvalued.

Since the allegation, OPay has raised hundreds of millions of dollars in funding while also ramping up customers. The fact that Tingo Group is also working towards bridging the gap of financial inclusion leaves much to be desired about Hindenburg’s outburst. Does it benefit from the widening financial exclusion in Africa?

The accusation of financial inaccuracy again Tingo Group is nothing short of the figment of the imagination of Hindenburg and its sponsors. Africa has numerous problems which Tingo Group is making frantic efforts to bring solutions to. Hindenburg is comfortable with over-reliance of Africa in the western system which at the end of the day leave the continent exploited and cheated.

Hindenburg should focus on the problems bedevilling the West such as organised crimes, gun, drugs, internet fraud and more. Tingo Group is a brand of pride Africa is proud of and should be spared unnecessary vilification and targeted antagonism.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Featured

Fubara Bows to Pressure, Invites Pro-Wike awmakers to Peace Meeting

Published

on

By

Leaderboard Ad

Rivers State Governor, Sir Siminialayi Fubara has extended an olive branch to lawmakers loyal to his rival, Nyesome Wike.

The governor invited the Amaewhule-led House of Assembly members to a peace meeting, following the Supreme Court’s judgement on the state’s political unrest.

The invitation was made through a letter from Dr. Tammy Danagogo, Secretary to the State Government, to Speaker Martins Amaewhule.

The meeting is scheduled for Monday at 10 am at the Government House in Port Harcourt.

The agenda includes addressing lingering issues, presenting the 2025 state budget, and discussing payment of lawmakers’ allowances.

The letter read: “I hereby write in furtherance of His Excellency’s promise stated in my letter dated 5th March 2025 to notify you that His Excellency has received the Supreme Court Judgment, and has therefore directed me to invite you and your colleagues -the Honourable members of Rivers State House of Assembly, to a meeting to discuss:-

“Provision of a befitting space for the Assembly’s sittings. Payment of all outstanding remuneration or allowances of the Honourable members. Presentation of Budget and sundry matters;

“Any other matter(s), as may be necessary, to chart the way forward in the best interest of the State. Sequel to the above, I hereby humbly invite the Rt. Hon. Speaker, and all the Rivers State House of Assembly members to a meeting with the Governor as follows.”

Continue Reading

Featured

Rivers Lawmaker Rejects Fubara’s Invitation for Peace Meeting

Published

on

By

Leaderboard Ad

A member of the Rivers State House of Assembly, Lolo Isaiah Opuende, has dismissed an invitation from Governor Siminialayi Fubara for a crucial meeting at the Government House, Port Harcourt, on Monday.

In an online video, Opuende stated that it was time for the governor to “dey his dey” (be on his own) while the lawmakers would do the same.

Representing Akuku-Toru Constituency 2, Opuende recalled that when the political crisis began, their principal had warned that a time would come for both sides to go their separate ways.

He also questioned the mode of invitation transmission, arguing that it is not feasible for lawmakers to honor the governor’s request.

“How can you write a letter for the House of Assembly and put it on social media and expect us to come? The governor should write us the proper way,” he insisted.

Continue Reading

Featured

Abacha Family Slams Babangida, Says Book a ‘Revisionist Narratives’, Distortion of Facts

Published

on

By

Leaderboard Ad

The family of the late General Sani Abacha has rebuffed claims made by former Head of State, General Ibrahim Babangida, that the late Abacha was responsible for the annulment of the June 12, 1993, presidential election.

In his recently launched autobiography, A Journey in Service, Babangida expressed regret over the annulment, acknowledging that the Social Democratic Party’s candidate, MKO Abiola, won the election.

Describing the annulment as an “accident of history,” IBB blamed military officers led by Abacha, who was then his Chief of Defence Staff, for the controversial decision, alleging that it was done “without his permission.”

Reacting in a Sunday statement signed by his son, Mohammed Abacha, the late dictator’s family dismissed IBB’s claims, insisting that Abacha was neither the Head of State nor the Commander-in-Chief at the time of the annulment.

The family accused Babangida of attempting to distort historical facts and shift blame.

“The decision to annul the election was made under the administration of General Ibrahim Babangida, who, as the then Head of State, held absolute executive powers and was solely responsible for the actions of his government,” the statement read.

“Any attempt to shift this blame onto General Sani Abacha, who was a very senior military officer within the regime, is a deliberate distortion of historical facts. For years, various actors have attempted to rewrite the history of that critical period in Nigeria’s democratic evolution.”

The Abacha family also urged Nigerians to be cautious of what they termed “revisionist narratives” intended to manipulate public perception for political gain.

“We urge Nigerians to be wary of revisionist narratives that seek to manipulate public perception for personal or political reasons.

“The memory of our late father and leader, General Sani Abacha, must not be tarnished by baseless accusations meant to absolve those who were truly responsible,” the statement continued.

In conclusion, the family slammed Babangida’s autobiography for failing to present an honest account of events, stating, “We regret that A Journey in Service missed the opportunity and failed to make history as a truthful and objective account of past events.

“As one public commentator aptly put it, honesty, sincerity, and integrity are virtues not commonly associated with the author.”

Source: Newspoint

Continue Reading

Trending

Close