By Mike Ozekhome

INTRODUCTION

In the last part of this treatise, we concluded our discussion of Colonial Constitutions, after which we considered our range of options on the way forward, including a Sovereign National Conference. We equally x-rayed the imperatives of a new Constitution taking into consideration the experiences of a number of countries (Iraq, Kenya and South Africa) in making of a people’s Constitution. Today, we shall continue our review of countries that adopted a new Constitution through referendum (Iran, Bangladesh, Morocco, Egypt, Eritrea, Tunisia and conclude with the American example. Please read on.

COUNTRIES THAT SUBJECTED THEIR NEW CONSTITUTIONS TO CITIZENS’ REFERENDUM TO GAIN THEIR PEOPLE’S LEGITIMACY AND CREDIBILITY (Continues).

IRAN

THE DECEMBER 1979 IRANIAN CONSTITUTIONAL REFERENDUM

A proposed new Constitution which would make Iran an Islamic Republic, introduce direct elections for the presidency, create a unicameral parliament and require any constitutional changes to go a referendum was proposed by the Iranian Government. To bring this about, a constitutional referendum was held in Iran on 2ndand 3rd December, 1979. The new Islamic constitution was approved by 99.5% of voters at the Referendum.

BANGLADESH

THE 1991 BANGLADESHI CONSTITUTIONAL REFERENDUM

A constitutional referendum was held in Bangladesh on 15th September, 1991. Voters were asked “Should or not the President assent to the Constitution (Twelfth Amendment) Bill, 1991 of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh?” The amendments altered the existing Constitution and reintroduced of Parliamentary system of government. It also abolished the position of Vice-President and provided that the President be elected by Parliament. 83.6% of Bangladeshis voted in the referendum, with a turnout of 35.2%.

MOROCCO

THE 2011 MOROCCAN CONSTITUTIONAL REFERENDUM

A referendum on constitutional reforms was held in Morocco on 1st July, 2011. It was called in response to a series of protests that spread across Morocco which had begun on 20th February, 2011, when over ten thousand Moroccans took to the streets in massive demonstrations demanding democratic reforms. A Commission was set up to draft proposals by June, 2011. A draft was released on 17th June, 2011, which brought about fundamental changes upon people’s referendum.

EGYPT

EGYPT’S NEW CONSTITUTION AND REFERENDUM

In October, 2012, the Egyptian Constituent Assembly announced that its first draft of a new Constitution and launched a public awareness campaign called “Know your Constitution”, to educate the public. On November 29, 2012, the Egyptian Constituent Assembly of finalized the drafting process of a new Egyptian Constitution. One week later, on December 8, 2012, Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi issued a new constitutional declaration announcing that the constitutional draft would be voted on in a national referendum.

In accordance with article 60 of the Transitional Constitutional Declaration of March 2011, a special Judicial Commission was formed to supervise the referendum process and monitor vote counting. The referendum took place in two rounds on two different dates: December 15 and 22, 2012. The majority of Egyptians thus voted in favour of the newly drafted Constitution in a popular National Referendum, a Constitution that brought about profound reforms.

ERITREA

CONSTITUTION MAKING IN ERITREA

The Eritrea’s Proclamation 55/1994 established a Constitutional Commission which organized popular participation in the process of a new Constitution.
The Commission members and more than four hundred specially trained teachers instructed the public on constitutional issues and related political and social questions using local vernaculars. The process took three years to solicit the views of a broad cross section of Eritreans. The participation of a majority of Eritreans gave the people a “sense of ownership of the Constitution”.

TUNISIA

CONSTITUTION OF TUNISIA

Tunisia’s first modern Constitution was the fundamental pact of 1857. This was followed by the Constitution of 1861, which was replaced in 1956, after the departure of French administrators in 1956. It was adopted on 1st June, 1959 and amended in 1999 and 2002, after the Tunisian Constitutional Referendum of 2002. Following the revolution and months of protests, a Constituent Assembly drafted a new Constitution in 2014, adopted on 26th January, 2014 after a referendum.

THE AMERICAN EXAMPLE OF A PEOPLE’S CONSTITUTION

As a great contrast to the 1999 Nigerian experience, when America became independent from Britain in 1776, it held a Constitutional Convention under the leadership of George Washington, between May 14 and September 17, 1776, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 55 delegates represented the autonomous Confederates, with a view to creating a “more perfect union”. Broad outlines of a new union were proposed and hotly debated. This was how the American people achieved a federal system of Government, separation of powers among three branches of Government (Legislative, Executive and Judicial); bicameral, legislature; an Executive presidency; and Judicial Review. The Constitutional draft was signed by 39 of the 55 delegates on September 17, 1787; and thereafter released to the States and the American people to debate and ratify. It was this people’s Constitution that threw up great founders, such as George Washington (first president); Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay (the Federalists), Thomas Jefferson, etc.

The 1999 Constitutions lacks these. It is not autochthonous or indigenous Being imposed, it worsened the unitary nature of government, and concentrated enormous powers at the centre. While the 1979 Constitution had 67 items on the exclusive legislative list, and 12 items on the concurrent list, the 1999 Constitution increase this to 68 on the exclusive list, but retained only 12 items on the concurrent list. This indicates an unacceptable unbearably strong centre and very weak federating units.

OUR CONCLUSION

The unity, development and peaceful co-existence of Nigeria as a country are currently imperial. Our diversities in area of culture language, tribe, and religion, must be seen by all as a Dolly Parton’s Coat of Many Colours, blessing and not a curse, because variety they say, is the spice of life. Concerted effort must be put in place by formulation of policies and reforms that would help promote national integration and peaceful co-existence. However, one of the strategies that must be pursued to ensure a far-reaching national integration and peaceful co-existence are to create a meeting point that would ensure and enhance integration between one ethnic nationality or tribe and another. One of the ways by which this noble idea can be achieved is by putting up a strong advocacy and support for intertribal land interreligious marriage.

Philosophers, many say, have understood the world, but the problem is to change it. Albert Einsten’s dictum is apposite here: “we cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them.”

Hippocrates, the father of medicine, once told us that desperate diseases requires desperate remedies. An economy based on oil and other depleting natural resources is fast becoming obsolete. The global economy is already in the 4th Industrial Revolution or digital age, dominated by Robotics, Artificial intelligence, Machine learning, Virtual reality, Augmented Reality and others. At the moment, Nigeria is largely bypassed and still grappling with the most basic aspects of the old economy. But given its geographic- demographic conundrum, Nigeria has to leapfrog the industrialization value chain or stagnate. Yet its institutions are those woven around the distribution and consumption of oil rents and the old economy. A system designed for consumption cannot be expected to become efficient for competition and production in the 21st century. Sadly, many people miss this point. As Professor Claude Ake once put it, Nigeria operates a disarticulate economy, where we produce what we don’t consume and consume what we don’t produce.

For a change since the military incursion into our body politics, let us sit down and craft a new Constitution that not only provides for a stable, equitable and just polity but even more so focuses on the incentive structure to usher a competitive and productive economy of the future.
Reforms at the meta-level would entail either embracing our discarded Prime Minister system of government or dismantling and recoupling several of the institutions that help or hinder us, including a serious re-examination of the 36 state structure as federating units vis-à-vis their fiscal/economic viability or their consolidation into six or more regions with economies of scale and higher investment rates; multiple vice-presidency representing respective regions other than the region of the president, each with supervising powers over certain ministries to ensure equitable representation at the federal cabinet (the Central Bank has four Deputy Governors for instance); principle of equality of regions; multivariate judicial systems with state/regional appellate courts up to regional supreme courts while the federal supreme court becomes the constitutional court— and this is to decongest the centralized system and guarantee speedy dispensation of justice; introduction of commercial courts for speedy resolution of commercial disputes; institution of merit and equal opportunity principle; etc. This will carry the majority along.

Devolution of functions between the central and federating states/regions should be guided by the principle of subsidiarity. According to the European Charter, subsidiarity means that: “Public responsibilities shall generally be exercised, in preference, by those authorities which are closest to the citizen. Allocation of the responsibility to another authority should weigh up the extent and nature of the task and requirements of efficiency and economy“. This principle is not observed in the 1999 Constitution. For a Constitution that proclaims a federal structure, the exclusive and concurrent lists constitute an atypical concentration of powers at the centre. Currently, the federal government is burdened with hundreds of parastatals and agencies trying to inefficiently micro manage the entire Nigeria, with the recurrent expenditure of the federal government exceeding total federal revenue. Every penny of capital spending by the Federal Government of Nigeria (FGN) is borrowed, and its fiscal position is precarious. Put starkly, not one kobo of oil money is invested in infrastructure by the FGN: it is all consumed by the obtuse federal bureaucracy. The federal government should loosen its hold on policing, electricity (power), railways, ports, aviation, business incorporation, taxation powers, regulatory functions, etc. This will generate the economy.

The greatest challenge is how to get some of the elite whose privileges are provided by the existing system to support its dismantling into a system that is potentially beneficial to ‘society’ but perhaps disproportionately harmful to their interests in the short term. In other words, we are faced with the same kind of conundrum as some western countries with their welfare system. Having designed and implemented it for generations, it has grown into an unsustainable octopus of inefficiency but reforming it is not easy. In the US, millions of voters are hooked to the feeding bottle and its government keeps postponing the day of reckoning by borrowing to keep the system alive (the US, with the global reserve currency can afford to borrow for a while from the rest of the world but Nigeria cannot). Everywhere, such a distributional system has acquired a huge and powerful constituency, and the political cost of dismantling and recoupling is not trivial. There is also an intergenerational issue involved. The present beneficiaries don’t care if the same benefits do not extend to the future generations: they just want to have their share and go, and let the future generations take care of themselves. Nigeria cannot continue to share the national cake without caring how it is baked. (To be continued).

THOUGHT FOR WEEK

“By common endeavor we can raise the country to a new greatness, while
a lack of unity will expose us to fresh calamities”. (Sardar Patel).

By Mike Ozekhome

INTRODUCTION

For the past two weeks, we had to step down on this series to mourn the passing away of Dr. Christopher Ogbonnaya Onu, the first civilian Governor of old Abia State. We also felicitated with a prominent Nigerian- Chief Ayo Adebanjo who turned 96 on 10th of April. Having in our last installment looked at the following sub themes: A brand new or an amended Constitution?; Re-working Nigeria’s Federal Structure through a new Constitution and the Nigerian experiment with Constitutional Democracy (the Colonial Era. We shall today, continue with an examination of Colonial constitution followed by suggestions for the way forward – specifically, convening a sovereign National Conference and the Imperative for a New Constitution. The latter focuses on the experiences of a selection of countries across the world, including Iraq, Kenya and South Africa. Read on.

THE NIGRERIAN EXPERIMENT WITH CONSTITUTIONAL DEMOCRACY

COLONIAL CONSTITUTIONS (Continues)

In the words of Olu Ariwoola, J.S.C., as he held in the case of UGBA v. SUSWAM (2014) All FWLR (Pt. 748) Page 825 @ 863, “The Constitution is the heart and soul of the people. That explains why the Constitution commences (with the word) ‘We the people…’ all provisions in the Constitution were put in by the accredited representatives of the people.”

Many Nigerians including most of the erudite constitutional law lawyers have expressed serious reservation about the process leading to the making of the 1999 Constitution and the resultant lack of popular acceptability occasioned by the process of its making. Again, Chief Rotimi Williams, SAN, a foremost Constitutional Law Lawyer described the 1999 Constitution as a “document that tells lie against itself.” Professor Itse Sagay, SAN, categorically described the Constitution as a “fraud.” The erudite constitutional law lawyer and a foremost Professor of Law, Professor Ben Nwabueze, SAN, described the Constitution as an “illogicality”. That the 1999 Constitution is a “Unitary Constitution for a Federal System of Government.”

The Constitution was described as a fraud and a document that lies against itself at a seminar on the new Constitution organized by the Nigerian Bar Association, Ikeja Branch, on the 18th of June, 2009, because the Constitution purportedly stated in its opening recital that “We the people of the Federal Republic of Nigeria having firmly and solemnly resolved… do hereby make, enact and give to ourselves the following Constitution.” Since the enactment of the 1999 Constitution, these pertinent questions have been asked repeatedly,
a. “where and when did that resolution take place’’?
b. “How did the people of the Federal Republic of Nigeria arrive at that firm and solid resolution purportedly expressed in the recital to the 1999 Constitution?

Everyone or perhaps almost everyone in the Nigeria today accepts the fact that the Nation is faced with series of structural and systemic challenges, a good number of which are the products of the inadequacies of the 1999 Constitution. It is no longer news that there has been over concentration of power at the centre to the detriment of the federating units. Indeed, over the years the centre has been grabbing and grabbing powers at the expense of the federating units. The long years of military adventure in governance has not helped the situation. For the sake of comparison, the ‘1954 Constitution donated 43 items to the center’ in the Exclusive Legislative List, ‘45 items in the 1960 and 1963 Independence and Republican Constitutions; 66 items in the 1979 Constitution’ and ‘68 items to the center in the 1999 Constitution’ as amended.

THE WAY FORWARD

It is worthy of note that since the 1999 Constitution came into force (The Constitution came into force on 29th May, 1999.), attempts have been made by previous administrations to remedy the situation. Two national (Constitutional) conferences have at different times been held unsuccessfully. The first was by the Obasanjo administration in 2005 tagged the National Political Reform Conference; (National Political Reform Conference, Abuja 2005 (VOLUME TWO; FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA) Paperback – January 1, 2005 by NPRC (Author) and the second was by the Jonathan administration in 2014, simply known as the 2014 National Conference. (The 2014 National Conference was inaugurated by the Nigerian President Dr. Goodluck Ebele Jonathan on 17 March 2014 in Abuja, Nigeria) I was a participant at both Conferences, including the Vision 2009 Conference. Attempts have also been made (and continue to be made) to amend the Constitution. Some of the amendments were successful and some unsuccessful. In 2017 alone, 32 new amendments to the Constitution were proposed by the Senate. Only 5 succeeded at the end of the day. Till date, there are still various Bills pending before the National Assembly for amendment to different provisions of the Constitution.

TWO OPTIONS ARE AVAILABLE

As a way forward, two options are available to us to remedy the defects of the 1999 Constitution. The first option is to continue to amend the Constitution relying on the amendment clause in the 1999 Constitution. This option has its own challenges because the military after handing down the Constitution made it so rigid to amend, to the extent that getting an amendment is almost as difficult as getting a new Constitution. Despite its obvious short comings, this option is ever more appealing to those at the corridors of power because it gives them room to manipulate and promote their selfish interests. No party in power wants to hear about the idea of a new Constitution because they are afraid of losing their existing positions. For instance, the number one item on the APC manifesto was the convocation of a Sovereign National Conference to fashion a new Constitution for Nigeria; but since they came to power, they have resisted every discussion on that.

The second option is to jettison the Constitution completely in favour of a new one. I am more in agreement with this option. In his book ‘Forms of Constitution Making and Theories of Democracy’ (See A. Arato, ‘Forms of Constitution Making and Theories of Democracy’ (1995–96) 17 Cardozo Law Review 191, 194.), Andrew Arato identified five different mechanisms of making a new Constitution in modern times: they are (1) through the Constitutional convention, (2) the sovereign constituent assembly, (3) the normal legislature, (4) the executive, and (5) an evolutionary process.

On his own part, Schmitt, C, in his book ‘Constitutional Theory, (See Schmitt, C, Constitutional Theory, trans Seitzer, Jeffrey (Duke University Press, Durham, NC, 2008) 94 Cross RefGoogle Scholar), insists that for the Constitutional-making process to be considered to be fully democratic, it must pass through five stages. According to him, all previously constituted authorities must first be dissolved, followed by a popularly elected or acclaimed assembly with a sovereign power. The assembly then begins to function as the government on a provisional basis. Next, a new Constitution is drafted and offered to the people to be ratified in a national, popular referendum. As soon as the draft Constitution is finally ratified, the constituent assembly will be dissolved and a new government will be duly formed under the new Constitution.

A SOVEREIGN NATIONAL CONFERENCE?

We believe that this is what is borne in mind by those calling for a Sovereign National Conference (SNC). It is understandable why this call is loudest among those in the opposition, while those in power tends to turn a deaf ear to it, because if this is implemented, they are going to lose their positions.

The truth of the matter is that if Nigeria truly wants to continue to be one indivisible entity and silence the various agitations for self-determination, it cannot shy away from the Sovereign National Conference. There is no amount of amendment of the present Constitution that can truly address the discontent and mutual distrust between the various ethnic nationalities. There must be an avenue where the people can meet and freely decide the way they want to stay together in a nation and be governed. Call it a Sovereign National Conference, Constitutional Conference, Constituent Assembly or simply National Conference, but the body must have the full power (sovereign power) to enact a new Constitution which can only be ratified by the people in a national referendum, devoid of any interference by any governmental authority. This is the only way we can stop running in a circle as a nation.

THE DIRE NEED FOR A NEW CONSTITUTION

Nigeria needs a new people-driven Constitution. It is not rocket sign. It has been done before.

COUNTRIES THAT SUBJECTED THEIR NEW CONSTITUTIONS TO CITIZENS’ REFERENDUM TO GAIN THEIR PEOPLE’S LEGITIMACY AND CREDIBILITY

IRAQ

THE CONSTITUTION OF IRAQ AND REFERENDUM

The first Monarchial Constitution of the Republic of Iraq came into force in 1925 and existed till the 1958 Revolution which established a Republic.

The current Constitution was adopted on September 18, 2005, by the Transitional National Assembly of Iraq, and confirmed by a constitutional referendum, held on October 15, 2005.It was published on December 28, 2005, in the Official Gazette of Iraq (No. 4012), in Arabic original, and thus came into force.

KENYA

There were three versions of the Kenya Constitution; with the most recent being the 2010 redraft. This replaced the 1963 Independence Constitution. This version of 2010 was presented to the Attorney-General of Kenya on 7th April, 2010, officially published on 6th May, 2010, and was subjected to Referendum of the Kenya people on 4th August, 2010. It was voted for and approved by 67% of Kenya citizens. It was then promulgated on 27th August, 2010.

SOUTH AFRICA

THE SOUTH AFRICA CONSTITUTION AND THE PEOPLE’S PARTICIPATION

After the elections of 1994, the new Parliament – working as the Constitutional Assembly (CA) – began writing the final Constitution of South Africa. On May 8, 1996, the Constitutional Assembly completed two years of work on a draft of a final Constitution, replaced the interim Constitution of 1993 by the year 1999.
The objective to submit the draft to the Constitution court was to ensure that the final Constitution was legitimate, credible and accepted by all South Africans. The process of drafting involved many South Africans in the largest public participation programme ever carried out. Nearly two years later, representatives of political parties negotiated the formulations contained in the final draft and ignited an integration of ideas from ordinary citizens, civil society and political parties represented in and outside of the Constitutional Assembly. The Constitution therefore represents the collective wisdom and will of the South African people because it was arrived at by general agreement and consent of all South Africans. (To be continued).

THOUGHT FOR WEEK

“We are fast approaching the stage of the ultimate inversion: the stage where the government is free to do anything it pleases, while the citizens may act only by permission; which is the stage of the darkest periods of human history, the stage of rule by brute force”. (Ayn Rand).

LAST LINE

God bless my numerous global readers for always keeping faith with the Sunday Sermon on the Mount of the Nigerian Project, by humble me, Prof Mike Ozekhome, SAN, CON, OFR, FCIArb., LL.M, Ph.D, LL.D, D.Litt, D.Sc. kindly, come with me to next week’s exciting dissertation.

By Mike Ozekhome

This title of Michael Mann movie (released in 1992) and an earlier novel of the same name (released in 1826) is most apposite for our celebrant. As the title suggests, Chief Ayo Adebanjo is a member of the fast dwindling tribe of heroes. One of the very few last men standing. Yes, of a fast-depleting breed of nationalists and ideologues, committed and principled politicians who refuse to compromise or bend in tune with the latest fad – or the dictates of personal, parochial, ethnic or self-interest.

His likes are, indeed, very hard to find in today’s Nigeria – a country of never ending oddities. Little wonder the encomiums which have been poured (and continue to be showered) on him on the occasion of his 96th birthday a few days ago – on the 10th of April, to be precise. That makes him a nonagenarian. Accordingly, this is as good an occasion as any to take stock and reflect on a life less ordinary: the remarkable times of a man of the world, who both defined and was defined by it. Here is a man who stood up to be counted. Here is a man of rare courage – a man of principle. A man for all seasons.

Given all of these, does the man, Chief Ayo Adebanjo really need any introduction? What can be said about him that has not already been said – or, has he not said of himself in his biography “Tell It As It Is”?. What? Little, if anything, to be honest. Accordingly, I will only dwell briefly on Chief’s glittering past and illustrious antecedents. Chief Ayo Adebanjo made his earthly debut on the 10th of April, 1928, in Ijebu-Igbo, in the South-West of Nigeria. His early life showed the promise of what was to come when he slapped a British colonial officer reportedly for lacking in manners, retorting audaciously: “Is that how you say ‘good morning’ in your country?”. That singular act of courage (some might call it foolhardiness) and his refusal to apologize cost Chief his job in the colonial civil service; and this has defined him ever since.

Chief Adebanjo started life as a journalist with a regional newspaper before the lure of politics (his first love) beckoned. It was not difficult for him to pitch his camp with the foremost progressive politician of our time, Chief Obafemi Awolowo, under whose tutelage, Chief Adebanjo thrived and blossomed, becoming an effective grass-roots mobilizer. His political career was only interrupted by his legal studies in the UK, which he successfully completed, after which he was called to the English Bar in 1961. Back home in Nigeria, he continued his sojourn with Chief Awolowo – this time in the latter’s law firm.

Their relationship continued into the tumultuous politics of the First Republic, which saw both men face criminal trial for treason leading to the incarceration of Chief Awolowo. With such an ominous fate befalling his leader, Chief Adebanjo needed no prompting to seek refuge in Ghana. This was unfortunately short-lived, as the new military government in that country promptly rounded him and his co-exiles up and bundled them back to Nigeria. Fortunately for Chief Adebanjo, and other political prisoners in Nigeria, they benefitted from the magnanimity of the government of Gen. Yakubu Gowon which after seizing power in July, 1966, freed them

The onset of the 2nd Republic in 1978 saw Chief Adebanjo becoming part of the Constituent Assembly which ushered in democracy under a new Constitution in 1979. Once again, Chief Adebanjo found a natural platform under Chief Obafemi Awolowo and, together, they made a clean sweep of the seats they contested for in the South-West – including Lagos. Chief Adebanjo was an integral part of that success – something he repeated 20 years later, in 1999, under another progressive platform – this time without Chief Awolowo, who had transitioned to the Great Beyond in 1987.

In the intervening period, Chief Adebanjo has remained consistent in championing the cause of good governance, social justice, political restructuring and devolution of powers along the lines of the autonomy which the sub-national entities (the regions) had enjoyed in the First Republic. Even though his Yoruba ethnic base was Chief Adebanjo’s original platform, it would be uncharitable to say that he is an ethnic jingoist or tribalist. Far from it. Chief’s record has shown that he’s a detribalised Nigerian who does not hesitate to speak truth to power – no matter whose ox is gored – sometimes at great personal risk and cost.

This was amply demonstrated during the struggle to validate the results of the presidential elections held on June 12, 1993, which were annulled by the military government at the time – and more recently, the last presidential elections in 2023. The latter saw Chief Adebanjo (and the Pan-Yoruba pressure group which he leads, Afenifere) take the courageous position to back the Igbo candidate of the Labour Party, Peter Obi, against one of their own, incumbent President Bola Ahmed Tinubu. Many a commentator has since opined that this singular act might be counted among Chief Adebanjo’s greatest legacies. I agree.

Indeed, if there is one word which defines Chief Adebanjo, it is courage – raw courage; daring bravado. The kind that looks fear in the eye and does not blink. Courage in the face of adversity. Courage to speak his mind without mincing words: to tell it as it is (pun intended!). Little wonder, then, that Chief Adebanjo was and is always at home in the trenches. I recall one incident in 1998. General Abacha who had torpedoed the short-lived interim government of Ernest Shonekan, had released his goons to arrest and detain us at an anti-military campaign rally held in the Ajao, Surulere residence of Chief Supo Shonibare, a distinguished patriot and one of the leaders of the June 12 struggle. I led my Universal Defenders of Democracy (UDD). Present at the protest rally were Chief Gani Fawehinmi, our fearless leader in the struggle; Walter Carrington, the then American Ambassador to Nigeria; his wife, Arese (a Delta, Nigerian lady); Chief Ayo Adebanjo, the intrepid gadfly; Chief Ayo Opadokun, General Secretary of the National Democratic Coalition (NADECO); and other patriots and Nationalists who participated. I still have the picture taken of the brutal invasion of our peaceful rally made by fully armed military and Police personnel who insisted that the rally must break up. We refused and beat their tight security network by dispersing and secretly escaping. Unknown to them, we had used sign language to agree to meet at Chief Ayo Adebanjo’s then residence at Aguda, Surulere, Lagos. By the time they got wind of our plans and arrived at the new venue, we had concluded our successful rally. Those were the locust days that tried men’s souls.

Chief Adebanjo is at his best when he engages in one hot-button issue or the other – either discussing it enthusiastically or otherwise articulating it in his usual characteristic pugnacious way. No. Chief Adebanjo does not shy away from controversy. In fact, you could say that controversy is his second name. Many who have dared to lock horns with him have lived to regret it.

Only on 18th March, 2024, at the Patriots’ Colloquium organized in honour of late Prof Ben Nwabueze, Chief Adebanjo, in ringing baritone voice only perhaps matched by another living legend, Chief E.K. Clark, called for a new autochthonous people’s Constitution. He had maintained this position over the years. He is a consistent man – always as constant as the Northern Star. Perhaps, Emperor Julius Caesar had Chief Adebanjo in mind when he said, in “Julius Caesar”, by William Shakespare (Act III Scene i): “But I am constant as the northern star, Of whose true-fixed and resting quality There is no fellow in the firmament. The skies are painted with unnumbered sparks. They are all fire and every one doth shine, But there’s but one in all doth hold his place. So in the world.
‘Tis furnished well with men, And men are flesh and blood, and apprehensive, Yet in the number I do know but one That unassailable holds on his rank, Unshaked of motion. And that I am he Let me a little show it even in this That I was constant Cimber should be banished, And constant do remain to keep him So”.

Thus, he continues to be engaged even at an age when he is just 4 years shy of a century. His energy and stamina are truly amazing, something men young enough to be his grand-sons can only marvel at – which they can never dream of matching. What is his secret? Perhaps his genes (his father lived to be 105). But, part of it must surely be his Spartan, disciplined lifestyle, marked by a daily exercise regime which he has faithfully observed for as long as he cares to remember.

CONCLUSION

To say that Chief Ayo Adebanjo is one of Nigeria’s few surviving nationalists is to merely state the obvious. He has transcended his origins and regional roots to become, today, a National icon, a colossus of progressive, populist and people-oriented politics. He is a pan- Nigerian politician in the mould of the late Herbert Macaulay and Dr Nnamdi Azikiwe. Indeed, he follows rigidly, the footsteps of his mentor and leader, Chief Obafemi Awolowo, who was described by the irrepressible Chief Odumegwu Ojukwu as “the greatest president Nigeria ever had”. While both Awo, Ojukwu and other contemporaries of Chief Adebanjo have since transitioned to the great beyond, Adebanjo remains strong and stoically struggles on with all his faculties intact. He is truly one of the very last of the Mohicans – the last men standing. Here’s wishing and praying that he outlives his father and continues well beyond his 100 year anniversary in good health, fine cheer, and peace that passeth all understanding. All for the benefit of Nigeria and Nigerians. We desire to continue to drink from and draw from his inexhaustible wealth of experience, wisdom and sagacity and to keep being inspired by his life of courage and achievements. Many happy returns Chief! God bless you, papa.

PROF. MIKE OZEKHOME, SAN, CON, OFR, FCIArb, LL.M, Ph.D, LL.D, D.LITT, D.Sc. is a notable constitutional lawyer