Connect with us

Featured

Nigerian Director Wins First Round In Battle For Popular Edmark Direct Marketing Limited

Published

on

By Michael Effiong
The minority shareholder and only Nigerian Director of Edmark Direct Marketing Nigeria Limited, Mr Etim Maurice Anthony has won round one of his legal battle with majority shareholder, Low Ban Chai and others.
Hon. Justice C.J. Aneke of the Federal High Court, Lagos had ruled that the interim ex-parte orders obtained by Mr Anthony was lawful and he was not guilty of any misrepresentation of material facts.
That was not all, the court also held that before the ex-parte is vacated the petitioners, that is Edmark Direct Marketing. Low Ban Chai and others would have to provide a satisfactory bank guarantee to be agreed upon by both parties covering Mr Anthony’s 5% shareholding.
This ruling is a big win for Mr Anthony who had rushed to court to seek redress after he was virtually schemed out from the company he set up, nurtured and turned into a money-making machine.

Mr Low Ban Chai: Majority Shareholder of Edmark who is in the eye of the storm

Mr. Anthony had dragged Edmark Direct Marketing Ltd, Low Ban Chai, Edmark Holdings Limited, Wapanio Benvendo and Jorolan Noel Had to court and also obtained an exparte to stop the company’s facilities located along Aromire Street, Ikeja Lagos. This was obtained on May 24, 2022.
The whole saga began on May 18, 2022 when Mr Anthony, the petitioner, filed a legal action  against five respondents, Edmark Direct Marketing Limited, Low Ban Chai, Edmark Holding Limited, Wapanio Bienvenido and Jorolan Noel Had.
He wanted a declaration that the affairs of Edmark Direct Marketing are being carried out by Low Ban Chai, the second respondent in manner that is oppressive, unfairly prejudicial, illegal and breaches his rights as contained in Companies and Allied Matters Act (CAMA) sections 107, 235, 250 and 252.
He averred that his relevant rights such as right to attend meetings and vote, on appointment and removal of secretary, on duty to keep open accounting records and annual accounts were breached.
He also prayed the court to grant an order setting aside the purported appointment of the fourth and fifth respondents (Wapanio Bienvenido and Jorolan Noel Had) as directors of Edmark Directing Marketing and an oder restraining the company and Low Ban Chai or their proxies from further passing any board meeting resolution, an order setting aside the any purported appointment of a company secretary for Edmark, an order setting aside the purported transfer of Edmark Direct marketing shares  to Edmark Holding and the registration of the said transfer of shares.
That was not all, he also wanted an order appointing the audit firm of Deliotte Nigeria to conduct a forensic audit of Edmark Direct Marketing’s account, income, expenditure, bank statements, assets and financials from 2010 till date, and  directing Edmark, Low Ban Chai and others to provide all financial records to the auditors.
He also wanted  an order directing Edmark Directing Marketing and Low Ban Chai to conduct the affairs of the company in a manner that is equitable and just to all shareholders including notifying the petitioner of all board and general meetings and participation in the management and administration of the company as along as he remains a shareholder.
Furthermore, he desires an order directing the first or second respondents to purchase the petitioner’s shares at a market value after valuation of Edmark’s assets and in the event of a deadlock,winding down of the company in a manner that is just and equitable under the law.
In addition, he wanted an order of interim injunction restraining the first respondents, their agents and others from depleting, withdrawing from,  transferring from, charging to, transacting on or dissipating Edmark’s assets pending the hearing and determination of the motion on notice for interlocutory injunction.
And an order of interim injunction restraining the respondent’s banks from disbursing funds from 13 and any other bank accounts linked to Edmark and its affiliates pending the hearing and determination of the suit.
Also an order mandating Edmark’s officers, managers and employers to disclose or provide information about the location of any property, assets or funds acquired with the company funds wether held directly or indirectly including but not related to ED2E Technology Nigeria Limited, Edmark City Development Company Limited, Megwang Resources Limited and any other related company.
He also wanted an order empowering the Receiver/Manager, Seyi Akinwunmi & Co to  preserve all assets of Edmark including  D’Podium Event Centre,Aromire Avenue, Edmark City Project, Lekki and order directing the Inspector-General of Police and his officers to assist the Receiver/Manager to effect the above order and ensure the safety of the assets.
On June 23, 2022, the respondents filed a motion on notice, seeking reliefs such as an order setting aside or discharging the order of interim injunction, or alternatively an order varying or modifying the ex-parte orders and  stay of execution of the order of interim injunction.
Mr Anthony had sworn to an affidavit that he was  consistently excluded in the management and administration of Edmark, that Low Ban Chai had requested him to transfer the sole mandate to the company account for ease of business and he trustingly accepted the proposal, not long after Low Ban Chai started taking unilateral decision and that he was never served notice or invited to general meeting since 2010.
He also averred that Low Ban Chai siphoned funds from Edmark into other ventures without his consent such as Edmark City Development Ltd, AD2E Technologyu Limited, is about to float a Microfinance Bank with a minimum deposit of N2billion and used the platform of Edmark to market a cryptocurrency “Edcoin”,  moved the proceeds of $15million to Megawang Resources Limited  and the funds moved offshore.He also stated that Low Ban Chai also prepares financial reports for governmental agencies without his signature as required by law.
He also revealed how he was offered N50million by Mr Donald Abih and a three bedroom apartment of be forced out by Low Ban Chai and because of his refusal, on May 11, 2022, Low Ban Chai secretly  filed notices before the Corporate Affairs Commission  and made changes to Edmark’s status adding two new directors (Bienvendo and Han) and transfer of 95% of Edmark to Edmark  Holding Limited.
It was based on these alleged wrong doings that he approached the court for an exparte and now the court has affirmed that his request was justified and has sent conditions for the opening of the Edmark’s facilities.

Continue Reading
1 Comment

1 Comment

  1. Pingback: Court Bars Edmark, Distributors From Importing Or Selling Products Except Through Receiver/Manager - TheBoss Newspaper

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Featured

Strategy and Sovereignty: Inside Adenuga’s Oil Deal of the Decade

Published

on

By

By Michael Abimboye

In global energy circles, the most consequential deals are often not the loudest. They unfold quietly, reshape portfolios, recalibrate value, and only later reveal their full significance.

The recent strategic transaction between Conoil Producing Limited and TotalEnergies belongs firmly in that category. A deal whose implications stretch beyond balance sheets into Nigeria’s long-troubled oil production narrative.

For Mike Adenuga, named The Boss of the Year 2025 by The Boss Newspapers, the agreement is more than a corporate milestone. It is the culmination of a long-term upstream strategy that is now translating into hard value barrels, cash flow, and renewed confidence in indigenous capacity.

At the heart of the transaction is a portfolio rebalancing agreement that sees TotalEnergies deepen its interest in an offshore asset while Conoil consolidates full ownership of a producing block critical to its medium-term growth trajectory. The parties have not publicly disclosed the monetary value, industry analysts place similar offshore and shallow-water asset transfers in the high hundreds of millions of dollars, depending on reserve certification and development timelines. What is indisputable, however, is the deal’s structural clarity: each partner exits with assets aligned to its strategic strengths.

For Conoil, the transaction represents something more profound than asset shuffling. It is the validation of an indigenous oil company’s ability to operate, produce, and partner at scale. That validation was already underway in 2024, when Conoil achieved a landmark breakthrough: the successful production and export of Obodo crude, a new Nigerian crude blend from its onshore acreage.

In a country where new crude streams have become rare, Obodo’s emergence signalled operational maturity. More importantly, it shifted Conoil from being perceived primarily as a downstream and marginal upstream player into a full-spectrum producer with export-grade assets.

The commercial impact was immediate. Obodo crude enhanced Conoil’s revenue profile, strengthened cash flows, and materially improved the company’s asset valuation.

For Mike Adenuga, Obodo represented something else entirely: oil income with scale and durability. Producing crude shifts wealth from theoretical to realised. It is the difference between potential and proof.

That momentum was reinforced by Conoil’s acquisition of a new drilling rig, a move that underscored its intent to control not just resources, but execution. In an industry where rig availability often dictates production timelines, owning modern drilling capacity gives Conoil a strategic advantage lowering costs, reducing dependency, and accelerating development cycles. It also enhances the company’s bargaining power in partnerships such as the one with TotalEnergies.

Taken together, the Obodo crude success, the rig acquisition, and the TotalEnergies transaction, these moves materially expand Conoil’s enterprise value. While private company valuations remain opaque, upstream assets with proven production, infrastructure control, and international partnerships typically command significant multiple expansion. For Adenuga, all of these represents a stabilising and appreciating pillar of wealth.

As The Boss Newspapers honours Mike Adenuga as Boss of the Year 2025, the recognition lands at a moment when his oil ambitions are no longer peripheral to his legacy. They are central. In Obodo crude, in steel rigs, and in carefully negotiated partnerships, Adenuga is shaping a version of Nigerian capitalism that privileges patience, scale, and execution over spectacle.

In the end, the most powerful statement of wealth is not net worth rankings or headlines. It is the ability to convert strategy into assets, assets into production, and production into national relevance. On that score, the Conoil–TotalEnergies deal may well stand as one of the most consequential chapters in Mike Adenuga’s business story and in Nigeria’s evolving oil future.

Continue Reading

Featured

Peter Obi, Only Life in ADC, Says Fayose

Published

on

By

Former Governor of Ekiti State, Ayodele Fayose, says the former presidential candidate of the Labour Party, Peter Obi, is the only life in the African Democratic Congress, ADC.

Fayose made this statement on Friday while fielding questions in an interview on ‘Politics Today’, a programme on Channels Television.

He also said that the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, is technically no more, adding that it is dead.

The former governor equally said that Oyo State governor, Seyi Makinde, should not be dragged into the woes of the PDP.

He said: “Obi is the only life in ADC; all other people in ADC are semi-existent. If Obi had remained in Labour Party or has gone to Accord Party, he is the only life there. All the other people there, they are not existing. They are old-forces.

“Openly, I supported Tinubu in 2023. I didn’t hide it. Till now I’m still there. I don’t jump. I have said it to you I’m not a member of APC and I will never be.”

DailyPost

Continue Reading

Featured

More Troubles for Ahmed Farouk: Dangote Drags Ex-NMDPRA Boss to EFCC over Corruption Claims

Published

on

By

The Chairman of Dangote Industries, Aliko Dangote, through his legal representative, has filed a formal corruption petition against the former Managing Director of the Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority, Farouk Ahmed, at the headquarters of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission.

This was disclosed in a statement made available to our correspondent by the Dangote Group media team on Friday.

Recall that Dangote had earlier petitioned the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission to investigate Ahmed for allegedly spending $5 million on his children’s secondary education in Switzerland. He withdrew the petition a few days ago, even as the ICPC vowed to continue with its investigation.

The statement on Friday said Dangote’s petition to the EFCC followed “The withdrawal of the same petition from the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission, a strategic decision aimed at accelerating the prosecution process.”

In the petition, signed by Lead Counsel Dr O.J. Onoja, Dangote urged the EFCC to investigate allegations of abuse of office and corrupt enrichment against Ahmed, and to prosecute him if found culpable.

The petition further stated that Dangote would provide evidence to substantiate claims of financial misconduct and impunity.

“We make bold to state that the commission is strategically positioned, along with sister agencies, to prosecute financial crimes and corruption-related offences, and upon establishing a prima facie case, the courts do not hesitate to punish offenders. See Lawan v. F.R.N (2024) 12 NWLR (Pt. 1953) 501 and Shema v. F.R.N. (2018) 9 NWLR (Pt.1624) 337,” the petition read.

Onoja further urged the commission, under the leadership of Mr Olanipekun Olukoyede, “To investigate the complaint of abuse of office and corruption against Engr. Farouk Ahmed and to accordingly prosecute him if found wanting.”

Continue Reading

Trending