Connect with us

Opinion

The Oracle: Managing Complex Litigation: A Personal Experience (Pt. 2)

Published

on

By Mike Ozekhome

INTRODUCTION

Last week, we examined the meaning of the word litigation; the role of the Judiciary and counsel in complex litigation; complex commercial litigation; factors to be considered incommercial litigation and jurisdiction of courts in commercial litigation. Generally, complex commercial litigation is the most common dispute resolution process in Nigeria for resolving high-value disputes and are also resolved through commercial arbitration. It is evidence that commercial arbitration is fast becoming the preferred method of resolving such disputes in Nigeria. Today, we shall conclude our discourse on this germane issue. 

APPLICATION OF NIGERIAN LAW

In deciding cases of complex litigation before them, the courts are duty bound to apply Nigerian law. The courts will not apply a foreign law to determine issues litigated before them except in instances where the contract between the parties contains a valid choice of law clause in favour of the laws of a foreign jurisdiction. It must be noted, however, that such law would only be applicable where it is not inconsistent with Nigerian law or against public morality, equity and good conscience. Where there is no settled Nigerian law position on an issue or matter, a settled foreign law position regarding the issue or matter may have a persuasive effect on the Nigerian court.

ADR TO THE RESCUE

Parties are encouraged to resolve their dispute by utilising Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) mechanisms. Where parties fail to utilise these available mechanisms, the court can refer or subject parties to ADR centres created by the courts, for example, the Lagos State Multi Door Court House. Usually, the court refers parties to ADR at the commencement of proceedings and before trial. In the event that the parties are referred to ADR and are unable to resolve their dispute amicably, they will be referred back to court for trial.

CONCLUSION

In general, complex commercial litigation enjoys little or no difference from standard litigation. The major difference arises in the multiplexity of complex litigation and the expertise needed to handle either. While many lawyers can handle standard litigation, very few lawyers have the expertise of handling complex litigation. There are three major points that every lawyer should engage when planning and managing lengthy complex litigations. These are:

  • Form and empower a team

 Building a solid bench of experienced lawyers for these types of cases is imperative and starts with the identification of a “Vice”, “Deputy” or “Second-in-Command”, who can share in the global view of the case, and assist with its management.  Other team members must be experienced with the roles, functions and responsibilities meted out to them. Nonetheless, these other team members should be accorded the opportunity to share in the “big picture” planning, as their ideas or opinions could make the difference between winning and losing.  Institutional knowledge that is developed must be shared and documented, otherwise there remains the risk that team members could always leave with their ideas. The team, now in place, must be empowered to perform their roles, and given an understanding of how their contribution is necessary to the overarching strategy.  Without such a shared sense of ownership in the case, it is more difficult to keep team members engaged over the length of the matter.

  • Always document your case

 Create a timeline and update it as frequent as possible.  Each team member can and should contribute to the case timeline.  The practice is invaluable for many reasons, including that it memorializes events and developments (big and small); provides a quick history of the case for new (or forgetful) team members; useful for the summaries included with most motions; and, allows you to constantly validate activity against the case strategy.  Such a timeline is also useful for updating clients and mapping out strategies.

  • Communicate with your client regularly

 Update your client regularly and without prompting.  This is the most important practice pointer for any type of matter, but it is especially true with complex actions.  Like the practitioner, your client is also susceptible to the same fatigue, loss of focus and internal transition.  Anticipate this concern (as it is potential impactful on your lawyer–client relationship) with regular updates, and consider providing them access to your litigation timeline (or create and update an abbreviated version for them).  This provides ready answers to most client questions, and will indirectly address the time-to-time perception of a lack of progress common to year-long cases.  Providing regular updates and showing empathy to the situation will go a long way to keeping your client committed to working with you.

Working on long, complex cases is rewarding, but requires significant effort to maintain the constant energy and focus required throughout.  Pre-planning and continued emphasis on these core principles will help lawyers to keep the focus and enjoy successful outcomes in such complex litigation cases.

A LAWYER’S DUTY GOES BEYOND ACHIEVING SUCCESS IN COMPLEX LITIGATION

A peep into the entire programme of this retreat shows wonderful topics ranging from Ethics of the Legal Profession; The Corporate Counsel & Legal Practitioners Rule of Professional Conduct; Trial Proceedings in the Federal High Court; Appeals; What makes a good Legal Department; The Ideal of Corporate Counsel; Review of draft DLS new Commercial Agreement Templates; The Judiciary and Remote hearings: Advantages and Challenges; Managing Complex Litigation – My Experience; Garnishee; Managing Garnishee Orders – The FCTA Experience; to the Role of National Industrial Court in the Enforcement of labour Related Violations, Under the NOGICD Act, and the Conflicting Jurisdictions of the State and Federal High Court – Enhancing Synergy between DLS and in-house Stakeholders, the experience of DDDs. There are also topics which span from can the EFCC Investigate Violations of the NOGIC Act; ADR Methods of resolving Commercial Disputes: – How Arbitration works, – Principles of Arbitration, – Mediation Process, – Conciliation Process; An examination of the arbitrability of violations under the NOGICD Act?; Federal and State Tax Laws and their implications on NCDMBs Mandate; Fundamentals of Maritime Agreements; a primer on Midstream and Downstream Energy Infrastructure Transactions and Agreements; Financing, Structuring and drafting power project Agreements; Essentials of Gas Sales Agreement and the role of GACN; Planning for Effective Performance – Team Building and Attitudinal Change for Effectiveness; Commercial Ventures and Projects; to Procurement. You did not forget to include critical subjects such as the new NOGICD Act Regulations and Strategy for Industry Compliance; Effective use of Microsoft Productivity Tool (Word, PowerPoint, Excel etc.): – Conducting Internet Research, – The Legal Department of the Future, – How Disruptive Trends are creating a new business model for in-house legal, – Legal Technology Adaptation (Data & Security); The Nigerian Procurement Law, Procedure & Practice; The Nigerian Corporate Governance Law and its Application to the Implementation of NOGICD Act; An examination of the Applicability of ICPC Act on the Mandate of NCDMB; and the implications of Nigeria’s WTO and ACFTA’s Obligations on the Implementation of the NOGICD Act; Legal Implications of the Proposed NOGICD Act Amendment bill 2011.

No doubt, the above topics are beautiful, and extensive; and cover the field in terms of enhancement of your work as corporate and commercial lawyers driving the local content of our national industrial life. However, I strained my neck in vain, but could not see any topic that deals with any of the burning national issues of the moment; current issues about Nationhood, insecurity, corruption, and our parlous economy. I thought we should take at least a peep into how our tottering Nation is twiddling Twitter; how Twitter users are to be prosecuted under a non-existent law (remember AOKO V. FAGBEMI (1961) 1 All NLR 400); and section 36(12) of the 1999 Constitution. I wanted to see an inclusion of a discourse about how we are operating a Military Decree No 24 of 1999 as our Constitution; about rule of law; democracy; about devolution of powers; resource control; true fiscal federalism and issues concerning self-determination. I yearned to see something, just anything about the incessant rate of kidnappings, armed banditry, Boko Haram; whether State Governors could promulgate laws setting up local vigilante groups.

I did not see any. Because I believe they are important to the very corporate existence of Nigeria and the enablement of a conducive environment for you to operate from your beautiful 17-story edifice in Yenagoa, and the 4 NNPC towers in Abuja, I shall touch them. Permit me to take upon myself the liberty and licence to discuss some of them. Yes, because without security and safety of lives and property, none of us will be present at this beautiful Wells Carlton Hotel built by my good friend, Capt. Hosa Okunbor, I therefore will and must touch them. A lawyer’s role should go beyond these very classroom lectures. Yes, we are all lawyers here.

It should involve participating in the social milieu, finding answers and solutions to complex problems of the society; problems that are at once centripetal and centrifugal. A lawyer must look at the immortal works of the first Nigerian lawyer, Sapara Williams (18551915), when he said, “the legal practitioner lives for the direction of his people and the advancement of the cause of his country”. A lawyer must situate his societal role in one or more of the schools of thought in jurisprudence with a view to helping societal growth. Let us therefore first briefly look at the various jurisprudential schools of thought.

REFLECTIONS ON THE MEANING OF LAW

The term “Law” has been defined in different ways by several scholars. The definitions proffered by these scholars are reflections of their environments, their rationale for law and its relationship to justice. These divergent views on the meaning of law culminated into varying schools of thought on the subject which in turn crystallized into what has become generally known as the schools of jurisprudence.

One of the earliest schools of thought on law is the Natural Law School. St. Thomas Aquinas, Socrates, Aristotle, Cicero, John Finn, St. Augustine, etc., are some of the proponents of this school of thought. They believe that there is a universal law from a supernatural being which is discovered by reason or rationalization. The Italian philosopher, St Thomas Aquinas, defined law as:

… nothing else than an ordinance of reason for the common good, made by him who has care of the community, and promulgated.

The Positivists School of thought on the other hand, believe that law is made by a sovereign, who serves as the only source of its validity, who imposes both the law and it’s sanctions on the people while himself is exempted from the law. John Austin, one of the proponents of this school of thought, stated in his Lectures on Jurisprudence (1885) that:

Law is a command from the sovereign person or body in the political society to a member or members of society and supported by sanctions.

The proponents of the Realist School of thought on the other hand postulated or argued that law should be seen as it is or as it is done in the law court, not as it ought to be or anything else. They argue that what transpires in the law court or what the judges do to arrive at their judgments and those judgments are the law. The American Judge, Oliver Wendell Holmes “The Path of the Law” in Collected Papers, 1920” noted that:

The prophecies of what the courts will do … are what I mean by the law.

Benjamin N. Cardozo, who succeeded Oliver Wendell Homes as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States,  noted in the Growth of the Law (1924) that:

When there is such a degree of probability as to lead to a reasonable assurance that a given conclusion ought to be and will be embodied in a judgment, we speak of that conclusion as the law.

The Sociological School of jurisprudence, considers law or legal development from the perspective of the people in the society. Perceiving law as a social phenomenon, the proponents posit the harmonization of law with the wishes and aspirations of the people.  According to Rosco Pound (one of the proponents of this school of thought):

… For the purpose of understanding the law of today, I am content to think of law as a social institution to satisfy social wants – the claims and demands involved in the existence of civilized society – by giving effect to as much as we need with the least sacrifice, so far as such wants may be satisfied or such claims given effect by an ordering of human conduct through politically organized society. For present purposes I am content to see in legal history the record of a continually wider recognizing and satisfying of human wants or claims or desires through social control; a more embracing and more effective securing of social interests; a continually more complete and effective elimination of waste and precluding of friction in human enjoyment of the goods of existence – in short, a continually more efficacious social engineering.

As stated above, the sociological school is concerned with satisfying the interest of individuals and social institutions. These interests are claims or want or desires which men assert de facto, about which the law must do something if organized societies are to endure.  The English philosopher, Thomas Hobbes defined “Law as the formal glue that holds fundamentally disorganized societies together.

While Oliver Wendell Holmes and Cardozo approached law on the basis of what the Court eventually does, Rosco Pound considers the concept “law” as a social institution to satisfy social want. His view of the law accord with the democratic principle of government. In a democracy, law is the reflection of the will and wish of the society. It is said that if you want to study any society, you have to study the laws enacted by that society.  Law, though, a product of the society is the tool for the transformation of a society. Law does not only set the path for change, it is the catalyst for change in any progressive democratic society.

Lastly, the proponents of the Historical School of Thought believe that law is a product of the people’s historical advancement. According to Von Savigny, law is:

… a result of moments the germ of which, like the germ of the State, remains in the nature of people as being produced for culture and which grows different types from this germ, depending on the environment of the factors that perform on it.

For Savigny, law is a reflection of the spirit of the people (Volksgeist) that grows with the growth of the people and dies as the nation loses its nationality.

The perspectives of the various schools of thought on the meaning of law are germane to our understanding of law as a tool for social change in Nigeria. Notwithstanding their perspectives, one outstanding feature in the various schools of thought is the need to ensure orderliness in the society through law. We, as lawyers, are the engineers that drive the legal process.

So, permit me therefore henceforth, to speak to these above vexed issues which I raised earlier ex tempore. I believe that your automatic recording of same will enrich your communique that will emanate from this beautiful retreat exercise. Consequently, allow me to speak on Nigeria; where we were; where we are; where we ought to be and how to get there. That is my ex tempore talk henceforth.

FUN TIMES

“E CHOKE HERE NA DIE OOO..

Wife carry her card give hubby to withdraw money and support his business. Hubby carry the same card give side chick to go shopping!! Side chick use the same card go do shopping for wife boutique. As it stands, wife dey receive debit and credit alert at the same time. So wife call DPO to come arrest side chick.. E just shock us say side chick na DPO wife… I go update una later shaa. Make I check egg wey I dey fry for fire”. –Anonymous.

THOUGHT FOR THE WEEK

“Litigation is the pursuit of practical ends, not a game of chess”. (Frankfurter).

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Opinion

The Stockholm Syndrome in the Delta

Published

on

By

By Boma Lilian Braide Esq.

The water remembers. It remembers when we were queens and kings of the creeks, when our voices carried across the rivers like thunder, and when no external force could dictate the terms of our existence.

Today, as a daughter of the Ijaw nation, I look at our political landscape and my heart breaks into a thousand pieces. The recent withdrawal of Pastor Tonye Cole from the political race reopened a wound that never properly healed. I immediately texted him a single, urgent question: “Why?” His response was a resigned, familiar phrase; “It is well.” At that exact moment, my thoughts were screaming so loudly inside my head, “Not again!” It felt like a brutal repetition of an old script. Every single time, without fail, they treat the Ijaw man badly, pushing him out of the room where decisions are made.

This leadership class continually trades our birthright for political crumbs, leaving me with a profound sadness I cannot shake. Every four years, we are forced to watch the same exhausting, predictable cycle play out. We have become the laughing stock of the Nigerian politics. We roar like lions in the morning, only to allow ourselves to be led like sheep to the slaughter house by nightfall. This pattern is not merely a string of tactical errors. It is a structural and psychological condition that has calcified into our political culture. We begin every election season with unparalleled bravery, massive energy, clarity, and a list of demands. We mobilise, we protest, we declare our rights. Yet at the decisive moment we fold. We trade collective power for personal gain. We accept crumbs while the harvest is taken from our lands allowing our leaders to be used as mere pawns, chess pieces, and foot soldiers on a board completely controlled by outsiders.

Call it what it is, a political Stockholm syndrome. When a people are held hostage by extractive systems for generations, they can begin to see the captor as a provider. When political actors poison our rivers, burn our gas, and extract our wealth, then return during elections with token gifts, the damaged political imagination can mistake those gifts for benevolence. A motorcycle, a solar lamp, a bag of rice, or a ten thousand naira note becomes a substitute for structural justice. We applaud the giver and forget the theft.

This is not a partisan indictment. The major parties have all participated in this system. From the coastal edges of Ondo and Edo, through Rivers and Bayelsa, to the riverine communities of Delta and Akwa Ibom, the script is the same. Political machines arrive with cash and spectacle. They leave with votes. They do not stay to build roads, to clean oil spills, to fund health care, or to restore fisheries. They do not invest in education or in the infrastructure that would make our communities resilient. They know they do not have to. They know that the combination of poverty, fragmentation, and short-term survival instincts will deliver the votes they need.

The spectacle in Rivers State is instructive. The conflict between an incumbent and a predecessor is not only a personal rivalry. It is a mirror of a deeper structural problem. An Ijaw son may occupy the governor’s office, but the expectation of loyalty to an external power broker remains. When disagreements arise, the Ijaw polity does not close ranks. Instead, it fractures. Elders, youth groups, and political actors align with different external centres of power. We tear ourselves apart while the larger system remains intact.

Delta State offers another painful example. The region produces a disproportionate share of the oil wealth that sustains the state and the nation. Yet Ijaw communities are routinely relegated to secondary roles in governance. The highest offices are often out of reach. When an Ijaw candidate shows real ambition, the pressure to step down, to accept a consolation prize, or to be bought off intensifies at the last minute. The result is a steady stream of symbolic representation and token appointments that do not translate into structural change.

Even Bayelsa State, our most homogenous political home, has not been immune. The state has been turned into a dependent outpost. Political life there is often conducted under the shadow of Abuja. During elections, communities are militarized. Young people are paid paltry sums to snatch ballot boxes and intimidate their neighbours. The leaders who emerge from such processes rarely prioritize environmental remediation, health care, or education. They prioritize survival within the national political economy.

Why do we accept this? Part of the answer lies in a minority complex that has been cultivated over generations. We have been taught to believe that because we are numerically small and geographically dispersed across several states, we cannot set national terms. That belief is false. Our geographic position along the southern maritime border gives us leverage. Nigeria’s economy cannot function without the peace of our creeks. Yet we negotiate from a position of weakness because we lack a unified, non-partisan political command structure.

Other major ethnic blocs in Nigeria have developed cultural mechanisms that protect collective interests across party lines. They maintain consensus on key strategic questions and punish those who betray the collective. The Ijaw political house, by contrast, is fragmented. We are divided into Western, Central, and Eastern blocs. Internal jealousy and rivalry consume us. When an Ijaw son or daughter rises to prominence, it is sometimes their own people who are recruited to pull them down. This internal sabotage is a major reason we are treated as expendable by national political machines.

Our representatives in national assemblies and federal boards are often the most silent and compliant. They vote for policies that harm our region because they want to protect their personal seats and committee positions. We have forgotten the intellectual foundation of our struggle. Our fathers did not rely on muscle alone. They fought with logic and strategy.

Harold Dappa Biriye used constitutional arguments to demand minority rights during the pre-independence conferences. Isaac Adaka Boro presented a detailed economic manifesto during the twelve-day revolution, exposing the systematic underdevelopment of the Delta. The Kaiama Declaration of 1998 linked environmental justice with true federalism in a way that remains a model for strategic political thinking. Today, that intellectual tradition has been eroded by a culture of thuggery, praise singing, and the pursuit of quick money.

The social and economic costs of our political submission are visible everywhere. Schools sink into the mud. Primary health centres lack basic medicines. Women die in childbirth because there are no functional boats to transport them to urban hospitals. Rivers that once sustained us are coated with crude oil. Gas flares burn day and night, releasing toxins that cause cancers and respiratory diseases. In any functioning democracy, such environmental devastation would provoke electoral punishment. But our people accept ten-thousand naira, wear party uniforms, and return the same leaders to office.

This pattern is not only morally wrong. It is strategically suicidal. The global energy transition is underway. The world is moving away from fossil fuels. In a few decades, crude oil will no longer be the primary driver of the global economy. When that happens, the Nigerian state’s willingness to distribute minor rents, amnesty stipends, and pipeline contracts will evaporate. If we remain politically domesticated and economically dependent, we will be discarded once our resources lose value. We will be left with a ruined environment and a population unprepared for the modern economy.

Breaking this cycle requires a radical transformation of our political behaviour. It requires both immediate reforms and long-term institution building.
First, we must refuse to sell our votes for temporary relief. If politicians bring money during elections, take it because it is a fraction of your stolen wealth, but enter the voting booth and vote fiercely against them if they have not delivered real, systemic progress. The act of taking money and voting against the giver is not a moral ideal. It is a pragmatic tactic that recognizes the reality of survival while asserting political agency.

Second, we must create a culture of community accountability. Any Ijaw politician, elder, or youth leader who sells out the collective interest for personal gain must face social consequences. They should be stripped of traditional honours, excluded from community gatherings, and greeted with public disapproval rather than celebration. The cost of betrayal must be made higher than the reward offered by external actors.

We must also institutionalize our collective strength. The Ijaw nation needs a permanent, non-partisan political and economic council composed of our finest minds. This council should include intellectuals, legal experts, economists, and community builders from across the globe. Its mandate would be to define a multi decade Ijaw National Agenda that transcends party lines. Any Ijaw person entering politics should be bound by that agenda. Any external political force seeking our cooperation should be required to commit to its verifiable execution.

Again, we must build strategic alliances with other coastal minority groups. From Calabar to Badagry, the coastal communities share common interests in environmental protection, maritime economies, and regional development. A unified coastal voting bloc would create a political force that no national party can ignore. Such an alliance would also strengthen bargaining power for federal resource allocation and environmental remediation.

Fifth, we must shift our economic focus from pipelines to the blue marine economy. Our future lies in the ocean. We must invest in community owned industrial fishing fleets, deep sea shipping logistics, local shipbuilding yards, and aquaculture networks. We must develop port infrastructure and maritime training centres. Economic independence is the foundation of political courage. When our communities can fund their own schools, hospitals, and water systems through independent marine enterprises, we will no longer beg for crumbs.

Sixth, we must invest in education and leadership training. Political courage is not loud rhetoric. It is disciplined strategy. We must train a new generation of leaders who understand constitutional law, public finance, environmental science, and international trade. We must teach negotiation skills, coalition building, and institutional design. The Ijaw struggle must be intellectualized and professionalized.

Seventh, we must reclaim our narrative. For too long our story has been told by others. We must document our history, our legal claims, and our environmental evidence. We must use the courts, the media, and international forums to hold polluters and complicit officials accountable. We must turn our lived experience into verifiable claims that can be litigated and publicized.

Finally, we must practice disciplined solidarity. Political unity does not mean uniformity of opinion. It means a shared commitment to core strategic objectives. It means agreeing on red lines that cannot be crossed. It means supporting candidates who commit to the Ijaw National Agenda and sanctioning those who betray it.

The hour is late. The cost of our political naivety is visible in every polluted river, every jobless youth, and every broken promise. We cannot enter another election cycle with the same broken playbook. We must reject transactional politics and demand structural change. We must hold our leaders accountable and refuse to celebrate personal appointments that bring no collective benefit.

We must heal ourselves of this political Stockholm syndrome. We must stop loving the systems that destroy us and begin the difficult work of building lasting political infrastructure. The future of the Ijaw nation depends on our ability to transform our pain into strategic power. The water is watching. The spirits of our ancestors who resisted colonial domination are watching. We must rise, cleanse our minds of dependency, and stand with dignity. The era of last minute surrender must end. The time for strategic, sovereign Ijaw political courage has arrived.

Continue Reading

Opinion

Leadership in Africa: Forging a New Era of Self-Reliance, Unity and Global Relevance (Pt. 3)

Published

on

By

By Tolulope A. Adegoke

“True leadership in Africa is not the pursuit of power, but the courage to serve — to turn the pain of yesterday into the promise of tomorrow, to bind broken hearts into one destiny, and to raise a continent where every son and daughter can stand tall, not by pulling others down, but by lifting one another higher.” – Tolulope A. Adegoke, PhD

Building upon the foundational principles and practical pathways discussed in Parts 1 and 2, this continuation explores the deeper implementation strategies, institutional reforms, cultural shifts, and long-term vision required to translate African leadership into tangible, sustainable transformation. It addresses the realities on the ground while offering forward-looking, actionable recommendations that can help Africa move from potential to performance on both regional and global stages.

Institutional Reforms as the Backbone of Transformative Leadership

Visionary leadership without strong institutions is like a beautiful dream without a foundation. Africa’s progress depends on building institutions that are resilient, transparent, and people-centred.

Leaders must prioritise civil service reform, judicial independence, and anti-corruption mechanisms that are not only punitive but preventive. For example, Rwanda’s use of performance contracts (imihigo) for public officials has created a culture of accountability and results. Similarly, Ghana’s strong electoral commission and relatively independent judiciary have helped sustain democratic stability. These models show that when institutions are strengthened, leadership becomes less about individual charisma and more about systemic effectiveness.

Regional institutions such as the African Union, ECOWAS, SADC, and the East African Community must also be reformed. They need greater financial autonomy, faster decision-making processes, and clearer enforcement mechanisms. The African Union’s current efforts to reform its Peace and Security Council and operationalise the African Standby Force are steps in the right direction, but they require consistent political will and adequate funding from member states.

Cultural and Mindset Transformation

Leadership that builds Africa must also transform mindsets. Many of the continent’s challenges are rooted in colonial-era thinking, dependency syndromes, and a culture of short-termism.

Progressive leaders should invest in cultural renewal programmes that celebrate African excellence, innovation, and resilience. This includes supporting the creative industries — Nollywood in Nigeria, Afrobeats music, and contemporary African literature — which are already projecting positive African narratives globally. Educational systems must move beyond rote learning to foster critical thinking, ethical reasoning, and entrepreneurial spirit.

Youth leadership development is particularly crucial. With over 60% of Africa’s population under the age of 25, the continent’s future depends on preparing young people not just for jobs, but for leadership. Initiatives like the African Union’s Youth Agenda and national youth service programmes should be expanded and made more impactful.

Economic Transformation and Self-Reliance in Practice

True self-reliance requires deliberate economic restructuring. Leaders must champion value addition in agriculture, mining, and natural resources. Instead of exporting raw cocoa, cotton, or crude oil, African countries should invest in processing facilities that create jobs and capture more value domestically.

The African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) offers a historic opportunity. When fully implemented, it can boost intra-African trade, reduce dependence on external markets, and create new industries. Leaders who actively remove non-tariff barriers, harmonise standards, and invest in cross-border infrastructure will be remembered as the architects of Africa’s economic renaissance.

Public-private partnerships (PPPs) should be strengthened, with clear frameworks that protect national interests while attracting responsible investment. Countries like Morocco and Ethiopia have shown how strategic industrial policies can attract foreign direct investment while building local capacity.

Global Relevance: Africa as a Solution Provider

Africa must stop seeing itself solely as a recipient of global solutions and begin positioning itself as a contributor. The continent’s vast renewable energy potential, youthful population, and rich biodiversity give it unique advantages in addressing global challenges such as climate change, food security, and digital innovation.

Leaders who understand this will invest in research and development, patent African innovations, and engage confidently in global forums. The success of African pharmaceutical companies during the COVID-19 pandemic and the growth of African tech unicorns demonstrate that the continent can compete and lead when given the right environment.

 

A Balanced and Hopeful Conclusion

Africa stands at a historic crossroads. The challenges — poverty, inequality, climate vulnerability, and governance gaps — are real and significant. Yet the opportunities — a youthful population, abundant natural resources, cultural richness, and growing regional integration — are even greater.

Leadership remains the decisive variable. When leaders rise above narrow interests to serve the collective good, Africa does not just survive — it thrives and offers the world new models of resilience, innovation, and inclusive growth.

The path forward requires a new covenant: between leaders and citizens, between nations and regions, and between Africa and the global community. This covenant must be rooted in trust, mutual accountability, and shared vision. With the right leadership — courageous, ethical, inclusive, and strategic — Africa can forge a new era of self-reliance, unity, and global relevance.

The question is not whether Africa can rise. The question is whether its leaders, supported by an awakened citizenry, will summon the will, wisdom, and courage to make that rise unstoppable. The world is watching, and history is waiting to record the choices made in this decisive decade.

Africa’s story is still being written. With visionary leadership, it can become one of triumph, dignity, and global excellence.

Dr. Tolulope A. Adegoke, AMBP-UN is a globally recognized scholar-practitioner and thought leader at the nexus of security, governance, and strategic leadership. His mission is dedicated to advancing ethical governance, strategic human capital development, resilient nation building, and global peace. He can be reached via: tolulopeadegoke01@gmail.comglobalstageimpacts@gmail.com

Continue Reading

Opinion

A Familiar Kind of Tragedy by Adeoye Inioluwa

Published

on

By

The recent attacks on school communities in Oyo and Borno states have once again forced the country into a familiar emotional cycle — shock, grief, statements, and questions that briefly dominate public attention before gradually fading into silence.
What makes this cycle more unsettling each time is not only the incident itself, but the growing sense that it no longer feels entirely unexpected.
No society is completely free of insecurity. That much is understood. But what often defines public confidence is not the absence of incidents; it is the clarity, consistency, and visibility of response over time.
People do not only want to hear that action will be taken. They want to understand what has changed since the last time similar words were spoken.
Schools are supposed to represent safety at its most basic level. They are meant to be spaces where children are temporarily removed from the uncertainties of the outside world, not exposed to them. So when violence reaches those spaces, it does more than disrupt learning — it disrupts trust.
In the immediate aftermath, responses are often swift in tone. Condemnation is expressed. Sympathy is extended. Assurances are made. These reactions are necessary, but the challenge lies in what follows after the statements are made.
Because for those directly affected, the consequences do not end when public attention moves on.
There is also a broader national concern that emerges in moments like this: the increasing difficulty of distinguishing isolated incidents from a pattern. When similar events recur across different locations and times, they begin to reshape how communities perceive safety itself.
At that point, the issue is no longer only about response, but about prevention — and more importantly, about whether prevention is visibly evolving in a way that matches the scale of concern.
Citizens are not only listening for reassurance. They are watching for evidence that lessons from previous incidents have been fully translated into action. This includes how vulnerable spaces are secured, how intelligence is applied, and how quickly gaps are identified before they are exploited again.
Without that visible progression, reassurance risks becoming routine, and routine reassurance gradually weakens public confidence.
There is also a quiet emotional cost that is rarely acknowledged. Each new incident does not erase the memory of the previous one; it adds to it. Over time, this accumulation creates a national fatigue — a troubling adaptation to repeated distress.
In such a climate, the most important responsibility is not only to respond after events, but to reduce the conditions that allow them to repeat.
Because ultimately, the measure of any serious response is not how firmly it is stated in moments of crisis, but how clearly it reshapes what happens next.
And if that shift is not visible, then the unanswered questions will continue. Not out of impatience, but out of necessity.

Continue Reading

Trending